Jump to content

Wybory Wikimedia Foundation/2024/Kandydaci/Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2024/Candidates/Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight and the translation is 100% complete.

Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight (Rosiestep)

Rosiestep (talk meta edits global user summary CA  AE)

Podsumowanie
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight (Wikimania Singapur, sierpień 2023)
  • Dane osobiste:
    • Imię i nazwisko: Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
    • Miejsce zamieszkania: Kalifornia, Stany Zjednoczone
    • Języki: Angielski (ojczysty); serbski (ojczysty w dzieciństwie; obecnie podstawowy); hiszpański, francuski (podstawowy)
  • Historia edycji:
    • Uczestnik projektów Wikimedia od: 2007
    • Projekty: angielska Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata
Całkowita liczba słów dla całej kandydatury (pytania wymagane + opcjonalne) wynosi 1000 (tysiąc) słów.
Pytania wymagane
Dlaczego kandydujesz do Rady Powierniczej Wikimedia Foundation? Co chcesz do Rady wnieść? O czym chciałabyś/chciałbyś dowiedzieć się więcej w Radzie? Wierzę, że zasiadanie w Radzie jest dla mnie najlepszym sposobem na zapewnienie, że zalecenia i inicjatywy Strategii Ruchu 2030 otrzymają strategiczne zaangażowanie (np. Proces Planu Rocznego). Będę nadal głęboko zaangażowaną wikimedianką, słuchając i uczestnicząc w rozmowach, kampaniach i konferencjach, aby zapewnić, że punkty widzenia społeczności są uwzględniane w strategicznych rozmowach z CEO, pracownikami i Radą, popierając zmiany kierunku lub priorytetów, gdy jest to korzystne lub wpływa na Ruch.
Opisz swoje doświadczenie w Wikimediach (np. wkład w projekty Wikimedia, członkostwo w organizacjach Wikimedia lub podmiotach afiliowanych, działalność jako organizator/-ka ruchu Wikimedia lub udział w organizacji sojuszniczej ruchu Wikimedia). - edytorka

Wikipedystka: według liczby "czywieszy", #5; według liczby artykułów, Top 100; według liczby edycji, Top 150. Patrolowanie nowych stron: #7. współ-wikipedystka roku, 2016; tytuł szlachecki, 2018, częściowo z powodu mojej pracy na rzecz Wikipedii.

  • Wikimedia Commons: Ponad 72 000 edycji od 2008 r.; w tym ponad 12 000 obrazów przyciętych z publikacji online na licencji PD.
  • Wikidata (ponad 56 000 edycji, od 2013)

- Organizatorka: lista wydarzeń, komitetów itp.

Z Twojej perspektywy, co powinno być priorytetem Wikimedia Foundation w ciągu najbliższych 5-10 lat i dlaczego uważasz, że są to najważniejsze priorytety? Noszę silikonową bransoletkę z napisem: WWHSD? (What Would Hari Seldon Do? - Co zrobiłaby Hari Seldon?). W ten sam sposób, w jaki ta fikcyjna postać myślała i planowała daleką przyszłość, ja myślę o dalekiej przyszłości naszego ruchu Wikimedia... za 10-100 lat. Dlatego uważam, że istnieją cztery najważniejsze obszary, którym powinniśmy nadać priorytet:

Dlaczego: Wierzę, że tego właśnie potrzebuje od nas świat, a także to, czego oczekują od nas konsumenci (czytelnicy, wirtualni asystenci, chatboty itp.), redaktorzy, współpracownicy, organizatorzy, partnerzy i darczyńcy.

Optional questions - Professional Experience, Skills and Education
Please describe your experience with governing bodies of organizations (nonprofit or for-profit), mentioning the scope of your responsibilities, as well as the complexity of the organization (in terms of scale of operations, budget, number of people involved, or other meaningful measures) and the size of the board or body. 1. Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees (2021-present). Elected in 2021 for a 3 year term. I serve as Chair, Talent & Culture Committee. Member: Executive Committee and Community Affairs Committee; also, Sibling Projects Task Force. Previously: Governance and Audit Committees.

2. Board of Directors, Wikimedia District of Columbia (WMDC) (multi-state programmatic operations of a 501(c)(3) public charity) (2016-2021). Appointed, 2016. Vice-President, 2017-2021. Among my responsibilities: Human Resources and Friendly Space.

3. Co-founder, Women in Red (established July 2015).

My role: Maintain a strategic, long-range view; media inquiries; present at conferences.
Governance model: totally flat -- no one is in charge. Consensus-based decisions: no Affiliate, no charity, no off-wiki website, no grants.
Members: volunteers only, of all genders.
Find us on: 33 language Wikipedias.
Converse/coordinate/plan: on-wiki only (33,700+ comments on the WikiProject's talkpage).
Budget: $0
Please describe your professional career experience. Professional career: healthcare industry. Since 1990, I worked for a large corporation (national; later international) that provides healthcare services: administrator, contract management, talent acquisition. Memberships: PMI SHRM, and ERE. Retired in 2016.

In 2017, I became a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar at Northeastern University's Digital Scholarship Group. My work focuses on pre-20th-century, trans-Atlantic, English-language women writers and their works (on Wikipedia and also a Wikidata project). Unpaid position.

Please briefly describe 3 situations that show how you tackled, or advised others on, a complex problem in an organization. How did you work with others to address the situations? 1. I helped bring together leaders from WM-CA, WM-DC, WM-MX, and WM-NYC during Wikimania Esino Lario (June 2016) to coordinate WCNA 2016 as a regional conference (previously, it was US-based). Together, we developed plans for it to occur in October and I agreed to be a co-grantee. It was a success (4 days; 7 tracks; >300 attendees).

2. In November 2020, the WCNA Core Team was still unable to decide whether to facilitate an online-only conference before the end of the year (e.g., COVID pandemic) because we were inexperienced with such a model. I suggested that the learnings from facilitating an online-only conference could be incorporated in future WCNAs so we don't have to be perfect this time; it's okay to take the risk and make mistakes. A successful virtual WCNA 2020 occurred in December (3 days; 4 tracks; >150 attendees) with several learnings.

Please describe your educational background, including degrees, certificates, and courses of study finished, and their relevance to board work. BA in Business Management, and later, an MBA degree. Also, post-graduate certificate in "Healthcare Executive Leadership". More recently: Board Leadership Development Program (2022), Team Dynamics/Board Practice Series (2023), and Essential Facilitation (2024).

Relevance: MBA degree is quite relevant as the Board's mission is to focus on organizational strategy, a central component of this degree.

Please add any relevant links describing your professional background, experience, profile (such as LinkedIn, staff page, etc.). - https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosiestephenson/
Optional questions - Leadership Experience
Please describe ways in which you have helped to form a bridge between multiple communities (such as by working on projects outside your home wiki, or working on a collaboration between multiple affiliates). 1. Wikimania 2023: co-founded WikiWomenSummit x Wikimania (WWS). "Building bridges" day for strategy, skill-building, leadership development, celebrations. Goal: repeat WWS at future Wikimanias, shifting format to support each year's unique ideas/requirements/Core Team/attendees.

2. Helped develop ideas on the Community Health Working Group (2018-20).

3. Elected to the Affiliations Committee (2016-2021). Served on its Conflicts Committee all years. Officer (Secretary, 2017; Chair, 2020-21).

4. In 2016, I ideated that WCNA become an Affiliate to retain/incorporate learnings into future convenings. To date, WCNA is the only conference-based Affiliate.

Can you describe a policy, on wiki or off, that you helped to create or change? What did you learn from this experience?
How have you been able to empower people to make their voices heard? Create safe spaces; provide opportunities for dialogue; inspire and encourage to build on it. Example: at

WikiWomenSummit x Wikimania 2024, we will soft-launch a new concept: WikiWomenSummit X Lunch, which empowers women at regional wikiconferences to convene lunchtime meetups (program, scope, time, format varying with each iteration).

Sometimes in professional situations, there are personality conflicts. Explain how you remain productive even with personality conflicts. Listen and learn before reacting; remain polite and civil; focus on issues. Understand that perceptions vary; we don't all see things the same way.
Optional questions - Strategic Thinking
Where do you see the need for greater diversity in the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees or within the movement? What steps would you take to improve diversity on the Board or within the movement? What steps would you recommend the Board take to improve diversity? Current Trustees incorporate gender and age diversity (for transparency, I'm 70 years old); represent four continents. An "Advisory Board" would bring additional perspectives. Historically, an "Advisory Board" existed. Currently, "Volunteer Advisory Members" serve on the Board's Governance and Audit Committees, plus the Community Affairs Committee's Sister Projects Task Force -- but this is different than an "Advisory Board". This would be a possible approach to provide opportunities for Wikimedians in underrepresented parts of the world, e.g., with representation from each region (per "Regional Grants Committees" alignment).
Zatwierdzenie Zatwierdzenie przeprowadzone przez komitet wyborczy lub pracowników Fundacji Wikimedia.
Uprawnienie: Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: KTC (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Identyfikacja: Zatwierdzono
Zatwierdzono przez: – NahidSultan (WMF) (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]