위키미디어 재단 선거/2022년/후보자/로지 스티븐슨-굿나이트
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight (Rosiestep)
Rosiestep (talk • meta edits • global user summary • CA • AE)
요약 정보 |
| |
---|---|---|
전체 신청서(필수 + 선택 질문)의 총 단어 수는 1000 단어입니다. | ||
필수 질문 | ||
위키미디어 재단 이사회에 출마하는 이유가 무엇인가요? 당신은 무엇에 기여하시겠습니까? 무엇에 대해 더 배우고 싶나요? | 저는 이사회에서 일하는 것이 2030년 운동 전략의 권장 사항 및 이니셔티브가 전략적 약속(예: 연간 계획 프로세스)을 받도록 하는 가장 좋은 방법이라고 믿습니다. 저는 계속해서 깊이 헌신하는 위키미디어인으로서 대화, 캠페인 및 컨퍼런스에 경청하고 참여하여 CEO, 직원 및 이사회와의 전략적 대화에서 커뮤니티의 관점이 다루어지도록 하고 이익이 될 때 방향이나 우선순위의 변화를 옹호할 것입니다. 또는 운동에 영향을 미칩니다. | |
귀하의 위키미디어 경험(예: 위키미디어 프로젝트에 대한 기여, 위키미디어 조직이나 가맹단체 회원 자격, 위키미디어 운동 조직자로서의 활동, 위키미디어 운동 동맹 조직 참여 등)을 설명해 주세요. | - 편집자
위키백과인: DYK 수 기준, #5; 문서 수 기준, 상위 100위; 편집 횟수 기준, 상위 150위. 새로운 페이지 점검 검토자: #7. 2016년 공동 올해의 위키백과인; Knighted, 2018, 부분적으로는 제 위키백과 작업 때문입니다.
- 주최자: 행사 목록, 위원회 등 | |
귀하의 관점에서 볼 때, 위키미디어 재단은 향후 5~10년 동안 무엇을 우선순위로 두어야 하며, 이를 가장 중요한 우선순위로 보는 이유는 무엇입니까? | 저는 WWHSD?(하리 셀던은 어떻게 할까요?)라고 새겨진 실리콘 팔찌를 착용하고 있습니다. 이 가상의 인물이 먼 미래를 생각하고 계획했던 것과 마찬가지로, 저는 우리 위키미디어 운동의 먼 미래를 생각합니다... 지금으로부터 10~100년 후. 따라서 저는 다음을 우리가 우선순위로 두어야 할 상위 4개 영역으로 봅니다.
왜?: 저는 이것이 세상이 우리에게 원하는 것뿐만 아니라 소비자(독자, 가상 비서, 챗봇 등), 편집자, 기여자, 주최자, 파트너 및 기부자가 우리에게 원하는 것이라고 믿습니다. | |
Optional questions - Professional Experience, Skills and Education | ||
Please describe your experience with governing bodies of organizations (nonprofit or for-profit), mentioning the scope of your responsibilities, as well as the complexity of the organization (in terms of scale of operations, budget, number of people involved, or other meaningful measures) and the size of the board or body. | 1. Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees (2021-present). Elected in 2021 for a 3 year term. I serve as Chair, Talent & Culture Committee. Member: Executive Committee and Community Affairs Committee; also, Sibling Projects Task Force. Previously: Governance and Audit Committees.
2. Board of Directors, Wikimedia District of Columbia (WMDC) (multi-state programmatic operations of a 501(c)(3) public charity) (2016-2021). Appointed, 2016. Vice-President, 2017-2021. Among my responsibilities: Human Resources and Friendly Space. 3. Co-founder, Women in Red (established July 2015).
| |
Please describe your professional career experience. | Professional career: healthcare industry. Since 1990, I worked for a large corporation (national; later international) that provides healthcare services: administrator, contract management, talent acquisition. Memberships: PMI SHRM, and ERE. Retired in 2016.
In 2017, I became a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar at Northeastern University's Digital Scholarship Group. My work focuses on pre-20th-century, trans-Atlantic, English-language women writers and their works (on Wikipedia and also a Wikidata project). Unpaid position. | |
Please briefly describe 3 situations that show how you tackled, or advised others on, a complex problem in an organization. How did you work with others to address the situations? | 1. I helped bring together leaders from WM-CA, WM-DC, WM-MX, and WM-NYC during Wikimania Esino Lario (June 2016) to coordinate WCNA 2016 as a regional conference (previously, it was US-based). Together, we developed plans for it to occur in October and I agreed to be a co-grantee. It was a success (4 days; 7 tracks; >300 attendees).
2. In November 2020, the WCNA Core Team was still unable to decide whether to facilitate an online-only conference before the end of the year (e.g., COVID pandemic) because we were inexperienced with such a model. I suggested that the learnings from facilitating an online-only conference could be incorporated in future WCNAs so we don't have to be perfect this time; it's okay to take the risk and make mistakes. A successful virtual WCNA 2020 occurred in December (3 days; 4 tracks; >150 attendees) with several learnings. | |
Please describe your educational background, including degrees, certificates, and courses of study finished, and their relevance to board work. | BA in Business Management, and later, an MBA degree. Also, post-graduate certificate in "Healthcare Executive Leadership". More recently: Board Leadership Development Program (2022), Team Dynamics/Board Practice Series (2023), and Essential Facilitation (2024).
Relevance: MBA degree is quite relevant as the Board's mission is to focus on organizational strategy, a central component of this degree. | |
Please add any relevant links describing your professional background, experience, profile (such as LinkedIn, staff page, etc.). | - https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosiestephenson/ | |
Optional questions - Leadership Experience | ||
Please describe ways in which you have helped to form a bridge between multiple communities (such as by working on projects outside your home wiki, or working on a collaboration between multiple affiliates). | 1. Wikimania 2023: co-founded WikiWomenSummit x Wikimania (WWS). "Building bridges" day for strategy, skill-building, leadership development, celebrations. Goal: repeat WWS at future Wikimanias, shifting format to support each year's unique ideas/requirements/Core Team/attendees.
2. Helped develop ideas on the Community Health Working Group (2018-20). 3. Elected to the Affiliations Committee (2016-2021). Served on its Conflicts Committee all years. Officer (Secretary, 2017; Chair, 2020-21). 4. In 2016, I ideated that WCNA become an Affiliate to retain/incorporate learnings into future convenings. To date, WCNA is the only conference-based Affiliate. | |
Can you describe a policy, on wiki or off, that you helped to create or change? What did you learn from this experience? | ||
How have you been able to empower people to make their voices heard? | Create safe spaces; provide opportunities for dialogue; inspire and encourage to build on it. Example: at
WikiWomenSummit x Wikimania 2024, we will soft-launch a new concept: WikiWomenSummit X Lunch, which empowers women at regional wikiconferences to convene lunchtime meetups (program, scope, time, format varying with each iteration). | |
Sometimes in professional situations, there are personality conflicts. Explain how you remain productive even with personality conflicts. | Listen and learn before reacting; remain polite and civil; focus on issues. Understand that perceptions vary; we don't all see things the same way. | |
Optional questions - Strategic Thinking | ||
Where do you see the need for greater diversity in the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees or within the movement? What steps would you take to improve diversity on the Board or within the movement? What steps would you recommend the Board take to improve diversity? | Current Trustees incorporate gender and age diversity (for transparency, I'm 70 years old); represent four continents. An "Advisory Board" would bring additional perspectives. Historically, an "Advisory Board" existed. Currently, "Volunteer Advisory Members" serve on the Board's Governance and Audit Committees, plus the Community Affairs Committee's Sister Projects Task Force -- but this is different than an "Advisory Board". This would be a possible approach to provide opportunities for Wikimedians in underrepresented parts of the world, e.g., with representation from each region (per "Regional Grants Committees" alignment). | |
확인 | 위키미디어 재단 직원이 수행한 신원 확인과 선거 위원회가 수행한 자격 확인 | |
적임: 확인됨 입증된: KTC (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC) |
신분, 신분증: 확인됨 입증된: – NahidSultan (WMF) (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |