Stewards/Confirm/2016

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

The 2016–17 Confirmation will begin on February 8, and will finish on February 28th.

The 2016–17 Steward Confirmations are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before February 1st 2016. During the 2016 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2016 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2016 will undergo this process.

Ajraddatz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-N, fr-2
Personal info: Hello everyone. It's been a privilege to serve the community as a steward over the last two years, and I would be glad to continue on in this role with your approval. Over the last year I have focused on cross-wiki work, particularly counter-spam and vandalism removal. I have also been active answering requests on the steward requests pages and the OTRS queue. I still have time and energy to devote to steward work, and will remain active in this role over the next year if confirmed. Any questions / comments / concerns are welcomed and appreciated. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Ajraddatz

Keep, good steward. --Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989. COOL BEANS! 16:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your good work. Miniapolis 20:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vogone. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep I heard all good about this guy, so lets keep it.--Juandev (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fulfils my activity levels benchmark :) ..--Ste moc 00:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per statement and activity level. — T. 06:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't know anything about your steward work, but I see that you've already stopped to contribute to the Wikimedia projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good participant, collaborative — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best few stewards. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good steward, active and helpful — NickK (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Beneficial volunteered steward. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 04:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (discusión) 15:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Active and good steward activity. [reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted user. --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Knowledgeable. –Ejs-80 16:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record. --Snaevar (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sane, trusted. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepPokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 01:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep BeeCeePhoto (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wpollard (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 00:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've been a steward for two years. How have my language skills impacted my performance in this role? There should be more than enough examples to choose from. You also voted to keep me last year, and my language skills haven't changed since then. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please enter your language skills in time so this will not happen again. I am too busy even when no longer a steward.--Jusjih (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see. So, despite being active and helpful in the role for a year, you think I should be removed because I forgot to put a few characters in my statement? That's your choice I suppose. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has contributed to en.Wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason not to. Does good work and is active. :-) Trijnstel_talk 21:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly, helpful and active enough. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - A clearly helpful and active fellow steward! -Barras talk 18:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice person, active and giving insightful comments on steward related discussions --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 19:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Super --Timk70 question? 21:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I know Ajraddatz as very helpful and engaged steward. einsbor _talk 08:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepKapçak (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 01:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active enough --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Quiddity (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active steward, almost always around. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: It is again with pleasure that I note that the steward body has been able to support the Wikimedia family of projects. I once again request of you the privilege and opportunity to continue to serve Wikimedia as a steward. With my term on the m:Ombudsman commission coming to a close, I look forward to returning to checkuser and oversight duties together with permissions. As always, I appreciate your collective trust in allowing me this opportunity, and I hope to continue to be worthy of your trust in the coming year.

Comments about Avraham

Remove concerns about activity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--6AND5 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)>[reply]
Keep perhaps he will be more active next year since he is no longer an OC-member. Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Natuur12. RadiX ∞ 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Responded to concerns about activity by being more active, and by stepping down from the OC this next year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove concerns about neutrality -- Severino (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Severino: this is a serious allegation, which incident(s) are you referring to? --Vituzzu (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Severino's edits at the English Wikipedia it becomes awfully clear to me that he has a bias regarding Israel and Africa related topics so I figure this has something to do with having different opinions in this topic. See also his vote here whixh is only one of 2 votes he has ever made at the English Wikipedia. Also note that he made the same unmotivated vote before and his other opposes / remove votes (his only votes) are made against Hebrew speaking users. Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Next year I should remember to pretend I can speak some Hebrew then, just for testing purposes. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the initial rendering: I remember comments of Avraham regarding the "CAMERA" campaign (2008), after the cover of the group was blown. And I remember having an edit conflict with him. Hence the DOUBTS. But actually I don't have to justify myself for my voting behavior. What is problematic here, is not my voting but your handling with it, your comments. Your attacks and accusations tell nothing about me - but a lot about you, and your standards. You only "analyze" MY voting and edits, comment only MY dissentient vote here (according to your allegations, my voting is "unmotivated" and/or motivated by the fact that candidates declare to speak hebrew...) - you show YOUR bias. I could also examine your edits, comments and votes for racial/religious/... aspects and bitch about it then. I understood that one of you two is steward and the other admin. Read WP:ASPERSION, WP:BULL ("False accusations are a common form of bullying on Wikipedia, although people do sometimes make honest mistakes. Accusations of misconduct made without evidence are considered a serious personal attack"), and WP:APR (Avoid personal remarks); and probably there are also guidelines regarding the voting rights on wikimedia which are relevant here.--Severino (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing tangible then? Just a pile of half-fluff? --Vituzzu (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Said he would become more active, became more active. Thanks for your continuing commitment to the role! Ajraddatz (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, hoping that activity will increase without OC obligations. Miniapolis 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep When he's around, he's a big help. Kurtis (talk) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - every year he claims he would become active, he doesn't.. --Ste moc 01:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't say I noticed much of Avraham. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most great! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and hoping for more activity next in the next year. — T. 06:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Less and less present. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hoping that the activity does occur post OC — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I understand that OC can take quite a lot of time, thus I would give a chance to increase activity this year — NickK (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--DCB (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He isn't very active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gue rillero 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- per Steinsplitter - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Billinghurst too. Érico (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I trust this user. Altamel (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Should have more time this time around, good faith keep! --Charitwo (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support worthy steward.--AryanSogd 11:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Vadgt (talk) 01:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--CaZeRillo (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Eleven contributions to Wikiversities is good but none to en.wikiversity in the past years. --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Might be less active, but is still valuable and around when you need him. Trijnstel_talk 22:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikitanvir, trusted and around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per Auvajs. --Kusurija (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--KTo288 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A helpful steward who will hopefully now be able to spend more time as steward as he's no longer on the OC. -Barras talk 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Barras, hoping to see more activity --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 19:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while Avi is not the most active steward, he is active and his contribution to the steward team have been very valuable. He is a keen mediator and is always ready to offer advice when the opportunity arises. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is not good by others to put so much pressure on volunteers forcing them to work more, more, more and to never have a break. That is a form of harassment and damages our project. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-4, de
Personal info: It's been five years since I've been made a steward. Since then I've been more or less active, depending on my real life. While I was more active during my first years of services, I think I maintained a good level of activity in the more recent years. I'm daily available on IRC to help whenever help is needed. For urgent matters (like oversight requests), I'm available at really any time of the day by mail. In the past year, I served as a member of the Ombudsmen Commission and was asked if I'd like to serve for another term, which I'm now doing. I think I managed both roles adequately and got them not conflicted, which means there is no problem for me to do both jobs for another year if the community is willing to support me again. As always, if you've questions, just ask. I'm happy to answer them.

Comments about Barras

Remove, for the sole reason of me being opposed to the steward-OC double role. Controversial actions can always happen, even unexpectedly, and making people feel uncomfortable reporting possible issues with current OC members is certainly not what we want. --Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't generally support the steward/OC combination due to workload concerns, but in this case Barras was able to maintain an acceptable level of activity, likely helped by stepping down from some of their other Wikimedia roles. As far as my concerns last year I am disappointed that they never responded publicly or privately to the concerns but I am not aware of any further issues and am thus not factoring that in this year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he is a good Steward.--BRP^ever 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 00:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - per Vogone, sorry but one should be neutral and as a steward he has access to stuff Ombudsman's should not...Good steward but he should not hold onto both rights..--Ste moc 01:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One of my go-to stewards. Osiris (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kindly for me, yeah! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep His OC membership does not concern me. He is good and active enough in his steward role which should get importance here. — T. 06:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wish you were more active now. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should visit the user's page at SimpleWiki. Etamni | ✉ 10:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Danny B. 07:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- All these hats and yet still manages to make simple edits and fight vandalism too! This one's a keeper! Etamni | ✉ 10:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep need wise heads, managed the OC role fine — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laberinto16 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I have no concerns with OC/steward double role as soon as a steward clearly understands the conflict and remains active, which is the case here — NickK (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He should be more active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- No concerns about acting as a steward and OC simultaneously. Sufficiently active; extraordinarily helpful. -- Avi (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to offset the bizarre opposes --Gue rillero 05:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bizarre? It even used to be WMF practice not to allow this until a few years ago. --Vogone (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is my pleasure to work with Barras at Simple Wikipedia. Always careful, courteous and a good watchkeeper from vandals (of which we seem to have many). Fylbecatulous talk 17:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy. The dual-role issue shold be resolved on a policy page not a confirmation page. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NickK. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted. --Rus793 (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for the competent and quick help lately. Good luck! --GeoTrinity (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Five years of valuable works, and many more to come. ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For the only reason being S and OC at the same time. Fine otherwise. — regards, Revi 07:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good work as a steward, trusted // JFTR: bit week suport because of: I'm really not lucky with this double-role-thing of you being steward AND OC-Member :-( — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rax (talk) -Barras talk 10:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Vogone and Revi. odder (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepBecause of your service at Simple English Wikipedia. PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 13:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Contributions to Wikiversities - 32, but none to en.Wikiversity since 2012! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Without a doubt. Fully trust him and also a less active Barras is a useful Barras for us. :-) Trijnstel_talk 22:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis.--Jusjih (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Jusjih: Stewards are, as far as I know, still allowed to express their opinion on votes, without being asked to be removed because you don't agree with them. I find it surprisingly narrowsighted coming from an ex-steward. Sa vh ^ñ 13:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Savh: I disagree you as I have even received even worse or irrelevant comments when I was a steward. This page is comment about Barras, not you.--Jusjih (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. --Antigng (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For his short-sighted remarks and pro-vandalism attitude. He first accused me of being a sockpuppet of Abbas Dothar. When disproved in a CU, he went on to make hue and cry over a chat-post, overlooking the comments across Hindi and English Wikipedias such as here over the use IPs and Wikipedia accounts to promote a mediocre poet. I wonder the dual role he will discharge in the days to come!!--Muzammil (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Context and more info to those who are not aware: User talk:Barras#Clarification. -Barras talk 13:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly, helpful and active enough. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently active, helpful and good steward :)--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove steward/ oc role resign for one or the other --DerekvG (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
active, helpful on IRC. tufor (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis. --Holder (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Quiddity (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Barras has been handling the steward / OC double role well, so that's not an issue for me. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while I don't particularly like the double role, I think Barras does fine work in his steward capacity and think the steward team benefits from his efforts. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bennylin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: id, en, jv, zh-3
Personal info: Hi all, sorry for not able to make the statements on time due to traveling to the states, and home just for the Chinese New Year yesterday. I still wishes to remain as an active stewards so that I could continue the work that I've done in the previous years. My statement and position has not changed from previous years, and that is to make the WMF projects to be as safe as possible from vandals, spammers, abusers. While this year saw a reduction of time I could committed to the steward tasks, but nonetheless I try to online at IRC and elsewhere as much as possible, so for this year I would also like your support for another year of serving this community. Salam. ✒ Bennylin 08:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about bennylin

Remove Unfortunately did not manage to create a statement on time. --Vogone (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral but will change to remove if no explenation is provided why he didn't create a statement. Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - though, activity is a concern, it is not enough of a concern to vote remove. Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral At least he created the page and was active, but no statement doesn't leave a good impression. --Rs chen 7754 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I feel that low activity has been a persistent issue here but not enough to vote remove. --Rs chen 7754 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ~~Waiting for the statement.~~ RadiX ∞ 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has provided a reasonable statement and wishes to keep helping out. Activity level is ok indeed. RadiX ∞ 19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per Vogone. --Alan ^(talk) 18:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Alan ^(talk) 07:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. Armbrust (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. Willing to change to keep if decent explanation provided as to why no statement was made. Jsharpminor (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, pending a statement. Miniapolis 21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Oppose No --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Doesn't seem to be any issues with Bennylin, but the lack of a statement seems to suggest that they're not really that interested in retaining the advanced permissions. Kurtis (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--White Master (e s) 23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove SQL ^{Query me!} 00:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has been inactive for over 2 and a half years..--Ste moc 01:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Az1568 (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no statement, either busy or not interested? --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Please write your statements quickly. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Was never very active as a steward and this time, no statement as well. — T. 06:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Ochloese (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Appreciations for all the service so far. --Meracritus (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per a number above --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no reason to remove, though you set your own public face — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now that statement is made. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity. jni (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the statement is already there, user was reasonably active and there were no concerns last year — NickK (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think, diversity within stewards is very important. --►Cekli 829 16:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, though the delay in creating the statement is a bit concerning. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. --Uğurkent^talk 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--DCB (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough, very helpful when around, necessary language skills, all of which combine to my belief that he will continue to contribute and be a net positive to the steward corps. -- Avi (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Avi. --Liang(WMTW) (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mind explaining it a little bit more? ✒ Bennylin 04:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ryan Ajie (talk) 06:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy imo, adds indonesian language to the pool of languages that stewards can are fluent in.--Snaevar (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Language and cultural skills from this individual are vital for the diversity of stewards :JarrahTree (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it isn't important that the statement was late. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please create your statement on time next year. Matanya (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 07:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Matanya :) Pundit (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There is no excuse for not creating a statement, in my opinion. The date of the Confirmations is known beforehand, so something can be prepared. --MF-W 22:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Never been convinced this blanket process was in any way necessary, so if all we can say about Bennylin is that the statement was late in coming, then I find no objection. Courcelles 20:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per activity --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --GeoTrinity (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Seven contributions to Wikiversities is good, but none since 2013 is bad! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anyone can be busy; he is active enough based on the inactivity policy and - even though a bit late - created a statement. Trijnstel_talk 22:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The more the merrier. Activity dip is no concern. We need more people. MORE PEOPLE!!! :) --Pratyeka (talk) 06:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly responsive (to me), created the statement in like the same minute I sent him a message. A little more activity surely wouldn't hurt. However, his language skills are also important to the whole team, imo. It simply also can happen, that you can't be on-time to create the statement. It's not really good, but it can happen. We all are human. -Barras talk 18:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep somewhat active. Language skills are useful--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nom statement flub nonwithstanding.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - It bugs me a bit that, despite the spam we received to create our statements from the electcom, you have not managed to create yours in time. On the other hand, asking for removal for this single incident looks a bit extreme to me and a justification was provided, although I understand the community opinions above me that perhaps more activity is expected. Overall, I think Bennylin does a good job so I'd prefer if he stayed with us, but with a bit more of activity. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 15:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't decide my mind.--DangSunM (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no evidence of missuse, active enough to keep I think, but most important reason: usefull language skills —Ah3kal (talk) 09:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarcoAurelio but I believe it's a good idea to have a good steward like him. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Timk70 question? 21:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No one is perfect. A little tardy is nothing. Plus, we need someone who knows Chinese like him! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove But his Chinese is poor, I think.--Lt2818 (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Linguistic skills are usefull, and no one should be forbidden to have a real life. --La femme de menage (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Trijnstel. --Bonaditya (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while disappointing that bennylin was not able to put forward a statement, I think he does good work as a steward and his language skill are a definitive asset to the team. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While he was not very active during the past year, his continuation as a steward will still be a net positive. This will increase the diversity of stewards as a group – we have few stewards from Asia. Ruslik (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 13:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: I have been a steward for about 5 years and would like to continue working with my fellow stews and handle crosswiki issues and tasks.

Comments about Bsadowski1

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still active and fighting LTAs and I'm shocked by the neutrals. --Rs chen 7754 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The LTA hunter! ;) RadiX ∞ 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove with sincere thanks for service. Five years is long enough, we should give Bsadowski the opportunity to pursue other interests. LavaBaron (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Armbrust (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep Good user --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not?--White Master (e s) 23:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - unlike most enwiki admin/steward, he handles the job well instead of favouring his home wiki..--Ste moc 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't remember any interactions. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Always seems to be around when you need him. Osiris (talk) 03:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Ah3kal (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the quietly active stewards I have seen so far. — T. 06:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not active enough any more on wiki projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Etamni | ✉ 10:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every team needs a goofy (blink blink). Manages a couple of our major vandals with aplomb. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk)
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can hardly remember an LTA sockmaster who hasn't trolled him. INeverCry 23:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep experienced, but should be more active imho.--Snaevar (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Henryk Borawski (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Chenzw (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Contributions to Wikiversities - 86 (good), but none to en.wikiversity since 2013 (bad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What would we be without him? Trijnstel_talk 22:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - active and helpful steward. However, I've to admit that I would've liked to read more than one short sentence as statement. ;-) -Barras talk 18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful and always available on IRC--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Effective fighter of troublemakers and LTAs so it seems like.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and appoint as Wikimedia Sheriff for all the level of vandalism and LTAs he manage to stop. —Marco Aurelio 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Timk70 question? 21:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with MarcoAurelio. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active stewards, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
Personal info: After a turbulent start in the ElectCom with different understandings of Steward confirmations, stewards together with WMF, global renamers, and many more supporters could accomplish the SUL finalization much smoother than expected (see lego’s presentation at Wikimania). Despite years of preparation and hundreds of helping hands (see my last confirmation statement), the forcible rename of millions of accounts as a unique invasive operation could have resulted in plenty of problems. I am proud to be part of the team that helped to avoid that (find the core team in an image on the right). After having accomplished one of my main goals as a steward since my first election in 2007 and with new duties at my jobs, I had to refocus my steward activities.

I still do some CheckUser, global anti-vandalism, and similiar stuff but nowadays I’m more interested in helping my dear fellows to work in a healthy, fruitful environment. Therefore, I am also in close connection with the WMF for global ban discussions, and development of a global user merge tool (which unfortunately will very likely not be developed soonish, see phabricator task). Further, I helped prepare the first-ever real-life steward meeting at the Wikimedia Foundation’s and published a German summary. As far as I can see, such joint activities led to a closer relationship among stewards and better coordination. If confirmed I intend to continue these activities in addition to handling selective general steward requests.

Comments about DerHexer

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy and very experienced. --Altkatholik62 (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always approachable, very active --Gereon K. (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Toni Müller (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FCT Berlin • ^=>?! • 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Behalten! :)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thx, wiktionary.de Susann Schweden (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kartoffeln--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep auch von mir ein großes Dankeschön für deine Hilfe im deutschsprachigen Wiktionary *unverzichtbar* — Caligari ^Ɔɐ^ƀïиϠ_Ⴕ 17:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sally Meyer (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Koenraad (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Agricolax (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine kompetente Unterstützung im Wiktionary --Yoursmile (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke! --Alexander Gamauf (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dankeschön! --Mario-WL (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pimpinellus (talk) – WikiMUC – 18:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Unrelinquishable! Best wishes![reply]
Keep. --Bubo 容 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Petronas (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Asio otus (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and though I had issues with how the confirmations went, actions after that were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wassertraeger 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Didi43 (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Thank You for everything![reply]
Keep Of course! Ajraddatz (talk) 20:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep of course! --Impériale (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Emptywords (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? --White Master (e s) 23:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Betterknower (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Regiomontanus (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ste moc 01:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt! Thanks for your commitment to the cause! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --PaulaMeh (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jbergner (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dnepro.. (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Ah3kal (talk) 06:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Der DerHexer muss weiter gehen. — T. 06:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --J.Dygas (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pankoken (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted -- smial (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--WS ReNu (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thorough — billinghurst sDrewth 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lutheraner (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely, he is trustworthy, reliable and competent --Udo T. (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your longer time activity as a steward. rxy (talk)
Keep, excellent job with SUL finalisation — NickK (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Freddy2001 ^talk 17:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from Schelmentraum 19:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --XXnickiXx (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emes (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DCB (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Selbstverständlich! One of the most involved and helpful stewards, both publicly and behind the scenes. -- Avi (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Opposing or pretending neutrality is not as funny if you're not the only one to vote that way. No counter-arguments detectable anywhere, as it seems. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 22:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plani (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Du hast mein Vertrauen, Gruß, --Shisha-Tom (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep up the good work! --Tilman2007 (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WolfgangRieger (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Partynia (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cvf-ps (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Peter Gröbner (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, great and trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Code (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AnnaS.aus I. (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ali1610 (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AleXXw (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 05:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He gets things done. –Ejs-80 16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snaevar (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MARKELLOS^{Leave me a message} 08:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~Absolutely not~~ Definitely. Green Giant (talk) 01:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I changed vote, because after more than a week did not find any reaction to my question. (But please (I beg) pay attention to Auvajs's vote and please answer, wether You think there is all OK with his block. --Kusurija (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)). It is not good for steward, which deals in himself election. --Kusurija (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I recused myself from this RfC because I consider -jkb- a friend and therefore feel biased. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quenhitran (talk) 08:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Henryk Borawski (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – couldn't want better. Tony (talk) 12:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --GeoTrinity (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ana al'ain (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Matthias Süßen (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for you help! --Sionnach (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Remove this steward ... Not! :D ✒ Bennylin 04:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 07:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Horgner (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ST ○ 21:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC) very experienced and trusted - we'd have to invent somebody like him if he didn't already exist ;)[reply]
Keep --HIMBA (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Chricho (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Seidenkäfer (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of my favorite stewards. Keep up the good work. --Meno25 (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mglaser (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikimedian #1 Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sixty-six contributions to Wikiversities, even to en.Wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very visible - almost the spokesperson of the stewards. ;-) Is around and active, so no worries. Trijnstel_talk 22:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Slökmann (talk) 00:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active. One of the finest and friendly folks I've ever met :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep // Martin Kraft (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aspiriniks (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - His experience is inevitable to the stewards. -Barras talk 18:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Such a nice person, Active and helpful also gives insightful opinions on discussions ( I think you are one who got more number of keep comments than others in the confirmations, i am jealous of you Martin :P ) --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, helpful, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --HakanIST (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Natürlich. —Marco Aurelio 15:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nhfflkh (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sieht gut aus.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Schwalbe (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always friendly and helpful! --Mellebga (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Einfach der Beste. --Timk70 question? 21:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biha (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kacir (talk) 12:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously. einsbor _talk 08:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice, trustworthy, helpful and lover of Ancient Greek... I could not ask for more! - εΔ ω 16:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 17:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aquilinae (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Artmax (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 18:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active, helpful and experienced. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 01:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.js^{[democracy needed]} 11:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted Ireas (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einsbor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl, en-3, fr-2
Personal info: Hi! I am active in Wikimedia project as editor since 2013. This is my first confirmation, since I have been elected a year ago.
During this term I was active mostly by answering for requests here, at meta (SRP, SRCU, SRGP, SRG) and via IRC (with spamming, LTA, vandals, etc.). I have not any 'steward specialisation', but I tried to be active where it was needed. I think this kind of stewardry is also important for the Wikimedias, so I would like to continue it.
I'd love to serve to the community for another term. I'm open for discussions, questions, etc. Must say, I'm not satisfied with my activity level and I'll work on it this year, if confirmed. einsbor _talk 14:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Einsbor

Keep, activity is fine, but I was quite disappointed when Einsbor removed an admin on Wikidata against the policy and didn't even bother to revert this action or at least give a reply after he's been notified about it. Since this is the only occasion where a lack of communication skills were shown, I hope it remains the only one and wish better luck with future actions ;-) --Vogone (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The mentioned issue has been resolved today with some delay, so this is no longer a concern. --Vogone (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wieralee (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helped process the ArbCom elections on en.wiki faster than usual. Altamel (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep I would like to see more acivity from the candidate on pl.wiki, but... oh well... he's the famous Iceman! - has always his own way. Emptywords (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --White Master (e s) 23:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Better luck for the future. — T. 07:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andrzei111 (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --J.Dygas (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep would like to see more activity, first year is always learning — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no significant concerns — NickK (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 18:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I didn't support last year. :) --Uğurkent^talk 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepMicpol (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stanko (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Maire ♣ 20:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK. Ankry (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per billinghurst. Green Giant (talk) 01:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mo Cuishle (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torrosbak (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity within years! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Though you may like people contributing to wikiversities it is hardly related to stewards' role. Above all, you shouldn't forget there are 14 more wikiversities which are as important as the English one. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Did a good job the past year and will surely continue with that in 2016. Trijnstel_talk 22:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good luck with those 'Cross-wiki spam' :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plogeo (talk) 13:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cynko (talk) 14:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Absolutely no reason to comment otherwise. Great fellow steward! -Barras talk 18:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful steward --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok --—Ah3kal (talk) 09:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active and does good work. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo man

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-n, en-3, it-1, fr-1
Personal info: Hello everyone, I have been a Wikimedian since 2008, active in the Small Wiki Monitoring Team since 2010 and have been global rollbacker and a global administrator until I got elected as a steward in early 2014. Furthermore I'm an administrator on Wikidata and casually active on various other projects.
At some point in 2010 I started developing tools for common global vandalism fighter tasks. Due to my growing experience in these areas I later on got into the development of MediaWiki and MediaWiki extensions. Nowadays I volunteer to maintain two MediaWiki extensions related to steward tasks which are used on Wikimedia Wikis: CentralAuth and AbuseFilter. Besides, I'm working as a Wikidata developer for Wikimedia Germany.
In the past year I was heavily involved with the SUL finalization, mostly helping out with technical things and with the coordination of that between the WMF and the stewards. Also I kept performing regular maintenance task and helped out in various areas.
This year I plan to use my technical skills in order to help out with small tooling improvements for steward tasks. Also I will of course stay active in various fields of steward work. like I did during the past years. - Hoo man (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Hoo man

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted & tech user with shell/db access. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep---Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Surely! No comments. RadiX ∞ 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Didi43 (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Ja --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Regiomontanus (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Thank you for your work finishing Single User Login.[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly a keeper. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 06:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Must and with thanks. — T. 07:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pankoken (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MORE ABUSE FILTERS! — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good guy. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Our good engineer.--rxy (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, also for SUL finalisation — NickK (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DCB (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very helpful, especially with behind the scenes work. -- Avi (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holmium (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 15:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AleXXw (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC) hoo dat?[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 17:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 18:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Hoo are you? Green Giant (talk) 01:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Horgner (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC) helpful and friendly - thanks for your efforts![reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mglaser (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Some 292 contributions to the Wikiversities is great, especially for a steward, but none to en.wikiversity since 2013 is bad. --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WS ReNu (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We need him as one of the few techy stewards. And he's also a nice guy. ;-) Trijnstel_talk 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly and helpful. Btw, Thanks for your pose in a photograph with a smiley face during Wikimania15 ;-) ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Alone his technical skills are inevitable for us stewards. A really helpful steward! -Barras talk 18:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice person, Active and helpful, His technical skills are very useful for the whole team --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep // Martin Kraft (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, highly needed technical skills, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Trijnstel and Taketa. —Marco Aurelio 15:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Tpt (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ist ein Guter. --Timk70 question? 21:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 13:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great work! einsbor _talk 08:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt. ✒ Bennylin 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --ContributorQ (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active as a steward and has highly required technical skills. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and his technical expertise has been greatly helpful to the steward team. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very helpful and friendly :) eurodyne (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted Ireas (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jyothis

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en,ml,hi
Personal info: I took on the responsibility in 2010 and would like to continue for another term. For the past term, I was mostly available on IRC while I wasn't traveling for work, and have focussed on providing emergency support for fighting spammers and vandalism. Comments, questions and criticisms are always welcome as usual, as that helps me to be better in the future.

Comments about Jyothis

Keep, good steward. --Vogone (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Experienced steward. RadiX ∞ 17:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues with actions. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not?--White Master (e s) 23:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Ja --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seen no issue with his action so far. He is always friendly and helpful when around. — T. 07:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Responds quickly and efficiently on IRC and this is a steward we need for sure. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful, responsive; all reasons to support continuation of steward role. -- Avi (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 15:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove More about their own power thinking than on solving problems in the project.--AryanSogd 11:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Some 38 contributions to the Wikiversities is good, but none to en.wikiversity since 2011 is so bad! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely. He's always around and active. Trijnstel_talk 22:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One of the guys who regularly are faster in taking actions when pinged on IRC than me. Actually, that should be a remove reason, but than other people would have to do that great job. -Barras talk 18:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently active and helpful steward --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, per Trijnstel. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭ^talk 00:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always helpful in other wiki's also Adv.tksujith (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and helpful steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Trusted and active--Fotokannan (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linedwell

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr, en-2, it-2
Personal info: Hi everyone, Wikimedian since 2008, I became in 2015 the second native french speaking steward and I would like to be able to continue supporting the global Wikimedia community and projects. During this year my main activity was on Global Rename Requests and (Global) Permissions Requests, I was also quite active for some x-wiki activities such as LTA or basic administrative actions on small wiki without any active sysop. I was also highly available on IRC to reply to various questions and requests. This year, I plan to continue this job and probably more, depending of the needs.

Comments about Linedwell

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues with actions. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Didn't have any personal interaction but seems legible enough to continue, so please. — T. 07:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yep. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Actions seems to be fine, but I haven't had too many interactions.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason not to support; net benefit to steward corps. -- Avi (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 15:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — schlum ^{=^.^=} 22:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — --Remy34 (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep bien sûr. Green Giant (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mattho69 (talk) 22:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove ZERO contributions to en.wikiversity, but ONE contribution to another Wikiversity, more contributions please! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. No issues. Trijnstel_talk 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Ne contribue effectivement pas à la wikiversity, et même pas à la Wikipédia en swahili, ce qui est absolument intolérable pour un steward. Keep :) SM ** Mal absolu** 16:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - active and helpful steward. -Barras talk 18:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Housterdam (talk) 20:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward, no concerns --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. Good to have stewards with native French language skills. - Taketa (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. C'est bien d'avoir un steward francophone. Thémistocle (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — 0x010C ^~talk~ 12:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kropotkine 113 (talk) 08:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, comme *SM*, einsbor _talk 08:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yodaspirine (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepGood user Raphoraph (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- --La femme de menage (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--ContributorQ (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M7

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-3, it, de-1, es-1, fr-1
Personal info: I am a Steward since 2006 and I'd like to continue this service. Even if not in the high activity, I follow the mailing list and monitor meta.wiki logs and RfP page. I also can be reached on meta user talk page, that is set to E-mail me when changed. I am also reachable on IRC as m7, usually in the afternoon CET, and a client sits for me in various channels when I am away. During the last year I visited the Wikimedia Foundation headquarter in San Francisco and there I met some fellow Stewards for a 3 day meeting.

Comments about M7

Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep doh. Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues with actions. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep --Nicolabel (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dimitrij Kášëv 05:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep Not much to say about this old fellow. — T. 07:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Etamni | ✉ 10:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with pleasure, one of the nicest people (which I am heard is considered a virtue, weird) — billinghurst sDrewth 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your longer time activity as a steward. rxy (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we need hard-working veterans — NickK (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, responsive, passes in my book . -- Avi (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Our friendly neighbourhood web-man - εΔ ω 07:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Tenere --Sciking (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pegasovagante (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Triquetra (talk) 07:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very experienced steward. –Ejs-80 16:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy imo, but should be more active.--Snaevar (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep naturalmente. Green Giant (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support worthy steward.--AryanSogd 10:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep proper, very accurate and reliable person. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --M&A (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove One contribution to en.wikiversity in 2008, ouch! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Without a doubt. And a very kind user as well. Trijnstel_talk 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - I can only remember good interactions with our longest serving steward. -Barras talk 18:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and experienced steward, very kind person --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sembra bene. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, experienced, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Grazie per tutti. —Marco Aurelio 15:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly experienced and active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Riottoso (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MarcoAurelio

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: es, en-2, fr-2, la-1 (can understand written an, ca, pt, it, gl, ext)
Personal info:

Dear community,
It is for me a pleasure to address you all again in which is my fourth steward confirmation, the first after my re-election last year, the third since I became a steward in 2010.
This year, and as before, my activities were focused on providing assistance at the steward requests pages and dealing with cross-wiki issues such as vandalism and spam, and also have performed general cross-wiki maintenance. As a creature of habit myself, you can see I stick to the same activities I’ve been doing in my previous terms, with the addition that this year and with the implementation of the global rename tool, I’ve also handled some renaming and usurp requests. While not strictly related to my steward duties, I've also became active in MediaWiki development, uploading patches to gerrit, for fixing small bugs for wikis such as permissions and extension setup; which I think it is also a good way to assist the projects on a technical side. I'd like to thank those who helped me in getting started in that area. In general and to sum up, I think I’ve been reasonably active as steward this year too.
Speaking as of incidents, I've recently performed a global bot flag cleanup on inactive global accounts according to the global bot policy, however and due to a mistake on my part, operators were not warned in advance before global bot flag removal. To fix that, I've sent notices later and a period of two weeks were given to operators to regain bot flags. I acknowledge my error and I'm sorry for any issue caused. Aside from this incident, I humbly think that I've performed my duties correctly.
If the community pleases I’d love to serve the communities for another term in this role. Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
—Marco Aurelio

Comments about MarcoAurelio

Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Maragm (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Off course, one of our best stewards.--Syum90 (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Por supuesto!--Yeza (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The best steward in Wikimedia Foundation )))--6AND5 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, estupendo usuario. Tiene toda mi confianza. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep absolutely. Always a pleasure to work with! Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted —Ah3kal (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sí. Raystorm (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Petronas (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active and taking care of maintenance tasks (wikisets, etc.) that are often ignored. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
¡Claro!--White Master (e s) 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the actively noticed stewards. — T. 07:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with stars — billinghurst sDrewth 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep One of the best few stewards. Why not? Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the best stewards — NickK (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of our more active stewards, especially in discussions and decisions. -- Avi (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sciking (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seen him mostly on Phab, but seems fine elsewhere as well.-- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant false statement. —Marco Aurelio 12:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 19:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trustworthy. –Ejs-80 16:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ¡desde luego! Green Giant (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AryanSogd 10:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ciberprofe (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Only one contribution to en.wikiversity and that in 2011 - bad! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That for sure is a missuse of my steward tools! —Marco Aurelio 22:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perhaps one of the best stewards.... I'm very happy he decided to return last year. Trijnstel_talk 22:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. He declined legitimate requests for checkuser[1]. I also agree with Auvajs that there are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it.--MariusM (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Legitimate because you asked for it? CheckUser is not for fishing and certainly not to settle disputes among users nor to apply pressure to editors. Everyone is able to see that CU request you link and see there was no reasons for running it, and as former ro.wp CU Strainu said, there was no serious reasons to invade the privacy of the users. Your assert that I or my fellows support harassment is a plain personal attack. Stewards do deal with a lot of harassment everyday, both on others and to ourselves; but that we have more buttons than other users does not convert us in arbitrators, super(wo)mens or the Foundation's Sheriff Department. Our role is clearly defined in the policy and we will stick to it, unless changed. —Marco Aurelio 22:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According the rules of both English and Romanian Wikipedia, attempted outing is a form of harrasment. You are doing nothing to stop it. In fact, you are OK with it. For you, attempted outing is only a „dispute among users”.--MariusM (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true at all. I refer to my reply above. If you do not wish to understand the policies governing both, stewards and checkuser tools, that's fine; but please stop insulting me and other stewards because we didn't resolve the requests in the way you'd have liked. I've also declined CU requests on you on that very page that threw to you "the other side" of the dispute. If you have problems with admin misconduct on rowiki I think Wikipedia:Destituiri is the page you're looking for. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 15:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The checkuser request against me is a second example of a legitimate request that you declined.--MariusM (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC) Sure.[reply]
Keep - No idea what I should say. MA is just a great steward and I really appreciate is input in various areas. It's just enjoyable to work together with him! -Barras talk 18:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great steward, active on multiple areas --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Excellent user. Theo10011 (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please, Have seen him around a lot. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pafsanias (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Turbojet (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with no doubt. einsbor _talk 08:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course! ✒ Bennylin 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- active and +ve person--Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely - experienced, active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was incredibly delighted that MarcoAurelio rejoined the steward team, and I'm even more delighted to see that he's seeking confirmation! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mardetanha

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fa, az, en-3, tr-2
Personal info: Dear Community, I have been steward since 2009 and I'm now standing for my sixth confirmation, In the past year I was mainly active in the field of fighting and inhibiting long-term abusers and spambots, I have been regularly available on IRC for emergency occasions, last year I was part of Election Committee which helped the community to choose new FDC and board members. Once again this year I would like to ask the community for support.

Comments about Mardetanha

Keep, trusted and always around to help. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep س چی Raystorm (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Yikes, User_talk:Mardetanha#Recent_OS_actions_on_Wikidata is mistake upon mistake, especially for someone who has been a steward so long, and who has served as a local oversighter on Meta. Since it's the only mistake I won't vote remove, but I can no longer support. --Rs chen 7754 03:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helped process the ArbCom elections on en.wiki faster than usual. Altamel (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, though I have some concerns with your use of the os bit given how long you've been a steward... Ajraddatz (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.HakanIST (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted user.--Jagro (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepGharouni (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure thing! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very helpful — NickK (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good steward. Surely! Trusted user. --►Cekli 829 16:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Raised concerns are valid but he replied positively to them and they are far from enough to remove.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Interactions with him have been decidedly to the net benefit of Wikimedia. I believe his continued participation as a steward is to the benefit of all Wikimedia. -- Avi (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was so sure that I vouched for you here already. Seems I missed. Anyway, here is my two-piece. — T. 14:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Happy to have you as a steward. Keep up the good work. --Meno25 (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Only one contribution to en.wikiversity in 2008! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason to have him removed. He's, still after all those years, around and a Farsi speaker can never hurt. :-) Trijnstel_talk 22:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AzorAhai (talk) 05:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Arian ^Talk 08:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ebrahim^talk 10:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep مهرنگار (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--کامران اورفه (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ochilov (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Absolutely no issues. He's still around and his language skills are simply inevitable. -Barras talk 18:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and available when needed, also language skills are useful--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, friendly and is always ready to help when needed. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted user. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mardetanha is an active and dedicated steward and their language skills have often proved quite invaluable. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 23:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: he, en
Personal info: Hello, I have been at the same activity level this year, mainly anti-vandalism/spam and rights requests, I have been involved in SUL, which went fairly well, and I plan to help more around this area this year. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year. questions and comments are welcome. best Matanya (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya

Keep, trusted and active. No concerns at all. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! One of the best stewards we have. Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Severino (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Steinsplitter. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Says he'll try to be more active this year, no other concerns, good steward.--Nahum (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per steinsplitter --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the careful stewards I have known so far. — T. 07:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk)
Strong keep One of the best few stewards and quick in response too! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep בלי שום ספק! Without a doubt. -- Avi (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fastest stewards ever. — regards, Revi 08:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to Wikiversity in the past year! Nice! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yep. Definitely. Trijnstel_talk 22:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Great fellow steward who beats me regularly to fulfil requests on IRC. -Barras talk 18:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and helpful steward, available when most of the stewards are offline/sleeping :) --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always a nice steward :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward, and provides valuable technical expertise. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: Hello again. My name is Matt and in addition to having served as a Steward for the last few years, I am also an administrator and bureaucrat on the English Wikipedia and an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. It has again been a busy year for me on the projects and in real-life, but I hope the coming year will be quieter now that I have returned to the United States from abroad. In real life, I am a lawyer in Washington, DC, and a community member on the Wikimedia Foundation's Audit Committee and Wikimedia Washington, DC's Governance Committee. I was very happy to participate in the Steward meeting in San Francisco and get a broader view of the areas where Stewards are contributing. With the continued renaming implementation and the need for more complex actions related to manual account merges and (possible) usurpation requests, I believe I have skills and abilities to contribute to the community as a Steward and seek confirmation to pursue those and other central-auth tasks (e.g., new OAuth program), in addition to the other duties and responsibilities of Stewardship. Please feel free to approach me here or on my talk page with any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MBisanz

Remove Though I appreciate Matthew's work on the wikis quite a lot, I am still of the opinion that global account renamer rights would absolutely suffice him. --Vogone (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also a little concerning that after 4 years of being a steward MBisanz still doesn't seem to be quite familiar with checking user group rights on local wikis.[2] --Vogone (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I looked at Special:UserGroupRights quickly and confused the listing the Groups column with the line item in the Bureaucrats' powers entry. MBisanz ^talk 12:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a tough call as activity is a bit low outside global renaming, however the candidate made a convincing argument about increased future activity. Also worth mentioning is that their membership on the English Wikipedia Audit Subcommittee is over and will leave them with more time to concentrate on their other wiki responsibilities. --Rs chen 7754 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should have more time this year to do Steward work with the end of AUSC. MBisanz ^talk 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Rschen7754. There is not a limited number of stewards, and MBisanz is helpful whenever he is around. RadiX ∞ 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I understand the concerns with the scope of MBisanz's activity, but I feel that he still contributes in the steward role overall. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Liridon (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and experienced, and has promised to be more active this year. Miniapolis 21:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 00:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As clearly visible from the links linked at the top of the page, his activities which needed steward tools concentrated on a few days in the past year only. And it is the same comment about a "busy year" and promising more activity etc. as every year. --MF-W 00:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - more active on his home wiki than as a steward and he does not need the steward rights since his only activity levels is for the 'global renamer right' , per Vogone..Edit: just realised i asked for his removal for the same reason last year which means nothing has changed...--Ste moc 01:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Busy beaver with a life outside the projects. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matt is one of the few grenamers/stewards who is willing to tackle the hairy renames, including those that can't be done via the global rename tool and require usage of the steward toolset. Legoktm (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep #GoMatt! — T. 07:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Stemoc etc --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep was a good thoughtful participant at StewCon, and will be of value with OAuth, no reason to remove — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone--DCB (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. He was actually active not only in renaming but also on changing user rights and locking here and there. Also, he was one of the most participative stewards on stewards' meeting. I worry about inactive stewards, but that is not the case here.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Similar to what Teles said, let me agree that not all steward activity can be measured by log actions. Matt continues to actively participate in steward discussions and meetings, providing valued advice and perspective. While this may result in other stewards having the "on-wiki" action, this in no way diminishes Matt's contribution to the smooth function of the stewards as a group. -- Avi (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we also need stewards who are moderately active in on-wiki actions but who are involved behind the scenes — NickK (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per lego --Gue rillero 05:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holmium (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – couldn't want better. Tony (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity in the past year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I understand the concerns, but - also based on his presence in SF - I believe stewardship suits him better than global renamer rights. Trijnstel_talk 22:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weakly Remove for English only--Jusjih (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Weak keep - His contributions to the rename requests are just great and I understand that for some things the steward flag is simply needed instead of "only" a global rename flag. However, some more activity outside the renames would certainly be good, otherwise the global rename right will at some point be seriously the better choice, imo. -Barras talk 18:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the indication that a steward mostly active in user rename work may want to consider switching to Global Renamer.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, good and vital work on renaming. - Taketa (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, active and per Legoktm. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --Timk70 question? 21:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Drmies (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with Trijnstel. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while MBisanz might not be the most active steward, I still feel he provides a valuable perspective to the team. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melos

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, scn, en
Personal info: Hi, since 2010 I'm honored to help the community in the Steward role. In the last year I have given my little contribution and I'd like to do the same for another year if the community will want to confirm me again, especially in fighting spam and cross-wiki vandalism. Feel free to ask any question, I'm also often reachable via IRC in several Wikimedia channels. Thank you! --Melos (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Melos

Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Teniri--Vituzzu (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't say I remember Melos as a Steward. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dimitrij Kášëv 05:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep His insights are useful. Hoping for better activity next time. — T. 07:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful insights, sufficient activity, helps the stewards act as smoothly as we do. -- Avi (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sciking (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 09:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Triquetra (talk) 07:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 11:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 09:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luigi.tuby (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity since 2011! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Surely. I still fully trust him and he's active. Trijnstel_talk 22:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill--Jusjih (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - An active and helpful fellow steward. -Barras talk 18:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Seems like a good worker here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Salutamu! But please add your languages in the statement. - εΔ ω 16:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 03:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful, No concerns --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 23:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mentifisto

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: I'm usually 'passively' around (handling spambots mostly, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL.

Comments about Mentifisto

Keep Long-term trusted user.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Armbrust (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough (and more so than last year). --Rs chen 7754 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kurtis (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Haven't noticed Mentifisto. Can't judge either way. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful to have him in the team. Please try to be more active next time. — T. 07:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No more activity on wikis. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose activity --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No reasons to remove. RadiX ∞ 19:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Activity is sufficient (not everyone can be Tegel) and contributes to cohesiveness and efficiency of steward corps. -- Avi (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not the most active one but helpful in fighting spambots — NickK (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. Trijnstel_talk 22:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weakly Remove for English only--Jusjih (talk) 01:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Certainly not the most active and visible steward, but the activity looks sufficient to me, while more activity wouldn't hurt. -Barras talk 18:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NickK. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MF-Warburg

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-N, en-3, fr-1, tet-1, la-1, es-1
Personal info: In my third year as a steward, I have, I think, maintained reasonable activity. My main focus was on requests on SRP; while also continuing to be a member of the SWMT and blocking and locking cross-wiki spambots and LTAs (some of them who move around Incubator & Meta became more noticeably active) I encountered. Recently I also have the impression that I am answering a higher number of tickets in the stewards OTRS queue (which was previously done mostly by a now-resigned steward). I also plan to be active in this year's Admin activity review, as in the previous years. I'll be happy to continue as a steward if the community still wants me to.

Comments about MF-Warburg

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep----Maragm (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krol111 (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Bubo 容 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You do a good job, though I believe you could be more friendly with words.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DCB (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No question. His activity is sufficient in and of itself, but I can speak from personal experience in saying that I think he delivers significant value to the stewards as regards our internal discussions. MF-W and I may not always agree, but I value his perspective and advice, and look forward to his thoughts on issues. His continuation as a steward would be a clear benefit to Wikimedia, in my opinion. -- Avi (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very good job — NickK (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good job --Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not the kindest guy I've ever met. eurodyne (talk) 04:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shisha-Tom (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cvf-ps (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Uğurkent^talk 16:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I, for one, oppose harassment. --MF-W 11:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted —Ah3kal (talk) 07:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ali1610 (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snaevar (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 18:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Horgner (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --GeoTrinity (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedantin9 (talk) 12:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, do you realize that this is not the confirmation page for en.wikiversity sysops? --MF-W 11:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Teles and eurodyne, but stewards don't always need to be kind. And no concerns with actions. Trijnstel_talk 22:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for opposing 2 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis.--Jusjih (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to reply something, but it would make people oppose "per Eurodyne". --MF-W 11:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity to several queries such as User_talk:MF-Warburg#Western_Balochi_language - we expect some reply - not a passive attitude. --Muzammil (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Sometimes it's really hard to keep calm, which I can totally understand. However, I see absolutely no reason to not to keep MF-W. -Barras talk 19:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - certe. —Marco Aurelio 16:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DerekvG (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always great. Theo10011 (talk) 22:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I always value his perspective on different issues. So, please... ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yodaspirine (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 18:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vadgt (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Teles. Quiddity (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful, Though you are not rude to me anywhere, i think you could use different choice of words in some places :) --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and dedicated steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Teles. Érico (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 23:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pmlineditor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: bn, en-4, hi-2
Personal info: Hello, I'm Pmlineditor, and I've been a Wikimedian for ~7 years. This is my first confirmation after I was elected last year. I have been mainly working on dealing with crosswiki spambots / vandals and global renames.

I was not as active as I would have liked last year and had relatively few actions related to some areas of steward work. I'm looking to work in these areas (for example, SRP) as well and being consistently active throughout the year. I am more confident with the CU tool than I was last year, so I will also handle CU requests if reconfirmed, while maintaining my activity in cross wiki antivandalism / antispam.

I would like to maintain higher activity this year if confirmed. Thank you for your consideration. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Pmlineditor

Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Activity a bit on the low side for a new steward but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for an active Bangla speaking steward. You will have more fun soon to have another one on board. — T. 07:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Etamni | ✉ 10:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk)
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, a net benefit to the stewards, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sufficient activity and it would be nice to have one more active steward on CU requests — NickK (talk) 01:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concerns about activity and steward is closing a request with a unanswered question at SRGP as successful 1. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Steinsplitter's point, though I am not going to ask for removal here. --Vogone (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And thanks for the help the past year. Trijnstel_talk 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove-- As per Steinsplitter. --Muzammil (talk) 08:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not the most active steward, but active enough. -Barras talk 19:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. Usefull language skills and timezone. - Taketa (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DerekvG (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure, active enough and friendly. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and No concerns --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pundit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl-N, en-4, ru-1.5, de-0.8
Personal info: I have served as a steward for three terms. I've never been as superactive as some of my fellows (although I hope that my organizational support has proven useful for stewards as a whole group). Yet, more recently, since I've been elected to the Board of Trustees, my activity dropped even as compared to myself in the previous year. The reasons are plenty: most importantly, being on the Board sucked out most of my bandwidth (it really is a time-consuming job), and some small bits of my enthusiasm and soul (I at least hope I traded them for something useful for the movement). Secondly, every time I wanted to do something as a steward, in the back of my head I had a thought that my action will be perceived as a Board action, rather than a functionary one. For that last reason, I think that Board members should hibernate their involvement in higher level rights (but this is a different discussion, and also an approach with many flaws). Anyway, I've decided that my being a steward at this point in time is not adding value for the movement. I'm not going anywhere, and whether on the Board or not, I'm going to support our cause - but at this moment I believe it is time to step down from stewardship. This message is basically an acknowledgement of this decision, and I'm not seeking a reconfirmation in the role. Pundit (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Pundit

Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep :( Natuur12 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep. I think you may want to reconsider your decision though. ;) RadiX ∞ 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep But I understand perfectly... Raystorm (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service! --Alan ^(talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service, and glad to see you continuing in another role. --Rs chen 7754 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work as a steward! Ajraddatz (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service as steward. Enjoy your new role! Miniapolis 21:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As you wish -> Remove :) Thanks for everything! Emptywords (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--White Master (e s) 23:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Consider keeping your SRUC works please?! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andrzei111 (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I respect his judgment. Thanks for your services as a steward and please continue the good work as a trustee. — T. 07:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have accurately captured the difficulties that you face. Concentrate on the board, no distractions, no concerns about perceptions. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :( Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 18:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rzuwig^► 21:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. -- Avi (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your work as a steward. I can perfectly understand your decision, I hope this will help you to concentrate on your work as a trustee and be more efficient in this role — NickK (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cvf-ps (talk) 12:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stanko (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Thanks you for your service. All the best! --Uğurkent^talk 16:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep --Maire ♣ 21:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 19:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mo Cuishle (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Matanya (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Afil (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - John Belushi (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sad to see you go, but thanks for everything you've done for us. Good luck in the future. Trijnstel_talk 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plogeo (talk) 13:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cynko (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your valued contributions to the stewards group! Good luck in the future with your duty as board member, maybe you will be a steward again. -Barras talk 19:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Indu (talk) () 22:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. I'm sorry to see you go. Best regards. —Marco Aurelio 16:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service as Steward :)--DangSunM (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 21:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for your service. Kind Regards. Theo10011 (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service —Ah3kal (talk) 08:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service as a steward. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for making complicated decisions. Please come back afterwards! Quiddity (talk) 19:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions as steward --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work both as a steward and as a board member. I hope that at some time in the future you will rejoin the steward team as your input and work on Steward-WMF cooperating has been quite valuable. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work! Érico (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work, hope you run again when/if your Board time ends. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 12:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QuiteUnusual

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en,fr-2,es-1
Personal info: This is my third confirmation as I was elected in 2013. During the year I've been reasonably active particularly with crosswiki spam and dealing with so-called spambots. I had expected to be more involved with renaming but since the appointment of a large number of Global Renamers this hasn't been necessary. I do, however, always keep a close eye on the noticeboards in the mornings (UTC) when there are less Stewards active to deal with anything urgent. I don't believe I've been involved in any major controversy and, if confirmed, I would expect to continue at broadly the same level of activity throughout 2016. I continue, as I wrote last year, to remain involved with my two home projects - en.wikipedia and en.wikibooks - as I believe it is important for all functionaries to continue to understand and be involved in the work of the projects.

Comments about QuiteUnusual

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough and remains involved in the community. --Rs chen 7754 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. — T. 07:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No problem --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easy, another wise wise head — billinghurst sDrewth 13:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A user with discernment. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mahir256 (talk) 03:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good, cheers! --Uğurkent^talk 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the few stewards that enforce the global inactivity policy.--Snaevar (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No worries. Trijnstel_talk 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Clearly a net-positive to us stewards and also active and helpful. -Barras talk 19:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Holder (talk) 19:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Putting obstacles in the way of small Wikipedias.[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DARIO SEVERI (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RadiX (formerly known as Ruy Pugliesi)

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-1, it-1, sk-1, sq-1, ms-1, hi-1
Personal info: Dear all, this is my first confirmation as a steward. I was elected in 28 February 2015, and it has been a pleasure to be part of this awesome team. :) I've used the steward tools for various purposes, and my main efforts in the past months has continued in anti-vandalism, long-term abuse and spambot management (I joined the Small Wiki Monitoring Team in November 2010). I am usually reachable via CVN channels whenever I'm on my computer, from ~16:00 (UTC) until early in the morning. Due to real life commitments, I always tend to be less active (or almost inactive) in June, and from September to November. However, my cross-wiki or average activity level over the remaining months is either pretty high or acceptable. I would like to see any input that could help me to improve as a volunteer, and I would also love to continue carrying on as a Steward - if I have your support, of course. Thanks for participating. RadiX ∞ 18:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about RadiX

Remove, I don't feel comfortable at all supporting another term. The issues raised during RadiX's election were activity issues, then after his election he even managed to sign the confidentiality agreement five days late (official deadline was December 15), despite a for months ongoing talk page spam, and now in this confirmation statement it's basically promised to be absent for half of the next year as well (5 of 12 months), and that on a regular basis. I cannot support a steward who might not reply to issues for months, and there are enough other persons who can show a higher availability and fulfil these duties. --Vogone (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, Trusted, helpful and friendly user but same concerns as Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleagues, as I told before, I was moving house in November/December, and without regular internet access [my ISP took 53 days! in order to reactivate it] (Jalexander and GVarnum were emailed about this). This is the reason why I signed the confidentiality agreement some days later (I wouldn't sign it without reading the terms carefully). I plan to be quite active in this comming term (and to keep my current activity level); I am just telling you the months I would possibly have a lower availability according to my real life commitments (usually June, October and November). You can see from my logged actions page that my activity levels have basically remained the same during the other months. I'd like to continue carrying on as a Steward and handling LTA, spambots, cross-wiki abuses, and also responding to other stewards requests. I am always reacheable via irc, email or talk page though. Thanks, RadiX ∞ 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the confidence in his proper use of steward tools during 7 ~~years~~ months a year is much more important than the activity in every single month, once this is a volunteer task and one is not supposed to be here all the way. CasteloBranco^msg 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and helpful.--Syum90 (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think he was active enough. --Rs chen 7754 15:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry, I can't support someone who had to be poked numerous times by WMF to sign the new confidentiality agreement, and then did so too late (and that in the first year as a steward, where activity is usually much higher). If WMF had cared for its own deadlines, the rights should have been removed back then. Also quite a contradiction to speak of being "less active (or almost inactive) in June, and from September to November" in the statement, and then to reduce that to "quite active" in the comment above. Also the comment of Castelobranco is misleading, Ruy wasn't a steward for 7 years. --MF-W 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MF-W, my ISP let me 53 days without regular access during these weeks. I've said that I plan to be quite during this year, and that is true. The months you have mentioned above are the ones when I would possibly have a lower availability. I can not predict the future, but I'd rather mention this as a possibility than saying nothing at all. I find it much better from an ethical point of view. ;) I don't think that activity is the only thing that matters, but since you mentioned it, I performed almost 3,000 steward actions in the past 11 months. I think this activity level is in line with or even higher than what a lot of my colleagues have done. Thanks, RadiX ∞ 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MF-Warburg:, I meant to say "7 months a years". Sorry for my mistake. CasteloBranco^msg 20:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mathanaharan (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Sfic (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ja --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with the expectation of more consistent activity. Miniapolis 23:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Proactively stating that he might not be available from ... to ... is a plus in my book. Steward actions are ok AFAIK. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reasonably active. His scheduled leave doesn't bother me. Anyone can have that from time to time. — T. 07:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- As someone who also changed ISPs this past year, I know what a pain it can be to get new service installed (mine was installed only a few days late, but service levels vary in different places). Editor still manages to make simple edits despite having the bit. Etamni | ✉ 10:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though concerns about activity, and has happened in other roles. If facing extended absence, I think that stewards should consider a leave of absence guideline. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even with expected absence will meet the minimum activity guidelines, and when he is around, he is a valued contributor, so I believe he will continue to be a net benefit to steward corps, and should not be removed. -- Avi (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, declaring leave of absence in advance is definitely a good idea, as scheduled leave is much better than an unexpected leave — NickK (talk) 02:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good.--Uğurkent^talk 17:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Hedwig in Washington. In ten months, he did more than many stewards in five years. Érico (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, I don't have a clue about what you are talking about, nor what the "harassing" thing is. Would you mind explaining it so maybe I can help you out? Thanks. RadiX ∞ 12:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
E. g. RfC. What means "Dude"?? (please, don't use this word in conversation with me, thx) --Kusurija (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is the problem with this word? Sorry, I didn't intend to offend you. RadiX ∞ 02:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AryanSogd 13:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! Thanks! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not fully convinced, but it's not enough to vote otherwise than keep. Trijnstel_talk 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove The problens with this user, in this election, are the same in 2016. JSSX (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant deceitful statement. This user just revealed non-public personal information on a local election page; oversighting was handled by Teles a few hours ago, he got a warning message and thus voted against Teles (see full conversation here) and me. RadiX ∞ 02:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-- Vanthorn (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Even if he is not around the whole year, he is highly active when he is around and more active than quite some other stewards (including myself), which is really appreciated. He is certainly needed as steward. -Barras talk 19:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could you kindly explain the reason? RadiX ∞ 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize, but i will not --DerekvG (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per Vogone and MF-W --DangSunM (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Avi, also a valued contributor and helpful steward when he is around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --Timk70 question? 22:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 01:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --La femme de menage (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful, No concerns --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslik0

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-3, ru-N
Personal info: This is my fifth confirmation since my election in the February 2011. I think that during the fifth year as a steward I became more active than in the previous year despite (or may be due to) concurrently serving as a member of WMF Election Committee and later in the year as a member of Scholarship Committee, and I believe that I still remain useful to the the Wikimedia Community. In the past year as before I have been answering userrights, bots rights and global rights requests. I have been working to help users to rename, merge or otherwise unite their accounts as well as to help with local administrative tasks including updating old local javascript code. I still have a lot of enthusiasm for this role and wish to continue to serve as a steward. I hope that the community will support me. Thank you.

Comments about Ruslik0

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted & active. No concerns at all. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, he helped me rename my username according to the rules. --Kosta1986 (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Does useful work but I feel that sometimes their attitude is causing issues. Surely there are better ways to communicate with people than at [3] and there seems to be significant issues with their understanding of AAR [4] (note conversation at Коваль@uk.wiktionary) and a lack of willingness to look into situations (see [5] and [6]. Stuff like this affects the effectiveness of all stewards and their ability to work together. --Rs chen 7754 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that when your request an account to be locked it is your responsibility to provide sufficient evidence that this should be done. You failed to do this. Just providing a link to a page on enwiki does not by itself constitute such evidence. Ruslik (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On that page are all the other accounts that were globally locked, and you can look at their contributions and figure out why they were locked. What more could you ask for? --Rs chen 7754 01:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the question of priorities. Should I spend my time answering the vast majority of well articulated requests? Or should I spend my time trying to understand why some accounts should be locked and whether they should be locked at all when the requests' author failed to provide the necessary information? Ruslik (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have the time to look into something, or aren't familiar with it, then leave it for another steward. It's as simple as that. --Rs chen 7754 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will ask a question which is also very simple. Ruslik (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not satisfied with the response here. But, he is trusted and active. --Mathanaharan (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reasonably active and I like his steward work. — T. 07:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 13:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good steward. On a personal note, I'd only suggest that you take the points raised by Rschen7754 into account. RadiX ∞ 19:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Русскоязычный стюард нужен...--6AND5 (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Draa kul (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good job --Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cvf-ps (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oleg3280 (talk) 13:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ I do not just enter into a dialogue with this person , and came to the conclusion that he was afraid to make a responsible decision. If on one side of the scale will be the development of Wikipedia and the other bureaucratic rules that Wikipedia itself recommends ignored in such cases , he would choose the latter.--AryanSogd 15:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This refers to this discussion where I denied a request for the bureaucrat access because there was no community consensus for it. Ruslik (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have twice received the administrator flag both times for 6 months. When I protested , the stewards explained to me that our society is too small to have a permanent administrator. At the end of the term , I was approached by Stewart and warned that if there is a desire to continue to work as an administrator , you must again pass a vote, and if I can convince the stewards , that our society is increased, then the flag will be available on an ongoing basis. Recently, You assigned administrator flag on a permanent basis to one participant, whose community is half of our. Having legitimate questions.

What rules do you personally guided, and what rules governed the rest of the stewards?
For you as a steward , there is such a thing as mere participants and selected participants? Thank you for attention,--AryanSogd 13:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I see no evidence that your community was larger. You had only four votes on 8 June. Ruslik (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
At the beginning of our dialogue , you have brought a link where the steward summing up said that the community is small, since the number of active participants 61. By the way, you yourself talked about this ibid. For this reason, Ibrahimjon did not get the bureaucrat flag. If I understand correctly, it is for you, the community - is the number of votes, and with five votes of the community may be obtained from the stewards the necessary tools on a regular basis!? Thank you.--AryanSogd 05:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Five votes is the threshold when I begin to consider the permanent adminship but it really depends on the quality of votes. For bureaucrats it is much larger: at least 15. Ruslik (talk) 17:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your direct answer . A negative vote on changing positive Keep up the good work! --AryanSogd 18:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Afil (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Рулин (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active. Trijnstel_talk 22:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A certainly active and helpful steward. Without him, we'd probably have a rather backlogged request for bot rights. Your work is appreciated! -Barras talk 19:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, highly active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Holder (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Putting obstacles in the way of small Wikipedias.[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- trusted user--Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted and active in bot requests, where relatively few stewards work. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Renamed me. ~Cybularny ^Speak? 21:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active on permission requests --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik0 is active and he also tackles areas that are often not getting as much attention as they could. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Savh

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info:
Dear community,
Serving in the capacity of steward during 2015, as my second consecutive year, has been a pleasure. Even though my activity has been sporadic, and has included some months of total inactivity, I still believe that, whenever I am connected, I am helpful. I quite appreciated meeting colleague stewards in October, and I am still involved and up to date in steward matters. Since I do not expect a significant increase in availability over the course of 2016, I would have no issue with resigning, should my activity not be sufficient, so please feel free to let me know what you think.
Yours,
Sa vh ^ñ

Comments about Savh

Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Maragm (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviamente--Yeza (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Confiable y discreto. Tiene toda mi confianza. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. Raystorm (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep True, some months of inactivity, but I think you've done enough when you were active to justify keeping the rights. --Rs chen 7754 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jca raballo 22:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--White Master (e s) 23:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful and helpful. — T. 07:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent contributor, especially at StewCon — billinghurst sDrewth 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK -- BAICAN XXX (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, valued contributor, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Bernard (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good. --Uğurkent^talk 21:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep petrohs (gracias) 20:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep INeverCry 23:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Baiji --> (Opinión) 01:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Savh is one of the few I would trust with everything. Well, almost everything then. :-P Trijnstel_talk 23:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Jusjih, my language skills are perfectly clear to me, and for most people that look on my user page. Could you please explain why this warrants removal? Sa vh ^ñ 13:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Missing language skill means incomplete statement.--Jusjih (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - I really appreciate his input on many things. Clearly active enough and very helpful! -Barras talk 19:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - claro. —Marco Aurelio 16:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure, ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nice person, active and provides valuable opinions on discussions --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk)
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shanmugamp7

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ta-N, en-3
Personal info: Hello everyone, this is my second confirmation. I would like to continue as steward for another year with community approval. In the past year I have been active in most of the stewards fields, including global counter vandalism and spam work, handling SRP, SRG, SRGP, SRCU, SRUC requests, global rename, OTRS, etc. I would like to continue working in the same areas if confirmed. Questions/feedback's are most welcome. Thanks for your consideration. Regards--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Shanmugamp7

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mathanaharan (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Taichi - (あ！) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helped process the ArbCom elections on en.wiki faster than usual. Altamel (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My tech Guru.--Info-farmer (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Rsmn (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please continue. Anyway, your statement lacks babel. Add them perhaps? — T. 07:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 07:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shrikarsan (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Maathavan (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep One of the best few stewards. Friendly and quick. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Such a nice person!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the more active stewards, a valued contributor, so no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Responds faster than 911 :)--Ravi (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sivakosaran (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 07:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 18:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kurumban (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 10:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Antan O 07:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice guy and sufficiently active. Keep up the good work. Trijnstel_talk 23:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Constantly active steward. It's really good to have him on-board! -Barras talk 19:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, highly active, does good work. Very usefull language skills and timezone. - Taketa (talk) 10:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --கி.மூர்த்தி (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snowolf

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: I have been incredibly happy to serve as a steward for 4 years, and it has been wonderful to work alongside so many dedicated people on the Steward team, the Global Sysop and SWMT teams as well as the Foundation side of things. Over the past 4 months I have struggled to find time for Steward matters due to a rise in obligations outside Wikimedia, and I have not been able to fulfill satisfactorily the duties you've entrusted me with. As such, I am not seeking another confirmation as Steward. I thank you for the support and trust that you have placed in me and hope to be able to come back and run for active duty again a some point in the future. I wish all the best to the other Stewards seeking confirmations as well as the candidates. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 08:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Snowolf

Thanks for your service. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't go away :/ RadiX ∞ 17:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work over the past years. Maybe you'll return someday when you are less busy? :) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Alan ^(talk) 18:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service over the last several years, and for being willing to help others getting started as stewards. --Rs chen 7754 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service! Miniapolis 23:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Noooooo! --Osiris (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service! Sad to see you go, good luck!. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dimitrij Kášëv 05:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your incredible services. Hope to see you around. — T. 07:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to see this - my support is here anyway. Thanks and all the best --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. Enjoy RL. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your service. --rxy (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for so many time of intense work!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you One of the best stewards I have had the privilege with which to work. Snowolf and I had many disagreements, but they were always cordial and always served to further the issue and help us as stewards come to reasonable conclusions; I gained a lot from our interactions. More often than not, though, we did agree . Snowolf was also the steward who would invariably pick up the slack when needed, who volunteered for the jobs that others didn't do, and led more than followed. You will be missed, Snowolf. Good luck, G-d bless, and I hope you return soon. Please keep in mind that Snowolf at even 30% activity would benefit the Wikimedia projects! -- Avi (talk) 22:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Avraham: I think you have beautifully expressed all we wanted to say about this so valued contributor and all the things he has done for Wikimedia projects. Thanks! RadiX ∞ 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your work and dedication. It's a pity that you leave, but I hope you will be back when you have more time, and good luck with your other projects — NickK (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service.--Shisha-Tom (talk) 08:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Thanks you for your service. Good luck. --Uğurkent^talk 21:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service at Wikivoyage. I would support your future candidacy, should you ever wish to return. Peter Chastain (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep petrohs (gracias) 20:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep -jkb- 08:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Long live the Queen --Charitwo (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you work and steadiness. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much for serving as a steward! --Rax (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity in over a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would have loved you to stay, but sometimes the real word is more important than something stewardship. Good luck and see you soon hopefully. Trijnstel_talk 23:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC). Sad to hear you are going.[reply]
I'm seriously sad to see you going, however, I'm looking forward to still work together with you on other areas. I hope you will at some point be a steward again! Thanks for all your past contributions, help and nice chats on IRC. See you on IRC. ;-) -Barras talk 19:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. See you around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As Trijnstel and Barras, sad to see you go. Please come back soon. Best regards. —Marco Aurelio 16:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Farewell, then.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your hard work as Steward:)--DangSunM (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Snowolf. Sad to see you go. Hope to still catch you around IRC. Best wishes. Theo10011 (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service as a steward. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the many years. Please come back sometime in the future. Quiddity (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your contributions as steward Snowolf, Hope to see you around --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work! Érico (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPQRobin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-3, fr-2, de-2
Personal info: I have been steward for two years. As I said in my election and in last year's confirmation, I didn't intend to be among the most active ones, I rather help out now and then e.g. when requested to do so. Though, as I was probably less active the past year than the year before, I considered resigning. However, in the course of this year I intend to evaluate/refocus my different fields of wiki and non-wiki activity. (Having recently become Wikimedia Belgium board member, that will require more time. Another aspect is changes in real life and uncertainty about how that will affect how much time I spend on wiki stuff.) So, by next year's confirmation I will either be a more involved and active steward or I will decide to resign in order to focus on other activities and responsibilities. However, if the community feels I should not be confirmed this time already, I would of course understand.

Comments about SPQRobin

Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though, I do have some concerns regarding how he estimates consensus. On they other hand, he had the guts to ban a certain problematic user after a RFC. Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Greenday2 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot support confirmation this year. I always appreciate SPQRobin's input and contributions, but he is and has been totally inactive for the majority of his two years in this role. I don't advocate for people to put all of their time and effort into being a steward, but at the same time, we need somewhat active people doing this to contribute to internal discussions and such. Thanks for the work you have done. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very well. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mostly per Natuur12. Stewards need balls'n guts. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward. Never had an issue. — T. 07:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please be active. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, net benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Thanks you for your services. --Uğurkent^talk 21:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Uğurkent! I am not sure why you voted removal with the reason 'thank you for your services'. Would you mind explaining? Thanks! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I see he/she isn't very active with stewardship works in the last year. Nobody don't let me be misunderstood. Thanks, Jianhui67. --Uğurkent^talk 16:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not active enough on meta.--Snaevar (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nederland! :-) --GeoTrinity (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity since 2011 (bad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Might not be that active, but is active enough according to the inactivity policy & he's trusted. Trijnstel_talk 23:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - Not very active, like most of your recent actions are from January and fairly inactive the rest of the year. I hope you will be more active in the next year. -Barras talk 19:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another great person I've met during Wikimania. Friendly and helpful, please be more active. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep zeker en vast! --Timk70 question? 22:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 23:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nice person and active enough :) --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stryn

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fi, en-2, sv-1
Personal info: Hi all, in 2015 I served my first year as a steward, and I would be glad if I could continue for another year. I'm an administrator on the Finnish Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki and Wikidata. On Finnish Wikipedia I'm also a checkuser and a member of the Arbitration Committee. I'm active on IRC, and member of the SWMT as well as the OTRS team. On my first year as a steward I mostly used my time in renaming users as part of SUL finalisation, granted/removed user rights and locked vandal accounts / spambots.

Comments about Stryn

Keep, good steward. --Vogone (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Tuttu paristo. --Pxos (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt.--Syum90 (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough considering his multiple roles. — T. 07:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep! Of course! One of the best few stewards! Friendly and wise in general, and always quick to respond on IRC. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- jni (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Pxos --Geohakkeri (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, net benefit to steward corps, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, excellent activity — NickK (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active. --Uğurkent^talk 21:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wieralee (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 02:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, sensible & most familiar steward to me. –Ejs-80 16:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can only second what Jianhui67 wrote. Stryn is doing great job. tufor (talk) 16:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity (good)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does his job without generating any problems. So no concerns. Thanks for the hard work! Trijnstel_talk 23:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - I've no idea what we'd do without you. Keep up your great work! -Barras talk 19:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good steward :D ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 23:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly active. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Good steward and highly active throughout the year --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taketa

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, li, en-4, de-1, fr-1, la-1
Personal info: Dear all, this was my first year as a steward. I would like to thank all the good people I worked with and who are doing an awesome job, for their work and for their kind and helpfull advice during my first year. The year started with the SUL finalisation in which all accounts became global. Over three million accounts were renamed. Several tens of thousands of manual renames made everything run as smoothly as possible. The global renamers did an awesome job. During my first months as steward I mainly worked on requests about the assignment of global accounts and the complex task of manually merging accounts. During the year I started working on (global) permissions and helping to answer requests for intervention against long term vandals and spam-bots. In October I meet with several other stewards in San Francisco, which was a great learning experience. I did not use checkuser or oversight tools. These requests are well handled by other stewards and I am very happy limiting myself to other steward functions. If there is an emergency I will ofcourse intervene. I believe I have been decently active and have made good use of the tools. I would love to continue helping as a steward in the coming year. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Taketa

Remove unfortunately. Overall activity is little for a "first year steward": Rather few global rename actions (6 between April and November); only started doing global blocks in December 2015 (and the vast majority was done on 1 day, 31 Jan 2016), same as for global locks where the activity is centered on a few days of mass-actions. Large gaps also in SRP activity. This combined with several mistakes / showing of little knowledge about policies etc. (here; visible in the same revision: granting of OS rights on a home wiki; [7]; execution of a non-existing request; recently here), leads me to oppose. --MF-W 14:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Dear MF-Warburg, thank you for the feedback. Rschen7754 asked for a specific response. Forgive me if this gets too long. With about 800 steward actions over the past 11 months, out of which 70 global renames, I think I have done the same as most active stewards. The 6 renames is probably not counting the 20+ local renames not logged on meta. I have listed them below. Local renames like "Kwork2" are merges of accounts, which only stewards can perform, and most do not. People experience a problem for months and we can solve this in minutes. For example here, here, here or a dozen other requests. You mention "large gaps in SRP activity". I made no permission actions in July and September. Though I renamed and gave global rights in July. In September I was less active on meta. Though I was online several times a day. At that time I was very busy on the Dutch Wikipedia, starting a local version of the writing week project. Our writing week on Denmark nearly doubled the new article production for two weeks, so you can imagine the potential and why I think this is important. Moreover local writing weeks create media attention and new editors. Writing week Amersfoort was mentioned in newspapers that were read by 100.000 people in the village of Amersfoort and lead to 4 new editors writing their first article (in 1 week!). Writing week North-Brabant was joined by the governor, who tweeted this picture of us at the wikimeet. Coming April writing week Brussels, will cooperate with 20 libraries. The Flemish minister for culture and the prime minister of Brussels capital region will both personally thank an online participant, to show appreciation of our Wikimedia volunteers. I will also invite other language versions to join us and have their volunteers meets the prime minister. Also in that period we came up with the WikiOwls to thank online volunteers, and started a cooperation with the Amsterdam Free University, and 3 other Universities in the country. So I was bit busy in September. Starting in October I had more time, and got slowly more active. As you can see I am currently active and intend to maintain this level of activity. Concerning the cases you mention: [8] The two weeks I mentioned 6 months ago in August was when I was indeed still getting to know SRP. I should not have mentioned two weeks as a period, but I have learned from this mistake and have shown this over the past 6 months. Though not a guideline I took advice from Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements, which I should not have. [9] The 5 days you mentioned as minimum period instead of the 7 days I used. I learned 7 days from the practise I observed on these requests. I like to be safe and when I see two practices I prefer to be safe and take the 7 days over 5 days. But ofcourse I learn from your example and advice and will certainly keep it in mind when making my own considerations. It is good to have feedback on these matters. [10] I believe we should help local communities. When an RFA is done and the only problem is that the local community cannot find meta, I think we can help. In this case I should have been a bit less pro-active and have adviced the community to make a request. The result we can agree was good, and I have taken your advice to heart to give better insight into my actions, like this case. [11] The recent case was an unclear reply from me to Vogone. I meant that I should have left specific rights to local admins as he pointed out. My mistake first in executing and then in writing caused unneeded confusion, which I regret. The result we can agree was good and the user was helped. Thank you. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I must admit I only got round now to fully read your lengthy reply. As Nemo bis below, I too fail to see the relevance of these actions involving Flemish and Belgian ministers for steward work. --MF-W 04:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I did more then 6 renames in April-October. More like 25. Merging accounts is not logged on meta. 6 meta logs, 11 commons, 2 fr.wiktionary, 4 de.wikipedia, 1 meta local (Mirwin), 1 pl.wikipedia, 1 en.wikipedia. Not mentioning the rejected renames. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove While Taketa is undoubtedly a friendly Wikimedian and acts with good intention, I feel he is quite overchallenged with the steward role. His temper does not suit and makes many actions of him look as if he didn't think about them before. Making mistakes is a normal thing, especially with new and globally inexperienced stewards, but this frequency of mistakes suggests his strenghts lie somewhere else. Furthermore, I am opposed to the steward-OC double role. Controversial actions can always happen, even unexpectedly, and making people feel uncomfortable reporting possible issues with current OC members is certainly not what we want. I wish good luck for the future and thank for the service, --Vogone (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I enjoy working with this user. He is never to proud to admit a mistake which is an important quality for every one with advanced user rights. I am sure he learned from his mistakes and he will do better in the future for sure. Active enough imho plus he always is a great help when someone needs stewards assistance. Natuur12 (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Taketa is a good steward. --6AND5 (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! Ik waardeer zijn werk. --geo ^») 17:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Taketa always seems open for feedback. He is a human being, not a overengeneered-bot exempted from making mistakes. :( RadiX ∞ 17:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I like the the way Taketa solve problems here.--Liridon (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Greenday2 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W and Vogone. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Armbrust (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Undecided on this one.~~ @Taketa:, could you respond to the specific issues above? --Rs chen 7754 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W and Vogone...Usually stews in their first year are very active and determined, you seem bored already...and also, i won't support users keeping both rights (Stewardship and Ombudsman)..if your activity levels for being a steward is so poor, I'm not sure how you will fare as an Ombudsman..--Ste moc 01:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove On-and-off activity doesn't bother me, really. But when a first time appointed steward starts most common (and usually non controversial) steward actions after 10 months of appointment, then that's something serious. — T. 07:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I started locking vandal accounts during my first month as steward in March 2015. Not after 10 months. I am not a vandal fighter but a content editor. I focussed on renames, user merges and (global) permissions. Our vandal fighters do a great job and I can be useful elsewhere. I noticed very large requests were being made in July, where a Japanese sock master created 20 accounts a day. So I helped and locked a dozen accounts in requests over the weeks. LTAs seem to be becoming more regular. I currently help in vandal fighting and have locked about 500 vandal accounts over the months. After two bot attacks in January in which over 1000 ips were involved, I helped block several hundred of the used ips. So in general I am not a vandal fighter. But when it is needed, I am there to help. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 08:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Taketa: I meant global blocks and your first global block was on December 13, 2015. If you consider global locks then your rates are also low. Such as, 7 in March, 1 in April, 1 in May, 15 in July, 1 in November — in average approximately 2.8 locks/month in first 9 months. You started locking continuously also in December 2015. I believe that you realize that the community usually expects more measurable activity from a steward before his first confirmation. I appreciate your content edits and understand that is the ultimate goal of the movement. Your help in jawikipedia is certainly appreciated, but I would like to see more in global scale which is also measurable. I hope you understand my point. — T. 09:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have my habits and I slowly grow into a task. Usually I see requests come by as I work on content. However I was not a regular user of meta. after becoming a steward I visited meta specifically to check request pages and you can imagine this was new. Being late for almost all requests is not encouraging. I got a slow start as steward and only became more active after the steward meet at the end of October. It became more and more of a rythme and by December I was checking request pages a dozen times a day. I hope that clarifies my activity, and I can understand you read more into it, though I can state firmly that this confirmation has nothing to do with my activity. I simply had to become familiar with visiting meta more often than I was used to. The block/lock pages were not my priority. I ran into some situations where I noticed large requests could use extra help, so I helped. After I became more active, I ran into more of such requests. I understand your point in wanting to see measurable results. 800 steward actions and only 150 in the first 8 months I can imagine you consider little. However, I intend to continue on my current activity level, so if you want me to be active I can say I will be. All the best, Taketa (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--Syum90 (talk) 08:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove sadly.
- There seems to be a disproportionate number of mistakes compared to other stewards. To be honest, I don't really care about the substance of most of the mistakes mentioned above; they are arbitrary rules that are not written down anywhere. There are some mistakes where the correct procedure is documented, but I wouldn't expect the average Wikimedian to know that global sysop does not include global rollback, or much of the other errors above.
- But what I do see in the above incidents is a pattern: not checking with existing practice in the area where one is acting, and not reading the manual.
- The one mistake that really bothers me, however, is the granting of privacy-related (OS) rights on one's homewiki, mentioned above. Given their answer here, they declared Wikidata as a homewiki. I asked them directly about this today, and they declared that they did not realize what wiki this was being granted on. The answer is concerning for a number of reasons: did they check to make sure there were other oversighters on that wiki? Did they make sure the user was identified? Did they look at the request to make sure it had 25 votes? (and wouldn't they have gone "oh, huh, this is Wikidata?") Considering that this is one of the big reasons why stewards don't get reconfirmed, I would have taken extra care to stay far away from actioning such a request, and I did when I was a steward. I do not understand this at all.
- I think Stemoc and Tanvir are onto something, and I won't add much more to that. I don't expect stewards to be vandal fighters, necessarily (I'm more of a content editor myself), but there's plenty of other maintenance-type things that can be done with the steward tools such as AAR, maintaining the global bots and global sysop wikisets, etc. that are generally forgotten.
- I see Taketa as a dedicated Wikimedian, and personally I want to keep him as a steward; however, some significant questions have been raised about his ability to perform the role without adding to controversy, which I can no longer ignore. --Rs chen 7754 08:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did realise what wiki it was being granted on. I did all checks as I always do, and as I have always done during my 6 years as bureaucrat granting rights. I did not realise it was my homewiki. I had never before had to take a homewiki into consideration. This is a steward only limit, that I had never experienced before. Even though I know that I should not act on a homewiki, I am only highly active on Wikidata in content and never was active in the community disussions. If it had been a Dutch project, I would have noticed instantly. I made a mistake not noticing the homewiki guideline applied. This happened 1 time, and never after. No complaints were noted during the 6 months since. If you think that I will repeat a homewiki action, after a single incident and no repeat in 6 months, vote against me for sure. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W etc --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Laberinto16 (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good contributor at StewCon, done nothing wrong, prepared to give another year to develop — billinghurst sDrewth 14:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen, MF-W and Vogone. jni (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Deserves a second chance.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DCB (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. On one hand, I see a lot of concerns both regarding activity and somewhat disturbing actions. On the other hand, I can assume good faith and consider that Taketa is still learning and thus makes mistakes. I would probably give a second chance, but I am not 100% sure — NickK (talk) 02:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per above. --Uğurkent^talk 21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK Ankry (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Geo (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove unfortunately i have to agree with MF-W. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per Auvajs, Vogone and per Rschen7754. Are really all stewards OK with harassments of -jkb- and &? See also RfC. --Kusurija (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per various people above --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Vogone. odder (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Just because he's OC at the same time. — regards, Revi 14:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep some mistakes for a first year are not the key issue, if they are not repeated and are clearly acknowledged. Clear mistakes, clear gaps can be addressed and analyzed in the future, and they are always IMHO less critical than correct yet "border-line" behaviours. Sometimes they both show patterns, you know... In other words he still deserves a second chance, or at least an encouragement. My humble advice: whatever didn't help you (communication problem, isolated or fragmented guidelines) invest some energy to improve it. Even someone who is more skilled than you will get some advantages from this practice and that's a good legacy you can provide.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dick Bos (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many contributions to en.wikiversity in the past year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove To be consistent with positions I expressed in the past about steward confirmations, I must support MF-W's points. I'm greatly confused by Taketa's answer above, which seems to be completely OT. Yes, we value Taketa's contribution to Wikimedia a lot. But here we're only talking of the steward bit. Nemo 23:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He does his best and that's all one can do... Trijnstel_talk 23:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepWe all make mistakes. Activity levels are not a great concern. We need more people. MORE PEOPLE!! :) --Pratyeka (talk) 06:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The issues mentioned here are fairly minor.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 18:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC) His answer to MF-Warburg convinced me that he can do it better.[reply]
Keep - Not the most active steward, however, he does a good work. I see no issues with being steward and OC member at the same time, I just hope that he can fulfil both roles. -Barras talk 19:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am not concerned about the dual OC-steward role as I feel that involved stewards still provide value even if they are less active in CU/OS. Between permissions, usernames, and contributions/advice when we have issues which require second opinions, there is plenty where an Omb/steward may contribute. That being said, I am somewhat concerned about the quantity of issues brought by some of the opinions above. However, I do not see anything malicious; rather, the mistakes are careless. We do expect better from our stewards, but I am willing to allow Taketa another year to demonstrate he has learned from these constructive criticisms. -- Avi (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove please resign from either steward or OC role --DerekvG (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. --DangSunM (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We all do mistake, important is that what we learn from it. I believe that Taketa will do better. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- If everyone makes mistakes, why are so many only being pointed out here, and not on all confirmation pages? —MF-W 04:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above. Érico (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W. --Timk70 question? 22:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep helping user --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with Billinghurst. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Billinghurst --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. -- Freddy2001 ^talk 11:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While he made some mistakes, I still think that he can continue as a steward. The removal will be a net negative, in my opinion. Ruslik (talk) 11:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I do not like the activity heterogeneousness over time mentioned. It looks like the user "remembered" that he's a steward not so far before the confirmation (just my opinion). I think user should take a break and rerun when he's ready for a smother activity performing. --Base (talk) 12:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep It is not good by others to put so much pressure on volunteers forcing them to work more, more, more and to never have a break. That is a form of harassment and damages our project. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@.js: Excuse me? Most people here are not even referring to the amount of activity but to the huge amount of mistakes which were made by this steward compared to other stewards. --Vogone (talk) 13:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-Warburg and Vogone. Ireas (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tegel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: sv, en-3
Personal info: I have been a Steward for four year now so this is my fourth confirmation. My activity this year has been similar to previous years with a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel _(Talk) 11:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tegel

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The same activity as every year ;) --MF-W 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, does great job —Ah3kal (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Off course.--Syum90 (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no brainer. -Mh7kJ (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - one of the only 2 very active stewards on wikimedia (the other resigned) ..--Ste moc 01:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Continue, please. — T. 08:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We need more fast stewards. Tegel always does a great job. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 16:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obelix (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 22:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another "no brainer"! -- Avi (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, without a doubt — NickK (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward for small wiki! --Sciking (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wieralee (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep petrohs (gracias) 19:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep INeverCry 00:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK. Ankry (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nothing to complain about. –Ejs-80 16:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many contributions to en.wikiversity in the past year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certainly. Trijnstel_talk 23:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Highly active, sure :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Great steward, please keep up the good work! -Barras talk 19:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. Useful to have a steward with Swedish native language skills. - Taketa (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Boberger Boberger (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly active. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active and responds faster --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sure. Érico (talk) 08:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teles

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt, en-3, es2
Personal info: Hello, everyone. This is going to be my fourth confirmation. I was elected in 2012 and I am still happy to help as a steward. 2015 was an important year for me as I finished my studies on College and started working. That forced me to save a little less time for stewardship. In spite of it, I am glad to help the little I can and would like to continue. Please, feel free to talk about ways of improving my activity as steward. Thanks for participating. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Teles

Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ficaê CasteloBranco^msg 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laberinto16 (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Skilled and helpful. Please continue. — T. 08:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 08:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep One of the best few stewards, clueful and helpful. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 16:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently active, valued contributor, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ficaê. Ativo, amigável, experiente. Obrigado por toda a sua dedicação. Érico (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For instance? I can't take any action when I have no idea what you are talking about.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 04:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ficaê, trusted and useful user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good work. –Ejs-80 16:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove not active enough on meta.--Snaevar (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Though I agree that a part of stewards' work depend on editing Meta, I am pretty sure that a large part of their work can be done without editing here. Actually, it is perfectly possible a hypothetical situation on which the most active steward could be the less active on Meta and, for that, this criteria wouldn't be a good one to measure activity in general. Thanks for participating.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 01:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By edits I am referring to number of steward requests answered, but I also looked at the number of actions in the logs. More specifically, I only looked at those logs that correspond to steward request pages that had an bigger backlog in January 2016 than the rest. Edits that do not fall in that sort of criteria I consider trivial and I did not look at those, so I agree with that. The expected number of answers to said requests and actions are based on the activity of other stewards. As such I am saying that the activity on these fronts is lower than with other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Snaevar: Thank you for your detailed explanation. Regarding the logs, I don't think I am that bad. We should maintain counters like this old one, which counts log actions and permit a better evaluation. Anyway, I am sad that I wasn't good enough in your opinion, but I'm not sure if removing me and raising a little bit the worload for others stewards is really the best approach. Thanks again for your thoughts.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 03:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--MARKELLOS^{Leave me a message} 08:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ciberprofe (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity since 2013 (bad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 19:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that editing on a specific project should be a criteria for approving a Steward and I don't think you read that in any page related with stewardship. Thanks anyway for your comment.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 01:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sure. Trijnstel_talk 23:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove The problens with this user, in this election, are the same in 2016. JSSX (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The retaliation/answer was fast. JSSX (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You just revealed the context of a private conversation, which was oversighted, and used that to insult an user. That was serious enough to use oversight tool. Facing a privacy violation, I had no other option than removing it and supressing per global rules. Trying to set up a situation is pointless on that clearcut case.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 22:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lies. The other user is candidate for Checkuser tools. There is a complaint that candidate revealed personal information of other users on Facebook. This is something that the community of pt.Wiki should know. Your action, Teles, was made after my vote here. And everyone, in pt.Wiki, know that you are friends. I have no more to talk. JSSX (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I still defend the idea that a private conversation can't be narrated as that is violating an user's privacy.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 23:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-- Vanthorn (talk) 21:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GRS73 (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Arthemius x (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --João Carvalho (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Sure. Friendly and active enough. Will try to follow your advice :-) ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active and helpful steward. -Barras talk 19:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Very helpfull, very active. Pedrassani (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. I like how he handles feedback. - Taketa (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 00:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Experienced and active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active and helpful --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and sound steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trijnstel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
Personal info: Hi everyone! I'm active on the Wikimedia projects for 10 years now and serving as a steward since 2011. This will be my fourth confirmation round.
Due to various reasons - such as my work as member of the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee and in real life obligations (work, private life, etc) - I couldn't be as active last year as I sometimes wished, but I still feel I was reasonably active in 2015. Most of my edits and actions involve dealing with right changes, cross-wiki vandalism, sockpuppetry and spam. I'm also active with behind the scenes stuff, such as OTRS. I am reachable by all means. In 2015 I visited the WMF office in San Francisco with fourteen other stewards. The meeting was useful for me - both to meet the others and staff, but also for prioritizing stuff.
I would like to continue for one more year on a higher activity level, if confirmed of course. Trijnstel_talk 17:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Off course.--Syum90 (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ When ask questions you need to answer [12], Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove a×p_de ^Hello! 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Keep up the good work! - Greenday2 (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still pretty active and no issues with actions. --Rs chen 7754 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Goede steward --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 23:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989. COOL BEANS! 00:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yup, no problem. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most certainly. — T. 08:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and I will vote to clone her. We need more female stewards. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep One of the best few stewards. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 16:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ahh, Trijnstel, whom I have been known to refer to as "she who keeps me honest" regarding my own activity levels . Trijnstel is unquestionable sufficiently active, even if she is not has hyperactive as she used to be. Even were she less active than she is now, she provides valued insight to internal steward discussions, and as long as she were above the minimums, I would gladly confirm that she adds value to the steward corps, we would not be as efficient without her, and she should not be considered for removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, an extremely valuable contributor to the CU mailing list — NickK (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Bernard (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shivanarayana (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 13:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am kind to you ;-) Taivo (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the best. –Ejs-80 16:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I've seen her acting on the basis of a biased view. This is not done on Wikipedia. De Geo (talk)12 feb 2016 16:01 (UTC); Now her recent remarks in a poll on Dutch Wikipedia "Democracy is fine, but in my opinion not always" make me doubt her point of view. [13] The Geo (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hereby confirm I prefer dogs over cats, I hope @Darkoneko: won't change his idea of me. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snaevar (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Vinvlugt (talk) 12:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep odder (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dick Bos (talk) 15:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Meno25 (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No contributions to en.wikiversity since 2014 (sad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WeeJeeVee (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Helpful whenever she's around. tufor (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Please. friendly and around when needed. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If it wouldn't look that stupid, I'd add like 10 keep templates for you. You are just an amazing steward. Highly active. It's a real pleasure to work with you and I also appreciate your input, which you gave me in the past. Thanks for everything! -Barras talk 19:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In my opinion, she is one of the best stewards. Active, friendly and very helpful. Thank you for your work here. Érico (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 01:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 08:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and thank you for your service. Drmies (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very helpful, active and engaged steward, very trusted person. einsbor _talk 08:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 14:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Excellent steward; very helpful, active enough and trusted. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great person, Active on all the areas --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active and dedicated steward, whose insight has always been very helpful. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, en, scn, able to understand a minimum of most of Neolatin languages
Personal info: I've been a steward for 4,5 years and I'm still fairly active. Dealing with the last year, pro(s): overall communication with WMF and tech guys has improved, some conflicts ended. Con(s): too many fellow stewards left. For the next year I'd like to lower my latency in answering via talkpage(s) (which is significantly longer than email/IRC ones) and to hold my current level of activity. Thank you! --Vituzzu (talk) 22:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Vituzzu

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt.--Syum90 (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sí. Raystorm (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I'm being seriously harassed by cs.wikisource admins (I was banned indef for posing a harmless question on site rules in a polite way, afterwards the admin who banned me keeps lying and manipulating about it, really no kidding at all, for details see RfC); when reporting this harassment on IRC Vituzzu was literally laughing at me, refusing to do anything about it, I'm unable to draw any other conclusion that Vituzzo supports harrasments by admins --Auvajs (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would love to belive Vituzzu was caught in a trap. But it does not matter wether he was caught in a trap, at this time, he supports indef ban for NEKIT and harrashemnt, which undermine our community.--Juandev (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Grammar correction: I would love to believe Vituzzu was caught in a trap. But it does not matter now. He has no problem with users being banned indef for POINT only and undermines our community.--Juandev (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC) And one more reason to oppose, As can be red lower, his wide IP blocks covering all projects hit also non problematic users. He admints that, he does not have time to repond on his user page. But I am affraid after reading reactions, that such behaviour may led to the loss of users, which is not definitelly our goal.--Juandev (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Juandev: There have neither NEKIT, nor Harrashemnt, and nor NEKIT and harrashemnt existing (although an account called Nekit exists, it hasn't any edits, and hasn't blocked), so which account are you asking? yourself? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Well NEKIT is a policy, but the right abrev is POINT and harassment is a word.--Juandev (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Miniapolis 23:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nicolabel (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ok for me. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Osiris (talk) 03:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clear keeper. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dimitrij Kášëv 05:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep — Danny B. 07:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very easy to decide. — T. 08:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep stewards to personal views, as long as it doesn't interfere with their stewardry, which it hasn't; and yes he can be less tolerant of crap, stewards cover a spectrum — billinghurst sDrewth 14:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billinghurst: in Italy we have to be less tolerant of crap, we have too much of it ;-)--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Lenka64 (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 16:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 20:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Activity is sufficient, contributions are valued, keeping Vituzzu as a steward benefits us all. -- Avi (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Let him stay as a steward through the process of Wikimedia, he's a beneficial volunteer. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 04:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Bernard (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 21:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pegasovagante (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 13:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wieralee (talk) 19:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 00:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues —Ah3kal (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Triquetra (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 09:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep. You both need it. --Kusurija (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ because of repeated wide IP range blocks with aggressive options that caused a lot of problems on PLWM toolserver. Weak, as hoping he will apply range blocking more carefully in the future. Ankry (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm always sorry to create "breakdowns" but we're targeted by an impressive amount of spam (and various for of abuses, your homewiki project is heavily target by a certain troll using lots of open proxies) and we're really a few overloaded people dealing with it. I've found it's better to fix side effects as soon as they arise: it would be impossible to check ranges, with high probability of being abused, on hundreds of wikis. Currently we lack more effective way to easily fix them but still we do. --Vituzzu (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not contesting your blocks as general. You applied many of them and I appreciate it. I am just suggesting that applying a long term (few years) wide range (/32) IP(v6) blocks that also blocks logged in users is a mistake that should not be repeated. Ankry (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I see your point but most of AS have /32 subnets and lots of abuse come from registered accounts (namely spam and long-term abusers). Another problem happened with a French ISP which horribly mixes up colo and residential users mislabeling the relevant whois informations! Still what I can guarantee is my best effort to *reduce* this kind of problem + my (and fellow stewards') best effort to *solve* any issue arisen. --Vituzzu (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your explanation and I am changing my opinion to Keep. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Ankry:! --Vituzzu (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Snaevar (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per Auvajs and per this RfC. --Kusurija (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep extremely valuable in the fight against cross-wiki vandalism. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 13:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 21:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Afil (talk)
Keep --Luigi.tuby (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove odder (talk) 13:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Odder: Uh, why? Pokéfan95 (talk) 09:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--M&A (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I really like these rangeblocks tufor (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK --►Cekli 829 08:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contributions to en.wikiversity within a year (good)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I consider him as one of the best stewards. We should cherish those guys and be thankfull imho. Trijnstel_talk 23:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Indeed one of the best stewards. --Ttzavaras (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Friendly and helpful. RIP, those poor LTA sock master :-) ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Your are worth at least 10 keep templates! You are the nightmare for our LTAs and many other trolls. You are not scared to make difficult actions, which I really appreciate. It's just great to have you as a fellow steward. Thanks for all you're doing here. It's a pleasure for me to work with you! -Barras talk 20:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I am seriously concerned about the long, sometimes illegitimate IP blocks. Most of the time, it is impossible to appeal the block even as a logged-in user (because they are write-restricted). Vituzzu blocked the whole French ISP “OVH” a few months ago, and a good part of the French ISP “Online” too. I understand the need to fight for spam, but Vituzzu’s talk page is full of request of users illegitimately blocked complaining (which is lucky, considering that, most of the time, these blocks are write-restricted on all wikis). I would like Vituzzu to try and make his blocks less extreme in the future. I am not voting for removal because I feel these are just mistakes that can be improved, especially the latency in talk page, as Vituzzu said! Diti the penguin — 11:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess local admins, can reblock IPes and users right? But the fact its a global block might be problem. Vituzzu advocate this (see above simillar discussion for PL) that there is not enough adminstrators, but local admins and small wiki monitoring team is not enough protection Vituzzu?--Juandev (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Diti: I (but also other stewards) usually block those server farms which are not supposed to be used by legit users. It can happen, anyway, people need to use them for a range of reasons (proxies in a shared network, need to use a VPN/VPS, tunnel brokers...) then we have a series of workarounds to let them edit. With Online the bigger range I blocked was listed in the relevant whois as being used for OVH's colo services while a smaller block (afair a /19) was actually assigned to Online's residential customers.

Those blocks don't affect meta, so anyone caught by them can come here and ask for help. It's still a side effect (I absolutely didn't mean to block xDSL French users). Dealing with answers yep, I hope I can improve latency but most of requests on my talkpage are handled by fellow stewards: this kind of block is pretty "technical" so anyone feels free to change it at any time. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 16:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --DerekvG (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Severino (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. I don't trust him since the short Italian language lockout a few years ago. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly active. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Riottoso (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 06:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and dedicated steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]