Taimako: Shirye-shirye/Asusun Al'umma na Wikimedia/Tsarin bitar kwamitin da tsarin
The Wikimedia Foundation Funds exist to support the strategic direction of the movement. We want to build a relationship of partnership with all of the people and organizations that are supported through these programs. For this reason, it is important to explain the review process within the new Funds strategy. Partners in the process: Applicants, Community Resources regional program officers and Regional Funds Committees.
The General Support Fund is being reviewed with the new Regional Funds Committees. These committees are decentralised and participatory decision-making bodies, composed of experienced and newer community members, and organised in 8 regions. For more information about the Regional Committee process and its current members see: Grants:Committees.
Our goal is to work with each applicant to explain decisions clearly. In the event the recommendation is to not fund the proposal as submitted we are committed to working with the applicant to ensure they understand what would be needed in the future and to support them in that journey.
Overview of the review process
A brief overview of the review process:
- Applicant submission: Applicants submit their proposal through the new grantee portal, these are available on Meta for general community review and comments.
- Due diligence: The Community Resources team organises the proposals and supporting documents for committee review. These supporting documents include any additional documents the applicants included in their proposal, such as strategic or annual plans, as well as background information about the organisation prepared by Program Officers based on several sources of information: such as Affiliate reports and surveys, review of past qualitative and quantitative results (from grant reporting), budget and staff growth, etc.
- Regional Committee review: Committee members take some time to review these proposals and supporting documents individually based on a series of criteria and questions. The categories and questions that can be reviewed below.
- Initial feedback : During this phase, committees may publish questions on meta so that applicants can clarify any aspects of their proposal. Community members in general may also be posting comments, questions or feedback that applicants should respond to via meta.
- Structured feedback from Regional Committee: The whole committee meets to discuss each project to consolidate a unified feedback document that will be sent to applicants. This feedback may include suggestions for adjustments in certain areas of the proposal or questions around issues that were unclear and the committee would like to understand further to review the proposal.
- Staff feedback shared with committee: At this stage Program Officers also share their Staff review of each proposal with Committee members. This analysis seeks to offer additional information or insights about the proposal based on Program Officers engagement with applicants throughout the process, but also other Foundation staff knowledge around thematic areas and learning from other programs and experiences. This may include analysis about the organizational growth and impact over time, the clarity of their approach and strategies, their staff and budget distribution, etc. Committees should feel ownership of the decision and be empowered to question and use the analysis from Foundation Staff as another perspective.
- Committee/Applicant meetings: In certain cases, committee members may request a live session with the applicants to discuss this feedback and ask questions. Program Officers may also organise these spaces to provide applicants with support to review this feedback.
- Applicant responses and revisions: Applicants have a set time to make necessary adjustments or clarifications. These should be done directly on Fluxx as the final proposal.
- Deliberations: Committee members hold a second round of formal deliberation sessions to make their final decisions on the funding. In this stage they take into consideration all the recommendations and adjustments, as well as the overall budget for the region. In the final Committee recommendation, some further recommendations may be made to applicants to support their implementation work, or for future proposal development.
- Committee funding decision and remarks: The applicants are informed of the funding decision via email, Fluxx and Meta and, if approved, begin the grant administration process.
The Regional Fund Committees use the following framework for the proposal review
Review resources
Useful resources used during review and decision-making:
Asusun Tallafawa Gabaɗaya - Kayan aikin bita na shawarwari
Wannan ɗan gajeren kayan aiki yana nufin tallafawa masu bitar shawarwari don fahimta da amfani da ƙa'idodin bita ta hanyar haɗa tsarin bita tare da kwararar aikace-aikacen.
Hakanan yana neman haɓakawa da tsara tsarin tunanin ku don shirya tattaunawar shawarwarin kuɗi. Jami'in shirin ku na iya amfani da / raba ƙarfafan martani tare da babban kwamiti. Da fatan za a rubuta ra'ayoyin ku kamar kuna magana da mai nema kai tsaye, ta yadda za a iya shigar da ra'ayoyinku cikin sauƙi cikin shawarwarin da za a buga a shafin mai nema daga baya. Da fatan za a kula cewa tsayuwar tsokaci da shawarwarin ku na iya taimaka wa membobin kwamitin ku, da masu nema, don karanta ta cikin ingantaccen bincike. Hakanan zaka iya ba da wasu takamaiman misalai waɗanda zasu iya taimaka wa mai nema yin bayanin da suka dace ko gyara.
Taken aikace-aikacen:
Sunan mai bayarwa:
Lambar ID na kyauta (wanda Jami'in Shirin ya cika):
| Tambayoyin da suka dace a cikin aikace-aikacen form wanda ya dace da waɗannan bangarorin: | Babban Al'amari | Ma'aunin kimantawa | Eh | A’a | Babu tabbas, ana buƙatar tambaya ta biyo baya |
| 5, 6, 8, 9 | Ƙimar ga tasirin ilimin daidaito:
Haɓaka ƙungiyoyin da ba a ba da izini ba ko gudummawar abubuwan da ba a bayyana ba game da, misali:
|
Girman daidaiton ilimi ana la'akari da shi yadda ya kamata a cikin ayyukan, abun ciki ko ƙungiyoyin manufa. | |||
| 5, 6, 8, 9 | Daraja ga al'ummar sa kai | Ayyuka sun haɗa da al'ummomin masu sa kai a cikin tsarawa, aiwatarwa da tunani game da aikin an nuna su da kyau, ko kuma wani nau'i na amincewar al'umma don aikin da aka ba da shawara ya kasance. | |||
| Ana la'akari da matakan kiyayewa ko haɓaka lafiyar al'umma, aminci, da haɗa kai. | |||||
| Jawabi daga al'umma kan yadda aikin ya yi tasiri a kansu (misali aikinsu, gwaninta ko iyawarsu) an tattara ko za a tattara su kuma za su sanar da dabara ko tsara shirye-shirye na gaba. | |||||
| Ayyukan da za a ɗauka ko riƙe masu aikin sa kai sun haɗa. | |||||
| 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15 | Darajar ga motsi | Ayyuka da dabarun da aka tsara sun bayyana a fili kuma suna amsa da kyau ga ƙalubalen da aka gabatar. | |||
| An gina haɗin gwiwa da haɗin gwiwa waɗanda ke da yuwuwar haɓaka wuraren jigogi / babban yaƙin neman zaɓe / canja wuri zuwa wasu yankuna da mahallin, ko samar da haɗin kai a cikin ayyukan ƙungiyoyi daban-daban. | |||||
| Ana amfani da hanyoyi, dabaru, ko dabaru masu mahimmancin canja wuri (misali a cikin yanki mai jigo ko cikin farfaɗowar al'umma). | |||||
| 13 | Ayyukan sun yi daidai da 2030 Shawarwari na Dabarun Motsi da tsare-tsare. | ||||
| Idan an amsa "A'a" ko "Ba a bayyana ba", kuna da takamaiman shawarwarin da za a iya aiwatarwa a cikin tsari ko fayyace tambayoyin da ke da alaƙa da ƙimar da shawarar ta kawo: | |||||
| 14, 15 | Yiwuwar aikin da aka tsara | Matsakaicin da aka tsara da mahimmancin gudummawar na gaskiya ne, kuma sakamakon aikin ne (ba za a yi aiki ba in ba haka ba kuma ba za a nuna wani kwafin ƙoƙari / haɗuwa tare da sauran ayyukan makamancin haka da sauran ayyukan al'ummomin ba). | |||
| 10 | Jadawalin lokacin isarwa yana nuna yuwuwar. | ||||
| 11, 12 | Ƙarfi da rawar da membobin ƙungiyar ke da hannu, masu sa kai, masu kwangila da abokan hulɗa na waje sun bayyana a fili kuma suna nuna iyakar yadda ƙungiyar aiwatarwa gaba ɗaya ta haɗu da ƙwarewar da ake bukata. | ||||
| 16-22 | Kasafin kudi: shirin aiwatar da kudaden shiga da kashe kudi yana da ma'ana, barata, kuma yana nuna dorewa. | ||||
| Idan an amsa "A'a" ko "Ba a bayyana ba", kuna da takamaiman shawarwarin da za a iya aiwatarwa a cikin tsari ko fayyace tambayoyin da ke da alaƙa da yuwuwar tsarin: | |||||
| Ƙarfin gaba ɗaya (ko kuma idan mai bayarwa yana dawowa, canje-canje masu kyau / haɓakawa / maraba da ci gaban ƙungiya (misali a cikin shugabanci, sarrafa kuɗi, ko ayyukan nuna gaskiya) muna gani: | Gabaɗaya Shawarwari / Abubuwan Da Aka Gani: | ||||
| Tambayoyi masu biyo baya / bayyanawa ga Meta, idan akwai: | |||||
Shawarar tallafin farko, idan ta riga ta bayyana:
| |||||
Duba kuma
The Community Resources team at Wikimedia Foundation supports the Wikimedia Foundation Funds. We offer funding opportunities, guidance, and other resources to the Wikimedia Movement.