Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/NahidSultan

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

NahidSultan (Nahid Sultan)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: bn-N, en-3, bpy-1, as-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear all,

    My name is Nahid Sultan and I hail from Bangladesh. I’m a native Bengali speaker and I’m able to communicate in English as well. I’ve been an active Wikimedian for over three and half years now. I started with contributing to the English Wikipedia on 30 April 2012, then gradually became active on Bengali Wikipedia and Wikibooks, Wikimedia Commons, Meta and various small Wikimedia projects. I’m currently an administrator on Bengali Wikipedia (since December 2013), Wikimedia Commons (since May 2014), Meta (since January 2015) and a global sysop for small wikis since March, 2015. More recently, I've joined the Ombudsman commission and my terms will expire on February 2017. I’m fairly active on every projects I’m holding advance rights. I usually do clean up tasks on small wikis and am an active SWMT member since September 2014. I’m quite often present in multiple IRC channels including #cvn-sw, #wikimedia-gs, #wikimedia-admin & #wikimedia-stewards under the nick NahidSultan. I’m also an OTRS member since May, 2014. As of this moment I have made 56,692 edits on all Wikimedia wikis.

    Other than my online contributions to the movement, I am also active in doing Wikimedia works offline—working actively for Wikimedia Bangladesh chapter where I currently serve as a Board member. I’ve conducted a number of Wikipedia workshops in all of the seven divisional cities (I’m the first person to do so) and various educational institutions of Bangladesh. More recently, I have coordinated the Wikipedia 15 programs in Dhaka. That’s why my global online contributions may seem a bit low for the last couple of weeks.

    As a Steward, I would like to help with the Steward requests backlog. In particular I would like to work with SRP, SRG, SRM and SRCU and various other maintenance tasks from time to time. As a SWMT member I also want to access my steward privileges to fight cross-wiki vandals and spammers. To demonstrate my ability to work in a crucial timeframe, I would like to quote one of the former stewards (my colleague from Bengali community as well) as I also fall under similar condition, “My timezone is UTC+06:00, so I’m usually awake when most of the stewards are in sleep. ;)” My stewardship would also provide an effective linkup between small wikis and the global community, also increase the diversity of the team. I would like conclude my statement with my agreeness to respect stewards policy, and other policies such as CheckUser, oversight and privacy policies. Thank you very much for your time to read this and your consideration.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#NahidSultan


Yes

[edit]
  1. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  The way this user has developed his skills and spread his area of contribution is outstanding. He has come from a small project and his expertise will certainly be be a big plus for the team (also considering diversity and timezone). Regarding his recent appointment as an Ombudsman, I believe it shouldn’t be a concern as he explained very well how he plans to continue without COI and actually maintain both tasks without controversy. He is trustworthy enough. Also other users have already worked under the same condition and they did fine. He has my full support for this position. — T. 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I think Mr. NahidSultan is very suitable for this responsibility as stated the page. His candidature will be helpful not only the Sub-continent, but also in small wikis. He is very energetic. I fully support to him as a Steward. Have a nice day. - Suvray (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Intakhab (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Considering applicant's previous and present contributions I believe him trustworthy for this responsibility. Intakhab (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • 
  8. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  no concerns.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I do share Vogone's concern but for me this is not enough reason to oppose a good candidate. Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Would be a nice steward. Good answers to the questions. RadiX∞ 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  After taking Vogone's concern into careful consideration, in this particular case I still think it's a good idea. Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  13. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Yeza (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  -- one of the finest Wikimedians I ever met. Simply trust him. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. बिप्लब आनन्द (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Trusted user and good cross wiki experience. Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       MVSSuccubus (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Shizuku Misaki Sakyubasu Kawaii Desu (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sfic (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sfic (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  OK. --►Cekli829 16:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Emergency doc (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Emergency doc (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  FiliP ██ 16:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Aftabuzzaman (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Aftabuzzaman (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Fortunately, the OC doesn't seem to do much so you'll have no problems focussing on your steward role ;-). Experienced candidate other than that. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  We need more stewards to handle copyright violations, an area where NahidSultan has been very active without reducing quality of each action. I've never seen issues with him and so far the opposers didn't mention any. As for the ombudsperson, yes, maybe he could resign that if he elected, but we'll see. Nemo 17:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Titodutta (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  -- Tito Dutta (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Obaid Raza (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. এম আবু সাঈদ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  He is very active & attentive. I support to him as a Steward.He really deserve it. এম আবু সাঈদ (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Would be a nice steward. Leništudent (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mh7kJ (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  BRP ever 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LavaBaron (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Maragm (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Dig deeper (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Seems like he'll do a fine job. Dig deeper (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Appears qualified, with good answers to questions. Miniapolis 19:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Like what I see OlEnglish (Talk) 20:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Tanweer Morshed (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  The user is trustworthy enough. I have been working with him for the past few years, and he has gained experience in a wide range of roles in Wikimedia movement. He has my full support. Tanweer (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Very kind, very helpful candidate but I'm not entirely happy with the steward-OC double role. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Maadikhah (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Maadikhah (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per Ajraddatz Riley Huntley (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wiki13 talk 21:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Very ambitious candidate from Bangladesh. Prof tpms (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I am not so happy with the answer to my question. If I may give you an advice, when somebody asks you something, make efforts to address what is being asked specifically. Seems to be a great user in general though and I believe will be helpful as a steward. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Masssly (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —M@sssly✉ 02:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I find a bit weird to be appointed to the OC and request steward tools in the very same month, but this is the only problem I see so far. Probably the best candidate in these elections, and I see much more reasons to vote in support — NickK (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Will be a good steward, no doubt! Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Easy one Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  With some concerns about the double role of Ombudsman and Steward —Ah3kal (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Masum-al-hasan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Masum-al-hasan (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       সাজিদ রেজা করিম (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  সাজিদ রেজা করিম (talk) 08:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  His contributions are undoubtedly more than excellent. I'm giving my full support to him. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Motiur Rahman Oni (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. iqsrb722 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I think his contribution to the Bangla Wikipedia is undoubtedly remarkable .So i'm supporting him. Iqsrb722 (talk) 11:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Mavrikant (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Mavrikant (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Not that happy with being elected for the OC at the same time, but hopefuly he can spend some time for stewardship as well. Trijnsteltalk 13:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Suitably trusted, suitably knowledgeable, though may be biting off a lot. Let us see how things pan out.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Ochilov (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Trusted user, helpful giving tools Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 13:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  A very trusted user. Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Pancho507 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Pancho507 (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. YmKavishwar (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Right up one's alley for this task. --Uğurkenttalk 16:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Epìdosis 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Ali Haidar Khan (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Nahid is one of the finest Wikimedians, very trusted user and a nice person. I strongly believe he will successfully perform his roles and responsibilities as a Steward. Probably he is the best candidate in this lot. Ali Haidar Khan (Tonmoy) (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Satdeep Gill (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HakanIST (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Odaxre (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Odaxre (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Meracritus (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Please prove yourself with stewardship. Meracritus (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Jayantanth (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Jayantanth (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Sumita Roy Dutta (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Taivo (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Ghiutun 22:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Mahir256 (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Ninjastrikers (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 04:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Herby talk thyme 11:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  101. Ferdous (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Trustworthy, Responsible, Dedicated and Devoted wikipedian. ferdous TM 12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC) ferdous TM 12:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Sufidisciple (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Thoug of same region but at first I encounterd Nahid at WikiConference in Jadavpur University, India. A perfectly progressive and energetic young individual having excellent leading capability. I like his views and respect sincerity. Doubtlessly can say, he will perform his roles and responsibilities as a Steward as the Global Wiki Community deserves. In fact, he is the appropriate candidate in this election. --- Sufidisciple (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Ahmed Nisar (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  A nice guy with multi talents. Ahmed Nisar (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I have not found any suspicious activity yet for this user. Mathmensch (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Mayeenul Islam (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Yes, he is active in both online and offline for Wiki movement. I'm voting for him and wishing him the best.  —Mayeenul Islam (TALK) 17:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jarould (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  rxy (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ghilt (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  eminently qualified Chris Troutman (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I was concerned with what Vogone mentioned too, but I reviewed the answers and I am satisfied, mostly because the experience shows good judgement. Caballero1967 (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Numbermaniac (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Appears to be a very promising candidate. Great statement, shows full involvement in Wikimedia projects. -- numbermaniac 22:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Matiia (talk) 23:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  loupgarous (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Ashiq Shawon (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He is very suitable candidate for this post. He is very familiar and energetic, also trustworthy enough. Ashiq Shawon (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. mogoeilor (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  --lrc lori (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Seems to be a good choice. I was little surprised when I saw that Nahid became a member of the OC and simultaneously applied for stewardship since both jobs can be time consuming. However, I assume that people think enough before taking such steps and so I'm sure he will just do well and has enough time to fulfil to roles. -Barras talk 13:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 14:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Per Tanvir vai, AND, I've worked with this user in real life. He is an EXTREMELY dedicated and responsible user whom I believe, will make a "great" steward. --Pratyya (Hello!) 14:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Pasaban (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  He has been one of the strong pillars of Bengali Wiki. I fully support him. Pasaban (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Buynaksk (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Buynaksk (talk) 19:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  OK. Ankry (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  INeverCry 23:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Csyogi (talk) 06:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Syum90 (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. WisiW (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  WisiW (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Smile4ever (talk) 08:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Clivemacd (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Vesuvius Dogg (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Clueful candidate with good track record and very strong commitment to the project. Vesuvius Dogg (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 14:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Kayser Ahmad (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Kayser Ahmad (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Sharif uddin (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Very very attentive and mostly trustworthy. Sharif uddin (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Christian Ferrer (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Has global rights and appears to be helpful based on answers in discussions.--Snaevar (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Yes. Best regrads. まSan [T•C•ES] 21:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Eyesnore (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eyesnore (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Eager Lin (Message) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Mharfouche (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  The way this user has developed his skills and spread his area of contribution is outstanding. He has come from a small project and his expertise will certainly be be a big plus for the team. Mharfouche (talk) 07:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  good cross-wiki activity, seems reliable and expert enough Shivanarayana (talk) 12:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. හරිත (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  හරිත (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Atudu (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Nahid Sultan is very supportive, responsible and active Wikimedian. I have full support for him as a Steward. Atudu (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Nomader (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Nomader (Talk) 15:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Msannakoval (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I appreciate his attitude of taking care of backlog of steward's request. Actually he is raring to help Wikipedia Drcenjary (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ori Livneh (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ori Livneh (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rationale answers to questions Nannadeem (talk) 06:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Melos (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. לערי ריינהארט (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Spasage (talk) 06:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       IAC-62 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Have seen some worthwhile edits by this candidate. IAC-62 (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Krish Dulal (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Krish Dulal 20:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Steschke (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  ST ○ 20:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fdssdf (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Nice profile Fadesga (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Worldbruce (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Worldbruce (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sebleouf (talk) 08:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Flixtey (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Flixtey (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Saehrimnir (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Quinto Simmaco (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Quinto Simmaco (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  175. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Wnme (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  --Wnme 20:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Courcelles 22:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I do not believe that the Ombudsman role interferes with the steward role. Even if voluntarily restricting oneself from CU & OS, the steward can contribute with permissions, and, more importantly, in discussions/discourse to help other stewards. Having someone with Nahid's language skills help other stewards, even if he is not running checks himself, will be very valuable. Avi (talk) 23:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Seth R (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 • -★ Sethtalk 08:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  ● Mehran Debate 11:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  The "double work" problem with Ombudsmanship nonwithstanding. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Good luck Meno25 (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  tufor (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  186. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Kharkiv07 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Kharkiv07 (T) 02:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  188. The ed17 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Ed [talk] [en] 06:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hawajez (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  -- Hawajez (talk) 07:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  189. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fessor (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Some 31 contributions to the Wikiversities (great), 9 to en.wikiversity (come back more often), and some within a year (excellent)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Önni (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Önni (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Godsy (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  —Godsy (talk • contribs) 06:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Geagea (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Geagea (talk) 09:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  195. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  EmreDuran (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Active globally and suitable for the role Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 non-english, +1 near my timezone (southwestern China), +1 offline stuff Pratyeka (talk) 06:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Csisc (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Csisc (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  202. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Srikant Kedia 14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Matěj Suchánek (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Amaling (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Emin • message 07:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Great guy ! Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Trusted and experienced. Taketa (talk) 10:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  209. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 12:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Peadara (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Peadara (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  210. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nahid.rajbd (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Nahid.rajbd (talk) 09:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Hasive (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  He really deserve it --Nurunnaby Chowdhury (Hasive) • talk • 12:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yair rand (talk) 20:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Öterbülbül (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Öterbülbül (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Caiaffa (talk) 22:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Gioto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gioto (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  217. रमेश सिंह बोहरा (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  रमेश सिंह बोहरा (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC) yes. रमेश सिंह बोहरा (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  219. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Delimapagi978 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Delimapagi978 (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ganesh Paudel (talk) 00:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Sidheeq (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  226. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nan (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Viswaprabha (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Nahid is a true promise, I can assure. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 22:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  231. taweetham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Taweethaも (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  232. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  [[مهدی فیلو]] (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Moheen Reeyad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Experienced and trusted user. ~ Moheen (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  238. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --ContributorQ (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  239. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  アンタナナ 16:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Anatoliy (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  244. SlimVirgin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SarahSV talk 00:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Quiddity (talk) 02:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Mamunurrashidkazi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mamunurrashidkazi (talk) 09:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  248. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Érico (talk) 09:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Rafaell Russell (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • He is dedicated and more active in different wiki projects.--Rafaell Russell (talk) 10:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  250. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  —MarcoAurelio 12:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Unfortunately I oppose, for the sole reason of me being opposed to the steward-OC double role. Controversial actions can always happen, even unexpectedly, and making people feel uncomfortable reporting possible issues with current OC members is certainly not what we want. I would happily support after Nahid's OC term ended, though, since he is clearly suitable for the steward role. --Vogone (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  As Vogone. Ulflarsen (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rampion (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rampion (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Vogone. It may seem silly but I agree that we need a separation here and people aren't going to go to the stewards with complaints if they are about the same people. Reguyla (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per vogone Sujalajus (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per Vogone, sadly... Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  only because of OC membership. I would vote favorably after the OC membership is over/relinquished. - tucoxn\talk 13:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kubura (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Stewardship requires a lot of years of editor and sysop experience, at least five. So, this candidacy came too too early. Second, problem of double role of steward and OC member, both time consuming, and colisions in which he may fall in as the bearer of both functions. Anyway, with more experience, this user might be a good choice in future. Kubura (talk) 05:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Mediatus (talk) 12:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Esmatly (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Esmatly (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  In accordance with (my vote on) SE2015, no ombudsman with Stewards access. — regards, Revi 17:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  OC CaZeRillo (talk) 09:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm afraid I have to agree with the above concerns. Nahid is an awesome person and he would be a superb steward, but a steward-ombudsman double role should be avoided. SPQRobin (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  OC members shouldn't be eligible. Mirer (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm very disappointed by his response. 6AND5 (talk) 23:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  not neutral Pradeepabk (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  steward / ombudsman conflicting roles should be avoided. --DerekvG (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  OC Wetterwolke (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Per Vogone DangSunM (talk) 20:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. OTAVIO1981 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  OTAVIO1981 (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Per Vogone.[reply]
  37. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Vogone. I am absolutely pro the candidate becoming a steward but it's COI'ish to be a steward and an OC member at the same time. Base (talk) 11:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  per Vogone Ireas (talk) 13:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
Neutral Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  has good crosswiki experience and seems to have the right idea about collaborating with others, so I won't oppose. I don't have any concerns about steward and OC being the same person, but I don't think the workload of being an OC member is compatible with being a steward and may be too much, looking at past cases where it didn't work out so well. Rschen7754 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Would have supported but he recently became an Ombudsman and I'm not in favour of users holding two "important" rights at once, cannot oppose either cause he is a good and deserving candidate.. Stemoc 05:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  your experience for Steward is very low but you can speaks to many languages. Sodeif (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC) per Stemoc[reply]
  12. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I think in a couple years I would consider a 'yes' vote. Would like to see this candidate gain a bit more experience. Wpollard (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Will vote Yes if candidate runs for Steward position in the future, but only if OC membership has been relinquished. Bmhs823 (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 11:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/NahidSultan&oldid=24933286"