Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Ajraddatz

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Ajraddatz (Adrian Raddatz)

[edit]
ContentsYesNoNeutral

Ajraddatz talkcontribsSULutil (accounts) / stalktoyglobalcontribscrosswiki-nessconfirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: en-ca-N, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello, I'm Adrian Raddatz. I've been editing Wikimedia since 2009 on the account Adragon111 (made when I was rather young), and more recently on Ajraddatz since 2010. I am active primarily with counter-vandalism at a global level and contributing to Wikidata, where I'm an administrator. I like to volunteer my time in areas where I perceive need. To this end, the majority of my use of the steward tools would be around global anti-spam and counter-vandalism. This includes reverting and globally (b)locking accounts and IPs, and running checkusers as needed on accounts whose pattern of behaviour have indicated that they are in a group of spambots. I've already been active in this area for over three years, including two and a half as a Global Sysop. I would also respond to requests on the steward request pages here on meta; I check meta quite often, so it would be easy for me to address requests of any kind (except requests for the bot flags) as they arise. I fully understand the privacy policy and the policies on CU/OS, and have applied my knowledge in roles as an oversighter on Wikidata, an OTRS volunteer and a former member of enwiki's ACC team. I don't have much local admin experience on Wikimedia, because I started off on Wikia, and moved here after serving as a local admin on a couple of Wikia's larger projects. I've never found a "niche" in the form of a specific wiki to work on until Wikidata was founded in October 2012, and since I've been consistently active there. It should be noted that my lack of local wiki admin experience is more than made up for in my practical experience in steward areas. I've been working with stewards for the last three years, am fully aware of the policies surrounding the use of steward rights, and have seen what those policies look like in action. I am also very good at reading French, though I'm still working on my ability to write and speak in it effectively. In real life I'm a full-time student studying political science in the third year of my undergrad, as well as a reserve officer in the Royal Canadian Navy. As such, my time can sometimes be quite limited, but I'm still active enough to be able to work effectively as a steward. I edit from MST (UTC - 7), and there are often no stewards on when I do the bulk of my editing (2300 - 0400 UTC). Thanks for your consideration, and please, ask lots of questions! Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Ajraddatz


Yes

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Ok. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Yes, definitely. His work in the small wiki monitoring team is very good, he is a global sysop, and his work on Wikidata (where he is an OS) has been great. I think he has all the qualities I would expect from a steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Alan (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Very active and experienced user in global countervandalism, will be a great steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ayratayrat (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Ayratayrat (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Wiki13 talk 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Mh7kJ (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Great user. Érico Wouters msg 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   JurriaanH (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Rettelo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I'm trust you. You will be perfect steward. Rettelo (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Brateevsky (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Odder (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   PiRSquared17 summed it up for me. odder (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Michaeldsuarez (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   I believe in his abilities and trust his sense of right and wrong. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Why not DangSunM (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Żyrafał (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   MoiraMoira (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Vituzzu (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Stryn (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jasper Deng (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Emin message 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Guycn2 (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Rzuwig 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Marmase (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   --Marmase (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   No problem Rome2 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Techman224 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Techman224Talk 20:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. APerson (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   APerson (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Jfblanc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   D Eaketts (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Chewbacca2205 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Amir (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Definitely. Legoktm (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Southparkfan 22:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Looks qualified. Trijnsteltalk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Danny B. (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014   Didn't I tell you to do so ages ago? — Danny B. 23:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   DanielTom (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   AGK [•] 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kolega2357 (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aftab1995 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Aftab1995 (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Have good experience with him from Wikidata. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Armbrust (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Maathavan (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Maathavan (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   —레비Revi 04:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   David1010 (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Conny (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Conny (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Mihewag (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Dede2008 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Definitely yes! Dede2008 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Bene* (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Clockery Fairfeld (talkenWS) 12:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       ApatitM (Not eligible, checked by Igna)   ApatitM (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Laaknor (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Steinsplitter (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Inkowik (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   IW 16:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   The opposes don't concern me. TCN7JM 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   INeverCry makes a good point but I'm going to extend Ajraddatz some leeway. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Work2win (Not eligible, checked by Igna)   Work2win (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Why not Hoo man (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Yes, please! Mathonius (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Vitor Mazuco (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Vitor Mazuco Msg 22:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Tlhslobus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Tlhslobus (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Usteinhoff (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Usteinhoff (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Abd (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   小躍 (talk) 00:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Appears more than capable of performing the role to the high standard required. GyaroMaguus (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. 7partparadigm (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   7partparadigm (talk) 01:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Taichi - (あ!) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Wrelwser43 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Seems responsible, and will put the tools to good use. Wrelwser43 (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. TeleComNasSprVen (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014    — billinghurst sDrewth 08:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Obelix (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Yes. Wpollard (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   --GZWDer (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jafeluv (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Kazkaskazkasako (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Definitely. I think he has a good track record on cross-wiki countervandalism, and can now be trusted as a steward. Quentinv57 (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Bms4880 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Bms4880 (talk) 14:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Arkanosis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   — Arkanosis 16:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Support this proposal. Midnight Gambler (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Wikit 18:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Niesy74 (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Jusjih (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Courcelles 02:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Pratyya (Hello!) 03:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Alberto568 (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Drzewianin (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Itsalleasy (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Itsalleasy (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Miks3001 (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Miks3001 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Demart81 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Demart81 (Qualcuno mi cerca?) 22:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. XanaG (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   XanaG (talk) 06:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Sj (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   By all means. SJ talk  09:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Glaisher [talk] 16:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Valencian (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Valencian (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Harald Krichel (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Defender (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Defender (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Guerillero 02:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Nejebad (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   good Nejebad (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   NaBUru38 (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Buggia 14:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   MF-W 16:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. PenumbraLpz (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   PenumbraLpz (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. George23820 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   George23820 (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Goldzahn (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Goldzahn (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Ronhjones (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Wnme (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Enzian44 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Enzian44 (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   EKMK (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Nolispanmo (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Nolispanmo (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Володимир Ф (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   --Володимир Ф (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   ST 22:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014   -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   CT Cooper · talk 17:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014    Hazard SJ  02:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Technical 13 (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   KundaliniZero (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Waka Waka (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Gamma127 (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham)   Tremonist (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Anton008 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Anton 008 18:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Crosswiki experience, no issues. The Anonymouse [[[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]]] 19:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Housterdam (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Very good candidate. Housterdam (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. ارژنگ (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Dan.- (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Tonelada (talk) 00:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   Harlock81 (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014   -jkb- 20:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Giftzwerg 88 (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Minihaa (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Minihaa (talk) 15:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Sitic (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   Sitic (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014   OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Thehelpfulone 02:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Denny (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   denny (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       ITAC (Not eligible, checked by LlamaAl)   ITAC (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   helpful at IRC. --Goldenburg111 03:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Accassidy (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Accassidy (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Quaestio Iuris (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Quaestio Iuris (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Mala chaubey (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   Mala chaubey (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014   FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Scoopfinder (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Scoopfinder (talk) 10:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Randykitty (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Randykitty (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Tar Lócesilion|queta! 22:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Grondin (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014    Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Triple5 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Triple5 (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Coffins (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Coffins (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham)   Benjamlikesjam (talk) 02:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Zyephyrus (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  156. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   - εΔω 15:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your great work on it.wikisource.[reply]
  157. Geraki (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   Geraki TL 17:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  158. KhabarNegar (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014   Looks qualified. --KhabarNegar 11:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014   Ruslik (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Shisha-Tom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Shisha-Tom 16:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   This is more of a personal reason than a competence one. In my opinion, I feel Adrian takes situations too far when it comes to simple matters which can be solved with a 'Why did you do this' and then an explanation. I don't have issues trusting them at all, it is just I feel they escalate simple situations too far. So, I am going to say it is a not now from me though I'll probably support them if they run next year or if they pass, at the next reconfirmations. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Not very active İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @İncelemeelemani: Can you please clarify why you think CentralAuth shows he is not active? PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course.  :)... Since 2010, his contributions have contributed less and only in certain areas.--İncelemeelemani (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, thanks for the clarification. :-) PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   I see better candidates and would vote for them rubin16 (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Insensitive and dismissive of the concerns of other editors here. A keep vote with the rationale "Offended persons should be advised to look somewhere else" doesn't demonstrate the maturity I look for in a prospective steward. INeverCry 19:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Dick Bos (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Little remarks on non-vandalism work and interaction with contributors, in the application. I think that's required. Gryllida 02:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I tried to keep my statement short, so I focussed on experience related to the role of a steward. I would be glad to explain some of my other on-wiki work and interactions, the best forum for this probably being on the questions page. Regards, Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014   Not enough involvement in small wikis or other languages. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you serious? Check out Special:CentralAuth/Ajraddatz. He has edits on many wikis. He has more than 1 edit on 490 wikis, more than 5 edits on 112 wikis. Compare to my stats. Ajr is one of the most cross-wiki users, is a global rollbacker, member of Small Wiki Monitoring Team, and a global sysop. Please clarify your oppose. Do you mean content edits, or just anti-vandalism? It's clear he's got antivandal and other maintenance experience IMO. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    John generally opposes based on lack of content edits cross-wiki, so I think that's what he's referring to. Snowolf How can I help? 07:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it's fair to expect steward candidates to have edited content (not just maintenance) in more than 2 languages. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Георгий Суворов (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Only for approx. 4 years in Wikipedia, knows only 2 languages. Георгий Суворов (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    don't see any kind of maturity in this user... --Goldenburg111 17:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    change to a yes. --Goldenburg111 03:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jni (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   jni (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Someone not using his real name (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Concerns about narrowness of languages qualification and--in tandem with that--the type of contributions to non-en wikis. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Javeec (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   Javeec (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014   Zerabat (discusión) 17:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Florence (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Keete 37 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   От него толку будет мало... Keete 37 (talk) 08:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   —Locke Coletc 00:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014   Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014   Bpierreb (talk) 07:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   LessayCatus (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Mátyás (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Ajraddatz's dedication to the SWMT is unquestionable and unwavering, and he is a very good vandal and spam fighter, but, and perhaps, that's just me, I haven't seen a more policy or mediation side of him yet, which I think a steward maybe ought to have. I also haven't seen him around as much as he used to be. Snowolf How can I help? 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Custinne (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Custinne (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Karol Karolus (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Karol Karolus (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JB82 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   JB82 (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Pas vraiment d'opposition, mais je te trouve un peu "jeune" dans le projet pour ce rôle. Not really opposition, but youre rather "young" in the Wikiproject for this job. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014   Kapsuglan (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014   Surely good experience with global countervandalism. However, I hesitate to vote for a candidate at Wikimedia projects where I fail to see any serious content contributions. AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Not enough foreign languages knowledges to vote yes. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014   Clearly experienced and qualified, no doubt about that. However some concerns expressed in the opposition give me a pause. So I remain unsure about it. Nonetheless I wish you all the best. TheGeneralUser (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014   Reade (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014   FeralOink (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]