Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2025

← Main page

Stewards (2025 confirmation) talk page

This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2025 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards)

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 28 February 2025, 21:00 (UTC) till 06 March 2025, 21:00 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status	Candidate	Notes
Confirmed	Ajraddatz	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Albertoleoncio	Consensus to confirm
Resigned	AmandaNP	Did not run for confirmation
Confirmed	AntiCompositeNumber	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Base	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Bsadowski1	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	DerHexer	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Elton	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	EPIC	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	HakanIST	Clear consensus to confirm
Resigned	Hasley	Did not run for confirmation
Confirmed	Hoo man	Clear consensus to confirm
Removed	JJMC89	No consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Johannnes89	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Jon Kolbert	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	MarcGarver	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Martin Urbanec	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Masti	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Melos	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Mykola7	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	RadiX	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Sakretsu	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Schniggendiller	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Sotiale	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Stryn	Clear consensus to confirm
Resigned	Superpes15	Resigned during confirmations
Confirmed	Tegel	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Vermont	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Wim b	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Xaosflux	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	Yahya	Clear consensus to confirm
Confirmed	علاء	Clear consensus to confirm

Results

• The results of the final decisions have been listed above and implemented. EPIC (talk) 21:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Ajraddatz

Keep: 93 (nuanced contributions to discussions/highly compentent/constructive in debates/good work/positive interactions/helpful/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus —MdsShakil (talk) 16:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:02, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Albertoleoncio

Keep: 68 (valid explanation for activity levels/has remained active on home wiki/no concerns about quality of actions/per others/no comment)
 Weak keep: 14 (willing to improve activity/moral keep/unless they provide they will be active in future/per others/no comment)
Remove: 20 (low activity/only 86 steward actions/unconvincing explanation about what they plan to do as a steward/per others/no comment)
Neutral: 2 (hope for increased activity)

• Since there are a notable amount of remove !votes, but also a lot of keeps, this should be evaluated based on the consensus and arguments of each side. After reviewing the discussion I’m going with a Confirm, although a bit weaker than my other keeps on this page. I see a weak consensus for confirmation here. The concerns of remove !voters has been activity levels, which are indeed valid. But there is also a significant amount of keep !voters who have brought up counterarguments, and the candidate has addressed the concerns raised. Other than that, no concerns regarding trust, communication or their actions were raised. Even looking at this from a "statistics" POV as well, the support rate is around 77% (80% with weak keeps counted in), and above that if blanket removes are discounted. There are some past precedents to this as well, such as Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2016#Bennylin, where the ultimate conclusion was to confirm due to the arguments of keep voters, even with the remove votes taken into account - I think roughly the same applies here as well. With that being said, there isn’t really any strong consensus to keep, but there certainly isn’t consensus for removal either. As such, I am leaning towards confirming - although the removes should definitely be considered, I find the weight of the arguments of the keep !voters and the overall support rate heavier. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - consensus to confirm despite concerns with activity. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm —MdsShakil (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, the consensus is to confirm. While activity levels were low, they weren't so low that they weren't making a valuable contribution. It was also in some respects a very difficult year to be active given how super-active a handful of Stewards were. MarcGarver (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - per MarcGarver. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, the consensus is to confirm ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - consensus despite concerns. masti <talk> 19:02, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm I see a consensus to confirm here despite the activity concerns. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm I believe there's a weak consensus to confirm, taking all the votes arguments into account, even numerically, the tally demonstrates the same. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus met. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm – consensus supports confirmation despite activity concerns. HakanIST (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, I feel like most of the oppose votes came before there was an explanation made as to why the activity was low. Once it was posted I think a consensus formed to consider it reasonable. I myself do see at as such too. --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

AntiCompositeNumber

Keep: 91 (sensible/competent/thoughtful/highly active/knowledgeable/helpful/good work on the Wikimedia Discord/per others/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:45, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:02, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Base

Keep: 76 (acceptable activity levels/valuable work/helpful/trusted/remove vote not convincing without evidence/no indication of trust issues or misconduct/per others/no comment)
Remove: 1 (Concern about communication style/cooperation)
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:45, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:02, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Bsadowski1

Keep: 77 (thanks/valuable work/positive interactions/helpful/active/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

DerHexer

Keep: 103 (good work despite barwiki case/helpful/great user/valuable knowledge/present/active/recognized mistakes/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Elton

Keep: 49 (helpful/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

EPIC

Keep: 112 (active/quick actions/good work but should take concerns into consideration/helpful/rapid scrutineering of enwiki elections/no comment)
 Weak keep: 1 (lenient about mistakes during first year)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 2 (homewiki actions/incautious work/per others)

• Abstain for obvious reasons. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus to confirm, and may I also say that your recent collaboration has been excellent and goes a long way to removing the concerns that I expressed on the other discussion. I really appreciate you taking a step back to let the new stewards learn the ropes. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus, all concerns were raised as expected improvement points rather than reasons to remove. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

HakanIST

Keep: 65 (helpful/useful work/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Hoo man

Keep: 54 (activity levels improving/helpful/knowledgable/useful/no comment)
 Weak keep: 3 (low activity but no controversies)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 1 (low activity)

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

JJMC89

Keep: 30 (other party’s behavior prior to Feeglgeef case was erratic/helpful/lenient during first year/not concerned enough to remove/good work/per others/no comment)
 Weak keep: 3 (pending response to concerns/per others/no comment)
Weak Remove: 2 (lack of response/no comment)
Remove: 26 (poor collaboration/poor communication/poor handling of Feeglgeef and enwiki OS cases/too many controversies/lack of accountability/per others/no comment)
Neutral: 2 (good work despite concerns/no comment)

• Remove with regret and on the slightly weaker side. Regardless of how much I’ve appreciated JJ’s work and think the concerns could have been properly addressed by them, the community has made it clear through their concerns that they think several of JJMC89’s actions, the lack of communication around those actions and the poor collaboration with others have been problematic, as with other concerns raised in the confirmation. With that being said, with 30 keeps to 26 removes (as well as one leaning remove), there simply is no consensus to confirm at this time. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Remove - despite my own opinion, I do not think that JJMC89 has demonstrated consensus of the community to continue as a steward. I hope that they are doing well and that incapacitation was not the reason for the lack of participation in the confirmations. Would reconsider my opinion if we hear from them. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove Stewards should be accountable for their actions and open to receiving criticism from the community. They should actively engage with the community to address concerns, respond to feedback, and ensure transparency in their role. There is no community consensus for them to continue as a steward. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove. It is always regretful when someone loses a bit of the community's trust and we end up in this situation. However, trust can be re-established so standing for election in a future year should not be ruled out if you deal with the concerns raised during the confirmation. Good luck. MarcGarver (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove, regretfully. The community has spoken. Stewards need to be accountable just as any other functionary, and not responding during confirmations (despite being asked for a response) is the bare minimum. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove with regret - per MdsShakil. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove, regretfully. No consensus to confirm as a steward. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove, a pity, but there is no consensu to keep. masti <talk> 19:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove, due to lack of consensus. I find it strange that he has been inactive since the voting began, which implied to the participants that he chose not to answer their questions. Being questioned is part of our role, but the lack of responses is not. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 23:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove No consensus to retain due to lack of response to questions. I will miss having JJMC89's skills, input, and experience around, and I also express hope that their sudden disappearance was not caused by something worse. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove regretfully, no consensus to keep, and the questions and concerns were not addressed. I also hope this sudden disappearance is not something worse and hope to see them returning. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove lack of consensus to retain. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Regretfully, Remove. I myself would vote as weak keep: I think it is quite reasonable to get lost in enwiki procedures as they are vastly different from the majority of other wikis and are notorisious for being uber-bureaucratic; basing on Legoktm's review of the security tickets concerns I do not feel like there was any breach of security made by JJMC89, stewards are entitled to have their own opinions; the RFP situation linked in the discussion is unpleasant though so this is something I would ask the user to do better. Were I strongly in support of the user keeping the rights I would consider overruling the wider community consensus, but unfortunately in this case I feel like there is no choice but to agree with the majority. --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove no consensus to keep--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove. Regretfully. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Remove. with regret. --Daniuu (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Johannnes89

Keep: 101 (no concerns/great first year/rapid scrutineering of enwiki elections/very helpful/good job/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Jon Kolbert

Keep: 58 (glad to see them continue/helpful/thanks/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 1 (inactivity on Commons)

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus, eh. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

MarcGarver

Keep: 47 (helpful/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Martin Urbanec

Keep: 83 (responsive/helpful/home wiki removal was in good faith/single incident/concerns insufficient for removal/responsible/per others/no comment)
 Weak keep: 1 (seems OK)
Remove: 2 (poor handling of Wikidata incident/controversial rights removal on home wiki/giving different users different treatment/lack of responsibility for controversies/per others)
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. I recognize the concerns raised here, but I too think that the cswiki removal was in good faith and the involvement in the Wikidata incident was minimal, and therefore do not find them sufficient for removal. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Masti

Keep: 72 (learned from last year’s concerns/fantastic work/helpful/improvements from last year/per others/no comment)
Remove: 1 (poor attitude in discussions)
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. The concern raised seems to regard a local dispute unrelated to their conduct as a steward. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Melos

Keep: 61 (great first term/active/helpful/competent/no comment)
Remove: 1 (granting of an iswikisource adminship request)
Neutral: 0

• Confirm I do not see that the concern raised here was their fault - Melos indeed acted correctly as the request had no visible objections and no one could have predicted what the admin in question would have done. In either case, there is clear consensus here. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Mykola7

Keep: 75 (thanks/rapid scrutineering of enwiki elections/helpful/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

RadiX

Keep: 61 (valid reason for inactivity/recent activity sufficient/brilliant steward/issue shouldn’t warrant opposition/sorry for loss/helpful)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 2 (no recent activity/no comment)

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Sakretsu

Keep: 53 (helpful/no comment)
Strong Keep: 1 (no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Schniggendiller

Keep: 62 (helpful/friendly/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Sotiale

Keep: 71 (good SRCU work/helpful/kind help/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Stryn

Keep: 55 (net positive despite activity levels/recognizes low activity in statement/helpful/per others/no comment)
 Weak keep: 2 (seems OK/per others)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Tegel

Keep: 71 (helpful/good work/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Vermont

Keep: 83 (of course/squirrel/professional/efficient/helpful/wonderful work/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Wim b

Keep: 38 (not concerned about lock situation/concern insufficient for removal/sufficient activity/helpful/single mistake/isolated incident/no comment)
 Weak keep: 4 (no comment)
Remove: 4 (poor handling of lock situation/lack of responses/low activity/net negative/per others/no comment)
Neutral: 3 (per others/due to concerns raised)

• Confirm I think the concerns raised are valid, but as I've already mentioned, I do not think they rise to the level of removal. Other than that, there is consensus to confirm. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - consensus to confirm, albiet one of the weaker ones. I hope Wim b takes the feedback into account this year. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm —MdsShakil (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 17:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm Consensus to retain. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm consensus to keep. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Xaosflux

Keep: 73 (definitely/easy keep/good VRT work/thanks/great wikipedian/useful work/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Yahya

Keep: 72 (great first term/rapid scrutineering of enwiki elections/helpful/no comment)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

علاء

Keep: 97 (competent/last year’s concerns unjustified/good activity/no concerns/thanks/helpful)
Remove: 0
Neutral: 0

• Confirm per clear consensus. EPIC (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - nihil obstat. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. —MdsShakil (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, consensus is clear. MarcGarver (talk) 08:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. masti <talk> 19:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 22:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm - clear consensus. --Melos (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, no objections. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Sotiale (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm, clear consensus.--HakanIST (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm --Base (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm clear consensus--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --❄️Mykola❄️ 17:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm. --Daniuu (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Note

You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

All stewards running for confirmation

Note

Should you be decided to drop your comment here, please don't forget to add Confirm all or Remove all to your text. The discussion below applies to all stewards listed in the sections above, except the one commenting. Thanks, EPIC (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Confirm all, abstain from DerHexer for obvious reasons. — Yes, there are one or two which are close calls, but for me they are okay, too. I'm pretty sure that the concerns about communication will be taken serious by JJMC89, his technical support is very much appreciated. Albertoleoncio's activity is okay, another chance is a fair option for me. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Confirm all, abstain for myself of course. I agree with DerHexer, although I also understand the arguments for not calling the weak majority of !votes for JJMC89 a weak consensus. --Johannnes89 (talk) 13:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)