Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Vodomar

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Vodomar

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: English, Croatian
  • Personal info: (English)
    I hereby nominate myself as a Steward, my main project, focus and involvement has been allocated to the Croatian Wikipedia Project. I have been involved with the Croatian Wikipedia since 6th of May, 2004, and have been an administrator since 2006. As a user, editor and administrator I have made many contributions to the Croatian Wikipedia project, contributing a lot in writing articles, adding other digital content such as graphics, diagrams, photographs and the like. My approach is one of collaboration, respect and consensus which can be vouched by many editors and users of the Croatian Wikipedia and wider. Vodomar (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Vodomar
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Yes

[edit]
  2. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Saileshpat (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Saileshpat (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Birczanin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  --Birczanin (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AnToni (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --AnToni(Talk) 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Daemon2010 (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  mnn Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Vodomar seems diplomatic enough to serve as a steward, in contrast to many of the admins (some of whom are voting on here) who have demonstrably less diplomatic skillsets. I think being able to navigate diplomatically is a key criteria for being qualified for some form of Wikipedia supervision. And by that, I don't mean being politically correct, but having a genuine sense of judiciousness. The candidate seems at least to want to possess that characteristic, so I vote yes.Stevenmitchell (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  I think the applicant is fully qualified Rberchie (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. DariaPolonia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  DariaPolonia (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Austral blizzard (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  I respect and support his willingness to contribute globally to the Wikimedia projects. Maestro Ivanković (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Elektracentrum (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  O.K. Elektracentrum (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. VS6507 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  VS6507 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Jacky50412 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Jacky50412 (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rovoobo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 • Rovoobo Talk 10:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Leyth (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Leyth (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Scalhotrod (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Scalhotrod (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Endo999 (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  -- It's a weak support from me, solely because Croatian expertise is needed in the mainspace - Royalmate1 (talk) 01:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Bff (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bff (talk) 10:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bpierreb (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rhatsa26X (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Rhatsa26X (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Excellent and profound in the mediating and with the resolving of issues. Kubura (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. 1AnuraagPandey (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Anuraag Pandey (Leave a message) 05:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ammartivari (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Ammar Tivari Talk! 16:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  With cross wiki experience, would be a strong yes, as Vodomar seems to have a temperate attitude, patience and decent much-needed language skills. FeralOink (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Washuotaku (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Washuotaku (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Even if his role in the systemic issues on the Croatian Wikipedia is minor (and this is not some sort of a judgment on that) it would be better for Wikimedia that he tried to fix the problems on his own wiki before trying to fix those on others. Rschen7754 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, comments like [1][2] make me very uncomfortable. --Rschen7754 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Crosswiki experience is required. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Vogone (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Rschen. Eurodyne (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  There must be more active in cross-wiki. Per Rschen. --Uğurkenttalk 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No crosswiki activity MF-W 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No crosswiki experience. –Davey2010Talk 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mh7kJ (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I'd like to see some activities on xwikis ~ Nahid Talk 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Legoktm (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Don't know you. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. C3r4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --C3r4 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per Rschen7754. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Dlambe3 (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt) •  Dlambe3 (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Igorwindsor (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per Rschen7754. Igor Windsor (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per others, more crosswiki experience is needed. SPQRobin (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  lack of experience DangSunM (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No crosswiki experience and sole local experience is in a project facing some problems — NickK (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I would really like someone from Croatian Wikipedia here and better connected to the international community but I expect to see a little more interest in any other Wikimedia project where there is more interaction with any other language. Global Contributions outside of Croatian only are low. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  - tucoxn\talk 01:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Soul Train (talk) 08:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Too early Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No crosswiki experience.[3] Nemo 08:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Herby talk thyme 09:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ethically Yours (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Ethically Yours (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not enough experience. AmaryllisGardener talk 14:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Focus currently too narrow. Sorry. Dweller (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Dean72 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I am a contributor to Croatian Wikipedia and my experience tells me that despite his accommodating tones Vodomar always bows decisions of the most problematic admins on CW. In praxis, he has not shown himself as an impartial user. Dean72 (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 15:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 19:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not satisfied by experience, candidate statement (that's one of the most important things, like the advertisement to sell yourself, yet many candidates seem not to have bothered) and some responses. Just the two languages? What about Serbian? Bosnian? Given the more-or-less mutual intelligibility within these South Slavic languages why weren't they included in your list of language skills? (removed following comments by candidate on my talk page which make sense. I still stand by my comments about candidate statement though) ( Xania (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  From a war torn Wikipedia, a good steward candidate are local Administrator who able to lead their communities on their own home wiki into a good communities.--AldNonBicara? 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC). (Changed to NO from Neutral) I just found out your theil index is 0.86 and only edit on 13 wikis See here truly embarrassing for a steward candidate.--AldNonymousBicara? 04:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 13:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ruthven (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  ST ○ 23:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Low cross wiki experience. I'm another who'd like to see an attempt at fixing the problems at hr first. KTo288 (talk) 23:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 23:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Widr (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  maybe next year Mardetanha talk 00:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sorry, but I do not see a real reason for his application for Steward, since you have little or no activity on other wikis than your wiki source. In addition, the Croatian Wikpedia, where you are administrator, has serious problems of conflicts between publishers, which makes your work there more important than here Leon saudanha (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Niesy74 (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. User:Hafspajen (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Crosswiki experience is required Hafspajen (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. GregorB (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Rschen7754, with an important correction: not being able to fix problems of CW is fine (that would be a tall order by any standard), but not being able to recognize them at all is not. GregorB (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Uchup19 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Uchup19 (talk) 09:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Grind24 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  per above and I don't see any cross-wiki activity . Grind24 (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Sebleouf (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Aspiriniks (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Aspiriniks (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  One of the worst candidates. Gilc (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Per Rschen MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mjesfahani (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No way! If you can't even keep the Croatian Wikipedia up to the basic principles of WMF projects, how could you ever do that with projects in languages you don't speak? თოგო (D) 15:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Very limited (not only crosswiki) experience.    FDMS  4    16:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  --Wnme 20:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Şeyx Şamil (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Şeyx Şamil (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The denial of hr.wiki's problems is even worth losing sysop rights. Vituzzu (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  lol Wikit 18:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vik-Thor (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Stolengood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Stolengood (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Get some more cross-wiki experience. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Literally zero cross-activity is way too little to become a steward. Base (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  I am not familiar with the "issues" about hr.wiki but I see that your cross-wiki acitvity is quite low. it is true that we don't have a lot of hr-N/hr-3 users with flags on the "meta" level and that is sort of a gap, but I think that more cross-wiki activity should be required. Alexmar983 (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 23:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  The Banner (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Harlock81 (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Vitek (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015 •  Vitek (talk) 00:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Coekon (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Miniwark (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Challenger l (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Challenger l (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Not certain of motivation for nomination, or what looking to do. Little xwiki experience, no global roles, though does hold CU rights so presumably knows how to use tools, though no participation in such discussions.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  112. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  114. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Conquistador (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  As an administrator at CW where there were (is?) heavy admin misconduct, he should have been able to explain his negative votes at the last two admin elections even more eagerly than the positive ones. Furthermore, to add to GregorB's comment, his view on the whole CW situation is very selective and in some aspects even misleading. His cross-wiki activity is rather poor for a steward candidate, but I do not call for him to fix this. What it needs to be fix is just in front of him, at his home wiki. Conquistador (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Adirlanz (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Avi (talk) 14:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Not now. Low cross-wiki activity/experience, also per Rschen7754 and Conquistador statements. Zerabat (discusión) 00:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Wlodzimierz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Wlodzimierz (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Good afternoon (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  The latest edits of this user mainly concern commercial projects or celebrities (he for instance created the article on Wii remote on the croatian Wikipedia). I would like to see a steward who has a background in science and hence is qualified to go for the right decisions. Mathmensch (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 11:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  While this user seems to mean well, I share other's concerns about hrwiki and do not see enough cross-wiki contributions to assuage that worry. Snowolf How can I help? 17:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zivax (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per Rschen7754's concerns. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:49 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per the answer to Billinghurst's question. Green Giant (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Zunter (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Zunter (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Being a Croatian user among the stewards isn't a bad thing imo, but with the answers Vodomar gave I'm not sure he's the right person for this task. Trijnsteltalk 12:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 • --Hannes 24 (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC) I´m not fully convinced. Sorry. Dobra večer.[reply]
  16. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not enough to oppose, but doesn't give me enough confidence to support either. CT Cooper · talk 14:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I don't know. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Dispe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Dispe (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bjoertvedt (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bulldoc (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Pablo000 (talk) 06:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The only concern I have is that this candidate has little experience outside the Croatian language Wikipedia. However, I must commend him for working in a very difficult Wikipedia and doing his best to make things better.. I encourage him to get more experience in other areas. Wpollard (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Boboseiptu (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Iich1960 (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Poti Berik (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Would be an able steward but not enough cross-wiki activity. —Gyaro–Maguus— 14:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/Vodomar&oldid=24961080"