Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2022/Votes/TheresNoTime

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2022 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

TheresNoTime

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-N, de-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hey, I'm Sammy, but you likely know me as TheresNoTime. I was previously a steward (2018 - 2020), and am standing for re-election after a break from Wikimedia projects for personal/mental health reasons.

    The sudden and unannounced break (and the concern it caused) is something I regret deeply - I believe as stewards we have a commitment to maintain a certain level of activity, and if re-elected I will ensure I devote the time needed to effectively contribute to the backlogs and assisting the global community.

    As I mentioned in my previous election statement, I am a checkuser and oversighter on my home wiki, the English Wikipedia. Since then, my proficiency in using these tools has increased tenfold. I was also a Meta administrator (RfA) during a portion of my stewardship, and used this access to maintain the spam blacklist and abuse filters.

    If re-elected, I can offer the steward team technical knowledge, previous experience with the tools, a familiarity with global policy and a good chunk of my free time. Not to mention my amazing jokes.

    As many kindly pointed out in my successful 2019 confirmation, I committed significant time to reducing SRG's backlog and being responsive on IRC - my work schedule for the foreseeable future lends itself to maintaining, if not increasing, this level of activity.

    Re-reading my 2020 confirmation, for which I was absent from Wikimedia projects and understandably did not pass, is somewhat emotional - I appreciate and understand the impact my contributions have, and wish to again step up and give back to the community.

    I hope you can support me based on my previous work, my current activity and my future commitment to the projects. Thank you.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2022/Questions#TheresNoTime


Yes

[edit]
  1. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Sotiale (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  CptViraj (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Majavah (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Majavah (talk!) 14:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Highly trusted former steward, also cares about editors as people which is often a forgotten part of the role. --Rschen7754 14:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Mykola7 (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AmandaNP (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  -- Amanda (she/her) 14:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Luxtaythe2nd (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  A nice and trusted member of our community. Luxtaythe2nd (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Zabe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Zabe (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Former Steward returning to the job, no concerns. JavaHurricane 14:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Asartea (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Asartea Talk (Enwiki Talk (preferred)) 14:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HouseBlaster (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  HouseBlaster (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  MF-W 14:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NightWolf1223 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  NightWolf1223 (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Though I hope that the incident with the enwiki functionaries isn't repeated with the stewards. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jonathan5566 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Jonathan5566(talk) 14:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  TheSandDoctor Talk 14:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Stryn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Stryn (talk) 14:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Thingofme (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Thingofme (talk) 14:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Victor Trevor (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  --Victor Trevor (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Vaticidalprophet (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Eviolite (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Eviolite (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Firefly (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  firefly ( t · c ) 14:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  No concerns at all. Thank you for considering to help out again as a steward. ~ Nahid Talk 14:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Welcome back! —Thanks for the fish! talk•contrib (he/him) 14:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Synoman Barris (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2022 •  MeganB... …till the end 14:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  29. EN-Jungwon (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  -- EN-Jungwon 15:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SQL (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  SQLQuery me! 15:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hulged (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Hulged (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jayprakash12345 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Jayprakash >>> Talk 15:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Tol (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Absolutely. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  36. ElBe (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  ElBe 1 | 2 | WP 15:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Glad to see you back - a very valuable and friendly steward. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Awesome Aasim (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Trusted user. Aasim 15:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Mirer (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Sargento de Hierro (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Good luck. Sargento - A sus órdenes 16:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  42. باسم (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  باسم (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Bridget (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Bridget (talk) 16:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Glad to have TNT back as part of our stewards team. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  46. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Competent, has my trust. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  47. MONUMENTA (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  MONUMENTA (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  We all have real lives that some times take precedent over Wikimedia, TNT has proven time and time again they they are a valuable asset to the community. Praxidicae (talk) 16:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  49. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  50. DownTownRich (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  DownTownRich (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Blablubbs (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Robertjamal12 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  A nice and caring editor. Robertjamal12 ~🔔 16:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  53. LuK3 (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  54. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Trusted, competent. ToBeFree (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  We'd be lucky to have them. Giraffer (talk) 17:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I like people who actually step in the mud and do serious amount of work, unlike some stewards' lackluster performance. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 17:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  57. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  — MusikAnimal talk 18:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Funkruf (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Funkruf (talk) 18:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Daniuu (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Berrely (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Berrely • T∕C 18:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  61. -Alabama- (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Alabama (Talk) 18:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Capable person with overall good answers all around. The issue regarding your conduct and inactivity was not penalised or taken against you since I note your blog post that detailed the issue you have (which helped me while scoring you). Leaderboard (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Kadıköylü (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Kadıköylü (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Spicy (talk) 19:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Diannaa (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Seddon (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Seddon (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  67. SummerKrut (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Trusted member of the community. SummerKrut (talk) 19:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Yes, definitely. Operator873 connect 20:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  69. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  DraconicDark (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  70. OwenBlacker (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  OwenBlacker (Talk) 20:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Rlink2 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Highly qualified for the position. Always assumes good faith, and an willingness to listen to the other side in even the most difficult of situations. For that reason I am proud to support TheresNoTime/Sammy for Wikimedia STEWARD. Rlink2 (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  72. LuchoCR (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  LuchoCR (talk) 21:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  73. CaptainEek (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Sammy is extremely nice and capable. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Vituzzu (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Hiàn (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  76. PorkchopGMX (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  —GMX(ping!) 22:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Galahad (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2022 •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 22:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ivi104 (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2022 •  —Ivi104 22:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Betseg (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Betseg (talk) 23:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Klein Muçi (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Klein Muçi (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Lomrjyo (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Lomrjyo (talk·contribs·CA·en) 00:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  82. EpicPupper (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  One of the most caring editors I've met. Former steward as well. EpicPupper (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Pppery (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  * Pppery * it has begun 00:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  ミラP@Miraclepine 01:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ruy (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Ruy (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Bobherry (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  YES YES YES! TNT is one of the nicest people I have ever met online. They are extremely helpful and caring of everyone I have seen them interact with. They should be more than steward in my opinion. I am more then happy to support them. Bobherry (talk) 01:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Unite together (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Once upon a time, I came across a global account named "There'sNoTime to deal with BREXIT". Quite interestingly, log shows that TNT locked that after it was created roughly 10 minutes with the reason:"Long-term abuse: But There Is Time to Lock You". It doesn't have always be so serious dealing with global stewards requests, and by playing a joke like this, TNT have added a bit of humor into it, which is a way I love. Unite together (talk) 02:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Miniapolis 02:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Rishabhbhat (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  Rishabhbhat (talk) 03:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  91. SD hehua (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  SD hehua (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Moneytrees (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  Moneytrees (talk) 04:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Sennecaster (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Capable admin on enwiki that is not afraid to delve into new areas. She has assisted me with administrative tasks in copyright; an area that most admins are unfamiliar with outside of speedy deletions with a willingness to learn the process and carry them out correctly. I am more than certain that she will do this for her steward work. Sennecaster (talk) 04:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  94. H78c67c (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  H78c67c (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Holder (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Holder (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  96. JAn Dudík (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  JAn Dudík (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Glad to see you back, I missed you. Trijnsteltalk 08:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 08:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Vincent Vega (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Vincent Vega msg? 09:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2022 •  Amir (talk) 09:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  101. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Elli (Eligible, checked by Jonathan5566)2022 •  Elli (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Jonathan5566)2022 •  Stuff happens —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by Jonathan5566)2022 •  Jack Frost (talk) 12:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  105. BureibuNeko (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  BureibuNeko (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Snævar (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Snævar (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  107. RogueShanghai (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I couldn't think of a more shining role model for the job. Sammy is a consistently helpful and reliable admin who's also one of the nicest people I've met. She's a hard worker who deserves the job a thousand times over, even if she is a furry ❤️ RogueShanghai (talk) 13:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  108. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  MrJaroslavik (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Welcome back! --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Srđan (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Srđan (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  — xaosflux Talk 15:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Drumingman (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Drumingman (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  Wutsje (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Igor Yalovecky (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  --Igor Yalovecky (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Eta Carinae (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Dylsss (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  117. MarioGom (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  MarioGom (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Trusted former steward, active enough, no concerns Meiræ 17:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Stjn (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  stjn[ru] 18:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Worldbruce (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Worldbruce (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Toadspike (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Competent candidate, all I hope is that she is able to stay on this time around. Toadspike (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  A competent user with experience in said role is offering their service. That should be a no brainer. Natuur12 (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Superpes15 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2022 •  Superpes15 (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Extraordinary Writ (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  No reservations. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Addshore (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  ·addshore· talk to me! 22:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  stwalkerster (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  127. DanCherek (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  DanCherek (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Casliber (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Should be fine Casliber (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Mister Pommeroy (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  --Mister Pommeroy (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  130. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  *Youngjin (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  131. TheAafi (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  Steindy (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Bencemac (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  134. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Mbrickn (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Predatorix (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Predatorix (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Chlod (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Chlod (say hi!) 13:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  138. TrangaBellam (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  TrangaBellam (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Mellebga (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  Mellebga 15:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Neptune, the Mystic (Eligible, checked by Daniuu)2022 •  Neptune, the Mystic 15:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  142. NonsensicalSystem (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  NonsensicalSystem (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  143. SVTCobra (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  SVTCobra (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  144. 94rain (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  94rain Talk 18:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Bgrus22 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Bgrus22 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  146. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 21:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  147. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Gebu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Gebu (talk) 23:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Excellent former steward and candidate. If the worst case scenario is that she goes inactive again... well that's not exactly terrible. Stuff happens. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  150. George Chernilevsky (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 08:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  152. L235 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  KevinL (aka L235 · t) 08:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Iich1960 (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 11:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Nosebagbear (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Nosebagbear (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  159. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 • . 20041027 𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓾（talk） 15:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2022 •  Nehaoua (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  161. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  εΔω 18:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Юрко Градовський (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Noel baran (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Noel baran (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  165. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stanglavine)2022 •  DannyS712 (talk) 00:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Fastily (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  FASTILY 01:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Happy to see you again TNT stanglavine msg 01:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  168. The4lines (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  The4lines (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Altamel (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  A sensible admin on enwiki whom I'm happy to see return as a steward. Altamel (talk) 03:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Weak support, actually it's just the first or maybe second time I see the user. Wolverène (talk) 04:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Novem Linguae (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I've seen them around. They do great work. Best of luck. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  172. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Joseywales1961 (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Agus Damanik (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  Agus Damanik (talk) 12:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Shizhao (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  Geraki TL 15:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  177. OcarinaOfTime (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  OcarinaOfTime (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  178. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  dwadieff ✉ 17:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  179. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  MdsShakil (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  --YodinT 19:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  — Coffee // have a cup // 19:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Premeditated Chaos (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Premeditated Chaos (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Wgullyn (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Wgullyn (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Mustafdesam (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  TheresNoTime let him be part of steward Mustafdesam (talk) 07:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Justiyaya (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Justiyaya (talk) 10:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Linedwell [talk] 11:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Lucas Werkmeister (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 17:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Ата (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Ата (talk) 19:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  189. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  JaventheAlderick (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  190. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  — csc-1 23:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  192. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  Have been canvassed here to support. Supporting after being canvassed. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     00:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  cyrfaw (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by Giraffer) •  Andyzweb (talk) 14:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 14:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  196. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  WikiAviator (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Aca (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Aca (talk) 15:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Girth Summit (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Girth Summit (blether) 16:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Ponor (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Ponor (talk) 17:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Remagoxer (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Remagoxer (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Ryse93 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Ryse93 (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Actorsofiran (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  Actorsofiran (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  203. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Bluerasberry (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  205. babegriev (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Babegriev (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Welcome back Legoktm (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Armbrust (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Fenikals (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Aishik Rehman (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Aishik Rehman (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Conny (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Conny (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Pdreijnders (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Pdreijnders (talk) 21:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Zsohl (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Zsohl (Talk) 02:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  213. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  DePlusJean (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Hells yeah ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  215. MJL (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Amazing person! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Jusjih (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Zangala (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Zangala (talk) 06:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  218. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  --Alaa :)..! 08:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Maurice Flesier (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Maurice Flesier (talk) 08:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  220. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  MelanieN (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  221. DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Oh absolutely. I am aware that she was a Steward before, so, why not? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Deepfriedokra (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Does good work. A true asset. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  —— Eric Liu（Talk） 06:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  224. The Most Comfortable Chair (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  — The Most Comfortable Chair 06:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2022 •  rubin16 (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Rzuwig► 12:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Mndetatsin (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Mndetatsin (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Lupus in Saxonia (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Bibliomaniac15 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  bibliomaniac15 01:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Zabia (talk) 08:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  231. JulieMinkai (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  JulieMinkai (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  232. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 15:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Zblace (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Zblace (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  234. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 21:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  236. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  the opposite of BRPEver: only if she promises not to give me the recipes for British food. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  238. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  239. Ulubatli Hasan (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Hasan (talk) 17:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Sunpriat (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Sunpriat (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Teles (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 19:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Yining Chen (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  --Yining Chen (Talk) 04:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Kpddg (Not eligible, checked by Superpes15) •  Kpddg (talk) 08:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Justus Nussbaum (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2022 •  Give the guy a chance! Just N. (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Sdkb (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Taivo (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  246. David Perez (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  DPC (talk) 17:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Achim55 (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Achim55 (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  248. Duży Bartek (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Duży Bartek (talk) 19:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Mkdw (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Mkdw (talk) 19:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  250. Des Vallee (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Des Vallee (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2022 •  Dash77 (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  252. CX Zoom (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  I've had some interactions with TNT and am sure that she will excercise her privileges with care as she demonstrated in enwiki and when she was last a Steward. —‍CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 16:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  253. Grasmat (Eligible, checked by Lomrjyo)2022 •  Grasmat (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  254. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Fehufanga (talk) 03:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Nurtenge (talk) 13:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  256. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  --Michel Bakni (talk) 21:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  257. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  BRP ever 23:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  258. कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  -- कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (talk) 02:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  259. Shahnamk (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Shahnamk (talk) 06:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  260. Wugapodes (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Wugapodes (talk) 07:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  261. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Coffins (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  262. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  RadiX∞ 14:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  263. Mx Lucy (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2022 •  Mx Lucy (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  264. Julle (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Julle (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  265. RogueScholar (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  ⚞ℜogueScholar⚟ 🞛 ₨Talk📟 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Bio06940 (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  267. Defender (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Defender (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Cbrescia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2022 •  Cbrescia (talk) 12:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Starship SN20 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  I don't see any reason to believe that TheresNoTime will not just disappear again. Starship SN20 (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Starship SN20 I see you are with the new account and just enough edits, so I am curious what made you make such harsh comment?
    Don't you think it is OK to have even half of all stewards drop out from their voluntary positions if the price of sticking around is high (personal health and possible loss of life of dedicated long term volunteer) for what is less than 5% of total stewardship work (which is by the way very much under-resourced and under-organized anyway)? If Wikimedia ecosystem needs to have super stable stewardship work done it should be fixed on the system level, rather than to have anyone individually take more burden they can carry at any point in time. No?
    --Zblace (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I am entitled to my own opinion, and so are you. @Zblace Starship SN20 (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure. It just sounds super strange (since you were not affected by previous situation with this account) that you formulated your reasoning in this particular way. --Zblace (talk) 21:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Going from enwiki admin -> enwp CU/OS and meta admin and now to steward within 8 months of beginning to be active again is just way too quick in my opinion, even though I've had good experiences with TheresNoTime. Also not much cross-wiki activity. Ferien (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, but's she's more than ready to take those responsibilities. If she can do the job now, why impose an artificial delay? After all, in life, "there's no time" to wait. Rlink2 (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rlink2: Personally, I just think it is way too quick going from a not-so-active admin to a CU/OS and meta admin -> steward within 8 months, even if she can do the job now. As I pointed out, there is also a lack of true cross-wiki activity which is crucial for a steward. Plus, looking back in contributions now, I don't even see many reports involving steward work and I don't remember seeing much on IRC either. Keep in mind: giving someone steward is giving someone access to everything on all Wikimedia wikis. There's no harm in waiting a year and eight months instead of eight months. Whilst there are a load of positives, the negatives outweigh for me unfortunately. --Ferien (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ferien I am curious (and not informed in this context) ((hope you can help me orient)) on what is ideal and what acceptable quantity, quality and type of cross-wiki activity you would like to see with stewards and velocity of 'moving up' in admin ranks? --Zblace (talk) 08:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Zblace:
    • With cross-wiki experience: as you can see here, most edits cross-wiki were fixing phab:T162235. There are a few reverts cross-wiki (in maybe 5-6 wikis), but nothing significant and if TheresNoTime were to request global rollback (which is included in steward btw), the request likely would not pass due to a lack of cross-wiki experience. Keep in mind steward is a very cross-wiki/small-wikis role and as an enwiki admin, TheresNoTime's work would definitely just consist of small-wiki issues because you can't act as a steward on your homewiki (e.g. you can't give checkuser to someone on enwiki if you are an admin there) That being said, this is one issue and I wouldn't oppose someone over it, especially if they were a steward before, but...
    • With "moving up": TheresNoTime has only been back for 8 months after a break that lasted about one and a half years. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that going from enwiki admin back to CU/OS to metawiki adminship and now back to steward within 8 months is too quick, because as I pointed out above, steward is technically access to everything on all Wikimedia wikis and she has only had all the other additional rights again for, what, 6 months? My opinion with user rights is take it slow and get used to the rights you have already before requesting new ones. Even if TheresNoTime was a steward before, there's just not enough time back for me, for a right that gives access to so many things, and combined with the lack of cross-wiki experience and requests to stewards, it shows there is not really any need for her to be a steward.
    Regards, --Ferien (talk) 12:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting. My impression was that the prefered candidate on these elections User:Vermont (at least based on strong positions by few committee members) has less cross-wiki work and higher velocity of moving up + at how fewer edits (almost no mainspace page creations on home wiki) is a non-issue in their case. I can only say as non-technical contributor that I am surprised of different standards. No? --Zblace (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't want to get into other candidates on the vote page for another candidate but Vermont has edits on over 400 wikis and reverts on most of them, as well as global sysop experience, so I think they have extensive cross-wiki experience. Article creation isn't that relevant to the steward tools imo. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ferien I agree and will direct question there, but I do not agree that stewardship should be only use and access of tools but also first hand experiences of content making, not just 'policing' it. Anyway Vermont is obviously set to get elected - I was interested in your arguments here. Thank you! --Zblace (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  as per Starship_SN20 above. Ankry (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bedivere (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  Per above. Bedivere (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Silver hr (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2022 •  Silver hr (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2022 •  per Ferien and very low x-wiki activity outside en.wikipedia and meta.wikimedia SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 10:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  similar to above with regret Dolotta (talk) 22:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Sorry but a common trend with enwiki people especially those that are admins (or more) there is that they don't take this job seriously, they are usually inactive or unavailable and usually already have too much on their platter. We don't need more stewards, we need more active ones. I have been around a while and have heard the same "i'll be more active" cliche, sorry but we already have too many stewards, don't need more future 'inactive' ones. Stemoc 03:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Stemoc ! Yes - after waiting for email reply for a month I have to say I mostly agree, though I experienced 'to busy' to be active steward among non EN also. From what I can see @TheresNoTime was active one until serious health crisis. So your point of correcting this is misplaced and I would love to support initiative to correct this on the more systemic level. I hope you are interested in that approach and your NO here is not just burnout with EN. --Zblace (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    burnout? serious health crisis? well what is it? I have been on this project for 15 years and i have seen a lot of stewards come and go but apart from one admin from enwiki, the rest have been very poor in terms of performance as stewards, the reality was that most saw this as the next step after achieving whatever they could on the enwiki, this was more of a feather on their cap then actually doing work and another unfortunate trend was that most only spoke one language, a language already well-covered. A lot also claim to speak multiple languages, but when you look at their contribution on those wikis, its basically zero contribution. Stewards are a bit like ambassadors, they represent an area where help is desperately needed so when candidates claim to be able to speak those languages or be able to contribute to those languages wikis, we believe them. Four years ago when Sammy ran for stewardship, I opposed her citing No real contribution cross-wiki, we need cross-wiki editors to becomes Stewards, not people who stick to one wiki..we have enough of those who are generally inactive and even after she did become a steward, her crosswiki work was poor and just as predicted she became inactive. I have personally seen admins/bureaucrats from smaller language wikis handle being stewards here a lot better than admins/crats/Cu's from enwiki cause the workload on enwiki is higher so in my experience, its best if we avoided those that already have a lot on their platter as stewards, we have nearly 40 stewards right now but we still have backlogs going back a few months, 4 years back when i was last active here, we had 22 stewards and NO backlog so if people think adding more stewards will fix that issue, then they seriously have no idea how all this works.. its not about quantity, its about quality and as it stands, my oppose reason for sammy 4 years ago on her RfS still applies...Its nothing personal, I just hold a higher level of respect for this right than any other right and i want someone better, no the best available people to become stewards, someone who will appreciate and above all respect this right especially since its much harder to remove inactive and/or under performing stewards so the best thing possible is to get stewards who won't become inactive...Stemoc 08:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Stemoc: I do not normally respond to votes, as I respect the right of every community member to voice their concerns—however it would be remiss of me to not address your comments regarding what was an incredibly challenging mental health issue.
    You are welcome to the opinion that the inactivity it caused makes me unsuitable to be a steward (though I would say you likely wouldn't have that opinion if I'd been physically injured), but I would respectfully ask on behalf of anyone else who may be struggling that you do not dismiss these as mere distractions as it is disrespectful.
    Thank you for your understanding. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 12:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    As you already know, I don't follow enwiki (for obvious reasons) and Zblace's last line was a bit incoherent, i thought he was talking about you being burnout on EN. I have had similar issues you have, oddly enough a few times caused by Wikipedia itself, i kept it quiet cause it was no one's business and i handled it by leaving for some time and returning after a short break.....until the last straw which forced me to leave for a very long time so i understand how this works, infact i have had PD for nearly 20 years now but you have to find a way around it and personally speaking, the best cause of action is not just taking breaks but also dropping responsibilities, the more you take, the worse it gets, oddly enough for me, i joined wikipedia back then to find something to do keep my mind occupied (MDD) but unfortunately my first MDE was brought upon by wikipedia itself and then 2nd and 3rd which forced me to resign back in 2009 and leave..i came back a year and a half later with this account opting to take lesser responsibilities which i did and it helped a lot...well atleast for a few years...If you want my opinion on this, then honestly the best thing to do is to take it easy, atleast in your case where i feel its much better if your dropped some responsibilities instead of taking more, you may have noticed my RfS votes and confirmations are more stringent than others cause i want whats best for this project and you may not like this but unlike others here, i do a deep dive of work done by each candidate and current stewards before i make my decision and in your case, i did feel like your lack of cross-wiki work over the last 4 years is below my own personal standards which i have for every current candidate or current stewards ...If you thought my earlier comments in reply to Zblace was intended towards you, that was not my intent and for that i apologize...I have been working on this project for a very long time and i have seen a sharp decline in candidates and quality of candidates over the last 4 years and as mentioned above and on other confirmations where i voted remove, we need more active stewards with cross-wiki experience and i personally felt you would not fulfil that criteria --Stemoc 13:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Pardon my lack of clarity @Stemoc as it was a subtle reference to your block on EN. --Zblace (talk) 11:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jdx (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  jdx Re: 07:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Tmv (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  doesn't have enough experience with x-wiki. 𝑇𝑚𝑣 (𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘) 02:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Per a number of the above comments Herby talk thyme 11:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hulged)2022 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 05:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wilfredor (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. RZuo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  absolutely not! RZuo (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Synoman Barris)2022 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC). Not enough cross-wiki experience.[reply]
  16. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Sennecaster)2022 •  IWI (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Sahaib3005 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  19. موسى (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  موسى (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Deinocheirus (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2022 •  Deinocheirus (talk) 13:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Tamzin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  Strongest possible moral support. As Sammy and I are currently in an interlude where we won't be sharing an IP for a bit, I suppose it wouldn't go against any policy for me to outright support, but somehow I get the feeling she will do just fine without me in that column. I look forward to seeing her mercilessly clear out m:SRG with the same efficiency she brings to en:WP:SPI. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 14:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oaktree b (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Oaktree b (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mirji (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  ɱ 20:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
       Windows 77770 (Not eligible, checked by Superpes15) •  Windows 77770 (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2022 •  Mtarch11 (talk) 07:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2022 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Morneo06 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Morneo06 (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2022 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. CactiStaccingCrane (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  I agree with Ferien that it is a bit too early, but I am open that she could serve as a steward well if she is elected. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Uncle Bash007 (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2022 •  I can't be sure whether he will re-disappear or stay on his duty Uncle Bash007 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Uncle Bash007: TheresNoTime's preferred pronouns are she/her, so please correct your comment. Best, —Thanks for the fish! talk•contrib (he/him) 16:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ed6767 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2022 •  Sammy is extremely bright, friendly, kind and a pleasure to chat and work with and is honestly my go to for policy and other concerns. I'm staying neutral here however, and I should remind her that this is a big obligation where, whilst voluntary, people will expect you to be in the right headspace. The speed of getting back all the roles is a slight concern and I feel getting back into the Wiki community and her roles at a steadier pace may be best. Ed6767 (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2022 •  Tvcccp (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2022 •  --SM7--talk-- 09:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2022 •  Thanks for her work but her quick return to roles makes me a little worried about being active again on the steward. --Uncitoyentalk 19:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2022 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2022/Votes/TheresNoTime&oldid=24951118"