Stewards/Confirm/2025/Albertoleoncio

Albertoleoncio

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: pt, en-3
Personal info: Hello everyone! This is my first confirmation as a steward, so I would like to take this opportunity to thank the community for the trust given to me. I have not been as active as I would have liked, mainly because all of our request queues have been quickly emptied, even faster than my mouse can click. Despite this, I am (almost) always available and I try to solve all demands that are presented to me, whether on-wiki or off-wiki, whether complex technical issues or simple doubts, whether participating in meetings with the foundation, or just responding to messages via Telegram. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 13:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

magyar:

Nyelvek:
Személyes információk: translation needed

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Tiếng Việt:

Ngôn ngữ:
Thông tin cá nhân: translation needed

中文（简体）:

可说语言:
个人资料: translation needed

中文（繁體）:

可說語言:
個人資料: translation needed

Comments about Albertoleoncio

Remove very low activity, see Stewards/statistics and Special:Log/Albertoleoncio. --TenWhile6 14:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately, your activity is very low, and is not what I expect from a Steward. --Stïnger （会話） 14:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Remove activity way too low, especially as a first year. --shb (t • c) 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per SHB.--A09|(pogovor) 14:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. aqurs ❄️ 14:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per above, 86 steward-related actions in the past year (not counting renames as you were a renamer prior to being a steward). --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, regretfully, due to the low number of actions, but I would welcome a future request when you'll be able to be more active. --KonstantinaG07 (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Albertoleoncio: what actually have you done as a steward? There's a lot that wouldn't show up publicly, and the stuff you've done seem to fall into that category. More detail would be helpful. Leaderboard (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Leaderboard: The problem is that I don't have "numbers" to present, which is what the community expects me to present, and unfortunately, I don't have them. But that doesn't mean I'm inactive, quite the opposite, but I end up just doing more complicated tasks. Two simple but illustrative examples: EPIC once complained about a page that was impossible to delete because of a database error (task T365482), but I went to solve it. An administrator of a small project asked me to delete almost a thousand pages, and I went to solve it. Again, I know a lot more was expected of me, but I focused on what I thought was most useful, even if it didn't generate as many stats. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 20:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK by me. Keep Leaderboard (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I have talked in private with Alberto regarding this application, and I took in consideration his position of acknowledging that activity last year was not adequate. However, as it was his first year and as he actually acknowledges that is an issue and is willing to improve it, I would consider keeping. He is careful with sensitive information, dilligent with his actions, and I see no harm on giving him another try.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards a weak keep per Teles above and as their activity has been just about sufficient, although not that high. I'll probably be coming back here if I have a final opinion. EPIC (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per TenWhile6 and SHB. --Wüstenspringmaus _talk 15:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactive user. JrandWP (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I had expected you to be much more active than you were, and as much as I would like to assume good faith that your activity will improve and that you are taking time getting into the tools, I think a year is more than enough time to get into the swing of how things are working. Sorry. --Ferien (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sad to see you go but with such low activity I cannot vote differently. --Jan Myšák (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very Weak keep per Teles; I don't think there is harm in giving them another term to become more active. I would absolutely be a remove in 2026 if activity levels do not improve. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove —Aopou {talk} 20:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Zafkiel GD | Talk 20:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, very week keep. Let's give him another chance, he might get more active in this year. This is not the last stewatds' election in our lives (hopefully), if the activity doesn't get better over the course of the next couple of months, he can always be removed in 12 months from now. Karol739 (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to low activity. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 03:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per above. Neriah - 💬 - 08:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, too inactive as a steward. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and somewhat strongly. I can understand the minimal on-wiki actions this year - it has not been a great year to learn how to be a steward, with very few entry-level requests available as a result of EPIC handling a majority of requests with very short response times. Albertoleoncio has remained active on his home wiki, where he is still a functionary, and for this year I think an exception is best. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 15:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Vermont, this was a bad year to be a new steward. Absent any signs of lack of trust, I think they should be given another chance. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Given that Albert's own explanation of what he's done is something that could have been done with only Global Sysop rights it utterly fails to convince me. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 16:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]