Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2025/Votes/AramilFeraxa

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

AramilFeraxa

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: pl, en-3, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, I am AramilFeraxa. My venture with Wikipedia in earnest began in 2020 on plwiki. I currently serve as an administrator, a checkuser, an abuse filter operator, and a member of the Arbitration Committee. On a daily basis, in addition to combating vandalism, I manage the "Did you know..." section on the main page. I am also an administrator here on Meta-Wiki.

    I am actively involved on a global scale. I hold the roles of global renamer, global rollbacker, and, above all, global sysop. I consistently resolve requests on GSR and frequently monitor Global sysops/Speedy delete requests. My cross-wiki contributions can be seen here. Additionally, I regularly report LTAs, proxies, and spambots on SRG. According to the statistics for that page, I am ranked as the 6th top contributor [1].

    I aspire to become a steward to enhance my ability to combat vandalism more effectively. I am also eager to support the current stewards; therefore, in addition to SRG, I will focus on SRP, SRGP, and SRM. Due to my field of study and my experience as a checkuser, I am familiar with issues related to networks and IP addresses. However, I acknowledge that I am not perfect, and I would be grateful for guidance from more experienced stewards. Since Einsbor stepped down from stewardship some time ago, we have only one Polish-speaking steward. Considering that plwiki is one of the large wikis, I believe a second one would be a valuable addition :)

    My time zone is UTC+1/+2, and I am usually active during the whole day, with a particular focus on evening hours. Thank you for considering my candidacy! AramilFeraxa (Talk) 09:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2025/Questions#AramilFeraxa


If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2025|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Yes

[edit]
  1. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  --TenWhile6 14:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  trusted user, good work as global sysop Johannnes89 (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. EPIC (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  AramilFeraxa is a GR/GS/GRN, as well as an administrator on Meta and plwiki and a CU on the latter. They are active in the roles they hold and have relevant experience. Most of their current activity was picked up last year and they became a CU only in December, but I don't think it will be too big of an obstacle, as they have shown competency and signs of sustained activity. Therefore, I am leaning towards a yes. EPIC (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  An easy support from me – GS + plwiki sysop and CU. shb (t • c) 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Arcticocean (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  arcticocean ■ 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --Minilammas (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. A09 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Highly proefficient user on GSR as far as non-stews actions go. Eventhough CU rights are recent, I believe Aramil proved himself to be a trusted and valued community member ages ago. A09|(pogovor) 14:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Skilsdhuo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Skilsdhuo (talk) 14:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  No objections. --Stïnger （会話） 14:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  No reason to oppose is a reason to support. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ayane Fumihiro (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2025 •  Ayane aka. eunn 14:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  XXBlackburnXx (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Svartava (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Svārtava (tɕ) 14:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. KonstantinaG07 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  KonstantinaG07 (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. WiiUf (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  WiiUf (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Icodense99 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Icodense (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good cross-wiki work and trusted. Please do keep in mind the concern(s) raised in the neutral section - just one as of when I make this vote on collaboration, that's very important for a steward. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Aqurs1 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  aqurs ❄️ 14:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Trusted and skilled user, proved himself on pl.wiki Nadzik (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Tulsi (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Yes, please. Tulsi 24x7 14:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  trusted member and crosswiki experience JrandWP (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. AshOregano (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  AshOregano (talk)
  24. AkaruiHikari (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  I trust him! AkaruiHikari (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Pretty able candidate, well done (like the other candidates). Leaderboard (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Brightt11 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  bright mensaje 15:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  V0lkanic (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Talimu0518 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Talimu0518 (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ternera (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  No concerns. Ternera (talk) 15:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Wüstenspringmaus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Wüstenspringmaus talk 15:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Iluvatar (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. نعيم قربوسي (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  نعيم قربوسي (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  --Ferien (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Alachuckthebuck (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. RadiX (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  RadiX∞ 18:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Mpn (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Mpn (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Argam Forbes (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Argam Forbes (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Tvcccp (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Sure Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Kggucwa (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Aopou (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  —Aopou {talk} 19:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Zafkiel GD (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Zafkiel GD | Talk 19:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  DCB (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Leserättin (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Leserättin (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yahya (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 21:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Codename Noreste (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Codename Noreste (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Miniapolis 23:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Jet Pilot (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Jet Pilot 00:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Pólux (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Pólux (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Elli (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Elli (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Hehua (talk) 04:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. JustARandomEditor123 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 07:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Justiyaya (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Justiyaya (talk) 07:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. 3aFW (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  3aFW (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  61. খাত্তাব হাসান (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  খাত্তাব হাসান (talk) 11:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Osps7 (Verification pending) •  — Osama Eid (talk) 12:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. BZPN (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  AramilFeraxa is active and does good work globally, but I don’t like his way of handling conflicts. To me it looks like he sticks to his own opinion and does not try to find a solution. He also seems to make decisions based on his own personal views rather than looking at the bigger picture. I think a steward should be more open to different perspectives and focused on solving problems fairly. But regardless, I still wish good luck. BZPN (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    نعيم قربوسي (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  نعيم قربوسي (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Vote was changed to support (Special:Diff/28223772) but not struck/removed here. Pinging نعيم قربوسي. --TenWhile6 20:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 20:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  PoetVeches (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sink Cat (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 22:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2025/Votes/AramilFeraxa&oldid=28228167"