Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Cyberpower678

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Cyberpower678

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, de
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I'm Cyberpower678. I didn't initially plan on running for stewardship, but after some words of encouragement, I decided to throw my name into the hat. I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia, as well as a global renamer. While I haven't been very active in global renaming lately, I have been very active developing InternetArchiveBot, and moving to deploy it cross wiki. I've started picking up on my renaming activities, however. My development of IABot and engaging with different language communities have definitely broadened my understanding of different cultures on different language Wikipedias, as well as partially learn new languages.  :-)


    My activity is mostly on the technical side things, so if elected, I will of course continue work on rename requests, and carry out more complex requests that requires a steward to perform. In addition to that, I will also monitor the requests to globally lock and/or unlock accounts. The rename queue has been getting abused by an LTA. Obviously my steward experience is limited, but I'm not one to hastily push buttons when I'm new to something, and will of course work with other stewards to ensure I don't end up locking everyone. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Cyberpower678


Yes

[edit]
  1. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Can certainly be trusted. Was thinking crat, but this is good enough. My name is not dave (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  A bit of an unconventional candidate, but in the process of getting their bot approved crosswiki they likely have more crosswiki experience than some past successful steward candidates. I've gone through some of their recent enwiki admin actions and liked what I saw. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  — regards, Revi 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Stïnger （会話） 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. WQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  WQL 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  The comments of MF-Warburg are worrisome, but in any case, I would prefer to assume good faith. He has done a good job as a global renamer and I do not think there are any problems while doing things with caution and asking questions before doing anything. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Trusted, knowledgeable user. Miniapolis 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Rxy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  per Rschen7754's comment. rxy (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  demonstrates unwavering commitment to the free content model, operating the InternetArchiveBot and working with the Internet Archive to make content more readily available and accessible to our users. There is a long and extensive track record of competence in undertaking +sysop level tasks on English Wikipedia and in undertaking global renaming functions. Nick (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Wischmat (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  SQLQuery me! 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  SoWhy 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Known user, enough expierence to be a stew Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Despite the lack of cross-wikiness I like what I see, can trust the user and agree that the bot is something Kostas20142 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  ~ Rob13Talk 19:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Zoranzoki21 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Zoranzoki21 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I trust him to do the job. Lepricavark (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000) •  --Fanjiayi (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018 •  Shizhao (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Csyogi (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Probably will be a fine steward. I do worry about them over-extending their commitments though. Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Gereon K. (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  strong yes! --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. LIVE NIEUWS (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Friendly, helpful and very active user. Also does good technical work cross-wiki. Livenws (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pelz (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Pelz (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  TomášPolonec (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. KrakatoaKatie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Katietalk 15:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Enough trusted, competent and helpful.Why not?! Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. FriedhelmW (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  FriedhelmW (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Luke081515 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Holder (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  His technical skills might be very helpful to our steward team. Furthermore he's trusted and competent, so I see no reason to oppose. Trijnsteltalk 22:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Vermont (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Quickfingers (talk) 01:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Apap04 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Apap04 (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Premeditated Chaos (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Premeditated Chaos (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Siddiqsazzad001 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Nice explained to new users Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Very technical editor, Easy support. –Davey2010Talk 15:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  DENAMAX (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Great floors (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Wikifreund (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  55. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Govindaharihari (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  trust this user with the advasnced permissions Govindaharihari (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Lanwi1(talk) 22:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Rzuwig► 22:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Elvesham (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000) •  --Fanjiayi (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Trusted user. Wolverène (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Ankry (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Darylgolden (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Darylgolden (talk) 08:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  64. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018 •  Eddie891 (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  It appears that the candidate is qualified and will make a contribution to the responsibilities and duties of a steward, so I vote Yes. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Bff (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Bluemel1 (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  70. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  71. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 16:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sigma'am (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ar sog 16:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  73. CambridgeBayWeather (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  74. SlimVirgin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  SarahSV talk 16:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Chrisaliv (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I voted neutral but I would like to change this to support. This person is an organized communicator. They pulled reams of documentation from the either to address an issue I raised. I had an isolated hiccup of an experience connecting with them which I described below but we just had a far-ranging conversation that convinced me that this person can deliver complicated feedback on short notice. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  77. DHeyward (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  --DHeyward (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Carlsrator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Carlsrator (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 22:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  80. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Telaneo (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Telaneo (User talk page) 00:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Yeza (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  84. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 09:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  85. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Absolutely YES. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  86. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Weak support, good technical skills and did not see any obvious red flags — NickK (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kojie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Kojie (Tell me) 17:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Seems a good candidate, minor concerns aside, with a lot of potential that Stewarship should provide opportunities for: should be encouraged! --YodinT 20:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kein Einstein (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Kein Einstein (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Atsme📞📧 03:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Ansumang (Not eligible, checked by علاء) •  Encountered him many times in the past. Very Helpful. -- ɑηsuмaη «Talk» 13:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  92. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  TJH2018talk 16:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  93. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  94. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MaynardClark (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Airbornemihir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Airbornemihir (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  97. UpsandDowns1234 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Cyberpower678 is pretty good with code, is an admin on English Wikipedia, and is obviously one who has an understanding of global policies. Ups and Downs (↕) 02:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  98. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Trustworthy. Being a Steward will not be bad for him. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Amortias (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Amortias (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alioreks (Not eligible, checked by Defender) •  Alioreks (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Debenben (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Debenben (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Yes, by all means! Dolotta (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  102. BD2412 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  An excellent Wikipedian. BD2412 T 00:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Liridon (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  –Ammarpad (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Gripweed (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Complainer (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  The cross-wiki experience is good. Anbans 585 (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Zabia (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Fish and karate (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  111. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ghilt (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  a×pdeHello! 06:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Per Trijnstel. Jules78120 (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Biplab Anand (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  per Rschen7754 Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Superyetkin (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Weslam123 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Weslam123 (talk) 06:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Schlurcher (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Schlurcher (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Enik (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Enik (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Пацифист (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Пацифист (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Smile4ever (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Barras (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  - Yup! -Barras talk 18:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  I believe this candidate will be a reliable steward. — Coffee // have a cup // 01:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Winner 42 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Winner 42 (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Steindy (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  FASTILY 06:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  130. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  HMSLavender (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  131. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Seems experienced, and I find their answers to questions satisfactory. While they have made mistakes in the past, they don't try and avoid responsibility and explain how they have learned from them. InsaneHacker (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Syced (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Syced (talk) 10:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Zakawer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Zakawer (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Minoo (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Minoo (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Samee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  - samee- talk    18:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       AfroThundr3007730 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  — AfroThundr (talk) 08:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Armbrust (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Mostafameraji (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Mostafameraji (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Anatoliy (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Feminist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Feminist (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Fenikals (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  141. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 09:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Miguelucas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  My vote is of support. I encourage you to learn and be a great steward! Miguelucas (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  143. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  S.Didam (talk) 18:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ronhjones (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Ciszema (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ciszema (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Popo le Chien (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  149. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  FN Markus (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Fadesga (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ramboj95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ramboj95 (talk) 09:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  152. John Cline (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018 •  John Cline (talk) 11:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Stang 11:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 12:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Yes indeed, a delightful (online, at least!) personality and possessing precisely the qualities required in such a global role. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  156. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  --Alaa :)..! 17:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Wiki13 talk 18:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Matanya (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Tapered (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Tapered (talk) 02:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Courcelles 02:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Snowolf How can I help? 05:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Vituzzu (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  masti <talk> 13:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  In the statement, I don't see a reason why Cyberpower678 is candidating as steward. I also don't see a reason why I should support him. Even though he is a global renamer, he is not really active cross-wiki - surprisingly, 92% of his edits are on enwiki; of the rest, several of course come from page moves effected by global renames or edits related to the bot he mentions in his request. This bot does not have much relationship to stewards' work however. What is more, I perceive Cyberpower as a quite immature person. Often I see supposedly funny jokes from him (e.g. on the global-renamers mailing list) which do not serve any purpose except making people cringe. MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Addition: Supporting the proposed removal of an oppose vote against him in an ongoing election is really bad taste. --MF-W 13:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I'm not really convinced by this nomination, nor are there any significant xwiki contributions besides some bot requests and performed global renames, as far as I can see. —Vogone (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I can neither recognize a sufficient cross-wiki activity nor does his nomination per se convince me – KPFC 💬 14:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Would like to see more administrative experience first (~1 year sysop experience on 1 project so far) — xaosflux Talk 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Leaky caldron (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Continues to demonstrate absolute commitment, but I fear over-stretching ability and just a hint of seeking to collect qualifications Leaky caldron (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018 •  Insufficient cross wiki experience Herby talk thyme 18:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Milad A380 talk 20:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  he is very active global renamer and trusted user, but his admin activity in Enwiki is too small (236 in 2017!) and that make a concern, his contributions is 23k only since 2011 (~91% in Enwiki only) with low activity in other project, I think it's early to be steward, bot developing isn't enough Ibrahim.ID ✪ 20:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jcc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Per my question, where he disclosed private information on en.wiki; his reply was that "I wasn't the only one to do it". Given that stewards are expected to handle private content on a daily basis, I have to oppose. Additionally- little admin experience as pointed out by others. Jcc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I personally find it unfair that from my answer to you, all you took from it were the last two sentences, and then using that as a justification to oppose. I can accept your reasoning of little admin experience, and I respect it, but I do wish my answer wasn't being taken out of context.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cyberpower678: Not unfair at all- in fact, had you stopped your answer at "yes, I messed up", I would be on the other side right now. But no, instead, you wrote "I messed up...but someone else did it too!". I'm happy to discuss this more on my talk page. Jcc (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Cyberpower has clarified that it wasn't obvious that the public didn't have access to rename requests. Jcc (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Not enough cross-wiki[ness] for me, sorry. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Lack of cross-wiki behaviour, despite the ongoing development of IABot. hiàn 22:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Az1568 (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  --Krd 08:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  per MF-W DCB (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Need more experience... Alex Pereira falaê 13:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Alex Shih (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  One of the most highly skilled technical user on en.wiki, but I am not too sure if their temperament is suitable to be steward, sorry. Alex Shih (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bbb23 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Helpful technically on en.wiki but too green to become a steward.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sagaciousphil (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Sagaciousphil (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  <comment was removed as disruptive and offensive> Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hhhhhkohhhhh (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Per MF-Warburg. No (explicit) need for steward access stated. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Not cross-wiki enough. (However, I must note that I saw him "grow" a lot by operating his InternetArchiveBot on multiple languages, interacting with the respective communities and working hard to meet their needs. So I can understand why the fact is mentioned in the statement.) Nemo 11:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Little cross-wiki experience. Though the potential here is great as because of IA user does deal with other wikis, so this situation where only in 4 wikis user has 100 edits might change. --Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       TheDoormouse (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  TheDoormouse (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Howan Hansi (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  Per MF-W. SPQRobin (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Dennis Brown (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Per xaosflux and others. Nice enough guy, good tech guy, but little experience using the tools with actual people and not a lot of crosswiki experience. I can see supporting in the future but this is a bit soon. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Per MF-W above. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Slowking4 (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  There's no compelling need for the tools, and limited administrative experience. In particular, I think being a steward will be a hindrance to rolling out IABot on other projects. power~enwiki (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Eks-istifadəçi (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Per MF Warburg Eks-istifadəçi (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Too early, unfortunately. Widr (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  This isn't a "never", but a "not now". The statement here needs work - the candidate doesn't have much experience in steward areas, and doesn't specify what they bring to the table as it pertains to this role. Most of what they discuss can be done with their existing global renamer permission. I think that after a year of being active in cross-wiki work, and continuing to gain administrative experience on their home project, Cyber would be in a position to use the steward tools well. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Risk Engineer (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. LindsayH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Too early, unconvincing rationale; sorry. LindsayH (talk) 11:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Karora (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Karora (talk) 11:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mojoworker (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Still a bit callow and not yet seasoned enough. Perhaps in the future after additional administrative and cross-wiki experience. Mojoworker (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Mounir Touzri (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Sorry, too inexperienced. Begoon (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mélencron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  Mélencron (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Not yet. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. NH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  From what I have seen at the Swedish (sv) Wikipedia, where Cyberpower678 runs the Internet archive bot, it seems Cyberpower678 does not quite communicate in the low affective way required by a steward. NH 10:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Your technical abilities probably are great for the job, and I would especially thank you for the XTools improvements, but I think you're too less invested on « main » contributions on wikies. Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    We do work as a team, but I have to butt in with [1]. Please forgive me :) — MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  English wiki people should not be allowed to mess up Wiki Media too. Stemoc 22:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Kudpung (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  --Wetterwolke (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Did not answer all questions. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Taivo: Thank you for pointing out that I had not answered all the questions. I have indeed missed a question, while all this time I was under the impression had answered them all. I have answered the remaining questions.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018 •  Too little cross wiki experience for my liking. Caliburn (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Mahir256 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Per both side. I couldn't make a strong decision. *Youngjin (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  To much doubt, but I don't vote 'no'. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Mahveotm (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I am a huge fan of this person's work with the IABot but in the past I had some questions about their projects and they declined to talk. I do not mind anyone delaying discussion or even if they heard me out saying that they would take my comments but be unable to act. Instead the user just said that talking is not an option even on their wiki page. I was a bit confused by the exchange but in any case, I am sure that for a steward I want people who are like beacons for communication. Talking to the general public, including people like me who might be clueless and asking dumb questions, is part of the steward role. Not sure what is on Cyberpower's mind in wanting to be steward but obviously this person has lots of talent which might be better spent with something other than newbie and clueless user requests. I see in their statement that they have identified a category of technical problems which they think they can manage, and which others might not manage. I do trust that if Cyberpower wants steward rights to be able to do that, then they would be a benefit and a success in that role. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Come back after more experience and a bit more cross-wiki collaboration. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Simplexity22 (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Andyboorman (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Communicate more and try next year Andyboorman (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  BugWarp (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  B20180 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Potatornado (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  per user Richardkiwi. Garam (talk) 08:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Lacking in xwiki experience, but not enough for me to oppose. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  DePlusJean (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hma969 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Hma969 (talk) 10:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Candidate has xwiki experience in global renaming, but I don't know if has experience in more controversial issues solving. Statement didn't convince me. Zerabat (discusión) 20:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  VictorBrice (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Arjayay (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Arjayay (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Serious editor. Not sure he/she is fitted for the position yet. Joalpe (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2018/Votes/Cyberpower678&oldid=20933233"