Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/SNN95

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

SNN95

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

The Wikimedia Foundation did not receive this user's signature on the confidentiality agreement prior to February 08, 2020, as mandated by the election prerequisites. This candidate is therefore disqualified. Details can be found on the talk page.

  • Languages: en, ms
  • Personal info: (English)
    I want to help my language wiki that is Malay Wikipedia to prevent any spam created article by anon users. As interface administrators in the Wikipedia, there some parts of feature I can't get access to install into all Malay Wikimedia related projects, that only high tier admin can. I am also want to help any small Malay Wikimedia-related projects that ditch by old community. Me and my other Wikimedia Community User Group Malaysia's members want to revive this small projects. If I got the access as stewards, I can give them and other potential users that really want to achieve the Wikimedia 2030's movement to gain sysop access as they got positive support from community consensus.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#SNN95


Yes

[edit]
  2. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. CyberTroopers (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  CyberTroopers (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Šedrvan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Šedrvan (talk) 10:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. He basically wants to be a steward to be a superuser in his homewikis, against policy. No thanks. Rschen7754 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  From answers to questions it does looks like they don't know what this role is about. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Doesn't seem to understand the steward role, or doesn't want to fulfill it. MF-W 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Statement shows that the user does not intend to do any x-wiki stuff. Minorax (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Low to little x-wiki experience, statement suggests they would operate primarily in their home wikis - not what I look for in a steward. — xaosflux Talk 14:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, Does not have their IN entry by Feb 8 - they had plenty of time to submit it well before the deadline. — regards, Revi 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Good faith nomination, but maybe GS is all they need, hope they will consider GS one day. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 • --Turkmen talk 14:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  per MF-W Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  doesn't understand the role of steward. Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Insufficient cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Herby talk thyme 16:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Pppery (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Primarily per Rschen7754 * Pppery * it has begun 17:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Per Rschen. Esteban16 (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  No way. I think you don't understand correctly about the Steward role. --Stïnger （会話） 18:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Kostas20142 (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  RhinosF1 (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Alex Noble (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Doesn't appear to get the role of a steward ~~ Alex Noble - talk 20:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per Rschen7754 *Youngjin (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Per Rschen7754 Sintakso (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per Stinger et al Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Wrong answer, and a really weird reason for wanting to be a steward. Leaderboard (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  I'm finding their responses to the questions wholely unsatisfactory. Hiàn (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Vermont (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Mirer (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  From their answers, I don't think they understand the role of stewardship. Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  Doesn't understand the purpose of steward role 1ForTheMoney (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Nomination statement does not make any sense. ST47 (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020 •  Doesn't understand the role of a steward Johannnes89 (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Good faith editor, but not suitable for steward role. — Jules Talk 12:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  No experience yet.. cyrfaw (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. AGK (Verification pending) •  AGK ■ 17:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Vmavanti (Verification pending) •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 17:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I no think he can do this very need job, but I say no is no good. So I vote neutral to let he happy--SickManWP (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/SNN95&oldid=19795709"