User talk:Tiptoety

Welcome to Meta!

أهلا Tiptoety ، ومرحبا بك في ويكيميديا ميتا ويكي! يعمل هذا الموقع على تنسيق ومناقشة كل مشاريع ويكيميديا. ربما سيكون مفيدا لك مطالعة صفحة السياسات هنا. إذا كنت مهتما بأمور الترجمة، راجع ميتا:بابلون. يمكنك أيضا ترك ملاحظة في ميتا:بابل (من فضلك راجع أولا التعليمات هناك قبل ترك الملاحظة). إذا أردت الاستفسار عن شئ ، لا تتردد في سؤالي في صفحة نقاشي. تمتع بالتحرير هنا!

Hola Tiptoety! Benvingut a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundació Wikimedia! Aquest lloc està fet per a coordinar i discutir tots els projectes de la Fundació Wikimedia. Potser us serà útil llegir la nostra pàgina de polítiques (en anglès). Si us interessen les traduccions, visiteu Meta:Babylon. També podeu deixar un missatge a Meta:Babel o al Meta:Metapub (però abans de fer-ho, llegiu les instruccions situades al principi de la pàgina). No dubteu en preguntar si teniu qualsevol dubte. Si cal ho podeu fer en la meva pàgina de discussió. Bona sort!

Vítejte, uživateli Tiptoety, a vítejte na Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Tento server je určen pro spolupráci a diskusím ke všem projektům nadace Wikimedia. Možná si budete chtít přečíst naše pravidla. Pokud chcete spolupracovat na překladech, navštivte Meta:Babylon. Také můžete přidat příspěvek na Meta:Babel či Meta:Metapub (nejdříve si přečtěte pokyny na začátku těchto stránek). V případě potřeby se neváhejte zeptat se na mé diskusní stránce. Hodně štěstí!

Hallo Tiptoety, und Willkommen bei Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Diese Webseite dient der Koordination und Diskussion aller Wikimedia-Projekte. Vielleicht findest Du es nützlich, unsere Regelseite zu lesen. Sofern Du daran interessiert bist etwas zu übersetzen, besuche Meta:Babylon. Du kannst auch eine Notiz auf Meta:Babel oder Meta:Metapub hinterlassen (bitte lies die Anleitung am Anfang der Seiten, bevor Du etwas schreibst). Wenn Du möchtest, kannst Du mir auch auf meiner Diskussionseite Fragen stellen. Fröhliches Bearbeiten wünscht

ވިކިމީޑިޔާގެ މީޓާ-ވިކީ އަށް މަރުހަބާ! މިވެބްސައިޓަކީ ވިކިމީޑިޔާގެ ހުރިހާ މަޝްރޫޢުތަކާއި ބެހޭގޮތުން ވާހަކަތައް ދެކެވި އެ މަޝްރޫޢެއް ހިންގައި ހަދާ ވެބް ސައިޓެވެ. އަޅުގަނޑުމެންގެ ޤަވާއިދުތައް ފުރަތަމަ ވިދާޅުވުމަކީ މުހިންމު ކަމެއް ކަމުގައި ދެކެމެވެ. ތަރުޖަމާކުރާ ހިތްޕުޅުވެވަޑައިގަންނަވާ ނަމަ މީޓާ:ބެބިލޯން އަށް ވަޑައިގަންނަވާށެވެ. އަދި ހަމަ އެހެންމެ މިކަމާއި ބެހޭ ލިޔުމެއް މީޓާ:ބޭބެލް ގައި ލިޔުއްވަވާށެވެ. (އެހެންނަމަވެސް އެޞަފްޙާގައި އެއްވެސް އެއްޗެއް އިތުރު ކުރެއްވުމުގެ ކުރިން އެ ޞަފްހާގެ މަތީގައިވާ ޢިބާރާތް ވިދާޅުވެލައްވާށެވެ.) މިއާއި މުދު ހިތްހަމަޖެހިވަޑައިގަންނަވާ ނަމަ އިތުރު އެހީ އަށް އެދުމަށް މި ޞަފްހާ ގައި އެދުމަށް ފަސްޖެހި ވަޑައި ނުގަންނަވާށެވެ. އުނިއިތުރު ގެނައުމުގައި އުފާވެރި ވަގުތުކޮޅެއް ހޭދަ ކޮށްލައްވާށެވެ!!

Hello Tiptoety, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

¡Hola Tiptoety! ¡Bienvenido a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundación Wikimedia! Este sitio es para coordinar y discutir todos los proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia. Tal vez le sea útil leer nuestra página de políticas (en inglés). Si le interesan las traducciones, visite Meta:Babylon. También puede dejar un mensaje en Meta:Babel o Meta:Metapub (pero antes de hacerlo, por favor lea las instrucciones situadas en lo alto de la página). No dude en preguntar si tiene cualquiera duda, o pregunte en mi página de discusión. ¡Buena suerte!

سلام Tiptoety ، به ويكی مديا متاويكیخوش آمدید! این وبگاه برای بحث و هماهنگ کردن ويكي مديا است. برای شما مفید است که اول صفحه سیاست های اینجا را بخوانید. اگر شما علاقمند به ترجمه هستید به صفحه متا:بابیلون سر بزنید. همچنین اگر یادداشتی داشتید می توانیید در متا:بابل یادداشت خود را بگذارید (قبل از نوشتن یادداشت به توضیحات موجود در صفحه توجه کنید.). اگر سوالی داشتید می توانید در صفحه بحث. سوال خود را بپرسید و کمک بخواهید!

Hei Tiptoety, ja tervetuloa Wikimedian Meta-Wikiin! Tämä nettisivusto on kaikkien Wikimedia-säätiön projektien koordinointia ja keskustelua varten. Saattaa olla hyödyllistä lukea käytäntömme. Jos olet kiinnostunut käännöksistä, käy Meta:Babylon-sivulla. Voit myöskin jättää huomautuksen Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub -sivulle (ole hyvä ja lue ohjeet sivun yläosassa ennenkuin kirjoitat sinne). Jos haluat, saat vapaasti kysyä minulta kysymyksiä keskustelusivullani. Iloisia muokkaushetkiä!

Bonjour Tiptoety, et bienvenue sur le Meta-Wiki de Wikimédia ! Ce site a pour but de coordonner et discuter de l’ensemble des projets Wikimédia. Il vous sera utile de consulter notre page sur les règles de Wikimédia. Si vous êtes intéressé par des projets de traduction, visitez Meta:Babylon. Vous pouvez aussi laisser un message sur Meta:Babel ou Meta:Metapub (mais veuillez d’abord lire les instructions en haut de cette page avant d’y poster votre message). Si vous le voulez, vous pouvez me poser vos questions sur ma page de discussion. À bientôt !

Ola Tiptoety! Benvido a Meta-Wiki, da Fundación Wikimedia! Este sitio é para coordinar e discutir sobre calquera dos proxectos da Fundación Wikimedia. Tavez lle sexa útil ler a nosa páxina de políticas (en inglés). Se lle interesan as traducións, visite Meta:Babylon. Tamén pode deixar unha mensaxe en Meta:Babel ou en Meta:Metapub (pero antes de facelo, por favor lea as instrucións situadas no alto da páxina). Non dubide en preguntar se ten calquera dúbida, ou pregunte na miña páxina de conversa. Boa sorte!

נכתב בלשון זכר למען הנוחות
היי Tiptoety, וברוך בואך ל- ויקימדיה מטא-ויקי! אתר זה נועד בכדי לתאם פעולות ולדון בפרויקטים של וויקימדיה. יש להניח שדפי המדיניות שלנו יהיו שימושיים עבורך. אם הנך מעוניין לבצע עבודות תרגום, בקר ב-Meta:Babylon. תוכל גם להשאיר הערה ב-Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (אנא קרא את ההוראות בראש הדף לפני כתיבה שם). אם תרצה, הרגש חופשי לרשום לי שאלות בדף השיחה שלי. עריכה נעימה!

Helló Tiptoety, és üdv a Wikimedia Meta-Wikijén! Ez a weboldal az összes Wikimedia projektet érintő ügyek megtárgyalására és koordinálására szolgál. Hasznosnak találhatod elolvasni az irányelveinket (angolul). Ha szeretnél fordításokat végezni, látogasd meg a Meta:Babylon-t, vagy a Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, oldalon hagyhatsz üzenetet (mielőtt ide írsz kérlek olvasd el a lap tetején található utasításokat). Ha szeretnél, nyugodtan kérdezz tőlem a vitalapomon. Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást! Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást!

Halló Tiptoety, vertu velkomin(n) á Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Þessi síða er til að ræða saman um öll Wikimedia-verkefni og samhæfa þau. Kannski finnst þér gagnlegt að lesa stefnusíðuna. Hafir þú áhuga á þýðingum er Meta:Babylon rétti staðurinn. Þú mátt skrifast á við okkur í Meta:Babel eða Meta:Metapub (vinsamlegast lestu notkunarreglurnar áður en þú breytir síðunni). Hikaðu ekki við að hafa samband við mig á spjallsíðu minni ef þú hefur einhverjar spurningar. Gangi þér vel!

Halo Tiptoety, dan selamat datang di Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Situs web ini berperan sebagai tempat koordinasi dan diskusi mengenai seluruh proyek-proyek Wikimedia. Mungkin akan bermanfaat bagi Anda untuk membaca halaman kebijakan kami. Jika Anda tertarik untuk melakukan penerjemahan, kunjungi Meta:Babylon. Anda juga dapat meninggalkan pesan di Meta:Babel atau Meta:Metapub (bacalah petunjuk di bagian atas halaman tersebut sebelum meninggalkan pesan di sana). Jika perlu, Anda dapat bertanya kepada saya di halaman pembicaraan (talk page) saya. Selamat menyunting!

Ciao Tiptoety! Benvenuto sulla Meta-Wiki della Wikimedia Foundation! Questo sito serve a coordinare e discutere di tutti i progetti della Wikimedia Foundation. Potrebbe esserti utile leggere le nostre policy (in inglese). Se sei interessato a fare traduzioni, visita Meta:Babylon. Puoi anche lasciare un messaggio su Meta:Babel o Meta:Metapub (ma per favore, leggi le istruzioni che si trovano all'inizio della pagina prima di scrivere). Se vuoi, puoi lasciarmi un messagio nella mia pagina di discussione. Buona fortuna!

Tiptoetyさん、ウィキメディア メタ・ウィキへようこそ！このサイトは、ウィキメディアのプロジェクト間の調整や話し合いを目的としています。もしよろしければ、基本方針とガイドラインのページを是非ご一読ください。もし翻訳に興味をお持ちなら、Meta:Babylon をご覧ください。Meta:Babel, Metapub にメッセージを投稿していただくことも可能です（投稿前にページ上部の説明をお読みください）。お困りの際は、ご遠慮なく私の会話ページに質問をお寄せください。楽しくやっていきましょう。どうぞよろしくお願いします。

Tiptoety님, 위키미디어 메타 위키에 회원가입하신 것을 환영합니다! 이 사이트는 모든 위키미디어 프로젝트들 간의 상호조정과 토론을 위한 공간입니다. 우리의 정책을 보면, 도움이 되실 겁니다. 만약 번역에 관심이 있으시다면, 바빌론을 방문해 보세요. 또한 바벨, 메타퍼브를 사용하실 수도 있습니다. (사용하시기 전에 각 문서의 사용설명을 먼저 읽어주세요). 만약 궁금한 것이 있으시면, 부담없이 저의 토론 문서에 질문을 올려주세요. 즐거운 편집이 되시길 바랍니다!

Hai Tiptoety, dan selamat datang ke Meta-Wiki Wikimedia! Laman web ini adalah untuk mengkoordinasikan dan membincangkan segala Projek Wikimedia. Anda boleh mendapat banyak faedah dengan membaca laman polisi kami. Jika anda berminat menterjemah, silalah lawati Meta:Babylon. Anda juga boleh meninggalkan pesanan di Meta:Babel atau Meta:Metapub (sila baca panduan di atas laman yang berkenaan sebelum meninggalkan pesanan). Jika perlu, tanyalah soalan di laman perbualan saya. Selamat menyunting!

Hallo Tiptoety, en welkom op de Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Deze website is voor het coördineren en bespreken van alle Wikimedia-projecten. Waarschijnlijk vind je het handig om onze beleidpagina te lezen. Als je geïnteresseerd bent in het vertalen van teksten, ga da naar Meta:Babylon. Je kunt ook een bericht achterlaten op Meta:Babel of Meta:Metapub (lees wel de instructies aan het begin van de pagina voordat je een bericht achterlaat). Als je nog vragen hebt stel ze me dan op mijn overlegpagina. Veel plezier met bewerken!

Hei Tiptoety, og velkommen til Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Denne siden er til for å diskutere og samordne alle Wikimediaprosjektene. Vil du vite mer om siden, kan vår policy-side komme til nytte. Er du interessert i å hjelpe til med oversettelser, besøk Meta:Babylon. Du kan også legge igjen en beskjed på Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub (vær vennlig og les instruksjonene øverst på siden før du skriver noe der). Hvis du vil, er du velkommen til å stille spørsmål på min diskusjonsside. God redigering!

Cześć Tiptoety i witaj w projekcie Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ta strona została stworzona do koordynacji i dyskusji nad wszystkimi projektami Fundacji Wikimedia. Proszę Cię o przeczytanie naszych zasad. Jeżeli chcesz się zając tłumaczeniem stron, odwiedź Meta:Babylon. Możesz również zostawić notkę na stronie Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (proszę jednak, abyś najpierw przeczytał instrukcje na górze tej strony). Jeżeli będziesz potrzebował pomocy zostaw komentarz na mojej stronie dyskusji. Miłego edytowania!

Olá Tiptoety! Seja bem-vindo ao Meta! Este site/sítio é dedicado à discussão e à coordenação de todos os demais projetos da Fundação Wikimedia. Talvez lhe seja útil ler a página contendo a nossa política (em inglês) antes de começar a editar. Se tiver dúvidas, sinta-se à vontade para me fazer perguntas em minha página de discussão, ou deixe uma mensagem para toda a comunidade na Babel, Meta:Metapub, a versão do Meta da Esplanada. Boa sorte!

Ciao Tiptoety, şi bine aţi venit la Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Acest website este pentru coordonarea şi discuţiile tuturor proiectelor Wikimedia. Este folositor să citiţi pagina despre politica noastră.. Dacă sunteţi interesaţi de traducere, vizita-ţi Meta:Babylon. De asemenea puteţi lasa o notă pe Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (vă rugăm citiţi instrucţiunile de la începutul paginii înainte de a posta acolo). Dacă ai întrebări, nu ezita să mă întrebi pe pagina mea de discuţii talk page. Editare cu succes!

Здравствуйте, Tiptoety, и добро пожаловать на Мета-вики фонда Викимедиа! Этот сайт предназначен для координации и обсуждения вопросов, связанных со всеми проектами фонда. Для начала предлагаю ознакомиться с правилами этого проекта. Если Вы заинтересованы в работе над переводами страниц Мета-вики и других материалов, посетите Meta:Babylon. Вы также можете обсудить различные вопросы на странице Meta:Babel или Meta:Metapub (пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с инструкцией сверху, прежде чем писать). Если возникнут вопросы, не бойтесь задавать их мне на моей странице обсуждения. Удачи!

Tjeta Tiptoety, dhe mirësevin në Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ky vënd i rrjetës është për të koordinuar dhe diskutuar çdo projekt të Wikimediës. Mund ta gjësh të dobishme faqet e politikës sonë. Në qoftë se je duke interesuar në përkthime, vizitò Meta:Babylon. Mund të lësh një shënim në Meta:Babel ose Meta:Metapub (të lutem të lexosh përdorimet në fillim të fletës para se të postosh atje). Në qoftë se do, ndihu i/e lirë të më bsh pyetje në faqen time të diskutimit. Të auguroj një redaktim të këndshëm!

Здраво Tiptoety, и добро дошли на Викимедијин мета-вики! Овај сајт служи за координацију и дискусију око Викимедијиних пројеката. Вероватно ће Вам бити корисно да прочитате наше странице везане за политику рада. Ако сте заинтересовани за превођење, посетите Meta:Babylon. Можете такође и оставити поруку на страници Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub (молимо погледајте упутства на врху те странице пре него што пошаљете свој коментар тамо). Ако имате неко питање, можете да ми поставите на мојој страници за разговор. Срећно уређивање!

Hej Tiptoety, och välkommen till Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Meta är till för att diskutera och samordna alla Wikimedias projekt. Vill du veta mer om webbplatsen, kan vår policy-sida komma väl till pass. Är du intresserad av att hjälpa till med översättningar, besök Meta:Babylon. Du kan skriva diskussionsinlägg på Meta:Babel eller Meta:Metapub (läs instruktionerna överst på sidan innan du skriver något där). Om du vill, är du välkommen att ställa frågor på min diskussionssida. Lycka till med redigerandet!

வணக்கம் Tiptoety, விக்கிமீடியா மேல்விக்கி! இற்கு நல்வரவு. இவ்விணையத்தளமானது கூட்டாகச் சேர்ந்து விடயங்களை விவாதிப்பதற்கென உருவாக்கப் பட்டது. விக்கித்திட்டங்கள். நீங்கள் எங்களின் பாலிசிகளையும் பாலிசி பக்கம் படித்தறியலாம். நீங்கள் மொழிபெயர்பில் ஆர்வமுடையவராகின், Meta:Babylon ஐப் பார்வையிடவும். நீங்கள் Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub இல் குறிப்பொன்றையும் விட்டுச் செல்லலாம். (பக்கத்தின் மேலேயிருக்கும் அறிவுறுத்தல்களை வாசித்தபின்னரே அங்கே செய்திகளை இடவும்). நீங்கள் விரும்பினால் எனது பக்கத்தில் செய்தியொன்றை விடவும் talk page. உங்கள் ஆக்கங்களை வரவேற்கின்றோம்!

中文（简体）: Tiptoety，你好！欢迎光临维基媒体元维基！这个网站是为协调和讨论所有维基媒体项目而设。我们的政策页可能对您有用。如果您有兴趣协助翻译工作，请参观Meta:Babylon。你可在Meta:Babel、Meta:Metapub留下口讯（张贴之前请先读该页上指示）。若有问题，请在我的讨论页问我 。祝
编安！

中文（繁體）: Tiptoety，你好！歡迎光臨維基媒體元維基！這個網站是為協調和討論所有維基媒體項目而設。我們的政策頁可能對您有用。如果您有興趣協助翻譯工作，請參觀Meta:Babylon。你可在Meta:Babel、Meta:Metapub留下口訊（張貼之前請先讀該頁上指示）。若有問題，請在我的討論頁問我 。祝
編安！

Cometstyles 00:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome! Tiptoety 01:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Note

Just a note that the Simple English Wiktionary does not currently fall under the current proposal for global sysops. We are currently discussing whether or not we should enable global sysops on the Simple English Wiktionary. Just a note, Razorflame 20:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

/me shrugs Tiptoety ^talk 22:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

SUL

Hey. I saw the comment you posted on the talk page of User:I'm so Hot.... I just wanted to tell you that was my error, I just used that account for SUL on fi.wiki, and I forgot to log out, I already fixed the vote. Good luck on you requst for adminship ;) RubiksMaster110 04:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

No worries, we all make mistakes. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 04:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks ;)

Thanks for fix my mistakes. --Kaganer 01:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 01:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Removement of vote

Hi Tiptoety! I recently changed my nick on de:WP and en:WP to NPunkt, see [1] and change log on [2] (dont know how the search function works there, sorry)...Where can I change my nick global? Regards --Nickaat 08:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

You are looking for Steward requests/SUL requests. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 08:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Sysop Vote Removal

I am not technically an anonymous user; I do have a Wikipedia account, which I thought I was logged into at the time of voting. 70.30.3.118 02:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

No worries. Please log into that account and cast your vote. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 03:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Vote

Oops! my bad. I did not know I was unqualified. The banner at en said "You are invited to vote on the global sysops proposal. Click here for more information." I think it's best to leave this invisible for the unqualified, to prevent confusion, or rephrase it so it does not imply qualification. Thanks --Hacky 02:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

That is not possible. The banner is not able to make a determination of who is qualified and who is not. The voter is expected to read the requirements posted at the top of the voting page. Tiptoety ^talk 03:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Sysop Vote

In the english wiki, maybe. But in all Wikis together, especially the german Wiki, i think i have at least 150 edits. -- Tscherpownik 15:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

You do not; you have 110 odd edits. Pmlineditor ∞ 15:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the message Tiptoey, fair is fair. However, I should not have received a vote in the first place. This is an error in the voting process. It could be argued my vote should stand. Thanks--Dunshocking 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Global Sysopvote

Hi.

I have almost 1800 edits at Norwegian wikipedia, under the user name of no:Bruker:Alexis

Alex norway123 21:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

You should consider SULing that account. Tiptoety ^talk 21:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Weird contribution

I still have no idea, what you have wanted to tell me with this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MutterErde#December_2009 contribution? Mutter Erde 78.55.206.217 19:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear administrator!

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | Nederlands | português | Türkçe | русский | العربية | Tiếng Việt | edit

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our budget is smaller than Commons)

Tiptoety, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Meta. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

A tip: add this page Meta:Administrators' discussion index to your watchlist, it tracks the latest activity to various sections of many of the important pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-admin @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading although it doesn't always completely apply here at Meta.

Please also check or add your entry to Meta:Administrators#List_of_administrators and the Template:List of administrators.

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 05:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations Tiptoety & welcome. — Dferg (talk) 11:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

'grats. Pmlineditor ∞ 15:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Global sysop

Congratulations! You now have the rights of global sysop.--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 12:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I won't get to test them out for a few weeks as I am on vacation. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 17:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats too, I wish good work for you! Regards, —Innv {ru-ws} 02:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations, Tiptoety. :) Lauryn Ashby (d) 02:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Wow! Congrats indeed :) - Alison ^❤ 03:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.

it is nice, you have block that user(192.248.92.4). he is doing a Vandalism. -- බිඟුවා ^{සාකච්ඡාව} 04:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. Tiptoety ^talk 05:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment

Please, comment this request: Violation of local policy by Ukrainian arbitration committee.--Prima klasy4na 01:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I think I am going to stay uninvolved in this matter. Tiptoety ^talk 03:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank for answer. Who may comment this request? Why Ukrainian arbitration committee and its members may violate of local policy without any aftereffect?--Prima klasy4na 08:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Anyone may comment, that is the nature of an RfC. I am just choosing not to. My actions do not reflect anything more than not wanting to get involved. Tiptoety ^talk 03:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Your RfB

Hi there! I've just closed your RfB as successful. Have fun with the new tools and ask me if you need any help. Best -Barras 19:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Barras. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Grtz Tiptoety. Kylu 14:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Danke Kylu. Tiptoety ^talk 17:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Need for closure

You had an active role in this matter, but then it looks like you walked away leaving me high and dry with this last unresolved matter [3]. Soon that page was running into trouble and I had to appeal, without much success. I would appreciate if you be so kind as to help bring this matter to a close with your opinion or, better yet, your action.

Sincerely,

Virgilio A. P. Machado

Vapmachado 06:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. I am not going to involve myself in this matter. Tiptoety ^talk 07:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Done. In any case, thank you so very much for your attention. Vapmachado 01:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

For your information

Request for follow up. This is for your information only. Please feel free to decline. I don't consider that you are under any obligation to do whatsoever concerning my request.

Sincerely,

Virgilio A. P. Machado

Vapmachado 01:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Fundraising Committee

Hi there! Thanks for volunteering to sit on the Fundraising committee. The work of the committee will be really valuable to making this year's annual giving campaign really effective. I've posted an overview to Fundraising 2010, and would love your thoughts on the talk page. I'm also going to try to set up an IRC meeting soon, and hope you'll join for that. Keep an eye Fundraising 2010/Committee for a couple of proposed times! Thanks again... Philippe (WMF) 18:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Meeting

Hi all,

I'd like to have a meeting on IRC this week to discuss the 2010-2011 annual appeal/fundraiser. This will be an "anyone is welcome" type meeting, open to the broad community. During this, Zack Exley and I will take you through our inital thoughts about the fundraiser and its organization, and ask you to join us in a discussion about the (massive) role of volunteers and chapters in this year's fundraiser.

Because of the vagaries of time zones, scheduling live meetings is hard. So, we'll have a couple of potential times, and we'll log and post the meeting for anyone who wasn't able to make it.

The meetings will be held Thursday, 12 August at 23:00 UTC (16:00 PDT) and Friday, 13 August at 16:30 UTC (09:30 PDT) in the #wikimedia-fundraising channel on the freenode network on IRC (irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-fundraising). You can access this using freenode's webclient, which is available at http://webchat.freenode.net/ or by using your favorite IRC client.

Hope to see you there! Philippe (WMF) 20:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Fundraising 2010

Hello Tiptoety, thanks for showing interest in the fundraising committee. You can see that we've started to develop the Committee structure and I'd like to encourage your thoughts and participation in the formulation of the important role Wikimedians will play in our drive this year. Please leave me a message if you have a specific request from me, otherwise head to the talk pages and lets get started brainstorming! Keegan (WMF), Fundraising 2010 20:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Ameena

Hi Tiptoety. I found you at META:CHU so thought you might be able to help. I have a big problem; I created the above account on the 3rd of September. And yes you guessed it, I forgot the password! To make matters worse, I have not yet set an email address. I am currently in a renaming process at W:WP:CHUU, so I decided to add the email after thats complete. Is there anything you can do? Perhaps you can delete this account so that I may recreate? As far as I remember, I have never edited on meta... Ameena 07:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I am truly sorry, but unless you can remember the password we cannot perform a rename. There is really nothing you can do, other than register a new account. Tiptoety ^talk 17:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I understand. :( Can treat this as another genuine usurpation case then? Notify the user (my account), wait for a week, if no reply, delete (or rename to some random name), so that I may register again? Ameena 01:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure, and Done. Now to wait. Tiptoety ^talk 05:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! 119.235.14.34 05:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Useruped. You can now create Ameena. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 06:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

┌───────────────────┘
Thanks! One small problem though, how come I still can't merge my accounts (SUL)? I own the same name at en.wiki, planning on usurping the de and ar wikis too... Ameena 07:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Have you tried merging your accounts using Special:MergeAccount? Tiptoety ^talk 17:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes. :( Do you think its because of the ar.wiki and de.wiki usurpations? Ameena 00:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Do you use the same password ar.wiki and de.wiki? Tiptoety ^talk 02:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The ar and de accounts are not owned by me. Still trying to get across the language barrier to request there. :) Managed to submit a request at de. I currently own Commons and en.wiki. Ameena 09:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah...that would be why you cannot merge your accounts. I will say that given the language barrier and that the de.wiki account has five edits you may have some difficulty. I wish you luck. Tiptoety ^talk 17:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Meta:Changing username

Hello Tiptoety!! I´ve tried to unified the accounts.. but is not work... this is the following messege... :

"Create unified account

You are ready to create your unified account, with the following wikis attached:

Home wiki The password and e-mail address set at this wiki will be used for your unified account.

pt.wikipedia.org (home wiki) Attached accounts The account named "Light Warrior" on each of the following sites will be automatically attached to the unified account:

commons.wikimedia.org (confirmed by password) en.wikipedia.org (confirmed by password) es.wikipedia.org (confirmed by password) fr.wikipedia.org (confirmed by password) pt.wikiquote.org (confirmed by password)"

I confirmed the password on Metawiki, but not happens when tried to login in Meta as the same... Can you help me please?

Light Warrior ^{Conspiracy?!?} 01:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh, no. It will not work for Meta until I perform the rename. I am simply asking you to merge your current "Light Warrior" accounts to a SUL system so that I can confirm you are in fact in control of it. If you would rather, post a diff on all of the projects that you hold the account "Light Warrior" confirming you want a rename on meta and post the diff here and I can do it that way. Tiptoety ^talk 02:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry the delay.. and thanks for your quick response... i made what you said and they told me :

"Login unification complete!You can now log in to any wiki site of the Wikimedia Foundation without creating a new account."

Thanks for your attention. Regards. Light Warrior ^{Conspiracy?!?} 20:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

You are still not unified under the "Light Warrior" account. How about you just do the second option, make an edit on every wiki which you hold the account "Light Warrior" stating you are requesting a rename on meta and post all of the diffs here? That would be the easiest at this point in the game. Tiptoety ^talk 02:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I could not... :-/

Until that when I do my login here and when I go to other Wikis, appears as Lightwarrior2 automatically... :-/

I also got into the Wikiquotes Light Warrior (the right username)...

Maybe I should create another account... Anyway, thanks for your attention in this situation...

Best regards, Light Warrior ^{Conspiracy?!?} 19:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

French Stub Transation removed

Hi, why did your remove the french stub translation?--TuxFighter 07:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

The page you created did not fall within Meta's scope. Biographical stubs should be on Wikipedia, not Meta. Tiptoety ^talk 18:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello thanks for your answer, but sorry maybe me english is worst then I thought, I will remove the other translation request soon.--TuxFighter 18:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

No worries. The translation requests are for global pages such as fundraising, privacy policy, and the likes. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 18:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

So I can´t request translations here? Is there any wiki community where translator helps each other--TuxFighter 19:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

AW here. --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks WizardOfOz. Tiptoety ^talk 05:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

CheckUser

Well... not sure what to tell you since you already know how that works. Anyway: I've closed your RfCU as successful given that a week has passed and you've got the minimum 25 support votes with a 100% support ratio which meets the requirements of CheckUser policy#Access to CheckUser (as well that you are identified). Congratulations & I hope, as a local checkuser, that we can work together in this area too. Regards, --dferg ^{☎ talk} 00:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Tiptoety ^talk 05:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Testwiki bureaucracy

Hello there,

You've closed this request three months ago giving temporary rights which should expire when tests will be done. Now, the user Joe Gazz84 is using 'crat tools to give sysop access to some people.

Just 'd like to inform you. See you. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

[4]. Thanks. Tiptoety ^talk 17:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Please check your part

Hi, I've added you name here. Please check your details there (the babel, IRC nick, and active from section), and include if any of the information is not included yet or added wrongfully. Thanks for your help. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 08:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Request

Aren't 'crat chats suposed to be public, or is any reason involving privacy they're not. For the sake of transparency and fairness (which obviously have not happened during this request as you ack.) I request that those discussions be made public.

This is not an attempt to cause more drama as people may see, but I'd like to know if some practices are going to be approved in meta so that I can reconsider some things.

-- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 23:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I considered having an actual on wiki "crat chat" but instead pulled aside a few 'crats that I trust and asked their opinions. I more or less wanted help in ensuring my closing rationale was sane. Tiptoety ^talk 00:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I assume good faith in your part but a public 'crat chat, given the complex situation of that request would have been infinity better IMHO. We've lacked transparency and fair play —that is only a single example—. After posting this I nearly resigned my bureaucrat tools... and it's something I'm continue considering. Given the (IMHO) complex situation of that vote —which in your rationale you ack. it was canvassed, making the whole voting nearly void— we can't do less but than opening a public bureaucrat chat and that those interested do have a say. Whatever is the result, I'm fine of course. I've critized on that RfA other fellow bureaucrats for not following policy when performing right changes, etc. I must be coherent with my words and do the same with everybody as much as I trust you or any other. -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 00:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

I am always of course open to recall as a 'crat, and I have no issues with a public 'crat chat taking place on wiki should you wish to still hold one. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 00:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you.

Be sure I will always take the points raised in the opposition into account when performing my administrative actions.

Kind regards, Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 00:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Friend?

Looks like you have a friend. --Bsadowski1 20:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I have looked into it. Tiptoety ^talk 07:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

If

If you are going to think that the votes in support should be accepted, can you at least get the voters to follow our directions? "All editors with an account on Meta, at least one active account on any Wikimedia project, and a link between the two, may participate in any request and give their opinion of the candidate." That has always been interpreted as needing to have something on the Meta page referring back to their main account (or the use of a Matrix). These editors need to do that: [5], [6], [7]. Meh. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

You can ask them to alter their userpages just as much as I can. Not sure why you feel the need to ask me to do so. If anything post a note at the admins noticeboard so an uninvolved 'crat can do what is necessary to correct this very minor violation of "voting guidelines." Tiptoety ^talk 00:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

You can talk to them via IRC and not be seen as a hostile user. A neutral or someone like myself would come off as hostile. The nominator would not. You are the obvious person to request it. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. [8], [9]. Fox already appears to have a Matrix on his userpage. Tiptoety ^talk 01:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey, guys. Having an unified account isn't enough to prove relation between local accounts? Kind regards.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 01:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Not sure, but I know after the unified accounts were established people were still prodded in the votes there to put up a Matrix. Perhaps it was to save time? There use to be some some fights over people lacking user pages and participating in elections in 2010 and 2009. A very simple fix. (It is the only reason why I have the semblance of a matrix on my user page) Ottava Rima (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Oversight

It's a bit disappointing that you on the on hand saw the need to nominate Courcelles for oversight on metawiki because of a late response when you didn't find any oversight on IRC for some minutes but haven't tried to mail them (I at least got no mail) while on the other hand you didn't give your opinion on my statement for hours and days (although you've been active here), concerning oversight in general and this case in particular. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi DerHexer. I'm sorry that you were disappointed, please understand I was only doing what I thought was best for the project. As for your statement, I wasn't aware that you wanted me to reply to it. I read the whole thing though, I just didn't want to get into a huge threaded discussion over oversight there. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 16:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Erm, Candidate and answerer are allowed to give an opinion … —DerHexer (Talk) 13:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC) ;o) Nevermind, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Is it allowed in Wikipedia?

To keep in the pages of wiki Administrator's personnel thesis? at http://sd.wikipedia.org ? Other problem is We call Computer as same in English, but admin forcibly used his word Ganpukar of Computer. I have proof that thousands of published books called it Computer not Ganpukar. If some one oppose him he started abusive language. That is the reason sd.wikipedia.org never got attraction to Sindhi community. Plz check record there. Other things are he locked CSS due to that on the same site there are lot of font styles appeared there. He is not able to set commonCSS or Monocss. We are in trouble to work in our local Sindhi language. I don't know where to say for this problem. Record history says all the situation there. I appeal plz warn him to follow en.wikipedia.org rules, other wise he will continue use his personnel details and personnel promoted articles there. Dear I am sorry If u r not right person to say all about this, Plz suggest me where I can raise this issue. My sd.wikipedia.org ID is same. His thesis is not a violetion? http://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/ماحولياتي_انتظام_ڪاڻ_اُپُگِرَهِي_عَڪس_ضماءُ_۽_درجه_بنديءَ_جي_طريقن_جو_اَڀياس

Alixafar 01:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Check user informations

Please check Meta:Requests for CheckUser information. It's very important for Portuguesa Wikipedia. Already, thanks. Quintinense 00:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Please see the page again. Quintinense 22:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

EdwardsBot

Can you flag EdwardsBot as a bot here at Meta-Wiki, please? --MZMcBride 14:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Never mind. I think the flag will just remain after this obscure process. --MZMcBride 14:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Inquiry

Hi Tiptoety! Thank you for recently renaming my account here on meta. If not too busy, would you please advise on where to submit usurpation requests on the following two projects. Both have only one bureaucrat each.

• ja.wikinews — local policy seems to say that requests should be placed on the Administators' noticeboard
• pt.wikibooks — requests seem to end up on the bureaucrat's user talk page.

Do I have to submit my requests to these locally, or can I do it here at meta through steward requests? Thank you, and best regards, Osiris (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, if there are no active local 'crats then you can just request a rename on the Stewards Noticeboard. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 04:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

missing noticeboard

Hi Tiptoety, seems there is no admin-noticeboard on Meta (hint, hint), so I needed to pick one. You should keep an eye on (or block directly) User:Lady Gaga 2012, who seems to be the same account on Commons, which was used this morning for a short spree of vandalism and sort-of death-threats[10]. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Dealt with (& "missing board" has been found :)) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Herby. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 16:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

OTRS and WS

Gday mate. Within OTRS, are the rights for Wikisource generic for the sisterhood, or are they specific for each language? Or is there a bit of both? Just trying to phrase my request to community properly. As I am in there daily, I may as well check the extra queue, and at the moment there is no one overtly saying what is going on in that space. Alternatively, are you able to review what has been happening in that space, about who is actioning the area, and what the traffic levels have been? Thx. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Or should I be digging around on the OTRS wiki for this info? — billinghurst sDrewth 02:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

No, there are no special "Wikisource rights", all Wikisource related tickets are held in the Sister Projects queue. Yes, I can check to see the activity level of the queue, who is responding to tickets, etc. And yes, this would be better handled on the OTRS-wiki. Best, Tiptoety ^talk 06:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

OTRS rights

Can you give me ipblock-exempt on OTRS? This shows a bit of light, but not much (I have global-ipblock-exempt set, but that evidently does not work on OTRS wiki). Thanks! SpeedyGonsales (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Global blocks should not affect OTRS-wiki. Are you unable to edit? If so, would you please email me the block message that you receive when you try and edit? Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 06:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Mail sent. If you are sure that global blocks should not affect OTRS-wiki, maybe you should submit a bug on bugzilla to set OTRS-wiki to ignore global blocks. Just a suggestion. SpeedyGonsales (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hm, after a little bit of testing I appear to be wrong. I have enabled IPBE on your account and will file a bugzilla. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 22:52, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Cupco

User:Michaeldsuarez/Sockpuppetry#Weltoners – I've mentioned you in a sockpuppetry investigation that I'm working on. Remember Meta:Requests_for_CheckUser_information/Archives/2012#James_Salsman? I believe that that person is back as "Cupco". --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Dear Ty, I know the above suggests a continuation of past cross-wiki socking. At the same time, the user in question is engaged in productive disussion about Meta topics on wikimedia-l. It would be helpful to have some of those discussions here directly on Meta, rather than intermediated through that list. What do you think about allowing the user to edit, while regularly checking for and blocking socks (i.e., otherwise treating the account and related CU use as though it were blocked)? –SJ talk  01:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I am certainly willing to discuss the possibility of allowing Salsman to edit here if he agreed to some conditions. I'm a little confused when you say "allowing the user to edit, while regularly checking for and blocking socks." Are you suggesting that even if he continues to sock, we just block those accounts and do not reblock the master?

Michaeldsuarez, I'll take a look at the evidence you have posted. Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 06:33, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

There isn't really any need anymore. The Cupco account has already been dealt with: en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dualus/Archive#03_October_2012, [11]. That enwiki SPI page also shows that Salsman created a few sockpuppets after the Cupco account was blocked. This discussion featured a few IP addresses used by Cupco / Salsman. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Do you have conditions in mind? –SJ talk  00:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=25901#p25901 – en:User:2010_SO16 might be one of Salsman's more recent accounts, but I'm not 100% sure. 2010_SO16 didn't edit as long as Cupco did, so there's less evidence for me to find. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&page=User%3A2010_SO16 – Confirmed. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that account is Likely here as well and as such has been blocked. Tiptoety ^talk 06:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

← Sj: I would be happy with conditions regarding no socking on any Wikimedia project and refraining from using Meta to publicly or privately (via email) engage in making/distributing/administering any type of survey (generally construed). Additionally, his account is subject to having a CheckUser performed on it at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 07:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. That seems reasonable, though unlikely to be followed. –SJ talk  10:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Completely unhelpful attacking against other users, needs a PERMANENT pause.

Repeated insults against ARBCOM: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&oldid=521380464#Statement_by_Fut.Perf.

Deletion of ang:1865

Hello! Why did you delete the page ang:1865? It wasn't empty as far as I can tell. πr² (t • c) 20:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Report

Hi, Tiptoety. I'm reporting recent situation of this issue. User:Calanor was unblocked in Zazaki Wikipedia on 12 March 2013 by diq:Karber:Mirzali, because there is no absolute proof that he/she is one of the sockpuppets of Erdemaslancan. His/her multiple accounts (User:Arde, User:Newos) will not be unblocked. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrat discussion

Hello. A bureaucrat discussion has been opened to decide the outcome of this request for de-adminship. It is opened for more than three days now and it has only received one comment so far. If you could please pass by and leave your comments over there it would be really appreciated. Best regards.

— Delivered via Global message delivery on behalf of MarcoAurelio, 15:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 16:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 16:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Just curious

why on earth should a subpage I deleted 4 years ago now become a spam target :) Can't even remember what I used that space for, some draft spamlink-investigation? All the best, Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, you used it for a spamlink investigation. Looks like some random IP came along and recreated it with a spamlink of their own. ;-) Tiptoety ^talk 03:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for closing and processing Meta:Requests for adminship/Varnent. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 18:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome. Tiptoety ^talk 23:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for removing the block and for the advice! I have already removed the additional details from the user page.-- Blessinvarkey (talk)

You're welcome. Happy editing, Tiptoety ^talk 03:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Wikimedia Commons

Hi, Tiptoety, I noticed you had closed in 2012 one of the requests for comment pages that I had taken an interest in. I believe that the closure of this particular requests for comment subpage should be undone, as the close was premature in light of the multiple interwiki conflicts pointed out by John Vandenberg, and I think we should discuss how to resolve such conflicts with each large Wikimedia wiki before implementing the interwiki change in the bug request. To engage in discussion with them mean we need to reopen the RFC subpage and allow them to comment about how best to resolve this matter. Do you think you could reverse your decision and reopen the subpage? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

You have my permission to reopen the RFC. Best, Tiptoety ^talk 01:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

I read your comment, Tiptoety, as a permission, not as an actual approval, based on what he has called "legitimate reason for reopening." John Vandenberg had addressed the issue TCNSV raised, both in the original RfC, and then recently, on Feb 2, prior to your "permission." Procedurally, reopening an RfC closed over two years ago is not a great idea. If there is a remaining issue, it can be discussed, and, if necessary, a new RfC opened, with reference to the old one and notice on Talk of the old RfC. Discussion, however, would bring out what was already clear two years ago, and that should have been more abundantly clear, from response to TCNSV on Bugzilla:4676. In any case, I reclosed the RfC, by reverting him, with comment on Talk, and TCNSV has continued to argue that reopening was the right thing to do, ignoring the actual issue, a supposed conflict with hiwiki, long ago resolved. If you disagree with my reclosure, please revert me. No action is needed, but I thought you should be notified, since TCNSV is citing your approval. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Abd. Yes, I was giving permission to revert if the reverting user felt it was justified (as in, I would not edit war over the edit). That said, I closed the RfC for a reason and I still stand by that closure. Personally, I have no stake in this decision. I'll go with whatever is decided. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 03:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Usurpation Request (SUL)

Hi Tiptoety, my request here has been lingering since 7 June, while most of my requests on other wikiprojects have already been accepted. I understand this is not very urgent, but I request you to please look into this sometime soon. Thank you. D abhi (talk) 19:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - Apologies about the delay. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Rename request

Hi Tiptoety. My request too, has not been answered (link). I can understand that you might be busy, but it's been almost a month since I made that request. Would you be able to look into it? Thanks Novice7 (talk) 13:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - Apologies about the delay. Tiptoety ^talk 17:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Ryoga Godai (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

ERDINC for ADMIN

Hallo, könntest du mich supporten! LG ERDINC [[12]]

An important message about renaming users

Dear Tiptoety,

I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) talk 18:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Mailing list for global renamers

Dear global renamer,

We have created a mailing list for us to allow easy communication. Please subscribe here and send me or Trijnstel an email to confirm it is you requesting it. Additionally, you might be interested to know of the existance of the #wikimedia-rename^connect IRC channel where you are welcome to join. Should you have any questions, feel free to use my talk page.

Cordially, Savh^ñ 15:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Bad situation in the Bashkir Wikipedia.

Hello! Bad situation in the Bashkir Wikipedia. Admin removed significant articles. October 14, 2014 have been removed (action administrator Ҡатнашыусы:Саган (https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%A0%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8B%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8B:%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD )): • Ҡалып:Рәсәйҙен банктары, Template:50 largest Russian banks https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%A0%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%BF:%D0%A0%D3%99%D1%81%D3%99%D0%B9%D2%99%D0%B5%D0%BD_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B • Гиннесс, Guinness • Өфө Фәнни Үҙәге https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D3%A8%D1%84%D3%A9_%D0%A4%D3%99%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D2%AE%D2%99%D3%99%D0%B3%D0%B5 • Рәсәй Һаҡлыҡ Банкыһы Sberbank of Russia https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D3%99%D1%81%D3%99%D0%B9_%D2%BA%D0%B0%D2%A1%D0%BB%D1%8B%D2%A1_%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%8B%D2%BB%D1%8B • ВТБ банкыһы, VTB https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%A2%D0%91_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%8B%D2%BB%D1%8B • Газпромбанк ‎ • Chevron ‎ https://ba.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron and etc.

These articles have been a number of copies of the English articles. Deleting articles administrators Bashkir wikipedia happen very often. Under the guise of Wikipedia, they also engage in fundraising (http://www.bashinform.ru/news/658297/?sphrase_id=191289 ). Help put an end to bad Admin - make a section of the Bashkir wikipedia really free! User talk:Ayratayrat October, 18 2014

@Ayratayrat: Such discussions do not belong on the user talk page in meta. The baWP community is self-regulating, and initially concerns should be raised at the wiki. If you are wishing to bring this to the notice of stewards, then you should utilise Stewards' noticeboard though than just saying that there is a problem there will need to be specific issues. If you believe that there are concerns about abuse of the Terms of Use, or abuse of fundraising, then you should put together some specific text and let Philippe know on his talk page.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok. This user is a little earlier contacted me by e-mail, without informing that parallel decided to inform all in the world about their offense. In my opinion (FYI), no abuse of the Terms of Use, and no abuse of fundraising. See relevant links:

• discussion in ba-wp (in Russian) -- my request to ba:user:Саган and answers from three ba-wp users.
• email request from User:Ayratayrat to User:Kaganer and subsequent discussion (2014-10-17 - 2014-10-19, in Russian)

--Kaganer (talk) 20:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comment!I appreciate your help. (Ayratayrat talk) 13:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• To have stormy passages with Kaganer. He posted without the permission of e-mails to the network. email request from User:Ayratayrat to User:Kaganer and subsequent discussion (2014-10-17 - 2014-10-19, in Russian). (Ayratayrat talk) 10:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to the CentralNotice-admins list

Hi! This bulk email is to let you know about a mailing list used to communicate bug reports and new features in CentralNotice, and to facilitate conversations between the admins. This message is being sent to you because you have the privileges to use the CentralNotice admin interface.

If you use CentralNotice to post or modify notices, please consider joining the list by visiting this page and subscribing yourself:

   https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/centralnotice-admins
   

Thanks,

Adam Wight (talk)

00:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Fundraising Tech,

Wikimedia Foundation

help pls

Hi; I am a student in Başkent University. ip 212.156.67.30 is used by Başkent Üniversitesi in Turkey. But it was blocked in Turkish wikipedia for unlimited time. block begins: 23:15, 6 Feb. 2011. Since that time whole university can not make any edits in Turkish wikipedia. We university students want to edit turkish wikipedia. Local adminstrators say they are very angry with an old time user and they dont unblock th i.p. and they punish a whole university. It has been a long time and probably the person that makes them angry is graduate by now. Thank you for help.

Happy new year 2015!

Happy New Year to you Dear Tiptoety --Grind24 (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

clarification

Due to recent events that had nothing to do with me I was again directed by email to that stupid "investigation" at Wikipedia, that came to the trivial "finding" that my brother at the time lived in the same house as me, and ridiculously claimed that he was my sock even though I had already said who he was way before the "investigation"[13]:

If you still aren't convinced that my IP edits show that I am Portuguese, please check, e.g., the article in the Portuguese Wikipedia "Pedro Cosme Vieira" (which is obviously written in Portuguese). It was my brother (Diogo Tomé) who created that article, but he asked for my help to improve it, which I did...

And if you went to that article you would see it was created by "User:Diogotome". So the only "sock" I allegedly had, User:Diogotome, is quite obviously not mine, but my brother's account, that he created in 2009, with his real name (Diogo Tomé). Who could I fool with this? If you have OTRS access, you may also find ticket 2013070410010677 interesting (although I believe that ticket should be deleted, I had no idea I was writing to OTRS at the time, and that all sorts of threatening anonymous nutcases had access to it). ~ DanielTom (talk) 12:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

By the way, in that "investigation", Toddst1 (the admin that blocked me) identified me as "Daniel Tomé who placed 34th in the tournament." My question: what does have to do with the SPI? Why is it relevant what place I took for Portugal in that World Go tournament in 2012? And I never said on Wikipedia, or on any wiki, which place I took there (even though I am proud of it, it was the best result in my country's history). That page aimed at clearly identifying me personally just to attack me, and because I was (and am) blocked there I never had the chance to respond to any of it, which is a complete disgrace. ~ DanielTom (talk) 12:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi DanielTom, I hope things are going well. I'm afraid that I am not familiar with the previous SPI you were subject to. With regards to the Miszatomic case, I know that an editor mentioned your name. I believe this was a simple misreading of the situation, as some of Miszatomic's socks contained usernames similar to yours. As I mentioned, there is no evidence to suggest that you and Miszatomic are one in the same. I hope this was the answer you were looking for, as I don't really see a questioned posed above. Best, Tiptoety ^talk 22:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, apparently I got irritated upon seeing that silly page again. Usually I pretend it doesn't exist, for my own mental sanity. Thanks for wishing me well. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

precautionary block

You blocked Contributions/Pina618, block log, with summary: Abusing multiple accounts: William Pina, per CheckUser. Pina618 has no edits, globally, and registering an account is not abuse, unless the user is globally banned, which is not the case with William Pina in his various incarnations. Because Pina618 cannot edit meta except as block evasion, the block does no harm here; however, globally, and right now on SRG, the existence of this block can be an argument for further blocks, and, most seriously, a global lock, even without any disruption. This shuts the door on a possible cooperative path, and generally can cause disruption that was not necessary, because it forces the user to anonymity, wasting a lot of time, then, in block enforcement. The user has "competency issues," and sometimes this is a function of age. People mature and learn.

So what to do? I recommend block log annotation so that the block record shows that it is precautionary, not a result of abuse of the account. I'd recommend a note on the user talk page, inviting the user to edit non-disruptively on wikis where he is not blocked. This has worked in the past with some users. I will place the note if you approve. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, the block was placed based on solid CheckUser evidence and was not based on behavior caused by that single account, but instead on behavior of the account's operator. I see nothing wrong with offering them a second chance. I have no problems with you doing what you feel is appropriate. Best, Tiptoety ^talk 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll place a note or notes. The user should not be locked, would be the major point, and he's not locked. If not locked, that could allow him to start up on a wiki where William Pina is not blocked. Because William Pena is blocked here, Pina618 could not legitimately edit here anyway; I would not give the operator a second chance *here,* not yet. --Abd (talk) 20:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Pina618 and User talk:William Pina. These things have maybe a 10% success rate, they are mostly ignored, but one never can tell. No harm, I hope. If Pina shows up on Wikiversity, we can handle him; if he does show, the chances are very good he will be helped and we will gain a productive user. It happens. Thanks. --Abd (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Similar usernames

I think we can be a little freer in our hand in granting requests for names the software flags as similar to other names already registered but not (very) active [so many account names are bedblocked at enwiki]; especially when they are trying to get off of a suffixed username.

I'm talking specifically about this request: Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/15427/view, those similar usernames are inactive and probably won't cause any confusion. If it does, it can always be looked at in future but I don't think it will present any problems at least in this current case and we should probably proceed with the request.

This issue probably deserves some wider discussion, but I really prefer not to have it on the global renamers mailing list. –xeno 15:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi xeno. I agree with you to a point. In that specific request, the only real identifying feature that distinguishes the requested username from the other ones is a period. (Something that I don't believe should be allowed in usernames anyways, but that is a different discussion). Personally, I would like to see something a little more unique, like a "-" between Scott and C.

If you would like to process the request, I certainly won't make a fuss. Tiptoety ^talk 21:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

Enjoy

Thanks for all the work over all the years. Enjoy your RL, and other extra-curricular duties.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your wonderful help! Take care... Tropicalkitty (talk) 22:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the hard work over these years.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 01:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)