Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Lofty abyss

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lofty abyss

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-4, mt, it-2 (at a very basic level I can also understand most Romance languages)
  • Personal info: (English)
    I had been a steward for eight years, and would like to continue counteracting spambots and generally monitoring small wikis and act when necessary, as I did to various degrees for about a decade now (although registered in 2006). I'm an admin on en (also os)/simplewiki (also cu), commons/meta, also respond to info-en queues; often encounter crosswiki vandals or spammers (even if not bots), whether reported locally on the bigger wikis I look out for (although most still require only a single block as they do not venture beyond that one site) or on #cvn-sw - metawiki itself seemingly attracts quite a few long-term abusers too, who I also hope I helped with in years previously. I would like to integrate my present patterns of activity with my past actions in the role, and so hope you could support my request.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Lofty_abyss


Yes

[edit]
  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Activity since last year has been fine. I think the confirmation fiasco last year wasn’t exactly fair to him. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  With my cavaet at their meta sysopship application where if he is inactive again, I don't think I can support any further application. Menti really pick up speed in admining at commons, simple. Let's give one more chance. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 • --Turkmen talk 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. EPIC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  EPIC (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  agree with Tony. Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Érico (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I've made my feelings about last year's confirmation known, but Lofty has been activeish since then and seems willing to re-engage in the role. I think the biggest risk here is that the candidate will go inactive again, which isn't particularly risky. Welcome back. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  largely per Ajraddatz. I am willing to give him one more chance, with the hope that he will be active this year. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Per Ajraddatz stwalkerster (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Joalpe (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Willing to give him another chance. Hiàn (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  per Ajraddatz and Jianhui67. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 06:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Mardetanha talk 17:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Bff (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Lofty abyss has a lot of expertise on Wikipedia. I am sure he/she will be an expert steward as well. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 23:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gharouni 03:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  AGK ■ 17:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 11:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Per TonyBallioni and Praxidicae. Activity is higher on English Wikipedia than I would like to see, but it's fairly spread around, which suggests good mopping of under-participated local and ancillary projects. Meets my simple requirements of smart + clue + polite and cordial + proficient knowledge of and adherence to global Steward policy = renewed global mop. Dmehus (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jfblanc (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  i'll vote for, but i will definitely oppose their confirmation next year if their activity patterns will once again be as low as they were in previous terms (and if something like 2019 confirmation will happen again). Meiræ 17:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arraque (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Thanks for your help on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  JogiAsad (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I want to give this user a second chance, but hopefully they will take these criticisms to heart regardless. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per user MJL Patriccck (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Xbspiro (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020 •  Xbspiro (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Lack of activity was my main concern last year. I mostly agree with TonyBallioni and MJL on this. OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Mr. Vernon (Not eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik) •  A friend to those of us fighting vandalism. Thanks for the good work. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Tazkeung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Tazkeung (talk) 09:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Good luck. Garam talk 18:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Alaa :)..! 21:52, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Stephan Tournay (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Dany Crash (talk) 23:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Kevin (aka L235 · t · enwiki) 19:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Happy to give a chance given that his inactivity is behind and overall his steward contributions were good. However, this would be pretty much the last chance, and I would not support in case of any further problem with activity or steward actions — NickK (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. I was originally going to support his confirmation last year but generally I got the feeling that he wanted to be a steward just to be a steward and wanted to do the minimum amount of work possible to keep the fancy hat. I'm seeing a tendency to argue endlessly about the rules (see also the questions), and I also was underwhelmed by the response to the unfortunate 2014 privacy incident involving another steward (which unfortunately I cannot further discuss as it was on stewards-l). So ultimately oppose, I'm not convinced that he wants to be a steward for the right reasons.Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Please let's never have a confirmation against like in 2019. MF-W 14:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; fails 4.2 — regards, Revi 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  I still remember last year's confirmation, also per Rschen7754. KPFC 💬 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Sorry--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 16:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Almost solely en.wp - more cross wiki experience needed Herby talk thyme 16:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Pppery (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  * Pppery * it has begun 16:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Per Rschen. Besides, his activity hasn't been considerably high recently. Esteban16 (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Difficult person to work with. I would rather not have him as my colleague again. Trijnsteltalk 17:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Gdarin (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gdarin | talk 18:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  I'm sorry, I don't trust you for now. Your activity in the last years as a Steward was very little for me, and please look at the concerns raised above by the rest of the users. Maybe in the future if you demonstrate more experience and understanding I will support you. --Stïnger （会話） 18:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  The user's steward flag was revoked last year due to lack of activity, and nothing has changed. Despite the statement about integrating their "present patterns of activity", they're not particularly active anywhere, not even on enwiki. Looks like they just hang out at the vandalism board and block a few vandals here and there. No, that does not make you a crosswiki specialist. They're not involved with the community on enwiki at all, nor are they involved with the community at the other projects they're an admin at, despite highlighting those user rights to bolster their credibility here. I'm also even more concerned by their embarrassing behavior in last year's election. The user was completely disruptive and hardheaded and endlessly pestered the opposers trying to gaslight them into believing that they had already resolved the activity issue and that we were just moving the goalposts on them. There was absolutely no reasoning with them whatsoever throughout that election, and that's not something I want to ever see from a Steward. Swarm (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Mirer (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Obvious troll nomination, in which the candidate even dares to withhold what lead to involuntary access removal last year. I am shocked by the utter impudence shown around this candidacy. --Vogone (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 • Minoo (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Did not mention anywhere in this election about their recent name change (of maybe I overlooked that). Gereon K. (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Am I to understand that this user failed reconfirmation only last year due to inactivity, has since changed usernames, and does not feel that this should be mentioned in their nomination statement? ST47 (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Withholding pertinent details of election past? Not suitable. Waddie96 (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Per Rschen. Tymon.r (talk) 01:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Mercy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Mercy (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 20:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  behavioural concerns Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Masumrezarock100 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  per Swarm. Please try not to be inactive as much as possible this year. So maybe I will support you next year. Masum Reza📞 22:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Djsasso (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  per Rschen7754. Back before his first steward run he all but told me that was his goal. And he has done similar on simple.wiki. To avoid his flag removal from inactivity he has in the past stopped at the exact number needed to maintain his flag on Dec. 31 after being inactive all year. I think he just wants flags for the sake of flags. -Djsasso (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Frettie (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Seems a bit hat-collecty per the other opposes. John M Wolfson (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  as per Rschen, Swarm, DjSasso and per their failed confirmation last year, Given they apparently don't do much when they were a steward I fail to see the point in making them a steward again, Unfortunately this is an easy Oppose. –Davey2010Talk 23:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --oSeveno (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Operator873 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  This candidate's behavior with edit counting to maintain flags is enough for me to say No. Operator873talkconnect 14:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020 •  Kurtis (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  After reading comments concerning cooperation capabilities and general behaviour. Kind regards, Daniuu (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per comments by User:Djsasso. Mardus (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  It's saddening that I had to oppose as I encouraged them to run for a second time and given my support in the above. However, their activity as pointed out by others throughout this confirmation is at enwp mainly. I didn't see them on meta, simple and commons that much. I will still stand that their activity last year is quite good overall. I am just fearful that if they cannot stay active enough in this SE period, they may not be able to sustain and what happened in confirmations 2019 will appear again. Apologies and regretful,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Nightenbelle (talk) 15:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  WikiAviator (talk) 04:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Boobarkee (talk) 10:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Kyykaarme (Eligible, checked by DannyS712)2020 •  Per Swarm. kyykaarme (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  — xaosflux Talk 14:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Chipermc (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Cabayi (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hannes 24 (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  TJH2018talk 22:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Regretfully, since I do not see sufficient evidence of significant cross wiki activity. Despite them being admin on several projects, about 75% of their edits are on enwiki. epicgenius (talk) 21:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  You have not edited Commons since July 2019, your last 50 edits go back to 2015 and still you are proud to be a Commons admin. But you neither mentioned nor explained well your name change during last year. Taivo (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Schniggendiller (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Long-time steward, but … I saw some odd behaviour during last years stewards confirmation (on-Wiki & off-Wiki). And iirc you changed your name last year *during* the election. That's kind of a stunt … Schniggendiller (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Minorax (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Previously, I had negative thoughts about your role as a steward. I would like to be you given a chance again but I have some concerns based by negative comments. --Uğurkenttalk 14:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Although I agree with No votes, but they had been fairly active recently. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC) changing vote. Ankry (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Sintakso (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per 1997kB Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Nothing against you on paper, but your answers seemed haphazard and did not clearly explain your thought process. Leaderboard (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  I am concerned by the 2019 confirmation and the comments on activity. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  人人生來平等 (talk) 05:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       HunMaster (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  HunMaster (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arbnos (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Poti Berik (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Patsagorn Y. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Patsagorn Y. (Talk) 08:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Darkhan 16:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 13:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Lofty_abyss&oldid=24929716"