User talk:Nishkid64

Welcome to Meta!

Hello Nishkid64, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

Hallo, Nishkid64, und Willkommen bei Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Diese Seite ist für die Koordination und Diskussion aller Wikimedia Projekte. Vielleicht findest du es nützlich, unsere Regelseite zu lesen. Wenn du daran interessiert bist, etwas zu übersetzen, besuche Meta:Babylon. Du kannst auch eine Notiz auf Meta:Babel hinterlassen (bitte lies die Anleitung am Anfang der Seite, bevor du schreibst). Wenn du willst, kannst du mir auf meiner Diskussionseite eine Frage stellen. Fröhliches bearbeiten.

Bonjour Nishkid64, et bienvenue sur le Meta-Wiki de Wikimédia ! Ce site a pour but de coordonner et discuter de l’ensemble des projets Wikimédia. Il vous sera utile de consulter notre page sur les règles de Wikimédia. Si vous êtes intéressé par des projets de traduction, visitez Meta:Babylon. Vous pouvez aussi laisser un message sur Meta:Babel (mais veuillez d’abord lire les instructions en haut de cette page avant d’y poster votre message). Si vous le voulez, vous pouvez me poser vos questions sur ma page de discussion. À bientôt !

Olá Nishkid64! Seja bem-vindo ao Meta! Este site/sítio é dedicado à discussão e à coordenação de todos os demais projetos da Fundação Wikimedia. Talvez lhe seja útil ler a página contendo a nossa política (em inglês) antes de começar a editar. Se tiver dúvidas, sinta-se à vontade para me fazer perguntas em minha página de discussão, ou deixe uma mensagem para toda a comunidade na Babel, a versão do Meta da Esplanada. Boa sorte!

Hola Nishkid64! Bienvenido a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundación Wikimedia! Este sitio es para coordinar y discutir todos los proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia. Tal vez le sea útil leer nuestra página de políticas (en inglés). Si le interesan las traducciones, visite Meta:Babylon. También puede dejar un mensaje en Meta:Babel (pero antes de hacerlo, por favor lea las instrucciones situadas en lo alto de la página). No dude en preguntar si tiene cualquiera duda, o pregunte en mi página de discusión. Buena suerte!

Ciao Nishkid64! Benvenuto sulla Meta-Wiki della Wikimedia Foundation! Questo sito serve a coordinare e discutere di tutti i progetti della Wikimedia Foundation. Potrebbe esserti utile leggere le nostre policy (in inglese). Se sei interessato a fare traduzioni, visita Meta:Babylon. Puoi anche lasciare un messaggio su Meta:Babel (ma per favore, leggi le istruzioni che si trovano all'inizio della pagina prima di scrivere). Se vuoi, puoi lasciarmi un messagio nella mia pagina di discussione. Buona fortuna!

Ciao Nishkid64, şi bine aţi venit la Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Acest website este pentru coordonarea şi discuţiile tuturor proiectelor Wikimedia. Este folositor să citiţi pagina despre politica noastră.. Dacă sunteţi interesaţi de traducere, vizita-ţi Meta:Babylon. De asemenea puteţi lasa o notă pe Meta:Babel (vă rugăm citiţi instrucţiunile de la începutul paginii înainte de a posta acolo). Dacă ai întrebări, nu ezita să mă întrebi pe pagina mea de discuţii talk page. Editare cu succes!

Hej Nishkid64, och välkommen till Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Den här sidan är till för att diskutera och samordna alla Wikimedias projekt. Vill du veta mer om sidan, kan vår policy-sida komma väl till pass. Är du intresserad av att hjälpa till med översättningar, besök Meta:Babylon. Du kan också lämna ett meddelande på Meta:Babel (vänligen läs instruktionerna överst på sidan innan du skriver något där). Om du vill, är du välkommen att ställa frågor på min diskussionssida. Lycka till med redigerandet!

Helló Nishkid64, és üdv a Wikimedia Meta-Wikijén! Ez a weboldal az összes Wikimedia projektet érintő ügyek megtárgyalására és koordinálására szolgál. Hasznosnak találhatod elolvasni az irányelveinket (angolul). Ha szeretnél fordításokat végezni, látogasd meg a Meta:Babylon-t, vagy a Meta:Babel oldalon hagyhatsz üzenetet (mielőtt ide írsz kérlek olvasd el a lap tetején található utasításokat). Ha szeretnél, nyugodtan kérdezz tőlem a vitalapomon. Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást! Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást!

Здравствуйте, Nishkid64, и добро пожаловать на Meta-Wiki Фонда Викимедиа! Этот сайт предназначен для координации и обсуждения вопросов, связанных со всеми проектами фонда. Для начала Вы можете ознакомиться с нашими правилами. Если Вы заинтересованы в работе над переводами, посетите Meta:Babylon. Вы также можете обсудить различные вопросы на странице Meta:Babel (пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с инструкцией сверху, прежде чем писать). Если возникнут вопросы, не бойтесь задавать их мне на моей странице обсуждения. Удачи!

Hola Nishkid64! Benvingut a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundació Wikimedia! Aquest lloc està fet per a coordinar i discutir tots els projectes de la Fundació Wikimedia. Potser us serà útil llegir la nostra pàgina de polítiques (en anglès). Si us interessen les traduccions, visiteu Meta:Babylon. També podeu deixar un missatge a Meta:Babel (però abans de fer-ho, llegiu les instruccions situades al principi de la pàgina). No dubteu en preguntar si teniu qualsevol dubte. Si cal ho podeu fer en la meva pàgina de discussió. Bona sort!

Nishkid64, 你好！歡迎光臨維基媒體元維基！這個網站是為協調和討論所有維基媒體項目而設。我們的政策頁可能對您有用。如果您有興趣協助翻譯工作, 請參觀Meta:Babylon。你可在 Meta:Babel 留下口訊 (張貼之前請先讀該頁上指示)。若有問題, 請在我的討論頁問我 。祝
編安!

வணக்கம் Nishkid64, விக்கிமீடியா மேல்விக்கி! இற்கு நல்வரவு. இவ்விணையத்தளமானது கூட்டாகச் சேர்ந்து விடயங்களை விவாதிப்பதற்கென உருவாக்கப் பட்டது. விக்கித்திட்டங்கள். நீங்கள் எங்களின் பாலிசிகளையும் பாலிசி பக்கம் படித்தறியலாம். நீங்கள் மொழிபெயர்பில் ஆர்வமுடையவராகின், Meta:Babylon ஐப் பார்வையிடவும். நீங்கள் Meta:Babel இல் குறிப்பொன்றையும் விட்டுச் செல்லலாம். (பக்கத்தின் மேலேயிருக்கும் அறிவுறுத்தல்களை வாசித்தபின்னரே அங்கே செய்திகளை இடவும்). நீங்கள் விரும்பினால் எனது பக்கத்தில் செய்தியொன்றை விடவும் talk page. உங்கள் ஆக்கங்களை வரவேற்கின்றோம்!

--Majorly 23:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signature

It is my very personal impression, but you could consider to change your signature much plainer one? It is too itchy for me in following discussions. Thank you for consideration. --Aphaia 10:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Your vote for admin confirmation

Hi, I saw your vote there and if you fixed your signatures, it would be more kindly in my opinion. ;)

By the way I think you hardly a part of meta community since you have little substantial edits here ... specially after reviewing your votes, I am afraid you have not understood how it works well. Meta admin is not the same on local wikis - specially for people deeply involved into the Foundation affairs. Even once a year or so, they need it in a critical moment. I would like you to consider what you are saying, it is not a popular poll and not all meta admin are needed to engage in "janitor works", though most of us are happy to serve in that way too. I am afraid people who haven't belong here in the real sense make our community confused. Thanks.--Aphaia 21:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

hope you sort out your confusions so that people that have not been belonging here in the real sense can engage. Long live new. Pablo2garcia 13:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Vote

Hi, you said Essjay needed to keep his adminship on meta, while he was inactive. But I think you only stated that he needed it, without reasons. I'll appreciate you to give us reasoning. Thanks. --Aphaia 02:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikiskills

Ok --Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 10:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ouch!

And apologies. On books it's a week and brain was out of gear, however I am not the only one doing it? Thanks tho for the warning, regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 06:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I have no problem with this - I closed it too soon I know. Importantly I was not aware of the policy which was wrong. Had I done so aware of the policy I would have been doing it with eyes open & more care - thanks for pointing it out, cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion of early close VfD

I noted your opinion on herby's talk. I would like you to remind not always meta regular can be active, with other concerns. I once saw a meta sysop speedied useful pages for translators. After I undeleted it, he listed on VfD and claimed it was not related to meta with his buddy he was called from some other local project, those who don't know anything multiligual coordination, one of meta objectives. To shorten the time may deprive the meta editors to oppose such behaviors, therefore I strongly oppose to shorten the discussion. --Aphaia 00:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I was just trying to justify why Nick1915 might have closed the RfD early. The RfD in question had 8 delete votes, and no opposition, so I used that reasoning to justify Nick's closing. Personally, I let RfDs run for the normal two week period. Nishkid64 (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Endorsement striking

Thank you for your interest, however we would much appreciate you to notice it, just remove, for invalid endorsement. I think the rule below needs to prevent fraud, removing valid vote by a third party on bad faith.

As states:

Do not remove the endorsement. Please contact a member of the Election Committee, who will investigate the claim.

Thank you for your consideration, --Aphaia 23:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Invitations to the Milipedia

Hey you can also get friends to visit me at the Milipedia. To get there find go to my talkpage then click my userpage and finally click the link that leads to http://wiki.uschallengecoins.com/User_talk:Novabolt or click the link that I put on your talkpage. You can help me expand that Wiki which is rarely edited for a long time.(76.247.222.101 06:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC))

My steward election

Thank you for supporting my steward election having passed with 72-1-4-99%.--Jusjih 23:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Changed usage for {{closed}}

Hello Nishkid64. At some point you used {{closed}} with the "text" parameter (ie, {{closed|text=Rogue deletion omg. ~~~~}}). This will no longer work correctly in the future, because the "text" parameter will contain the entire discussion (to wrap it in a coloured box). Instead, please use {{closed|Summary}} or {{closed|1=Summary}} (for complex summaries). Thanks. —{admin} Pathoschild 00:16:03, 05 February 2008 (UTC)

Closing RfA's

Please don't ever do that again..I know it was 100% but its good to follow the time, this ain't enwiki and crats don't delay here so no need to hurry it. We had problem before to because of ppl closing RfA's early and there is an RfA that has been running before this so its not really a good idea to close this one and wait for the other one to close which was before this...--Cometstyles 02:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

btw you are 33 hours too early... :| ..--Cometstyles 02:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah. So that's what happened. Can I just say here that I've no objections whatsoever if a 'crat wishes to re-open my RfA here - Alison ^❤ 02:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Nope, crats decision is final, you'll just have to live with it now allie ;) ..--Cometstyles 02:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

lol - thanks, guys! :) - Alison ^❤ 02:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid that I'm going to have to second Cometstyles here. This move was completely out of policy and was in error. Please ensure this does not happen again. You were, as Comet notes, nearly a day and a half early. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm actually rather uncomfortable that it closed this early. While it appeared fine and was unanimous, I'd rather it had gone to end of process for peace of mind and correctness sake. Unfortunately, now there will be a question mark over it and people may always question its validity. I'd dearly like it to be reopened if possible, to remove any doubt - Alison ^❤ 06:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it Alison. It was completely clear, and one of the highest amounts of support ever. Other RfAs have been closed out of process here before and there hasn't been a problem with the admin involved. Cheers, Majorly (talk) 07:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

It was not a big problem here, but I would prefer if RfAs are closed near (after) the ending time in the future. I propose to remove the note in WM:RFA on which you were referring to;^[1] please see Meta talk:Requests for adminship#RFA ending times. Thanks and regards, Korg 14:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

This RfA was running at 35/0/0. In the last two days, there were only two comments on the RfA! What would we have expected if we kept the RfA running 33 hours longer? One comment, two comments at most? AD, see my response on Comet's talk page. I based my decision on the text at the top of WM:RFA. Show me how this was "out of policy". Nishkid64 (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Umm, look further down. It is noted expressly that requests should not be closed early. 33 hours is quite a breach of this, no? It's not a matter, necessarily, of whether the request would have passed or no, but it's a matter of protocol. There needs to be some line drawn. If we're closing a day and a half early, why not 2 days and a half? 3 days? 7 days is the line drawn. Arbitrary though it may be, it is the time that has been agreed upon for RFAs. 5 and a half days was not. I'll also add that I'm sorry about my previous post; I realise I might have been too harsh. But, surely, you see that what you did was not really within policy? --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 03:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

About closings

Hey Nishkid, I see they are being pretty harsh in regards to your 12-minute-early closure. While your 30-something hour early close was wrong, I don't think it's fair that you get so much flack for 12 minutes. Just wanted to express my defense of you here; you should not be penalised, and definitely not lose your access for 12 minutes. Best, --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Notice of removal of adminship

Hello,

I regret to inform you that, in accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and as a result of your inactivity, you have been automatically stripped of your adminship. Please see Meta:Administrators/Removal/October 2009 for details. Kind regards, —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

six month block on english wikipedia

can you please remove the block on english wikipedia --68.192.158.195 17:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Your unblock request has been denied over there multiple times, and as such it is very unlikely you will change anything by posting here (other than getting the IP blocked here as well). I recommend going and finding something more constructive to do with your time. Tiptoety ^talk