User:revi C.

ko-N	이 사용자는 한국어가 모어입니다.

en-3	This user has advanced knowledge of English.

de-0	Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch nicht (oder versteht es nur mit beträchtlichen Schwierigkeiten).

fr-0	Cet utilisateur n’a aucune connaissance en français (ou le comprend avec de grandes difficultés).

ja-0	この利用者は日本語が分かりません (または理解するのがかなり困難です)。

zh-0	这位用户不懂或很难理解中文。

This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons (verify).

This user is a member of the Wikimedia VRT. (verify)

This user is an administrator on Wikidata. (verify)

This user is a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team.

Translator in the following language combinations

This translator translates from
English to Korean.

This translator translates from
Korean to English.

Search translators

I am revi ^[1]^[2] - just an editor with full of laziness. See more info about my permissions here.

Contact me

You can leave a message on my talk page.
You can send an email. (You can use GnuPG key to encrypt the email.)
You can contact me via Discord - find my Discord username here. (You can't PM me, though. Figure me out via English Wikipedia server. From there, you can either ping me to enable DM for a short period or join my personal server at the profile to PM me.) or via Libera.chat. (cloaked with .*@wikimedia/-revi. Note that as of 2022 I no longer monitor IRC on a daily basis and I might be disconnected.)

By the way, as of the time when this page is last edited or purged, my home in South Korea is currently 11:13 PM. (click here to refresh the clock!) I may not respond when the time is 12:00 AM ~ 09:00 AM.

Opinions

I will not delete local userpage for GlobalUserPage, as I consider meta page only for meta, and I want to keep globaluserpages independent from meta page. So, don't waste your time asking about it.
Partial block is a nonsense. You can't be civil in one place, and act like bullshit and be 'partial blocked' on the other side of a single project. You get a (sitewide) block from me or no block at all. If some policy demands partial block instead of a 'block', I will stay clear of them. Go ask someone else who will use it. That's not me. Never.
Whoever at WMF making breaking change with impact to community tools MUST ensure that every previously working tool continue to work after breaking change deploys. (I don't care about how. It's developer's job, not user's. I only care whether it works or not.) Otherwise you are saying "I am lazy, I don't do my work" and offloading your work to volunteers. You are creating problem, you should be the one fixing it, not someone else.
Abstract Wikipedia is a mere projection of 'western (specifically Western Europe/North America) values' to the rest of the world. It is bound to be a short version of English Wikipedia for translation. I do not endorse its existence, therefore I do not / will not contribute to that.
Rebranding stuff is a scam. They had their result decided beforehand. It's like North Korean general election: there is only one candidate (rename!) and no other opinion is allowed.
I try not to use support/oppose templates because I want you to read my comment, not the template.
I generally avoid processing any controversial requests and closing RfC. I am not interested in dealing with your problem.
- Mostly because there's other non-controversial business waiting for me without looking at that complex stuff.
I outsource all my mathematical questions to Calculator or WolframAlpha. I don't consider advanced mathematical knowledge (beyond $+$ , $-$ , $\times$ , $\div$ ) essential to my life, and forgot all of them as soon as I was done with it.
I hate CCLv4, so nobody shall use my contribs under CCLv4 even if it becomes default license for Wikimedia. (Maybe I have to retire?)
- I hate it because it will heal the license violation if you fix it in 30 days: I don't want whoever ignore the license to be automatically given second chance. I want to be in control of that.
Langcom should be careful when promoting tests to their own subdomains, and they should be willing to close down inactive wikis (more than they currently do now - which is none).
- Their Closing Project Policy - which says "spambots are always automatically blocked" is outright lie, if it were so why am I deleting spambots from small wikis now and then? What about SRG entries about "Spambots"? Are they witch-hunting? No, LangCom is lying about spambot. They can do better, they must do better.
I would rather block one more spambots, rather than spending my time on hypothetical 2030 stuff.
I always need some ~~coca-cola~~orange juice.

Handy links

COIBot for kowiki: 1
Rename User • Queue
MassGlobalBlock (No interface to also block locally)
Internal Docs

Prompt is my middle name.
— User:Yunshui
— on English Wikipedia 08:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Real life

Attribution: This is copied from Tegel's user page on Meta.
Center of the world for me is South Korea.

This user has never been further
	north	Coordinates: 59.6543942°, 17.9370324°
	south	Coordinates: -33.990900°, 18.432000°
	west	Coordinates: 45.6274°, 8.7131°
	east	Coordinates: 45.5132734°, -73.5546515°
... and higher than 2334 m
... and faster than 300Km/h (yes, on solid ground, that is...)

| | | | ^[3]

Footnotes

↑ When I read this, I read as 'lɛbi', but don't ask why I use revi - I don't know either!
↑ Also, my username has " C." because Username "Revi" is in use, and cannot be usurped.
↑ because it is not possible to miss an online event

[1] When I read this, I read as 'lɛbi', but don't ask why I use revi - I don't know either!

[2] Also, my username has " C." because Username "Revi" is in use, and cannot be usurped.

[3] use it is not possible to miss an online event

[1]

[2]

[3]