Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/Ajraddatz

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Ajraddatz (Adrian Raddatz)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Ajraddatz talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: en-ca-N, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello, I'm Adrian Raddatz. I've been editing Wikimedia since 2009 on the account Adragon111 (made when I was rather young), and more recently on Ajraddatz since 2010. I am active primarily with counter-vandalism at a global level and contributing to Wikidata, where I'm an administrator. I like to volunteer my time in areas where I perceive need. To this end, the majority of my use of the steward tools would be around global anti-spam and counter-vandalism. This includes reverting and globally (b)locking accounts and IPs, and running checkusers as needed on accounts whose pattern of behaviour have indicated that they are in a group of spambots. I've already been active in this area for over three years, including two and a half as a Global Sysop. I would also respond to requests on the steward request pages here on meta; I check meta quite often, so it would be easy for me to address requests of any kind (except requests for the bot flags) as they arise. I fully understand the privacy policy and the policies on CU/OS, and have applied my knowledge in roles as an oversighter on Wikidata, an OTRS volunteer and a former member of enwiki's ACC team. I don't have much local admin experience on Wikimedia, because I started off on Wikia, and moved here after serving as a local admin on a couple of Wikia's larger projects. I've never found a "niche" in the form of a specific wiki to work on until Wikidata was founded in October 2012, and since I've been consistently active there. It should be noted that my lack of local wiki admin experience is more than made up for in my practical experience in steward areas. I've been working with stewards for the last three years, am fully aware of the policies surrounding the use of steward rights, and have seen what those policies look like in action. I am also very good at reading French, though I'm still working on my ability to write and speak in it effectively. In real life I'm a full-time student studying political science in the third year of my undergrad, as well as a reserve officer in the Royal Canadian Navy. As such, my time can sometimes be quite limited, but I'm still active enough to be able to work effectively as a steward. I edit from MST (UTC - 7), and there are often no stewards on when I do the bulk of my editing (2300 - 0400 UTC). Thanks for your consideration, and please, ask lots of questions! Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#Ajraddatz


Yes

[edit]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Yes, definitely. His work in the small wiki monitoring team is very good, he is a global sysop, and his work on Wikidata (where he is an OS) has been great. I think he has all the qualities I would expect from a steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Alan (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Very active and experienced user in global countervandalism, will be a great steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ayratayrat (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ayratayrat (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wiki13 talk 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Mh7kJ (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Great user. Érico Wouters msg 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  JurriaanH (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rettelo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I'm trust you. You will be perfect steward. Rettelo (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Odder (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  PiRSquared17 summed it up for me. odder (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Michaeldsuarez (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I believe in his abilities and trust his sense of right and wrong. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Why not DangSunM (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Vituzzu (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Stryn (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jasper Deng (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Guycn2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guycn2 (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Marmase (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Marmase (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  No problem Rome2 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Techman224 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Techman224Talk 20:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. APerson (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  APerson (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 20:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Jfblanc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Chewbacca2205 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Amir (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Definitely. Legoktm (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 22:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Looks qualified. Trijnsteltalk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Danny B. (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Didn't I tell you to do so ages ago? — Danny B. 23:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DanielTom (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  AGK [•] 23:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Aftab1995 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Aftab1995 (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Have good experience with him from Wikidata. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Maathavan (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Maathavan (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —레비Revi 04:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Conny (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Conny (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Mihewag (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Dede2008 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Definitely yes! Dede2008 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Bene* (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 12:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       ApatitM (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  ApatitM (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Laaknor (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Inkowik (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  IW 16:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  The opposes don't concern me. TCN7JM 17:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  INeverCry makes a good point but I'm going to extend Ajraddatz some leeway. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Work2win (Not eligible, checked by Igna) •  Work2win (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Why not Hoo man (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Yes, please! Mathonius (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Vitor Mazuco (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Vitor Mazuco Msg 22:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Tlhslobus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Tlhslobus (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Usteinhoff (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Usteinhoff (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Abd (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  小躍 (talk) 00:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Appears more than capable of performing the role to the high standard required. GyaroMaguus (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. 7partparadigm (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  7partparadigm (talk) 01:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Taichi - (あ！) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Wrelwser43 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Seems responsible, and will put the tools to good use. Wrelwser43 (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. TeleComNasSprVen (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •   — billinghurst sDrewth 08:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Yes. Wpollard (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  --GZWDer (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Kazkaskazkasako (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Definitely. I think he has a good track record on cross-wiki countervandalism, and can now be trusted as a steward. Quentinv57 (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Bms4880 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Bms4880 (talk) 14:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Arkanosis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  — Arkanosis ✉ 16:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Support this proposal. Midnight Gambler (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 18:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 02:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Pratyya (Hello!) 03:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Itsalleasy (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  Itsalleasy (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Miks3001 (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  Miks3001 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Demart81 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Demart81 (Qualcuno mi cerca?) 22:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. XanaG (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  XanaG (talk) 06:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Sj (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  By all means. –SJ talk  09:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Glaisher [talk] 16:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Valencian (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Valencian (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Defender (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Defender (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guerillero 02:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Nejebad (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  good Nejebad (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Buggia 14:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  MF-W 16:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. PenumbraLpz (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  PenumbraLpz (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. George23820 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  George23820 (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Goldzahn (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Goldzahn (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wnme (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Enzian44 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Enzian44 (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  EKMK (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Nolispanmo (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Nolispanmo (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Володимир Ф (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  --Володимир Ф (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ST ○ 22:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  CT Cooper · talk 17:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •   Hazard SJ  02:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Technical 13 (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  KundaliniZero (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Waka Waka (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Gamma127 (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Tremonist (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Anton008 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Anton 008 18:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Crosswiki experience, no issues. The Anonymouse [[[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]]] 19:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Housterdam (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Very good candidate. Housterdam (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. ارژنگ (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Dan.- (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Tonelada (talk) 00:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Harlock81 (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  -jkb- 20:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Giftzwerg 88 (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Minihaa (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Minihaa (talk) 15:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Sitic (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  Sitic (talk) 15:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Thehelpfulone 02:41, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Denny (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  denny (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       ITAC (Not eligible, checked by LlamaAl) •  ITAC (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Goldenburg111 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  helpful at IRC. --Goldenburg111 03:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Accassidy (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Accassidy (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Quaestio Iuris (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Quaestio Iuris (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Mala chaubey (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Mala chaubey (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  FASTILY 09:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Scoopfinder (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Scoopfinder (talk) 10:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Randykitty (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Randykitty (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Tar Lócesilion (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Tar Lócesilion|queta! 22:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Grondin (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •   Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Triple5 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Triple5 (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Coffins (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Coffins (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Benjamlikesjam (talk) 02:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  157. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  - εΔω 15:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your great work on it.wikisource.[reply]
  158. Geraki (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Geraki TL 17:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  159. KhabarNegar (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  Looks qualified. --KhabarNegar 11:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by DerHexer)2014 •  Ruslik (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Shisha-Tom (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Shisha-Tom 16:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  This is more of a personal reason than a competence one. In my opinion, I feel Adrian takes situations too far when it comes to simple matters which can be solved with a 'Why did you do this' and then an explanation. I don't have issues trusting them at all, it is just I feel they escalate simple situations too far. So, I am going to say it is a not now from me though I'll probably support them if they run next year or if they pass, at the next reconfirmations. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Not very active İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @İncelemeelemani: Can you please clarify why you think CentralAuth shows he is not active? PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Of course.  :)... Since 2010, his contributions have contributed less and only in certain areas.--İncelemeelemani (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay, thanks for the clarification. :-) PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I see better candidates and would vote for them rubin16 (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Insensitive and dismissive of the concerns of other editors here. A keep vote with the rationale "Offended persons should be advised to look somewhere else" doesn't demonstrate the maturity I look for in a prospective steward. INeverCry 19:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Dick Bos (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Little remarks on non-vandalism work and interaction with contributors, in the application. I think that's required. Gryllida 02:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I tried to keep my statement short, so I focussed on experience related to the role of a steward. I would be glad to explain some of my other on-wiki work and interactions, the best forum for this probably being on the questions page. Regards, Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Not enough involvement in small wikis or other languages. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you serious? Check out Special:CentralAuth/Ajraddatz. He has edits on many wikis. He has more than 1 edit on 490 wikis, more than 5 edits on 112 wikis. Compare to my stats. Ajr is one of the most cross-wiki users, is a global rollbacker, member of Small Wiki Monitoring Team, and a global sysop. Please clarify your oppose. Do you mean content edits, or just anti-vandalism? It's clear he's got antivandal and other maintenance experience IMO. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    John generally opposes based on lack of content edits cross-wiki, so I think that's what he's referring to. Snowolf How can I help? 07:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it's fair to expect steward candidates to have edited content (not just maintenance) in more than 2 languages. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Георгий Суворов (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Only for approx. 4 years in Wikipedia, knows only 2 languages. Георгий Суворов (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    don't see any kind of maturity in this user... --Goldenburg111 17:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    change to a yes. --Goldenburg111 03:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jni (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  jni (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Someone not using his real name (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Concerns about narrowness of languages qualification and--in tandem with that--the type of contributions to non-en wikis. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Javeec (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  Javeec (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Zerabat (discusión) 17:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Florence (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Keete 37 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  От него толку будет мало... Keete 37 (talk) 08:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Bpierreb (talk) 07:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  LessayCatus (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Mátyás (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Ajraddatz's dedication to the SWMT is unquestionable and unwavering, and he is a very good vandal and spam fighter, but, and perhaps, that's just me, I haven't seen a more policy or mediation side of him yet, which I think a steward maybe ought to have. I also haven't seen him around as much as he used to be. Snowolf How can I help? 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Custinne (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Custinne (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Karol Karolus (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Karol Karolus (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JB82 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  JB82 (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Pas vraiment d'opposition, mais je te trouve un peu "jeune" dans le projet pour ce rôle. Not really opposition, but youre rather "young" in the Wikiproject for this job. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kapsuglan (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Surely good experience with global countervandalism. However, I hesitate to vote for a candidate at Wikimedia projects where I fail to see any serious content contributions. AFBorchert (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Not enough foreign languages knowledges to vote yes. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Clearly experienced and qualified, no doubt about that. However some concerns expressed in the opposition give me a pause. So I remain unsure about it. Nonetheless I wish you all the best. TheGeneralUser (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Reade (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FeralOink (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/Ajraddatz&oldid=24929657"