Stewards/Confirm/2016/Barras

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en-4, de
Personal info: It's been five years since I've been made a steward. Since then I've been more or less active, depending on my real life. While I was more active during my first years of services, I think I maintained a good level of activity in the more recent years. I'm daily available on IRC to help whenever help is needed. For urgent matters (like oversight requests), I'm available at really any time of the day by mail. In the past year, I served as a member of the Ombudsmen Commission and was asked if I'd like to serve for another term, which I'm now doing. I think I managed both roles adequately and got them not conflicted, which means there is no problem for me to do both jobs for another year if the community is willing to support me again. As always, if you've questions, just ask. I'm happy to answer them.

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen: en-4, de
Informationen zur Person: Es ist nun fünf Jahre her seit ich zum Steward gewählt wurde. Seit dem war ich immer mehr oder weniger aktiv, je nach dem wie beschäftigt ich im realen Leben war. Ich war in meinen ersten Jahren aktiver als in den letzten Jahren, aber ich denke ich konnte ein gewisses Maß an Aktivität aufrecht erhalten. Ich bin täglich im IRC zu finden um zu Helfen wenn es notwendig ist. Für dringende Angelegenheiten (wie Oversight Anfragen) bin ich rund um Uhr die per Mail erreichbar. Im vergangenem Jahr war ich Mitglied der Ombudsmann-Kommission und wurde gefragt, ob ich dieser Kommission für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung stehe, was ich bejahte. Ich denke ich konnte die beiden Rollen gut von einander trennen und habe mögliche Konflikte vermieden, was bedeutet, dass es für mich kein Problem darstellt als Mitglied der Ombudsmann-Kommission und auch als Steward für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung zu stehen, sofern mich die Community darin untersützt. Wie immer, wenn es Fragen gibt, dann fragt mich einfach. Ich freue mich Rede und Antwort zu stehen.

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about Barras

Remove, for the sole reason of me being opposed to the steward-OC double role. Controversial actions can always happen, even unexpectedly, and making people feel uncomfortable reporting possible issues with current OC members is certainly not what we want. --Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't generally support the steward/OC combination due to workload concerns, but in this case Barras was able to maintain an acceptable level of activity, likely helped by stepping down from some of their other Wikimedia roles. As far as my concerns last year I am disappointed that they never responded publicly or privately to the concerns but I am not aware of any further issues and am thus not factoring that in this year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he is a good Steward.--BRP^ever 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 00:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - per Vogone, sorry but one should be neutral and as a steward he has access to stuff Ombudsman's should not...Good steward but he should not hold onto both rights..--Ste moc 01:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One of my go-to stewards. Osiris (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kindly for me, yeah! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep His OC membership does not concern me. He is good and active enough in his steward role which should get importance here. — T. 06:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wish you were more active now. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should visit the user's page at SimpleWiki. Etamni | ✉ 10:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Danny B. 07:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- All these hats and yet still manages to make simple edits and fight vandalism too! This one's a keeper! Etamni | ✉ 10:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep need wise heads, managed the OC role fine — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laberinto16 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I have no concerns with OC/steward double role as soon as a steward clearly understands the conflict and remains active, which is the case here — NickK (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He should be more active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- No concerns about acting as a steward and OC simultaneously. Sufficiently active; extraordinarily helpful. -- Avi (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to offset the bizarre opposes --Gue rillero 05:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bizarre? It even used to be WMF practice not to allow this until a few years ago. --Vogone (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is my pleasure to work with Barras at Simple Wikipedia. Always careful, courteous and a good watchkeeper from vandals (of which we seem to have many). Fylbecatulous talk 17:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy. The dual-role issue shold be resolved on a policy page not a confirmation page. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NickK. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted. --Rus793 (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for the competent and quick help lately. Good luck! --GeoTrinity (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Five years of valuable works, and many more to come. ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For the only reason being S and OC at the same time. Fine otherwise. — regards, Revi 07:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good work as a steward, trusted // JFTR: bit week suport because of: I'm really not lucky with this double-role-thing of you being steward AND OC-Member :-( — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rax (talk) -Barras talk 10:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Vogone and Revi. odder (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepBecause of your service at Simple English Wikipedia. PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 13:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Contributions to Wikiversities - 32, but none to en.Wikiversity since 2012! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Without a doubt. Fully trust him and also a less active Barras is a useful Barras for us. :-) Trijnstel_talk 22:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis.--Jusjih (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Jusjih: Stewards are, as far as I know, still allowed to express their opinion on votes, without being asked to be removed because you don't agree with them. I find it surprisingly narrowsighted coming from an ex-steward. Sa vh ^ñ 13:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Savh: I disagree you as I have even received even worse or irrelevant comments when I was a steward. This page is comment about Barras, not you.--Jusjih (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. --Antigng (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For his short-sighted remarks and pro-vandalism attitude. He first accused me of being a sockpuppet of Abbas Dothar. When disproved in a CU, he went on to make hue and cry over a chat-post, overlooking the comments across Hindi and English Wikipedias such as here over the use IPs and Wikipedia accounts to promote a mediocre poet. I wonder the dual role he will discharge in the days to come!!--Muzammil (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Context and more info to those who are not aware: User talk:Barras#Clarification. -Barras talk 13:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly, helpful and active enough. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently active, helpful and good steward :)--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove steward/ oc role resign for one or the other --DerekvG (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
active, helpful on IRC. tufor (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis. --Holder (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Quiddity (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Barras has been handling the steward / OC double role well, so that's not an issue for me. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while I don't particularly like the double role, I think Barras does fine work in his steward capacity and think the steward team benefits from his efforts. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]