Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2025/Votes/TheresNoTime

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

TheresNoTime

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-N, de-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Sammy, and I've been editing Wikimedia projects since around 2008.

    I was previously a steward between 2018 and 2020, and then again briefly between 2022 and 2023. I am currently a global sysop, as well as a checkuser on the English Wikipedia.

    As the result of an English Wikipedia ArbCom case in November 2022, I had both checkuser and oversighter rights removed for cause. In October 2024 I requested the restoration of my CheckUser permissions (via the normal application process) and was successful.

    During my 2023 steward confirmation, I failed to mention this incident nor loss of tools. I should have been transparent and upfront about my mistakes, and I apologise for falling short of the high standard of transparency the community expects of stewards.

    This incident is a blot on what I otherwise hope can be agreed to be a good record of stewardship — as many kindly pointed out in my successful 2019 confirmation, I committed significant time to reducing SRG's backlog and being responsive on IRC. Although the loss of permissions, and resultant inability to help in the ways I had gotten used to/enjoyed, has significantly impacted my local and global activity, I have maintained some activity helping out as a global sysop (SRGR).

    If re-elected, I can again offer the steward team my technical knowledge, previous experience with the tools, familiarity with global policy, experience with combating spam/automated vandals, and a good chunk of my free time. I know I messed up, I am sorry about that, and hope that the community can see fit to give me a second chance to do the work that I enjoy and do well. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 00:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2025/Questions#TheresNoTime


Yes

[edit]
  1. Skilsdhuo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Skilsdhuo (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Arcticocean (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  arcticocean ■ 14:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  I'm nervously supporting, though I'm not very happy with the response to the GS activity question, which reminds me of their low SPI clerk activity before requesting CheckUser. My vote in 2022 was already an extension of AGF, but I'm doing so again mainly based on the reflection and commitments in their request for CheckUser in October. TNT, please be careful, because I'm not sure how willing the Community is to provide third and fourth chances. All the best! Sdrqaz (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stang (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Stang 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  great work when they held steward permissions in the past. I think TNT has learned from their mistakes and has regained the necessary trust. Johannnes89 (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --Minilammas (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tulsi (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Please be kind if they wanted to return back to the Stewards' work. I urge to give them an another chance. Best of luck, Sammy! Tulsi 24x7 14:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I think they've learned from their mistakes and would once again be a good steward. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good luck! Nurtenge (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Very able candidate, though I echo Sdrqaz's comment - I can't think of another user with these many chances. I didn't see the answer to Wikibayer's question as particularly problematic. Leaderboard (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  The issues TNT had were basically because of their work as an English Wikipedia Checkuser. Since enwiki has already decided to restore checkuser I don't see much sense in saying TNT shouldn't be a steward. For context following the ArbCom case, TNT lashed out at me both on and off wiki. They've since apologized (and I obviously accept) so I am very aware of the past issues and still find myself ready to again support them as steward. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Taavi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Taavi (talk!) 15:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Iming (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Yours sincerely, Iming 彼女の愛は、甘くて痛い。 15:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  V0lkanic (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Drummingman (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Talimu0518 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Talimu0518 (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hasley (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Sgd. —Hasley 15:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hey man im josh (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Hey man im josh (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Well very well (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Well very well (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Vermont (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Thank you for volunteering to return as a steward, Sammy, and for being open about what happened. I think the steward team would benefit significantly if you return. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 16:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 16:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. ~aanzx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --~aanzx · ✉ · © 16:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. نعيم قربوسي (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  نعيم قربوسي (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Alachuckthebuck (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  They have learned from their mistakes, and I have seen change. All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Stjn (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Assuming good faith with hope that enWP drama would not affect things any more. stjn[ru] 18:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  I voted against you in 2022 due to a low amount of cross-wiki activity (justification for some of the oppose votes now) but was proved wrong by your brilliant work as a steward in that term. The OS situation was obviously poor but you've taken full accountability for it now and I can certainly trust it won't happen again. --Ferien (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  I support a second chance here. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Aopou (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  —Aopou {talk} 19:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  This is an usual request, stewards who lost their role in a similar way generally do not rerun. However, you addressed the 2022 events exceptionally way, and I have no issues with trusting your judgement. Thank you for volunteering and good luck! Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Achim55 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Achim55 (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Meiræ 20:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Leserättin (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Leserättin (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yahya (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 20:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I very weakly supported confirmation in 2023, but am happy to lend a stronger support here. It takes a great deal of humility and introspection to unconditionally own mistakes made that publicly, and it speaks to the kind of qualities we want from our stewards. Alongside their previous (very good) track record, I'd be happy to see Sammy return to stewardship. Best of luck. Giraffer (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Shushugah (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  They messed up in 2023, combing some necessary actions with unnecessary overreach. I find their explanation very convincing and apologetic. Happy to trust this user Shushugah (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jet Pilot (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Jet Pilot 01:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Pólux (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  I appreciate their recognizing of past mistakes and support giving them another chance. Pólux (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. HouseBlaster (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Echoing Sdrqaz in their entirety. HouseBlaster (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Elli (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Elli (talk) 03:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:33, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Thank you for your consideration. Your experience would be a great addition to the team. ~ Nahid Talk 07:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. 1AmNobody24 (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Nobody (talk) 08:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Sdkb (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Sdkb talk 08:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 09:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mx Lucy (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Mx Lucy (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Sohom Datta (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Sohom (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Bunnypranav (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:12, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  cyrfaw (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. WindTempos (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  More than capable, and I am satisfied by the level of transparency regarding the enwiki ArbCom case WindTempos (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Pppery (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  * Pppery * it has begun 15:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per Giraffer. –FlyingAce✈hello 16:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  dwadieff ✉ 17:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Tol (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Don-kun (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  61. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  HakanIST (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ookap (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Ookap (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  63. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Mtarch11 (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  65. MolecularPilot (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Without a doubt. They've clearly learned from their mistakes (which for those who don't have time to read through the whole was, was running a CU on someone when it wasn't really warranted, but they've never shared any confidential data without anyone else) and have already regained the communities' trust (and CU rights). I think being able to own up when you are wrong, admit your mistakes and learn from them in future makes someone an even better steward. They are someone who is always so kind and caring to people of all experience levels everywhere across Wikimedia - including the wikis but also discord and gerrit/phab and would make a perfect steward. :) MolecularPilot (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Ulricus Angelus (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Ulricus Angelus (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Trasheater Midir (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  100% support for our 🦊. Trasheater Midir (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  68. AmandaNP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  -- Amanda (she/her) 09:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Steven Sun (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Steven Sun (talk) 09:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I don't see why not Saederup92 (talk) 09:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Shahnamk (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Shahnamk (talk) 09:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Wim b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Wim b 11:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  73. S8321414 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  S8321414 (talk) 11:29, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Yes, yes, yes. Eta Carinae (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Altamel (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Altamel (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  76. QuicoleJR (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  I trust them with a second chance. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ulubatli Hasan (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Hasan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Melquíades (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Melquíades (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  --Ankermast (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  80. DynamicFolklore (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Folklorelet`s Talk! 21:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Adtonko (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Rin [ T · C ] 04:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nanona15dobato (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  nanona(15) 04:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  84. EN-Jungwon (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2025 •  -- EN-Jungwon 07:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  85. نوفاك اتشمان (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Helpful global user. نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 10:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Kocgs (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Amir (talk) 13:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Hide on Rosé (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Welcome back Phương Linh (thảo luận) 14:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Alien333 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  They have visibly learned from their mistakes. — Alien  3
    3 3     18:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Summer92 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Summer talk 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Dispe (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Dispe (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Skarmory (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  I do not see any reason to expect TNT to run into the same issues that caused her resignation in 2023 again. Skarmory (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Three Sixty (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  The CU incident was a one-off issue that was not part of a broader pattern of behavior. TNT clearly regrets it and has learned from the mistake. ⟲ Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 02:55, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 07:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per Barkeep + I trust they will be a good steward Tar Lócesilion (talk) 12:41, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Antoine.b (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Novem Linguae (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Kristbaum (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Kristbaum (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2025 •  Harlock81 (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Timtrent (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Timtrent (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Atsme (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Will make an EXCELLENT steward. Atsme📞📧 17:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  104. KonstantinaG07 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  After a lot of consideration, per Barkeeper49. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  I am entirely aware of the previous rights removal, situation, and following apology. The Wikipedia process supports transparency and reconciliation. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Aca (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Aca (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Zippybonzo (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Zippybonzo (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Lollo98 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Lollo98 Text me 22:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Sennecaster (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  I trust TNT and have found them consistently sincere, reflective, and willing to do work to improve themself. Their return to enwiki CU has been fine. Sennecaster (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Ldorfman (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Ldorfman (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  111. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  20041027 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾（talk） 06:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Galahad (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Second chance Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 06:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  – Ammarpad (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  114. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  They have taken into consideration and learned from their past mistakes, and have done good admin work on en.wiki, which makes me believe that they're ready for a second chance. Chris ☁️(talk - contribs) 22:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  115. L235 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  KevinL (aka L235 · t) 01:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  116. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  No concerns ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Gadir (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Sincerely, Gadir (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User3749 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Leaning towards yes, willing to give another chance. User3749 (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  119. M7 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  M/ (talk) 09:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Niryhpr (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Niryhpr (talk) 10:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  121. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Yes vote. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 11:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Reading Beans (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Let’s get done with this; there’s no time. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Estrellato (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Great experiences with TNT from checkuser on enwp Estrellato (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Alexisdepris (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •   Alexis EBRC Member 16:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  125. SAaphIrEblUE (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Supportive of most of the tasks and ideas as described. SAaphIrEblUE (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Nazgul02 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Nazgul02 (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Lightoil (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Lightoil (talk) 00:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  128. ThiagoSousaSilveira (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  ThiagoSousaSilveira (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 09:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Wiki Jonathan2 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wiki Jonathan2 (talk) 13:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  131. AF1011 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  AF1011 (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Seawolf35 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  They have obviously learned from their past mistakes. Seawolf35 (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Schützenpanzer (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Schützenpanzer (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Rares Kosa (Not eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) •  Rares Kosa (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Joalpe (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Günther Pabst (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Günther Pabst (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  137. TypeInfo (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  TYPEINFO (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Grasmat (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Grasmat (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Sakretsu (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  per Ajraddatz and Barkeep49 Sakretsu (炸裂) 12:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Ruy (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Ruy (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  141. JohnLaurens333 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  JohnLaurens333 (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Mdaniels5757 (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Ivan1ab (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Ivan1ab (talk) 06:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  144. DatGuy (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  DatGuy (talk) 11:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Teles (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Tzim78 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Tzim78 (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Isla (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Trusted and admits making a mistake and also was a former Steward and while they made a mistake causing them to lose their CheckUser and Oversight rights on EN Wikipedia they successfully gotten their CheckUser right back as per EN Wikipedia ArbCom appointments in October despite having previously lost the right i do not believe they will have any issues in the future. Isla (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  148. DBrown SPS (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  DBrown SPS (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Aydoh8 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Aydoh8 (talk) 12:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 15:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  151. QuickWittedHare (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  QuickWittedHare (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  152. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  — MusikAnimal talk 20:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Ciell (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Ciell (talk) 08:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Jeff G. (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 14:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Mbch331 (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Fathoms Below (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Willing to grant a second chance, and I'm unconvinced by the opposing arguments. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Spielvogel (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Sheriff U3 (Not eligible, checked by Galahad) •  Your record looks good although you have made mistakes you recognize them and try to do better. Also you are the only one who is largely active on the English Wiki. Sheriff U3 (talk) 03:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Känguru1890 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Känguru1890 (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Thesavagenorwegian (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  TheSavageNorwegian 17:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Mö1997 (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  always a yes from me. TNT is awesome, responsive and level headed. Praxidicae (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  162. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 21:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Flnario (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  I assume good faith. Flnario (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Tanbiruzzaman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 21:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Antoine2711 (Not eligible, checked by Galahad) • Antoine2711 (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Legonin (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Legonin (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Redmin (Not eligible, checked by SHB2000) •  Redmin (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  167. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  FeralOink (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Awesome Aasim (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  TNT made a mistake and they acknowledged it. It is certainly a big learning moment that TNT had in 2022. I am pretty sure they will be much stronger and not repeat this mistake ever. Aasim 00:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Babegriev (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  Mistakes were made and acknowledged. Time to move on Babegriev (talk) 07:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Sunnyboi18 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  I'am not familiar with whatever did happen with this user, but the fact they got their permissions back, and have clearly been doing a good job since then, and have 17 years of experience with Wikimedia. I don't see a reason to not support this user once again, especially since the seats for Stewards are not limited, which I don't think everyone is aware of. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 10:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Unite together (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  High time to return! U.T. 12:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Ashlar (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Ashlar (talk) 04:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  174. JJPMaster (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Reluctantly. I think they've proven themselves to be trustworthy after regaining CheckUser rights on en.wiki, but that was quite recent. JJPMaster (she/they) 04:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  175. 3PPYB6 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 06:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Joris Darlington Quarshie (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Ahri Boy (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Welcome back. Ahri Boy (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Kudpung (talk) 01:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Frostly (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Frostly (talk) 05:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 07:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Doc.Heintz (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Doc.Heintz (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  — Jules* talk 11:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  183. ZandDev (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  ZandDev (talk) 14:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Asked42 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Asked42 (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Revi C. (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  Passes SE voting criteria, but TNT's pattern of mid-term resignation worries me. This is probably the last support I'd give TNT @ SE. — regards, Revi 18:04, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Aleator (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Aleator (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ivan1ab (Verification pending) •  Ivan1ab (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Struck as already voted. Svārtava (tɕ) 20:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  187. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:03, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  188. CFA (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  CFA (talk) 02:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Oksmel 70 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Oksmel 70 (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Bosco Sin (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Bosco (talk) 09:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Robertjamal12 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Robertjamal12 ~🔔 12:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Taivo (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Capodeturkiye (Not eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) •  Capodeturkiye (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  193. BRPever (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  TNT has done well in the past, now that they have returned to being a CU in enwiki, I don't see why they are not ready for this role. They have experience in the role, are reasonably active crosswiki and in meta, have more than required technical knowledge for the role. I only see pluses here. BRP ever 16:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  194. ElleAnónime (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Anónime (Talk; they/them) 21:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  ❄️Mykola❄️ 21:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  196. NickK (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  NickK (talk) 23:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Hiàn (talk) 00:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Leotalk 01:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Diamond315 (Eligible, checked by Aopou)2025 •  Diamond315 (talk) 02:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Titore (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Titore (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Ooligan (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  "Making Time" for TheresNoTime. Many good people have trust in you to do good here in the future. I hope you will honor, and earn, their trust. Respectfully, Ooligan (talk) 05:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  202. OwenBlacker (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  OwenBlacker (Talk; he/him) 10:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  203. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 11:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Nacaru (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Nacaru · Talk ✉ 11:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  205. علاء (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --Alaa :)..! 11:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Melos (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Melos (talk) 12:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  207. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  —MdsShakil (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. A09 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Weak oppose. It's a mixture of your previous actions, and even though I acknowledge your apology and salute you for your honesty, I'd like to see increased crosswiki experience with stew candidates.--A09|(pogovor) 14:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I was initially going to support – you knew you messed up, and I think the way you handled that going forward was very well and is the textbook example of what should be done. What confuses me is your response to WikiBayer’s question – if GS work was never your focus from the get-go, why did you apply for GS in the first place? Your stated answer doesn’t address that, and ultimately my reason for voting a weak oppose. //shb (t • c) 14:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi SHB2000, I hope you don't mind the direct reply here — I made a clarification to the answer in question, which I humbly hope may address the reasons for your vote. Many thanks :) — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No certainly, I don't mind the direct reply :). I'll probably think about it because I don't know how to feel about applying for a perm and then not using it on a large scale, but thanks for following up. //shb (t • c) 22:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This all said I'll probably support you if this request fails and you decide to run next year given 1 extra year of more experience in the perms you recently regained is more than enough for me. //shb (t • c) 22:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Weak oppose as it doesn't inspire confidence for now, given your previous actions that led to losing advanced permissions, and your answer at WikiBayer's question. I think it would be great if you have more crosswiki experience as well, so I may support in the future. --Stïnger （会話） 14:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BZPN (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per above. BZPN (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Lumihiutale (Not eligible, checked by TenWhile6) •  Lumihiutale (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. FusionSub (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  I'm sorry, but your activity levels aren't giving me much hope at this moment, with your most recent 50 global contributions going back to early/mid December. -FusionSub (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Per other opponents' reasons. Jusjih (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. DCB (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  DCB (talk) 20:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  MF-W 20:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 20:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Strange pen name PoetVeches (talk) 21:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Hehua (talk) 04:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. JustARandomEditor123 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 07:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  With sadness, as I think TNT is a great contributor, especially after the revocation of their CUOS rights and the failed steward confirmation. (In particular, their software contributions, and helping out on a less prominent scale since then.)
    I'm not sure if TNT ended up just spread too thin with the many responsibilities, or... In any case, I am concerned about the quick rate of regaining advanced permissions, in combination with the previous incident. I just get the feeling it doesn't end well. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Ankry (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Regretfully, I just don't think such a high-stress role is a good fit. Rschen7754 19:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. KaiEnTai-DX-Fan (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  per above but particularly per ProcrastinatingReader's take. KaiEnTai-DX-Fan (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Microplastic Consumer (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Many better candidates who lack the baggage and instability, wishing you the best in future editing. --Microplastic Consumer (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi! Welcome to Meta!! Just in case you didn't know, Steward Elections aren't like a typical election where only a fixed number of candidates can be elected (I know, all the processes can seem really confusing at first!), but where theoretically every candidate could become a steward if the community wanted, so it's not like you have to chose between candidates! :) MolecularPilot (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for pointing that out and educating me on that!
    Microplastic Consumer (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. RoyZuo (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  --RoyZuo (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grandmaster Huon (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Per FusionSub. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per A09 and ProcrastinatingReader. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Fenikals (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. JayCubby (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Too many concerns, many many chances. JayCubby (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Superspritz (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Superspritztell me 23:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Edelseider (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Edelseider (talk) 09:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Per ProcrastinatingReader and others. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Gymate (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Gymate (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Not yet, more time is needed after past issues. Possibly regaining some other roles first also. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 16:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Yeah, let's give a year or two. ミラP@Miraclepine 15:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Poor activity of late, combined with the loss-of-confidence due to the 2022 CU abuse and related matters, land me in the oppose camp by a fine margin. TNT's technical work with the WMF is much, much appreciated, but I don't think they are ready for a return to stewardship. Not yet. JavaHurricane 16:47, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ikan Kekek (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  I'm troubled by their history, as laid out in their statement. Those who know them better may be better placed to judge this, but from the outside, I prefer to vote for people without problematic histories. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  As per ProcrastinatingReader, A09, and EPIC's concerns, I don't think Sammy is fit to be steward for now. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Vizziee (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Vizziee (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Widr (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 •  Widr (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. موسى (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Musa (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Moguy (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Moguy (talk) 21:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  For me, the 2022 situation is disqualifying. Lepricavark (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Franzekafka (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Franzekafka (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. 2x2leax (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  --2x2leax (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Lentokonefani (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Lentokonefani (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Smaug the Golden (Eligible, checked by Skilsdhuo)2025 • --Smaug the Golden (talk - my contributions) 23:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Pavel200071 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Pavel200071 (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wizardman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  After what happened in 2022 I cannot trust this user as a Steward. Wizardman (talk) 22:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Tống Thành Hưng (Not eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu) •  Tống Thành Hưng (talk) 23:56, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. 1989 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Given the CU right was just returned to them, I prefer the candidate demonstrates proper usage first before requesting more advanced rights. 1989 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Dilettante (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Dilettante (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Kadı (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)2025 •  Kadı Message 08:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. MLTRock (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  MLTRock (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Omar7812 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Omar7812 (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. MrAureliusR (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  MrAureliusR (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Holder (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Holder (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Lordgilman (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Lordgilman (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Not this year. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 06:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Wozal (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Per concerns expressed above. Wozal (talk) 20:51, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Dash77 (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ciridae (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Ciridae (talk) 07:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Count Count (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Count Count (talk) 11:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Daask (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2025 •  Daask (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Homeostasis07 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Homeostasis07 (talk) 03:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. EPIC (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I'm neutral here, though leaning towards yes. They have relevant experience as a global sysop as well as a checkuser on enwiki and a former steward, but as pointed out in one of the questions I see several advanced rights and low usage of them, even on their home wiki (cf. the already public logs and en:Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit/Statistics), and this makes me have some activity concerns. On the other hand I also cannot oppose, since as already mentioned they have been a steward in the past and my interactions with them in the stewards' IRC channel have been positive. I also would like to note that I do not care about the past CheckUser issues on enwiki, as it was now over two years ago and TNT has made it clear through their apology that they regret their actions. EPIC (talk) 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    TNT has been above the median number of checks for English Checkuser in each of the 3 months they've had checkuser again. This true when considering all CUs and just CUs with at least 1 check in that month. I don't think it's fair to call that "low usage" when they've been in the upper half of users. I think that's not a good example of low usage compared to SPI or GS. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm mainly referring to activity in the roles combined, which wouldn't only include enwiki CU. EPIC (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  TenWhile6 14:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  As mentioned by SHB2000, your activity level as a GS isn't that promising and GS don't operate here on Meta so applying for the flag and not actively using it isn't something I'd support. However, being willing to admit one's mistake is a commendable act. Thus, neutral --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  People make mistakes, but IMO it is too soon after the 2023 confirmation (only one election skipped), more so when considering how quickly you have already been gaining back advanced permissions recently – and that in at least one case (as mentioned by some) where the need for the tools was rather unclear. Good luck. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     14:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Aqurs1 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  aqurs ❄️ 14:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Neutral, leaning yes. After the 2022 Arbcom case, you need more time in the future to reflect yourself. JrandWP (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Adelaideslement8723 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  You have not been very active as of recent, I could have voted no but your contribs are good and not disrupting anything so I am going to keep neutral. 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 𝒥𝑜𝒽𝓃𝓈𝑜𝓃 (adelaide)🩷T💫C🌺E 15:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wüstenspringmaus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ternera (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Per the concerns raised by epic and shb. Ternera (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Tvcccp (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sink Cat (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 22:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Codename Noreste (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Codename Noreste (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Miniapolis 23:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  per above comments Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Karol739 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Karol739 (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Daniuu (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Xacaranda (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  I am a bit concerned about the CU thing on enwiki. Xacaranda (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Daisytheduck (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Daisytheduck (talk) 05:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  with ProcrastinatingReader's thoughts in mind Mahir256 (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2025 •  Turkmen talk 08:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Caiaffa (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Aspere (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Aspere (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Rzuwig► 12:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Icandostuff (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Icandostuff (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Wolverène (talk) 04:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ratekreel (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  --Ratekreel (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Veracious (Eligible, checked by sdrqaz)2025 •  Veracious (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Wüstenspringmaus)2025 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tetiana Tkachuk (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Tetiana Tkachuk (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Al Lemos (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2025 •  Al Lemos (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Aurodea108 (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  Aurodea108 (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ)2025 •  ——d—n—f (talk) 18:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mirzoulugʻbek (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  M𝐢rzoUlug'𝐁𝐞k 👤💬 06:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Choucas Bleu (Eligible, checked by Cactusisme)2025 •  Choucas Bleu 🐦‍⬛ 22:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Voceta (Eligible, checked by Galahad)2025 •  Voceta (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Alex Pereira falaê 17:36, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. El flacucho venezolano (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  El flacucho venezolano (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Starlighsky (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Starlighsky (talk) 00:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
       Flyingphoenixchips (Not eligible, checked by ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ) •  Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 20:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 05:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Brightt11 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  bright mensaje 19:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Päppi (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Päppi (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. HippoLoid (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  HippoLoid (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Masti (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  masti <talk> 11:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Oq10pass (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Oq10pass (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. OrangKalideres (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  OrangKalideres (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2025/Votes/TheresNoTime&oldid=28318052"