User talk:Polimerek

Spróbujmy moze wypracować jedną wersję - zobacz Talk:Zasady postępowania w wypadku trollingu

1. Ja się przy tym układzie "art. X pkt. Y" nie upieram. Zastosowałem go ze względu na łatwiejsze poruszanie sie po takim tekscie. IMHO łŁatwiej znaleźć "art. X pkt. Y" niż "7 zdanie od końce w rodzdziale: XXXXXX". Można jednak zmienić Artykuły na rozdziały - tytuły już są. A listę numerowaną na nienumerowaną. Preeambuła powstałaby z rozbudowania Art. 1
2. Co do "sztabu kryzysowego" - w początkowej fazie konfliktu, gdy jeszcze możłiwa jest mediacja, to dobry pomysł, ale w ostatecznosci o uznaniu kogoś za trola IMHO powienien uznawać ogół, a nie "grupa" po konsultacji, to może niektórym zalatywać TWA w negatywnym rozwinięciu.
3. Gdyby zastosować w całosci twoją propozycję z "sztabem kryzysowym" dochodzimy do pewnego paradkosu: Ta sama grupa zgłasza "podejrzanego" (zatem pewnie popadła z nim w owe konflikty), usiłuje z nim dyskutować (tu dochodzi zapewne do eskalacji istniejacych konfliktów) i wreszczie decyduje o tym, czy "podejrzany" jest trollem. (Nemo iudex idoneus in re sua ;P)
4. Art. 4 pkt. 3 - to ostateczność, gdy łagodne metody zawiodą. Trzeba wziąć pod uwagę, że niektórzy są niereformowalni
5. Art. 4 pkt. 4 - ma zapobiec otoczce i walkom wokół "zjawisk" typu Xcor/Darzbór i Ergonom/Kwiecień. Dwa przypadki to już prawie reguła.
6. Art. 4 pkt. 5 - to dla "miłosiernych"

Art 13 and the rest

I don't want you to get in trouble for the things we say. Is there any way we can talk with those people who don't agree and explain our concerns? Maybe we need to do a little "explanation" here, and just say that we're not against everyting, but that some things make little sense, or cannot go according to the Wikimedia Foundation. Maybe we should talk to those people directly, either on the wiki or on irc if it's at all possible. Do not hesitate to ask me if you think it is a good idea. We have nothing against the Polish you know ;-). you should have seen the debate while we were doing the French bylaws ;-). Best. notafish }<';> 22:55, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and I was just kidding about "the Foundation does not want that", I don't think the board will say anything against it. This only hurts Wikimedia Polska, not the Foundation. The real question that they have to ask themselves is..how are they going to make sure that someone is a contributor? As soon as they have answered with an answer that makes sense, then I'll be fine with the article. This said, I don't really mind. I just think it is an impossible article to keep up :-). notafish }<';>

Ok, I answered Julo on the talk page of the English version. Again, do not hesitate to make clear that if this article stays, I won't scream against the bylaws :-). As I said, I just think it is making life difficult for Wikimedia Polska ;-). Thanks for your patience :) notafish }<';> 00:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Fund drive

The start of the fund drive has been delayed for at least a few days. The reason is to give us more time to prepare more translations, a press release, donor feedback mechanisms (such as automatically listing new PayPal donations), and work on next quarter’s budget. Sorry for the late notice on this. I will update the translation coordination page with the finalized start and end dates after the board decides that on their Friday 9 December meeting. --Daniel Mayer 21:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Scholarship application!

Thanks for the translation polimerek :-) Warning : we are updating the form a little to make it more clear and less, well, boring. (Update available in 30 min or so.) And we are asking people to fill out the application form in English even though the form itself is being translated (we won't have many translators at the conference, so some basic English proficiency will be useful). Please take a look at the new updated form (of course anyone who sends in the older form will be treated just the same; we just want to make it less of a chore to fill out). Sj 23:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Updated. Cheers, Sj

OT

Well... That's a wonderful baby. Compliments, M/ 22:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Polimerek, thanks much for your creation of Polish Wikipedia. Very interesting stuff, much of which I never knew. -- fuzheado 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

BG WP

Hello. I am a sysop on BG WP and I am from Sofia. I saw your (a bit random :-) ) requests to members of our wikipedian community. How can I help you? Btw I saw another colleague who contacted you but I wouldn't advise you to engage with her in case you want to have your work done. :-D --Spiritia 00:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Polimerek/OTRS

Shouldn't this be on the OTRS wiki instead? Cbrown1023 talk 20:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Poke. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 21:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to the Q&As...

... are greatly appreciated. I am currently proofreading your translation—I really value some of your excellent ideas. Thanks a lot for your help! Tomasz W. Kozłowski 07:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

There we are. I hope you agree to this changes. If not, be bold :-) Tomasz W. Kozłowski 08:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I have just marked this as published. If you want to proofread the text, please do so—I will, again, appreciate your contributions. (Uff, we've managed to finish it even before February 5th! Yay!) Best, Tomasz W. Kozłowski 15:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Żmudzinów

Niektórzy Litwini chcą zniszczyć Żmudzinów Wikipedia. Proszę, głosowanie w tej sprawie. Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Samogitian Wikipedia. Samogitia 13:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Hostel w Łodzi a sprawa Sabatu

Cześć! Przykuta powiedział mi, że masz namiar na hostel/schronisko w Łodzi. Myślę o zrobieniu jakiejś oferty pod Sabat w Łodzi. Podesłałbyś mi szczegóły tego miejsca? Z góry dziękuję. 217.153.71.214 13:06, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Translator, We need you!

Dear Polimerek,

You have helped us in previous years with translations and for that we are most grateful. Now we turn towards the 2011/12 fundraiser. It may seem forever away, but work has already begun getting everything ready to go. This year we want to have landing pages covering as many countries in as many languages as possible.

Right now, we want to figure out who is interested in translating for the fundraiser. This year we're hoping to have more of a solidified "core" group of translators that we can count on to have work done by a few key dates, but we'd also welcome help from people who are willing to just help out when they can.

If you would be interested please take a look at this little sign-up survey and fill it out http://survey.wikimedia.org/index.php?sid=13638&newtest=Y&lang=en. With that we can start building a list of people and filling any gaps in the languages we serve.

Many Thanks

Joseph Seddon (User:Jseddon (WMF))

Production Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
Jseddon (WMF) 00:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

WCI Grant

Just to advise you that we have decided to alter the grant request a bit ([1]). Rather than the $4000 from the bootstrap grant which the chapter will withdraw, we now request $15000 from this grant for the support of Budget A + $25,000 for support of Budget B. The change is due to an internal discussion on the amount of time remaining to raise sponsors. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Cheers, AroundTheGlobe 16:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Plans for 2012

Cześć! Wysłałem Ci mejla – nie wiem czy doszedł, więc na wszelki wypadek daje znać tutaj. Pozdrawiam --Mikołka (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

WM-ZA: Gauteng Grant

Hi there. I have answered your question here. Thanks for having a look. --Thuvack (talk) 10:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your translations

Dear Polimerek:

Thank you for helping to translate the WMF Grants Program pages on Meta. Thanks to your efforts, these programs will be accessible to more people all over the world. We would like to send you something in appreciation of your work, so please contact us by Email at grants at wikimedia dot org with your name, shirt size (optional), address for delivery (not a PO Box), and telephone number (for delivery).

We would also like to let you know that our programs are growing and we will need to make some significant changes to these program pages in the next few weeks. When this happens, these pages may need to be retranslated, although much of the new text will be identical or similar to the text you've already translated: you've already translated this text, so you'd be able to copy and paste much from your existing translation. Please consider continuing to support the movement's work in this area, and please continue to let your multilingual friends and colleagues know that this support is still needed as our programs grow!

Please also let us know if you have any feedback for us: it's always welcome.

With appreciation,

Wolliff (talk) 19:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of the Wikimedia Grants Team)

Questions for FDC candidates

Hi :-) thank you for putting yourself forward for the FDC. I want to draw your attention to the list of questions that people can answer to help the Board of Trustees learn more about the people volunteering for the committee. [2] Look forward to seeing your answers. Sydney Poore/--FloNight (talk) 21:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

GDJ

Nie zapomnij się dopisać do konkretnego pokoju - jeszcze tylko 3 dni zapisów ;) Tar Lócesilion (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Grant Conferences and meeting for tenth anniversary of the Galipedia

Hi Polimerek, we have confirmed the venue for this event with the support of University of Santiago de Compostela. I inform you in case you have not seen the last changes of the page of the grant. Cheers, --Elisardojm (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your comments are invited on four current FDC proposals

Hello! As you may know, we've opened the community review period for the current funding round in the Funds Dissemination Committee process. I noticed that in the past you expressed interest in the FDC, since you were a nominee for the committee. I'd like to invite you to review the 4 proposals (totaling $1.3 million USD) that were submitted to the FDC, and to ask questions and share comments about those proposals. You can help to ensure that they have high potential for impact regarding the movement's goals. The FDC especially values comments by community members and will take them into account when they prepare their recommendations. Let me know if you have any questions! --Katy Love, Senior Program Officer, Funds Dissemination Committee, Wikimedia Foundation, 22:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Request for comments

Hi Polimerek, I'd like to solicit your comment on our pending grants:

• Grants:WM PH/Admin operation 2013
• Grants:WM PH/Philippine WikiCon 2013
• Grants:WM_PH/Photo_by_demand
• Grants:WM_PH/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_Exhibit

-- Roel (talk) 07:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Feedback on Foundation Grant

A reply has been posted here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:Aislinn_Dewey/Distribute_WikiReaders_to_Schools

Wikimania Pre-Conference Volunteer Support

Hi Polimerek, I read your comment on our page for the volunteer-support pre-conference just before Wikimania. It would be great if you could share your wikigrants experiences with us during this workshop. Just in order to prepare: How much time would you like me to save for your input? We're still very flexible with the agenda, so we can adapt to your preferences. My very best wishes and I am looking forward to hearing from you, --Muriel Staub (WMCH) (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Polimerek, great. You can easily take 30 Minutes for your session. I assume you will be at the GAC in the afternoon and would therefore like to do your session in the morning? Let's say at 11am? Best wishes, --Muriel Staub (WMCH) (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Polimerek, slight changes: Are you ok with starting your session directly at 10:30am on Thursday at the pre-conference? Then we have enough time and you're in no hurry to change to the other location for noon/afternoon. Let me know if this is ok for you. Best,--Muriel Staub (WMCH) (talk) 13:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikimania 2014

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller and video producer for the Wikimedia Foundation. I'll be looking to capture stories about Wikimedians at Wikimania in London in a week. Here is an example of the kind of thing that I'm aiming to do. I saw that you're attending Wikimania and I was wondering if you might have some time to talk about what do you on Wikimedia projects. Anyway let me know if you are interested, I'll be at Wikimania from the 6th-10th of August and would need maybe 30 minutes of your time. I can answer any questions you may have. I’m best reached at vgrigas(at)wikimedia.org

Thanks!

Vgrigas (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Grants:PEG/WM DK/Buying marketing stuff

Hello Polimerek, As you said on the talk about WMDK's grant request it would be a lot cheaper to get it from Poland. Nobody in WMDK speaks polish, so could you help us out in finding a price and order the banners. I think we will opt for one-sided banners and we are working on the design, but if you can get us a quote, that would be great, so we can finish the grant proces. -HenrikKbh (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2015 2nd meeting

Dear Polimerek,

I am contacting You as a contact person of Poland for the Wikimedia CEE Spring 2015 event and to announce that the second meeting for the Wikimedia CEE Spring organisation team will take place on the 28th of January 2015. There will be 2 discussion groups for the meeting, as to get as much people involved (some of us have other engagements during the daytime and others are not available during the evenings).

The first group will start the discussion 12:00 CET (13:00 EET, 14:00 MSK, 15:00 AMT/AZT, 17:00 ALMT, 3:00 PST).

The second group will start the discussion 18:00 CET (19:00 EET, 20:00 MSK, 21:00 AMT/AZT, 23:00 ALMT, 9:00 PST).

During the discussion both Skype call and IRC will be used. For more details see event meetings page! Wikimedia Eesti will be responsible for moderating the groups, however all contributions to the etherpad protocol are more than welcome!

Thank you for your kind attention and CEE you soon! --Kaarel Vaidla (WM EE) (talk) 12:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Global checkuser requested

Dear member of the Ombudsman Commission. Yesterday (July 18) I filed a formal complaint by sending an email to the OC (see here). I've been falsely accused of having a sockpuppet and, in spite of my requests, the checkusers at the Spanish Wikipedia keep on claiming I control Pelayo Calderón account. That's not true and, IMHO, the only way to clarify it is to perform a global checkuser verification in order to compare my alleged sockpuppet editions (AFAIK, all of them in the Spanish Wikipedia) with mine (mostly in commons, but also in wikidata and other wikipedias... possibly there are a few records of mine also in the Spanish Wikipedia). I'm perfectly aware of the expiration of logs and therefore I'd like to get a fast response, as it seems to be the only way to clean my name. I'd like to get, at least, an acknowledgement, as I haven't received any news after sending my email. If necessary, I can contact you by mail. Just let me know. Many thanks into advance --Discasto (talk) 21:34, 19 July 2015 (UTC) PS: I'm leaving this message to all the members of the OC. Sorry for the spam.

How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?

Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.

After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!

In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:

• Respond to questions on the discussion page of the idea.
• Join a small group conversation.
• Learn more about this consultation.

This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Last call for WMF grants feedback!

Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

wybory stewardów

Nie głosuj dwukrotnie na jedną osobę. Ankry (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Inspire Campaign on content curation & review

I've recently launched an Inspire Campaign to encourage new ideas focusing on content review and curation in Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia volunteers collaboratively manage vast repositories of knowledge, and we’re looking for your ideas about how to manage that knowledge to make it more meaningful and accessible. We invite you to participate and submit ideas, so please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 28th.

All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is welcome - your skills and experience can help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign to improve review and curation tasks so that we can make our content more meaningful and accessible! I JethroBT (WMF) 05:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery.

Participate in the Inspire Campaign and help address harassment!

Through June, we’re organizing an Inspire Campaign to encourage and support new ideas focusing on addressing harassment toward Wikimedia contributors. The 2015 Harassment Survey has shown evidence that harassment in various forms - name calling, threats, discrimination, stalking, and impersonation, among others - is pervasive. Available methods and systems to deal with harassment are also considered to be ineffective. These behaviors are clearly harmful, and in addition, many individuals who experience or witness harassment participate less in Wikimedia projects or stop contributing entirely.

Proposals in any language are welcome during the campaign - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is appreciated, and collaboration is encouraged - your skills and experience may help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign so that we can work together to develop ideas around this important and difficult issue. With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 17:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC) (Opt-out instructions)

Re:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Summary 29th March to 7th April

Hi and thanks for the reporting I proceeded to report it to User: VLui (WMF) that if it is busy. If you have any doubt Face it well to him.It is not my job to bring the summary of on-wiki discussion here. (Also I'm not an active user on the Chinese Wikipedia so I would not know what to tell you). Thanks and regards. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Transparency

With respect to my efforts to improve transparency between the WMF and communities, an overview is here. Basically the WMF was planning a project which was going to cost 10s of million of dollars without the movements awareness (they were instead pitching it to potential donors).

Specifically I stated Oct 7th 2017 "There is a serious lack of transparency around this new "sister project". This has not been discussed with our communities as far as I am aware. Please correct me if I am wrong. As such it has the potential to worsen WMF / community relations. Starting a new sister site without community discussion is not the wiki way."[3]

We now have a new ED and are working together as a movement on a strategy partly as a result of these efforts. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

The Community Wishlist Survey

Hi,

You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.

You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Podziękowania

Witaj. Serdecznie dziękuję za głos poparcia --Gruzin (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Fixes to PL Wiki article

Ahoj Polimerku

I fixed https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Polish_Wikipedia including your 2007 contribution, to prepare it for the UCoC discussions (see plwiki Kawiarenka for the context.)

Hope you do not mind.

Zezen (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)