User talk:Ternera
Add topicWelcome to Meta!
[edit]Hello, Ternera. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I would like to completely delete the page on me. It is not factual and does not accurately describe my life. What's the point? FAltimare (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @FAltimare. Please note that it is highly frowned upon to write or edit articles about yourself on Wikipedia. You should read en:WP:ASFAQ for more information. Ternera (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
reverted my software engineering what is API section
[edit]dear ternera i edited software engineering i inserted API section i explained API and clearly the section is explained it is self evident and explained without any error and makes perfect logic you reverted my edit can i know what is the problem here Adnanyounis123 (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Adnanyounis123. I reverted this because some of the text seemed AI generated. There were parts that didn't match up with your writing style. Ternera (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- yes the first part is i took from book (Digital electronics, principles, devices and applications , Anil K.Maini, 2007)
- the bottom part i wrote myself. Adnanyounis123 (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
IceTre Acceptance
[edit]Hello there, about 12 days ago you nominated “IceTre” for deletion and in the most recent comment on the “IceTre” deletion talk page I gave absolute without a doubt proof of the subject’s notability (I was able to prove that the subject has released two or more albums on a major record label / or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).) There has been no response from anyone in 5 days so I am asking for you to please grant acceptance of the subject’s wiki.
Since it’s been 5 days after the 17th when a decision was to be made I fear that it may become forgotten about. You had originally nominated it for deletion but since it has almost been 2 weeks I don’t want to burden you with it. If you can close the request and grant its acceptance then I can continue to work on the subjects wiki and add in more sources to keep the page in healthy and proper condition and you can further continue your work here on Wiki and outside of it as well. Please let me know if that is agreeable. Thank you. Stephenbestk28 (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Stephenbestk28. I am not an administrator on simplewiki, so I am unable to close the AfD. You will have to wait for an administrator to check on things and make a decision. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 23:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Misrepresentation
[edit]It is with the utmost gravity that I address the actions of a particular editor who, in their misguided fervor, sought to condemn my contributions to deletion under the guise of combating ‘spam’ or ‘promotion.’ Such an assertion, bereft of merit and heedless of the broader significance of the work in question, constitutes a profound disservice—not merely to me as an individual but to the intersex community whose stories, struggles, and triumphs find so few champions in the public domain.
This ill-judged call for removal, executed without due regard for the labor and authenticity underpinning my efforts, is deleterious to the progress of inclusion, equity, and representation. It seeks, unwittingly or otherwise, to silence a voice that has endeavored to contribute meaningfully to the tapestry of human experience, shedding light where shadows have too long prevailed.
Let it be understood that such a cavalier dismissal of contributions bearing intrinsic value cannot, and should not, be tolerated. The noble enterprise of shared knowledge demands discernment and fairness, not the blunt instrument of unreasoned censorship. I beseech those entrusted with the stewardship of such platforms to exercise their judgments with care, to recognize the dignity of diverse narratives, and to ensure that no earnest labor is cast aside without due consideration of its worth.
In so doing, we safeguard not only the integrity of the medium but also the fragile, irreplaceable threads of voices that might otherwise be lost to history. Let my plea serve as both a protest and a call to higher standards of justice and wisdom in the curation of knowledge Jwilson10835 (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)