Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Tar Lócesilion

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Tar Lócesilion

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Tar Lócesilion talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: pl-N, en-3, fr-2 and la-2
  • Personal info:
    Wiki: I've been an active editor since 2010. On plwiki (my home wiki), I have sysop permissions and am a current (re-elected) member of the local Arbitration Committee. I'm an active member of the local chapter and its Wikigrants Committee (btw, I'm a sysop at pl.wikimedia, too). I have already been familiar with small wikis (for ex. pl.voy - where I have my 3rd mop). My sysop actions depend on the wiki in question. On plwiki, where I am the most active and try to be exceptionally friendly, I rather don't block and prefer gnome-sysop jobs like deleting, merging, responding to sysop requests on an appropriate page, sometimes watching RC and submitting OS requests. On pl.wikimedia, I check RC out regularly. If it comes to cross-wiki vandalisms & global blocks, many of you may remember Wikinger, pl-N user, and his numerous harmful actions. In his case, I was advising Wpedzich whether to block over 450000 IP adresses or not and how to explain the situation to Polish media, our community and users who may suffer from collateral damage. I can be easily reached on 2 IRC channels: #wikipedia-plconnect and #wikimedia-plconnect. If I am elected, I'll be certainly available on #wikimedia-stewardsconnect. Languages: So far, I have more to do with static language activities, than active talking with people, creating own statements, etc. If I've made a mistake here, I'm really sorry and I ensure you that my understanding of texts in foreign languages is definitely better :) Off-wiki: I live in Poland, which is CE(S)T timezone. I study law (finishing: 4th year out of 5) and I major in intellectual property law. More info about me - on my userpage.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Tar Lócesilion


Yes

[edit]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ptjackyll (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       H.Rabiega (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Tar is involved, helpful and trustworthy. I recommend him. H.Rabiega (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mpn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Clever, reliable person Mpn (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Marek Mazurkiewicz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kapsuglan (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Ffkapa (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Ffkapa (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 20:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sebada11 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sebada11 (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mika58 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Mika58 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Torrosbak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Torrosbak (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  --Piotr967 (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mateusz.ns (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Mateusz.ns (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Openbk (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Openbk (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Don't know him well, but he could become a good steward from what I've seen. Let's give him a chance. Trijnsteltalk 22:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Raz1el (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Raz1el (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Toma646 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Из его дискуссии видно, что этот участник рад помагает другим и что он очень уважаемый. Большое плюс и это, что он говорить одним из славянских языков, единственный кандидат, с которым я могу договориться. Z diskuzje tego Wikipedisty widzię, że rad pomaga drugim i że jest na plwiki barzdżo uważamy. Wielkie plus u tego Wikipedisty jest i to że mówię slawianskim językom, jedyny kandydat s którym ja mogym się domówić.--Toma646 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Your Russian is a bit broken (Nothing special, you just use many Czech calques:)); I'm very happy that you're able to speak it, but it's better to try using English, 'cause everybody understands it. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  AGK [•] 23:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Okay. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Exceptional candidate. We need more of such people. They power the future. Gryllida 03:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nicolas1981 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Nicolas1981 (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per Vogone Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. J.Dygas (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --J.Dygas (talk) 08:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Elfix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Trusted, and friendly. I want to believe he'll be helpful. Elfix 08:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Why not? —DerHexer (Talk) 11:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SusikMkr (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  SusikMkr (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Takamaxa (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Takamaxa (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Jerzyjan (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  ok Jerzyjan (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Karol Karolus (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Karol Karolus (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  I know him as a trustworthy, sensible user. The fact that he is a lawyer and will definitely comply with all policies is an added bonus. Pundit (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  Ankry (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Blackfish (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Blackfish (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  I think, we must give you a chance. Good luck! Daemon2010 (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jckowal (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  Jckowal (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  Good workers never enough. There's so much work... Wieralee (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Usteinhoff (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Usteinhoff (talk) 23:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Abd (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Cojan (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Cojan (talk) 06:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Павел Петро (talk) 09:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. PMG (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  PMG (talk) 11:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Uzyj (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Uzyj (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Nux (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Nux (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  The Theosophist (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Kazkaskazkasako (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Bacus15 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Bacus15 (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Wpedzich (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  A lawyer in the making, which makes the candidate policy-conscious. An organiser, responsible in a large part for the user-friendliness of our navigation pages, so an end-user oriented person. Communicative on- and offline, active member of the local chapter. Plus, a fun person to be around with. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 13:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sylwia Ufnalska (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Responsible, intelligent, trustworthy Sylwia Ufnalska (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Patrol110 (Eligible, checked by Trijnstel)2014 •  Good man! Patrol110 (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 17:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Rhinestone K (Not eligible, checked by LlamaAl) •  Rhinestone K (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Weak support as a form of encouragement. I like the way you think, but you are not enough experienced in steward-related areas yet. That's why I'm advising you to read the opposing votes and to improve in preparation for the 2015 elections. Quentinv57 (talk) 18:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. MAx 92 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  --MAx 92 (talk) 19:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Daemusin (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Daemusin (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Support it now. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. MPK100 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  MPK100 (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. El Matador (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  El Matador (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 02:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  No problem. Pratyya (Hello!) 03:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Lumos3 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Lumos3 (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Andrzej19 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Very involved, enough focused on project with good attitude. He's young, but this counts as a value, because young means energy. Andrzej19 (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Russavia (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Whilst I obviously share the same concerns as Odder (oppose) and John Vandenberg (neutral), I have always found Tar L to be friendly, firm and fair. Although the two fore-mentioned editors went different ways, am I willing to support Tar for steward this time around? Absolutnie kurwa tak! Russavia (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Yusek (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  very helpful user. Yusek (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Cynko (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Cynko (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Bosyantek (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Bosyantek (talk) 21:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Kelvin (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Mariusz Swornóg (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Mariusz Swornóg (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Mareklug (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  My strong support for the candidate as steward is 100% contingent on the candidate promising to make redirects from his user page on every WMF project. I don't care how it is done -- by hand or automagically. The reason for my conditional support is simple: I think the candidate cannot be a worse steward than some of our Italian colleagues presently occupying this office; however, I cannot ever remember the candidate's handle (user name), despite my best efforts as an active participant of both #wikipedia-pl and Polish Wikipedia, which happens to be my home wiki. $1 to pl:User:Picus_viridis for routinely branding the nominee as tar_salceson. The Polish-challenged are heretofore directed to look up the Polish word "salceson", which, if I were to guess, is not even Polish in the first place. Cordially, Mareklug (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Glaisher [talk] 17:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wulfstan (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Wulfstan (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Teukros (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Teukros (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Orem (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Orem (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Duży Bartek (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Duży Bartek (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Einsbor (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Einsbor (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Noyescancel (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Noyescancel (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  If elected I hope you will be firm with persons who commit vandalism and make inappropriate edits. I like that you try to deal with people in a friendly manner, however. We need people who do not resort to sarcasm, etc. Wpollard (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. יונה בנדלאק (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  [[user:יונה בנדלאק|Yona B.] 11:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  IJzeren Jan (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. 99kerob (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  99kerob (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Ajpvalente (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ajpvalente (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wnme (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rome2 (talk) 10:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  EKMK (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Володимир Ф (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Володимир Ф (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Luxetowiec (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Luxetowiec (talk) 11:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Jacek555 (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  Jacek555 (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  CT Cooper · talk 17:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Maire (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  I've known Tar as a trustworthy, hard-working and friendly person. Maire (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  KundaliniZero (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Waka Waka (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Chrumps (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Chrumps (talk) 12:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Wertuose (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Wertuose (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Jim Fitzgerald (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 • Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Gamma127 (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Tremonist (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Flyz1 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Flyz1 (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Bpierreb (talk) 07:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Galinhomane (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  Galinhomane (talk) 13:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       GeoTrou (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  GeoTrou (talk) 17:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Abronikowski (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  Abronikowski (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Imprezes (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Imprezes (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Winterst (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Winterst (talk) 06:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Some concerns have been raised about lack of major cross-wiki experience. But the positives greatly outweigh the negatives, and in this case I see a knowledgeable, trustworthy and qualified person. TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --Smartbyte (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Raboe001 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Raboe001 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Gabriel Kielland (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Gabriel Kielland (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Zurbanski (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Zurbanski (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Mátyás (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Lilibalu (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  Lilibalu (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Mala chaubey (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Mala chaubey (talk) 07:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  FASTILY 09:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Yarl (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Yarl (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Masti (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  masti <dyskusja> 19:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Remedios44 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Remedios44 (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Astromp (talk) 23:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. KoverasLupus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  KoverasLupus (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Doctree (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Polimerek (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Polimerek (talk) 18:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Soap (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Soap (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Piastu (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Piastu (talk) 08:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Unimog404 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Unimog404 (talk) 09:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Tomasz Raburski (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Tomasz Raburski (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Triple5 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Triple5 (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Ented (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Ented (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Paskin (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Paskin (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Laberkiste (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Laberkiste (talk) 22:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. I am One of Many (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  I am One of Many (talk) 04:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  With some credit :) Pablo000 (talk) 13:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. M Z Wojalski (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  M Z Wojalski (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Regan1973 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 • Regan1973 (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  小躍 (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I have never run into this user on a steward requests page and I do not believe that this user is active cross-wiki in steward-related areas. Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  He has a relative cross-wiki activity, but I don't see much experience "close to steward areas" except singulary issues (Wikinger). Reading the answer to the question from Quentinv57, I also get the feeling that he won't be really active. MF-W 18:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Odder (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Although I have met Tar Lócesilion in real life, and find him a very reasonable and dedicated Wikimedian, I am afraid that he has very little crosswiki experience, and no experience in steward-related areas. Ideally, I'd want him to gain some experience first, perhaps as a global sysop or member of the SWMT team, and then run for steward again next year. odder (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Steward of Wikipedia to be effective at the other. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Przemek Jahr (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Przemek Jahr (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per above -- DangSunM (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Too early. rubin16 (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 20:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rafandalucia (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rafandalucia (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Byfserag (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Mehran Debate 11:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FiliP ██ 12:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  - NO - per Snowolf, MF-Warburg and Odder... Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Who are you? --Goldenburg111 18:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Please read the statement. PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I agree with MF-Warburg. Mathonius (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per MF-Warburg. Érico Wouters msg 22:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience, and appears to not do the dirty work (i.e. blocking). GyaroMaguus (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Florence (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Hubertl (talk) 10:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Not enough experience. MZaplotnik (contribs) 11:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  per MF-Warburg. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Reade (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per MF-Warburg. --Nemo 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Zhuyifei1999 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per above. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Per Snowolf and others. Looks like an excellent future Steward, but a bit more time on relevant activities first. QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  Insufficient cross-wiki experience. Ruslik (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per aboves - early, not seen much around steward areas etc. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Alan (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Not very experienced in steward/global matters in my opinion, but they might be a good steward if elected. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Agreed with PiRSquared17. Wiki13 talk 18:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  as above Stryn (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Per PiRSquared17. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guycn2 (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 23:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per PiRSquared17. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I agree with PiRSquared17. LlamaAl (talk) 02:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Appears to be a good candidate, but not enough experience yet. Likely to support next year if has more involvement in broader range of wikis. John Vandenberg (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Bene* (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —레비Revi 07:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Taichi - (あ！) 07:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Insufficient knowledge of the candidate to make an assessment.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Zerabat (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 18:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  πr2 (t sums it up perfectly. --AldNonUcallin?☎ 19:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Krol111 (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Slightly concerned by the lack of cross-wiki experience. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience to vote yes. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Technical 13 (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  No concerns, but the candidate has little crosswiki experience. The Anonymouse [talk] 19:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  You seem to be an active and good contributor, but with a lack of cross-wiki experience. Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  LessayCatus (talk) 10:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FeralOink (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Benjamlikesjam (talk) 03:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/Tar_Lócesilion&oldid=19957745"