Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/~riley

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

~riley

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, es-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi everyone, I'm Riley and I have been editing for 8 years. My homewikis are Meta, where I am an sysop as of late, and Commons where I have been a sysop since 2016. As a SWMT member, my area of expertise and consistent activity is countervandalism. Currently, I use global rollback/global sysop permissions to fight vandalism, spam & long-term abuse. I am active on IRC which I view as a important communication tool for stewards to handle time-sensitive requests.

    I speak English but am functional in French and Spanish. Through my time on Commons, I have become comfortable helping editors that speak many different languages as it is a diverse multi-lingual project. When I am not helping on Meta & smaller wikis, I can be found writing content on the English Wikipedia, helping out with autoblocked users/verifying permissions on OTRS and creating accounts with the Account Creations team. Working with OTRS & ACC has taught me the impacts of collateral damage from blocks and this has helped me develop sound judgement when placing blocks. Between my Commons and SWMT experience, I have a well-balanced perspective of the challenges both small and large projects face.

    My primary focus as a steward, after finding an experienced mentor, would be to devote my time in the areas of greatest need and familiarity which I believe to be on IRC at #wikimedia-stewards (vandalism/LTAs), the stewards OTRS queue and steward noticeboards (global [b]lock requests, permissions, etc)

    Admittedly, I have only recently been given the global sysop permissions, however, I view this as a bonus as it appears I will be the only global sysop running for steward this year. Note: now one other GS running this year. ~riley (talk) 09:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your consideration, I hope you can place your trust in me. ~riley (talk) 08:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Disclosure: I recently returned to activity after having life altering events over the years that restricted my ability to edit. These life events are long behind me and my activity has been incredibly strong since then. I am committed to maintaining my activity and hope you will give me the chance to prove I will be an active steward. ~riley (talk) 06:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#~riley


Yes

[edit]
  1. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  trusted and good work--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 14:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  4nn1l2 (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rowingbohe (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/My work) 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Taivo (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Good candidate overall, despite some concerns with activity. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I get the activity concern but I like their work and I overall consider the candidate trustworthy competent and suitable Kostas20142 (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Huji (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Huji (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. そらたこ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Soratako🐙 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Good judgement and interaction with them. I think they have a clue on what stewardship entails. As of the too soon progression, their answer to my question allayed my fears. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Reaffirming support. For MF-W issue, I am one of those who seen through the admin handbook and think that it has potential to be a guideline for admins. The GS experience is a little unfortunate and not all stewards are GS before elections. I think should they not raised this up in the nomination will be better. Overall, I don't see them as a jerk and meets my stewards criterion quite well.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  When this candidature popped up, I somewhat expected opposition about their activity and tenure. The candidate has sufficient experience in crosswiki affairs, and most importantly, they have good understanding of global policies and steward affairs. Their answers to questions reflect their competence and understanding of policies. I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Hence, I'm supportive of their promotion. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JackPotte (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  JackPotte (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 17:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  It might a bit soon after the promotion as global sysop, but I'm not worried: I'm sure he'll become a useful steward, if elected. Trijnsteltalk 17:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  No hesitation. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Alex Noble (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Possibly a bit too soon, but good answers to questions, and from Commons interactions appear to have a clue. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hasley (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Sgd. Hasley 20:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vogone (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Mirer (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Joalpe (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Chicocvenancio (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Chico Venancio (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per Ajraddatz, Trijnstel et al Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Aron Manning (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  His heart is in the right place. That's more beneficial than years of experience. —AronM🍂 edits🌾 00:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  To me, you are an eager candidate who has quickly risen through the ranks, and that's fine by me. On paper, you seem fine as well. While I did not like your non-answer to my difficult questions, your other answers were reasonable, and hence you pass the test. (Also in future, do note that just saying 2+2 = 3 does not imply that I am giving them a math test) Leaderboard (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Hiàn (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Eatcha (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Competent and finest candidate. Really very helpful and worth giving this year a try. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Gampe (talk) 07:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Vituzzu (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 • Minoo (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Will do fine. Wutsje (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Rather a good steward who is sometimes inactive than no steward. Natuur12 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  This user has the experience necessary to be a steward. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 23:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. 蟲蟲飛 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gharouni 04:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  First, I feel contentment of the replication. I really support that. I think Riley will be a brilliant steward. --Wright Streetdeck 04:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Effeietsanders (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Effeietsanders (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I think he was very good people--SickManWP (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Authueil (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Authueil (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Udo T. (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per Ajraddatz. — Jules Talk 12:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ranjithsiji (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dolotta (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Ahmad252 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ahmadtalk 17:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  ok La coince (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Waddie96 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Janbery (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  janbery (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Sk4mp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Helpful, pleasant, trusted, and wanting to work. You can always become more active, that's not a problem. – Sk4mp talk 21:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Masumrezarock100 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  I am afraid I will never understand why some people are citing the assignment date of GS rights as a reason for opposing. Having GS is a proof of trust and experience. I am pretty sure there are some people with just GR applying for Stewardship this year. Would you have preferred if he applied for Stewardship without having GS right? As for inactivity concerns, we all have real life and I don't think anyone should be as active as if Wikimedia is like real life to them. I would rather have more stewards working together instead of having a handful of active ones. This can prevent wearing them out. He has been active enough over the past few months, so I don't see that as a reason for oppose. At the start of the next year, he can always be stripped off his rights after the confirmation process if the community thinks he has been inactive enough to have his rights removed. As for this, we all make mistakes. See what is good about him instead of assuming the worst. He has proven that he can learn and improve himself. He has plenty of existing Stewards near him who can mentor him and show him around. So I see no reason to hung up about that. Masum Reza📞 22:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Answered my questions to a high degree of satisfactory. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Borschts (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Borschts Talk 02:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. DavidDelaune (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  DavidDelaune (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Rxy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Active user, why not rxy (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Geagea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Geagea (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Gdarin (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  fair enough Gdarin | talk 09:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 12:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Saederup92 (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Smart + clue + exceedingly polite and cordial + proficient knowledge of and adherence to global Steward policy = renewed global mop Dmehus (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Trustworthy candidate Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  75. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  JaventheAlderick (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Tiven2240 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Deserving candidate. Best wishes. Tiven2240 (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Wilfredor (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --Wilfredor (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Meiræ 00:19, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  80. LuCKY (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  LuCkY talk 07:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jfblanc (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  82. J ansari (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  -J. Ansari Talk 14:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Masum Ibn Musa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 17:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Lautaro 97 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 • . Lautaro 97 (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Luke081515 21:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Approachable candidate, follows up, familiar with the procedures, forward going. Gryllida 00:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Nesmir Kudilovic (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Approachable, communicative, experienced. Best wishes. Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 00:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  89. ThF (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Thierry (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  91. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Foscolo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Foscolo (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  93. NEHAOUA (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  NEHAOUA (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Frettie (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  95. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  96. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  John M Wolfson (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Trusted and competent editor - Riley's a fantastic admin on Commons and so without a doubt would make a great Steward too. –Davey2010Talk 23:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Intelligent fellow, great cross-wiki experience, and always eager to volunteer more time. I fully believe they will make an excellent addition to the steward team. — Coffee // have a cup // 23:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Thanks for your help on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Joris Darlington Quarshie (Not eligible, checked by DeltaQuad) •  Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 01:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  100. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  101. कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  कन्हाई प्रसाद चौरसिया(talk) 5:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  102. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  JogiAsad (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Yes. Operator873talkconnect 14:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Wim b (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wim b 17:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Patsagorn Y. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Patsagorn Y. (Talk) 09:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  trustworthy candidate! Suvray (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Mardus (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  109. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  AGK ■ 07:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Nightenbelle (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Akchurin (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020 •  Akchurin (talk) 00:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  113. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 02:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  114. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Trusted user. WikiAviator (talk) 04:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Jni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  jni (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Darwinerasmus (Not eligible, checked by CptViraj) •  seems like a leading expert Darwinerasmus (talk) 13:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Nat (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 15:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Darkhan 16:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:28, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Josephine W. (Not eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra) •  a trusted candidate Josephine W. (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Coffins (talk) 12:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wieralee (talk) 13:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  123. REDMAN 2019 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Good luck. Garam talk 18:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Chipermc (talk) 04:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Cabayi (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Biplab Anand (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  Biplab Anand (Talk) 14:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Timmyboger (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Timmyboger (talk) 23:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ganímedes (talk) 01:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Jialxv (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Thx for your commitment. Jialxv (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Stephan Tournay (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Sonic Speedy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Sonic Speedy (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Stang 20:59, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  epicgenius (talk) 21:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  137. WhitePhosphorus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  The candidate is capable enough and demonstrate the need for steward tools, then I can trust them no matter how rapid they are gathering the rights. I believe Riley will be an asset to the steward team. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Lomedae (Not eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus) •  Lomedae (talk) 10:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Hamish (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  candidate with sufficient exp. Hamish 10:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  141. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 19:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Computer Fizz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I thought this guy was a steward already. Everything about him is yes yes yes. Even caring to mention he only got global sysop recently, but not a showstopper. Hell yes. Computer Fizz (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  144. SQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  SQLQuery me! 21:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  145. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  GZWDer (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Justus Nussbaum (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2020 •  Justus Nussbaum (talk) 01:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Jdx (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  jdx Re: 07:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Titore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Titore (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  149. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  RadiX∞ 13:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Sotiale (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. Would be a support if it weren't for the very inconsistent activity over the last year: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/~riley https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/commons.wikimedia/~riley Inactivity among stewards is already a problem and I can't justify potentially adding to it. Would reconsider after a year of sustained activity. Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per Rschen7754, not be active on one of your main wikis might be a problem. 5LZ 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Like him a lot, but agree with Rschen that I would prefer more activity before being a steward. Sorry. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Regretfully oppose as per above, more activity would be better. Sorry. Minorax (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Lack of activity, too quick from GS to Steward. Wait a bit longer and increase activity and try next year. RhinosF1 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  per Tony.--Turkmen talk 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  KPFC 💬 15:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Seems like the candidates heart is in the right place but I can't support the rapid jump from GS to Steward and I share concerns about activity level and experience, specifically recent experience. things like this also concern me, as it shows quite a lot of over-eagerness and very little forethought. Praxidicae (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Global sysop since less than a month ago. More time in this function is required before pursuing another. Érico (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  per Tony stwalkerster (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Having high activity for a considerable amount of time is something I look for. Esteban16 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 1989 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  1989 (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Just making a note. I find it extremely hypocritical that this candidate told me I was not eligible to become an oversighter on a project I currently still administrate despite the outcome because I was only a sysop for eight months, when they’ve barely even had global sysop for a month and they claim to be ready to become a Steward. 1989 (talk) 14:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Arthur Crbz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Je pense que cet utilisateur n'a pas l'expérience requise (pour le moment) pour disposer de ces outils. Peut-être attendre quelques années de plus. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Unfortunately the lack of recent activity is a problem. ST47 (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Šedrvan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Šedrvan (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Malatrad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per Rschen. Malatrad (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  First of all, I want to say I remember you from years ago and if my memory serves me well, you are a very decent person. However, speaking of "years ago", I was very surprised to see - from Rschen's links - that you have been active mainly for some months in 2013, then for some months in 2016, and then only really started again in November last year. I was even more surprised that you glossed over this in his candidature statement. Instead, we read "I view it as a bonus that I will be the only global sysop running for steward this year" when apparently, it was only on the same day that you became a GS. That in itself is nothing bad, but phrasing it this way in the statement? I don't like it too much. What also caused me to oppose was the strange fact that you asked questions to the other candidates - I think candidates should be better not do that - and then also said you would only answer these himself if someone specifically asked you. Also, what happened recently with the "meta admin handbook" is very strange to me: not only did you write an admin handbook only a short time after becoming an admin, but you also immediately proposed it as a guideline, which was (IMHO rightly) opposed for being too bureaucratic. Then, ending on a minor issue, there was even more bureaucraticness about it on Meta:Babel (and two sections above there) which just leaves me with a bit of an uneasy feeling about how you might handle steward requests - I fear both too "bureaucratically" and also with language that is sometimes difficult to understand. MF-W 23:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi MF-W: I will adjust my statement; my focus was looking forward rather than backwards. Yes, I recently returned to activity in October of last year. I have had some life altering events over the last few years and edited when I had the access to. These are long behind me and my activity has been strong since then. At the time I applied for GS, I was not planning to run for steward and submitted questions. I was approached by a steward to take the chance to run, so I changed my mind. It was recommended I wait until my GS request was over, so I waited until then and submitted my application. My statement was not intended to to imply GS experience, I clarified this in one of my answers. Yes, I wrote an admin handbook; I am able to pull from my experience as an admin elsewhere and had it reviewed by other admins as well. As any author can be, I was biased to the positive reception I received from other admins and so I began the process of gaining community consensus and notified the community on Meta:Babel. The instructions to discuss on the handbook's talk page were not followed, so there was two ongoing discussions. I realized my biasedness through the consensus comments and I immediately withdrew the proposal. Mistake made, lesson learned.
    If you take the time to look through the many of steward requests I have been involved in or ask any of the stewards that have supported me above, I think any cause for concern regarding bureacratics will be eased. I hope you'll see that the pros outweight the cons and give me the chance to demonstrate this. ~riley (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ejnal (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Ejnal (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Peregrin Falcon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Global sysop since just a month ago. Too much inexperience. Peregrin Falcon (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per Warburg Arraque (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Rikovers (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Rikovers (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  With regret. Local sysop that gains crosswiki permissions in the last few months with no language specialty. Happy to look to support next year barring issues. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Chiartop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per Delta Quad. Chiartop (talk) 09:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Boobarkee (talk) 10:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  per Tony OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hergel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Hergel (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Uršul (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Uršul (talk) 13:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zerukruhaivina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Zerukruhaivina (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Verud (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Verud (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Moderni futurist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Moderni futurist (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Tomec (Eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra)2020 •  Tomec (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Would look favorably upon a rerun next year with additional experience Mz7 (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pppery (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  * Pppery * it has begun 19:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Silverije (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020 •  Per Érico. --Silverije (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Stijenor NGC (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Stijenor NGC (talk) 14:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 21:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Widr (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  application too premature ! Eihel (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  A great guy, but it's unfortunately it's probably a bit too soon for this. Get some additional experience with the global sysop toolset, stay active, and I will be happy to support next year. – bradv🍁 00:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Suspected to be not active enough. Maybe years later. 游魂 07:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fast climber, fast on decisions, but I believe there's a space for improvement. I am somewhat cautious towards users whose homewiki is not some language wiki but Meta (??). Also, I am somewhat reluctant when the candidate does not says from which country he comes from. Kubura (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; This one is an exception to my rule - while ~riley qualify for my criteria, I think running for Steward at the same day when you got the GS bit is too hasty to me. — regards, Revi 14:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Although my interactions with them had been net positive but it looks like bit early as revi explained. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  I agree with many other people, especially with an inconsistent activity, one more year of experience with flags is probably better. I would have probably been more tolerant with a stronger language knowledge, but in general I fell more cautious this year. Good luck in any case. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Per -revi. --Stïnger （会話） 18:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Sintakso (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. AshokChakra (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ashok Talk 09:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  Similar to Alexmar, spend some more time with the global sysop tool and try again next year. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  人人生來平等 (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Would be a yes if it wasn't for the concerns relating to activity. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --oSeveno (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Herby talk thyme 14:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Poti Berik (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I need more time to ponder crosswikiness, Nemo 15:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. WikiLester (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  WikiLester (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I can't give you full support due to your activity. --Uğurkenttalk 19:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Would likely support next year if you are active — xaosflux Talk 14:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hannes 24 (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Active user, with good experience, but I hope to see more activity, especially that he got GS flag at same day of stew-nomination, also I didn't like this requests (1 and 2)--Alaa :)..! 21:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Dany Crash (talk) 23:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per -revi Patriccck (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  A past (long ago but serious) incident and a long period of inactivity. I could have supported with one of the two but not with both, sorry — NickK (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/~riley&oldid=24929699"