Meta:Administrators/confirm/Archives/2008-04

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in April 2008, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index.

.snoopy.

Latest comment: 16 years ago15 comments15 people in discussion

.snoopy. (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Sr 13 03:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep active and helpful. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Why not? --Cato 21:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Bastique

Latest comment: 16 years ago22 comments22 people in discussion

Bastique (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, sure — VasilievVV 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Yeah, I guess... ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Looks fine. Sr 13 07:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Philippe 14:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --A. B. ^(talk) 16:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
MEGA Keep. The best ever.--Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. WjBscribe 18:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Pile-on.--Cato 21:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 16:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Cbrown1023

Latest comment: 16 years ago23 comments23 people in discussion

Cbrown1023 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 16:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep ----Anonymous Dissident^Talk 11:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep I know him from EN:WQ; he's a good boy.--Cato 22:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Without a doubt. Very helpful admin. –Ejs-80 01:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Active and helpful. Sr 13 07:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep active. Philippe 14:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Great user. Acalamari 21:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep.--Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. WjBscribe 18:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Cspurrier

Latest comment: 16 years ago23 comments19 people in discussion

Cspurrier (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Note, cu has already been removed by the user himself.

Remove Inactive since 2007-12-26. Suggest also removing checkuser tool if it hasn't been used too (I'm not too sure what the policy on the checkuser tool is, but it does get removed after a length of inactivity.) Majorly (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I think all rights should be confirmed simultaneously. If the user is active either as an administrator or as a checkuser, they should not be removed for inactivity. Similarly, remove both if they're inactive. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:21:10, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
With the exception of steward, right? What I'm saying is to remove both anyway. Majorly (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Steward access is not based on Meta election, so it's not subject to Meta confirmation. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:27:37, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - He is very active on English Wikinews but he hasn't made a single edit on Meta-Wiki this year, His last admin action was 3rd November and steward action (which doesn't count) on 20th December, if he is willing to be active here, he can keep the tools but otherwise, I don't think he needs the sysop tools on Meta and some stewards do quite well without the sysop tools like Darkoneko ..--Comet styles 05:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove for inactivity, and someone should check the CU logs. I'd say if it's close to a year, remove that too. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
He performed a series of checks on 13–16 March 2007. According to the logs, he's otherwise never used his checkuser access. —{admin} Pathoschild 17:28:32, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
According to the checkuser policy, it should automatically be removed after a year of inactivity. Pathoschild, would you mind checking the other checkusers here for activity? Thanks, Majorly (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, will do. —{admin} Pathoschild 17:55:44, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove for inactivity - same for checkuser unless surprises. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Due to inactivity --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactive, but I just left him a message on Wikinews to alert him of this. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks EVula for the note. I intend to be more active on meta in the coming months. Other responsibilities have led me to neglect Meta, but I intend to change that :). I can not really remember why I have checkuser, but since meta has gotten local checkusers I have not used it and it should be removed, as I have done. --Cspurrier 17:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep admin but maybe revisit in 3 months instead of a year? Remove checkuser. ++Lar: t/c 00:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove I'm afraid. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 11:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep as an admin: Steward & current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove as CU, due to inactivity. --Aphaia 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove as both; even if within the letter of the rules he could stay as an admin, he is clearly rather inactive.--Cato 22:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, user wants to be more active here, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| ∇ 01:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep I share spacebirdy's opinion. --Jacob 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Cspurrier. --Thogo (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Inactive, but user is willing to make up for it. Sr 13 07:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove planning to be active is not the same as being so. I'm sure when the user is active again seeking the rights will be fine. (CU will have been granted for "log access" and is no longer valid as there is no cross wiki log) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 06:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - current stewards should IMO have sysop rights on meta. WjBscribe 18:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Not completely inactive. Korg 16:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

8 keep, 10 remove.

- Removed due to inactivity(44%)..--Comet styles 12:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Drini

Latest comment: 16 years ago19 comments19 people in discussion

Drini (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. Drini is active. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:00:04, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--LadyInGrey 21:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Sr 13 07:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep active. Philippe 14:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --A. B. ^(talk) 16:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 16:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Dungodung

Latest comment: 16 years ago14 comments14 people in discussion

Dungodung (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Ahonc 15:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --LadyInGrey 21:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
STRONG Keep. --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Effeietsanders

Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments13 people in discussion

Effeietsanders (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Philippe 14:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Fantasy

Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments12 people in discussion

Fantasy (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Inactive since 2007-11-16, and appears to have left. Majorly (talk) 01:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactive and last admin action on May 2007 ..--Comet styles 05:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive, sadly. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactive --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove He left Wikipedia.--Ahonc 15:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove no he left meta, it isn't same to leave Wikipedia. Due to inactivity and thousand appreciations for all his works done on meta and the community at large! --Aphaia 12:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove --LadyInGrey 21:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Let's let him go. Sr 13 07:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove -- KTC 23:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Removed..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hashar

Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments12 people in discussion

Hashar (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Inactive since 2007-05-05. Majorly (talk) 01:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - Last admin action in 2005, no need for the tools..--Comet styles 05:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove last admin action indeed in 2005. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactive --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive --Ahonc 15:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral inactive enough, but he as a sysadmin is around there at least on #wikimedia-tech. I think we are better to let him retain the sysop access as long as he is around, even vaguely. --Aphaia 12:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove --LadyInGrey 21:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactive. –Ejs-80 01:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove -- KTC 23:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Removed..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

JamesDay

Latest comment: 16 years ago12 comments11 people in discussion

JamesDay (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove Inactive since 2007-08-08, and no logged actions. Majorly (talk) 01:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - Inactive and no-admin action since given the tools ..--Comet styles 05:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove no action in the logs at all. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove No longer active --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove per above. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Inactivity. I heard he is also inactive as a sysadmin. --Aphaia 12:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Clarification: Wikitech shows his last activity as 23 August 2007 [1] and he apparently no longer has SVN access [2][3] since May 2006. No logged actions on Meta [4] at all. Further input from other developers would be appreciated. ~Kylu (u|t) 01:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Remove -- KTC 23:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Removed..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby

Latest comment: 16 years ago16 comments16 people in discussion

Jon Harald Søby (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Ahonc 15:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Helpful.--Cato 22:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Yes. Acalamari 21:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
STRONG Keep. --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Kate

Latest comment: 16 years ago26 comments20 people in discussion

Kate (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Remove - Kate is vaguely "around" but isn't using the tools. I consider this user inactive as an administrator. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Well, Kate is a steward, so the question of his adminship here has no relevance in my eyes. FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- He has recently denied even being a steward... Majorly (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  - What do you mean? That he has the steward flag as developer? ('cause that I recall) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    - I think so. Majorly (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Pretty inactive. Majorly (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - well he is a developer and can change his rights via the server and the Steward flag is not an important issue, since he believes he is not a Steward, but he assigned himself as a steward to make his workload bearable..--Comet styles 14:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral per Dungodung --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Need input from River himself — VasilievVV 16:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Dungodung.--Ahonc 15:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral inactive. When he needs the tools, he can easily either ask someone in the IRC channel, or make himself sysop with his steward buttons. --Thogo (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Changed to neutral, per Aphaia.
Keep Current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep active system administrator. Cary Bass ^demandez 23:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per cary. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Cary. Philippe 14:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Developer trumps inactivity guidelines, in my estimation. EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Kate is a developer who is not that active on meta unlike Brion and because of that I believe he doesn't need adminship status here, and BTW since he is a dev, he can temporarily assign himself as a sysop to make changes to MediaWiki related changes and remove it when not in use..--Comet styles 02:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  - Yes, but that's an extra step that, frankly, I don't see much point in forcing them to do. Trustworthiness is definitely not an issue here, only their inactivity; I choose to disregard that issue, though I certainly won't act like I don't understand why someone else may not make the same choice. If Kate wasn't a developer, I'd be singing a whole different tune. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --A. B. ^(talk) 16:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per all keep above .--Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral - low activity and Kate hasn't even expressed an interest in keeping the tools here. WjBscribe 18:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Not completely inactive. Korg 16:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

10 keep, 4 remove

- Kept, The user is an active dev that needs to use the tool time and again to fix the MediaWiki errors on multiple wikis which can be done easily through Meta (71%) ..--Comet styles 12:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Kph

Latest comment: 16 years ago11 comments10 people in discussion

Kph (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - active, helps out a lot with the portals...--Comet styles 05:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per Comets. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Ahonc 18:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Lar

Latest comment: 16 years ago22 comments22 people in discussion

Lar (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. Lar is active. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:00:55, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep (Hug)--Cato 22:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Charitwo 01:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Philippe 14:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Same here. Acalamari 21:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Strong Keep --A. B. ^(talk) 16:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
STRONG Keep. One of the best ever.--Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. WjBscribe 18:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Majorly

Latest comment: 16 years ago38 comments37 people in discussion

Majorly (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Comment: Formal support will be given if willing to understand and agree w:Wikipedia:BITE and w:WP:AGF, as suggested by RfA Candidate's Song.--Jusjih 02:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Would you care to explain what you mean? Thanks, Majorly (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Mønobi 02:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Controversial, yes. Abused tools, no. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Majorly is really very active on Meta and I doubt that he will ever abuse the tools..--Comet styles 05:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 is spot-on. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, and thanks for the work done in this year — VasilievVV 16:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I am adding my unnecessary Keep to the list. A very hardworking bureaucrat and an asset to the project. ++Lar: t/c 23:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
keep. Without any doubt. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Good value.--Cato 22:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Has maturity issues, behavior on other projects affects my opinion on a global scale. --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Mature and hardworking es:Drini 23:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Maturity is not a requirement for Admin. Majorly acts in his role in an exceptional manner. Cary Bass ^demandez 00:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, hard working on meta, if someone doesn't like him on other wikis, bad for them good for us. --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| ∇ 00:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep With no doubts. · AndonicO ^Talk 02:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- Chetblong 02:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment as the rule said, this confirmation is not intended to be voting, but rather designed to give the community a chance to raise their concerns around the current sysop each: So I think it isn't inappropriate some people show their concerns, in this case, maturity etc. I hope this issue is settled through productive interactions with interested parties. Aph.
Keep Hardworking, no abuse, no reason to remove the flag. --Aphaia 07:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep No reason why not. --Thogo (talk) 07:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Great contributor. Sr 13 07:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Philippe 14:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep from Wikipedia Alexfusco⁵ 19:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, and strongly too: he is not an abusive person. Removing Majorly's tools would be an error. Acalamari 21:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I was hesitant at supporting this, simply because it would seem like a "support: he's a friend" vote. I do, however, honestly think Majorly's being sysopped has a positive effect on Meta. Sure, he's very robust in his word choice, and isn't afraid to state his mind. Perhaps he's a little controversial. Per Nishkid, however, he's not abusive, and indeed, is a great admin. Fully support his being reconfirmed. Anthøny 10:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. WjBscribe 18:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Definitely. Maximillion Pegasus 21:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Millosh

Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments13 people in discussion

Millosh (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Nick1915

Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments13 people in discussion

Nick1915 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep--Ahonc 15:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Nishkid64

Latest comment: 16 years ago10 comments10 people in discussion

Nishkid64 (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Definitely. Acalamari 21:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Nixeagle

Latest comment: 16 years ago12 comments12 people in discussion

Nixeagle (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Mønobi 02:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep ----Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep — VasilievVV 06:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --A. B. ^(talk) 16:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Redux

Latest comment: 16 years ago22 comments17 people in discussion

Redux (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
By Majorly's request, I checked how active the checkusers on Meta were. According to the logs, Redux has never used his checkuser access. —{admin} Pathoschild 18:02:08, 01 April 2008 (UTC)
- In that case, I suggest that while he should be kept as an admin, he should remove his checkuser right. Majorly (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  - Was it granted the normal way? Or was it granted as a steward, like we did for some others (who already were removed)... If the latter, there is no reason in my view at this time to keep it, regardless of any other outcomes, as stewards used to have it to get access to the global log. The log is no longer global, hence no need. ++Lar: t/c 22:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
    - He granted it to himself. [5]. Majorly (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
      - Thanks for digging that up, Majorly. I would say that's a CU remove then. ++Lar: t/c 23:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep as sysop, but remove CU access. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - keep his admin, strip him of his self-given CU. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove CU.--Cato 22:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove as CU... Keep - as Admin ...--Comet styles 19:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep as sysop only, --Thogo (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep of course. Acalamari 21:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: I've gone ahead and taken care of the CU bit myself (here). It is indeed true that circumstances on Meta have changed, and it is no longer necessary for Stewards to be on standby as local CUs, now that we have active, regular users filling the shoes. So there's no need to wait until this concludes to do the sensible thing. Redux 04:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep, and good move resigning the CU bit. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept as admin but Checkuser was removed by Redux himself..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Sean Whitton

Latest comment: 16 years ago11 comments11 people in discussion

Sean Whitton (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Inactive for 2 months, but he's apparently busy in real life... Majorly (talk) 11:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral last admin action last december and only a couple of actions at all, but no problem in him keeping the tools. As Majorly said, it appears he's busy in real life... Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I know that Sean is too busy in real life :(. Though he's not going to leave the proect as far as I know — VasilievVV 16:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep -- KTC 23:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Shanel

Latest comment: 16 years ago17 comments16 people in discussion

Shanel (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep active. Majorly (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Jacob 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Helpful.--Cato 22:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Mardetanha 22:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Charitwo 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Meno25 19:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep - as admin but Remove- as husband-basher :P ..--Comet styles 19:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Sure. Acalamari 21:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep A great member of the wikiholic group --Tarawneh 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Sj

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

Sj (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep FiLiP ¤ 09:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

- Kept..--Comet styles 06:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Slade

Latest comment: 16 years ago19 comments18 people in discussion

Slade (talk • email • contributions • deleted contributions • all logs • blocks • deletions • protections)

Keep Nishkid64 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - Only 4 edits this year, and last admin action in November 2007 (protecting own archive page), too inactive for my liking...--Comet styles 05:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove - I agree with Cometstyles. Not active = no tools. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 05:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Per above. --Az1568 05:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove Pretty inactive. Majorly (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove inactive. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral 4 edits is not 0... --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep --.snoopy.  19:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral per Fabexplosive. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Active enough. --Thogo (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Current inactive clause says "0 edits within 6 months and 50 edits within a year". He doesn't meet that. --Aphaia 11:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Doesn't meet inactivity clause. --Jacob 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove as inactive — VasilievVV 06:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Neutral May not meet the inactivity guidelines, but certainly not active enough for my taste. I've alerted the user of this reconfirmation on his (apparent) home wiki, pt.wp. EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Remove per Cometstyles. Inactivity guidelines are... well, guidelines. I don't think Slade is active here. WjBscribe 18:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Random thought, but perhaps the guidelines may need to be upped? EVula raises a good point: if the guidelines are still not sufficient to mark an active and an inactive admin, surely they are insufficient? Anthøny 10:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)