Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Sjoerddebruin

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Sjoerddebruin

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Sjoerd de Bruin and I was born in the Netherlands. I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia since 2010 and became sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia in November 2013. Wikidata followed in 2013, where I've became sysop in February 2014 and oversighter in August 2015. I'm also helping on OTRS since January 2014. Also has been a member of the Arbitration Committee of the Dutch Wikipedia since March 2016. My main language is Dutch and I have advanced knowledge of English.

    In the last year, I have noticed a lack of active stewards on IRC in, for example, the European mornings. Urgent locks and oversights need to wait a long time for attention. I can complain about that, but I can also try to do something about it. This is one of main reasons why I've nominated myself this year. I'm always online to help people out, the same applies for international and local events in real-life! I have a decent amount of knowledge about LTA's and other situations on various Wikimedia projects.

    As steward, I would like to help with handeling (urgent) IRC requests and requests on the various pages on Meta. I hope the community will support me while I do the same to them.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Sjoerddebruin


Yes

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Admin on two large wikis, and ArbCom experience on nlwiki (which shows dispute resolution experience - sometimes is useful in dealing with difficult issues), as well as experience handling private information. As far as the incident I mentioned on the questions page, that was two years ago and I think that the candidate has proven, both by what they have said subsequently, and by their work as an oversighter on Wikidata, that they have the right attitude in regards to privacy. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Milesjolly1997 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Milesjolly1997 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Vituzzu (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Lingveno (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Pearli (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Miniapolis 15:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  — regards, Revi 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Mainly per Rschen7754. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  While he is not the most experienced candidate, he has a rather diverse experience including Arbcom membership on Dutch Wikipedia and oversight rights on Wikidata. Answers are good as well. This is enough for me to support the candidate — NickK (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Stryn (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  He seems to understand the responsibilities, has the right attitude, has experience in some areas, has specific ideas of where he can and wants to contribute and has a surprisingly good command of English for a Dutchman. Thumbs up. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sabri76 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mainly per Rschen7754.--Sabri76 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ankry (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Taketa (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Terry77 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 19:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  12345danNL (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 Talk to me 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elvesham (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Aledownload (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Ascánder (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  StevenJ81 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mbch331 (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  I'm not sure that inexperience should disqualify a candidate and all their answers were acceptable. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Hoo man (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Make an all-out effort. Eager Lin (Message) 00:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Mykola Swarnyk (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Geagea (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Geagea (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rodejong (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig► 09:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  I could not be less confident that this highly committed user will do an excellent job — TBloemink talk 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Martix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Martix (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Sacha47 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Sacha47 (talk) 15:39, 09. Februar 2017 (UTC)
  53. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ghilt (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Per Rschen7754, he seems to be a good candidate. Syum90 (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Kuuskinen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kuuskinen (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Barras talk 21:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Quedel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Quedel (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Endo999 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Stang 01:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  lNeverCry 02:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Earthscent (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Yogwi21 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Yogwi21 (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Esmost (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Looks ready. OneMember (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  M-J (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Moheen Reeyad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~ Moheen (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Bradipo Lento (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bradipo Lento (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Superyetkin (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lord Roem (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. David S. Hwang (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  David S. Hwang (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  FASTILY 10:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  MannMaus (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  OK for me. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Plasm (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jbergner (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Matanya (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I support this candidate, although I would like to use this opportunity to speak out against computer games, which are vastly inferior to reasonable literature, music and, in particular, mathematics and science. Mathmensch (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Anatoliy (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --თოგო (D) 21:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC) I'd give him a chance, I guess.[reply]
  86. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Worth giving a chance. Dolotta (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 00:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mahir256 (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Legoktm (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Howan Hansi (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Buggia 09:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Arbnos (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Naminsk (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bpierreb (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Addshore (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ·addshore· talk to me! 21:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Pnapora (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Min.neel (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Az1568 (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Jklamo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jklamo (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  104. ChristianKl (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ChristianKl (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Ibra~28 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ibra~28 (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shivanarayana (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Marumari (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Parvezahmed (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Wish you best of luck. Parvezahmed (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Amir (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  109. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 18:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Dispe (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Dispe (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  111. ArisMethymna (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ArisMethymna (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  ArmAg 05:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gts-tg (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Deb (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Deb (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  116. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  BuffaloBob (talk) 14:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  --Fenikals (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Muhraz (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Dan D. Ric (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dan D. Ric (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Taivo (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tobovs (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Popo le Chien (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bff (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  126. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HHubi (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lepricavark (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ymnes (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Odder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  odder (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  131. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Filipović Zoran (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Filipović Zoran (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC) Do not vote twice! Ankry (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  132. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 10:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Ce Ele 415 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  134. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Deryni (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  138. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  UaineSean (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Fine candidate and experience, especially on WD. –SJ talk  19:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Geraki TL 19:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Miguu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Miguu (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Marchy088 (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  142. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Smile4ever (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Edoderoo (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Alan (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  masti <talk> 22:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Foxj (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  — foxj 22:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Jvikings1 (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  148. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Jonathan Groß (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jonathan Groß (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Pngtblrs (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  150. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Helpful admin on Wikidata! WiseWoman (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Samuele2002 (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Good luck !! M.Karelin (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Artur Franca (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Artur Franca (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Matticusmadness (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tried to do this vote a few days ago, and can't seem to find it so I can only assume the mobile interface did mess it up. Anyway, after reading all of the candidate statements, this user seems to be the only one with one very important thing, previous experience with non-public data, as the positions in both an ArbCommittee and an Oversighter position (I believe) entail. As such, this is the only Election member that I can really stage a vote for. MM ("You called?") - ("He's over theeere!") 11:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Gamebuster19901 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Per above. Gamebuster19901 (talk) 13:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Ooo86 (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Lotje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lotje (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kenzia (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Very active at WP.With Experience. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  159. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       T34 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  t34 16:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Radlna15 (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Radlna15 (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cbyd (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Язев (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I think Sjoerddebruin can be trusted with stewardship. There is no glaring reason for me to oppose. Kurtis (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Taweethaも (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  ukexpat (talk) 02:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Paul2 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Paul2 (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kelvin (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wieralee (talk) 10:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cquoi (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Pelz (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 •  Pelz (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 •  Krassdaniel (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jelandstrom (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Jelandstrom (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Zozoulia (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Agremon (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mirinano (talk) 04:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ebear422 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Ebear422 (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Deadrat (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Deadrat (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dick Bos (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elkelon (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       PowerBUL (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  --PowerBUL (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Wiki13 talk 11:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Fantafluflu (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017 •  Fantafluflu (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gaeanautes (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Timk70 question? 21:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Hayordi (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Ptolusque (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dash77 (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  This candidate has been on Wikimedia a long enough time to be a competent steward. Wpollard (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017 •  Experienced functionary across multiple projects. Activity concerns about splitting time with the Arbcom roles are duly noted, but if Sjoerddebruin thinks they can make a contribution as a steward that's worth trying by me :) Snowolf How can I help? 10:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Frettie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Frettie (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Unfortunately, I am not convinced about his aptitude for stewardship. It's hard to know from the statement and the questions whether he understood the role and its policies well or not (especially because he only gave one short answer to the interesting questions for all candidates, even though there was at least one week time for all of this). I have to say however that he handled the theoretical situation question I asked him well. --MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  KPFC 💬 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  While trusted, I would like to see more involvement in cross-wiki activities. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  DCB (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Agree with above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  No activity on Wikiversity! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC) no trust in this candidates ethics. Also not very active as admin/cross wiki.[reply]
  11. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Per Ah3kal. Please, gain more cross-wiki experience and run again next year. Érico (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  No cross-wiki experience, and alegation for his candidature is absurd. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC) No cross-wiki experience, not enough knowledge of other languages[reply]
  14. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Sjoerd, I honestly think you are a very nice person and I'm sure you mean well. But since your activity both as a moderator and as an Arbcom member on nlwiki (can't speak for Wikidata/Commons) is minimal, I really don't see how taking yet another hat it going to improve that. IJzeren Jan (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Slowking4 (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Herby talk thyme 10:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  uses too many three (equivalent of English four) letter words. Besides ex[ects clear language from others while he is himself many times not clear enough to others. In few Latin words quod licet Iovi non licet bovi. The admin task is not a status symbol  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  16:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shotgun pete (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Whaledad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Whaledad (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC) - While I like Sjoerddebruin as a colleague and a person, I think I need to protect him against himself by voting against this. Sjoerddebruin already has too many positions to properly fulfill today, adding one more will only further jeopardize his functioning.[reply]
  21. Yscplus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Yscplus (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Schnatzel (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  a×pdeHello! 10:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  close to a neutral; oversight is nice; not seeing much crosswiki work; and in the end with an arbcom vs stewardry positions ... ouch! focus on one or the other, both is going to be an internal conflict  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Peter b (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  (talk) 13:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Silraks (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Catmando999 (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  JurriaanH (talk) 13:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Per User:billinghurst. JustBerry (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Bestoernesto (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Teles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Looks like a good candidate, but I miss a little more experience. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       DHbdbdbdbdbdb (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  DHbdbdbdbdbdb (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. TmY e12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --TmѰ e12 ✉ 15:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lsanabria (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gag0409 (talk) 13:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  After long consideration, and taking the above comments into account, I think it's better if Sjoerd focuses on his ArbCom work, especially since the lack of much steward work-related experience means he will probably need quite some time to get used to it. The European night/morning issue will hopefully be solved by Matiia who is usually around at the times in question. I may support next year provided Sjoerd becomes more active in the SWMT or helps out otherwise globally. --Vogone (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  The user has no cross-wiki experience. IMHO, that trait is a stewardship prerequisite, as one cannot even have "smaller" flags of global admin and global rollback without it, so no. Not this year. Base (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  African Hope (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Wimmiden (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Thank you for your contributions. But no cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 17:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Tesser4D (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Not trustworthy Tesser4D (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Akoopal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Although he is motivated, I don't have the feeling he has time enough to do all the tasks he is picking up. I think it is better for him to first concentrate on the tasks he has now. Akoopal (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
I do trust Sjoerd, but he is not the most experienced user in areas which concern steward work. The hypothetical situation on the questions was handled well, though. I'm undecided. Vogone (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • I have not seen the user enough cross-wiki patrolling work, however, I think it could equally be useful in some areas of stewards work. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 01:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Cpiebtanz (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Cpiebtanz (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  eurodyne (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  VictorBrice (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rollingcontributor (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I might change my mind if I have time to analyze the profile more deeply. So far i am probably not impressed by the language he knows (we have more nl-N than other languages) and by the platforms he is active. I personally value cross- and meta platform such as commons and wikidata a little bit less than "local" platforms.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  not enough knowledge of languages Maynich (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Gridditsch (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rberchie (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Plagiat (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Not yet. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Sjoerddebruin has been active in wikidata but with some significant gaps (for example why has no admin done anything on Properties for deletion recently?); I'd like to see more focus on fulfilling responsibilties this user already has rather than adding more. ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --SM7 --talk-- 19:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Varina (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Onverwacht (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tvcccp (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Yohannvt (talk) 07:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gampe (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Litlok (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HMSLavender (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Samuele2002)2017 •  Freddy2001 talk 22:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seven twentynine (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017 •  YaganZ (talk) 08:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Nan (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Per confidence from many stewards, but also concerns per Teles/Vogone/Base. Quiddity (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Undecided. Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Sjoerddebruin&oldid=24933289"