Jump to content

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Avraham

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Avraham

[edit]

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info:
      • Meta Account: User:Avraham
      • Second account meeting prerequisites: en:User:Avraham
      • About me: I am an administrator and checkuser on EnWiki, an administrator on the Commons, and an OTRS volunteer. I am present on Meta, and although eligible, have never submitted an RfA on Meta out of respect for the understanding that the tools are meant to be used, and not a badge of achievement. Avraham is my SUL for wikimedia projects. My interest in becoming a steward is specifically to help out with cross-wiki vandalism, especially those requiring checkusering for the projects that do not have active checkusers in and of themselves. I am accessible by talk page and e-mail, and occasionally on IRC, although e-mail is my preferred method of contact. Thank you for your consideration.
      • After discussions with other metapedians, I was told I may have undersold my linguistic abilities. I feel it may be helpful to the wikimedia community to know that I am often contacted to close the Hebrew permission-commons tickets on OTRS to close (e.g [1], [2], [3], and [4] for examples). I claim he-1 as I am weakest when it comes to typing Hebrew, which makes posting on HeWiki difficult, but my comprehension and speaking abilities may be closer to he-2 than he-1, having been in Israel a number of times, and spending a year in an Israeli institution where only Hebrew was spoken in classes. As that was a number of years ago, I doubt my ability is over he-2 (then I think I could claim he-3 ).
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, he-2
  • Informationen zur Person:
      • Meta-Benutzerkonto: User:Avraham
      • Zweites, die Voraussetzungen erfüllendes Benutzerkonto: en:User:Avraham
      • Über mich: Ich bin Administrator und Checkuser auf EnWiki, ein Administrator auf Commons und ein freiwilliger Helfer des OTRS. Ich bin anwesend auf Meta, und obwohl qualifiziert, habe ich nie eine Adminkandidatur (RfA) auf Meta eingereicht auf Rücksicht auf das Verständnis, dass diese Werkzeuge auch verwendet werden und nicht ein Leistungsabzeichen sein sollen. Avraham ist mein SUL-Konto für die Wikimedia-Projekte. Mein Interesse ein Steward zu werden ist im speziellen darin begründet gegen wikiweiten Vandalismus helfen zu wollen, insbesondere bei jenen auszuhelfen, welche einer Checkuser-Überprüfung bedürfen für Projekte, die selbst keine aktiven Checkuser haben. Ich bin unter meiner Diskussionsseite und per E-Mail erreichbar, sowie bisweilen im IRC, wenngleich eine E-Mail meine präferierte Methode der Kontaktaufnahme wäre. Vielen Dank für Deine Erwägung.
français:
  • Langues: en, he-2
  • Renseignements personnels:
      • Compte Méta : User:Avraham
      • Second compte demandé parmi les pré-requis : en:User:Avraham
      • Sur moi : Je suis un administrateur et checkuser (vérificateur d'adresses IP) sur Wiki-En, administrateur sur Commons, et un bénévole OTRS. Je suis présent sur Méta, et bien qu'éligible, je n'ai jamais posé de candidature d'administrateur (RfA) sur Meta par respect pour mes convictions car je pense que les outils sont donnés pour être utilisés, et non pour servir de récompenses. Avraham est mon compte unique pour tous les projets Wikimedia. Ma principale raison de devenir steward est de donner un coup de main dans la lutte contre le vandalisme inter-wiki, plus spécialement pour les projets qui n'ont pas de checkusers actifs parmi eux et qui ont besoin de vérifier des adresses IP. Je suis disponible via ma page utilisateur et mon e-mail, et occasionnellement sur IRC, bien que l'e-mail soit ma façon préférée de communiquer avec les gens. Merci de votre attention.
italiano:
  • Lingue: en, he-2
  • Informazioni personali: Sono amministratore e checkuser in en:wiki, amministratore su Commons e volontario OTRS. Sono attivo su meta e, sebbene eleggibile, non ho ottenuto i requisiti per la candidatura su meta per una questione di etichetta, ma conoscendo le finalità dell'uso dei tool. Avraham è il mio account globale nei progetti wikimedia. Voglio diventare stewart per combattere il vandalismo interwikipediano, specialmente nelle funzioni di checkuser nei progetti in cui non vi sono checkuser attivi. Sono contattabile nella talk o per e-mail, e saltuariamente via IRC. Comunque l'e-mail è il mio mezzo di cominicazione preferito. Grazie per tua attenzione.
日本語:
  • 言語: en, he-2
  • 候補者の情報:
      • メタのアカウント: User:Avraham
      • 必要条件に合う第二アカウント: en:User:Avraham
      • 自己紹介: 私は英語版ウィキペディアの管理者およびチェックユーザー係、コモンズの管理者、そしてOTRSのボランティアです。私はメタにいて、立候補資格がありますが、使うことになるツールへの理解を尊重しないでメタで権限付与依頼を出したことはありませんし、権限は自分の達成度のしるしということもありません。Avrahamは私のウィキメディアプロジェクトでの統一アカウントです。スチュワードになるという私の関心は、具体的には複数ウィキ間の荒らし、とりわけ活発なチェックユーザー係のいないプロジェクトにおけるチェックユーザーの必要なケースで、手助けをすることです。私とは会話ページや電子メール、また時折IRCでコンタクトを取ることができます。ただし、電子メールでコンタクトを取っていただく方が良いです。ありがとうございました。
polski:
  • Języki: en, he-2
  • Informacje osobiste:
      • Konto na meta: User:Avraham
      • Inne konto spełniające wymogi: en:User:Avraham
      • O mnie: Jestem administratorem i checkuserem na EnWiki, administratorem na Commons i ochotnikiem OTRS. Jestem obecny na meta, i choć spełniam warunki, nigdy nie zgłosiłem się do PUA na meta mając na uwadze to, że te narzędzia powinny być używane, a nie jest to odznaka za osiągnięcia. Avraham jest moim globalnym nickiem w projektach Wikimedia. Powodem, dla którego chcę zostać stewardem jest chęć pomocy w zwalczaniu wandalizmów międzyprojektowych, zwłaszcza tych wymagających uprawnień checkusera dla projektów, które nie mają aktywnych checkuserów. Jestem dostępny przez stronę dyskusji i e-mail, czasami na IRCu, choć e-mail jest moją ulubioną formą kontaktu. Dziękuję za rozważenie mojej kandydatury.
português:
  • Línguas: en, he-2
  • Informações pessoais:
      • Conta no Meta: User:Avraham
      • Segunda conta necessária pelos pré-requisitos: en:User:Avraham
      • Sobre mim: Sou um administrador e verificador na EnWiki, administrador no Commons e um voluntário OTRS. Estou presente no Meta, e embora elegível, nunca submeti uma requisição de administração no Meta por uma questão de respeito pelo entendimento de que as ferramentas se destinam a ser usados, e não são como uma flor na lapela. Avraham é meu SUL nos projetos da wikimedia. Meu interesse em tornar-me steward é especificamente ajudar a combater vandalismos cross-wiki, especialmente quando requisitar verificação nos projetos em que não há verificadores. Estou acessível pela minha página de discussão e e-mail, e eventualmente no IRC, apesar de o e-mail ser meu método preferido de contato. Obrigado pela sua consideração.
русский:
  • Языки: en, he-2
  • Личная информация: Я администратор и чек-юзер в EnWiki, администратор на Commons и доброволец на OTRS. Также работаю на Мете, и, хотя и мог бы, никогда не выдвигался в администраторы Меты, сознавая, что должность администратора предназначена для работы, а не для признания достижений. Avraham мой SUL в проектах Wikimedia. Я заинтересован стать стюардом в основном, чтобы бороться с кроссвики-вандализмом, особенно когда требуется проверка участников в проектах, не имеющих своих чек-юзеров. Со мной можно связаться через страницу обсуждения или e-mail, иногда можно застать на IRC, однако через e-mail со мной связаться проще всего. Спасибо за внимание.
中文:
  • 可说语言: en, he-2
  • 个人资料:
      • 元维基帐号：User:Avraham
      • 另一个符合先决条件的帐号：en:User:Avraham
      • 关于我：我是英文维基的管理员、用户查核员，维基共享资源的管理员以及OTRS的志愿者。尽管我目前在元维基上已经符合申请管理员的资格，但我还从未提出过申请请求，因为我理解并尊重这一点：管理员权限是拿来用的，而不是拿来当荣誉记录的。Avraham是我在维基媒体项目中的全域账户。我愿意成为一名监管员，以协助处理跨维基的破坏，以响应那些尚未拥有活跃用户查核员项目的用户查核请求。您可以通过对话页及电子邮件找到我，我有时会在IRC上，但我更喜欢以电子邮件作为交流手段。谢谢您的关注。
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: en, he-2
  • 个人资料:
      • 元维基帐号：User:Avraham
      • 另一个符合先决条件的帐号：en:User:Avraham
      • 关于我：我是英文维基的管理员、用户查核员，维基共享资源的管理员以及OTRS的志愿者。尽管我目前在元维基上已经符合申请管理员的资格，但我还从未提出过申请请求，因为我理解并尊重这一点：管理员权限是拿来用的，而不是拿来当荣誉记录的。Avraham是我在维基媒体项目中的全域账户。我愿意成为一名监管员，以协助处理跨维基的破坏，以响应那些尚未拥有活跃用户查核员项目的用户查核请求。您可以通过对话页及电子邮件找到我，我有时会在IRC上，但我更喜欢以电子邮件作为交流手段。谢谢您的关注。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: en, he-2
  • 個人資料:
      • 元維基帳戶：User:Avraham
      • 另一個符合先決條件的帳戶：en:User:Avraham
      • 關於我：我是英文維基的管理員、用戶查核員，維基共享資源的管理員以及OTRS的志工。儘管我目前在元維基上已經符合申請管理員的資格，但我還從未提出過申請請求，因為我理解並尊重這一點：管理員權限是拿來用的，而不是拿來當榮譽記錄的。Avraham是我在維基媒體計畫中的全域帳戶。我願意成為一名監管員，以協助處理跨維基的破壞，以回應那些尚未擁有活躍用戶查核員計畫的用戶查核請求。您可以通過對話頁及電子郵件找到我，我有時會在IRC上，但我更喜歡以電子郵件作為交流手段。謝謝您的關注。


Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Yes

[edit]
  1. Yes Alex F. 10:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. Support Support — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support Sceptre 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Yes. Razorflame 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support Already ID'd to the foundation, so this is just a matter of expanding his workload. NuclearWarfare 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support --林勇智 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support Support Udufruduhu 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support Sure, second and final candidate that I will support. —CyclonenimT@lk? 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Have known Avi for a long time and he is definitely fit for the job. -- Ynhockey 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Matt (Talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Az1568 (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support don't see a cause against. Marcus Cyron 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support --Ivan Štambuk 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Nishkid64 (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support — neuro(talk) 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support shirulashem 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support --Shizhao 01:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support --Revolus Echo der Stille 03:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support More workers are needed. --Millosh 04:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support MBisanz talk 04:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Based on support of several very active stewards, and a general trust of the user. Prodego talk 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support Avjoska 06:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support Hermann Luyken 07:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Gnangarra 07:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support "I am present on Meta, and although eligible, have never submitted an RfA on Meta out of respect for the understanding that the tools are meant to be used" I'm agree with that. Otourly 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support --DR 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Computerjoe 09:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support --Wing 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Support Support --Church of emacs 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support Support Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Support Support --Hatukanezumi 10:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Support Seems to be trusted. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support Support Yes. Alefbe 10:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support Support →Na·gy 11:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Support Support Njaelkies Lea 11:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support Support Rudget (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Support Support Tinucherian 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support Support The Helpful One 11:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Support Support sounds acceptable ;-) axpdeHello! 12:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Support Support Davemustaine 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support Support --Ahonc 14:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support --Steve94 15:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 16:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support Support Yes. Stifle 14:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Obelix 15:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support Certainly trustworthy. Rje 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support-- Bence My Talk 16:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  49. Support Support Yes. bastique demandez! 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Support Support. Trusted user. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 20:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support Support NonvocalScream 20:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support Support I trust Avi. Steve Crossin Talk 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support Support --Nemo 21:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Support Support TheNeon 21:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Support Support Rspeer 21:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Support Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support Support after thorough review of his contributions. The Relativity of The Truth 22:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support Support Philippe 23:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Support Support FayssalF 02:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Support Support Definitely trustworthy. Orderinchaos 03:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Support Support Looks good. faithless (speak) 05:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ryan Postlethwaite 09:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Support Jaranda | wat's sup 14:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support Support Szalakóta 14:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support Support JoshuaZ 16:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support Support Avruch 17:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support Support Kushal one 18:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support Support Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Support Nave.notnilc 22:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support Avi's a good guy (except for those darn smileys), and knows where his towel is. I've worked with him as an admin and CU on en:wp, and like his approach. He has two strikes against him if you read the opposes, experience on other wikis, and language. Language is hard to fix, but in general the other wiki experience can be fixed. My generic advice for it is: Come over to Commons, there's lots of work to do there, and you'll find people from all around the world, many who don't speak English as their first language... you'll demonstrate that you can (or can't) work in a multicultural environment, and that you can get the support of your colleagues. Now then... Avi HAS come over to Commons, he's got a lot of edits... and what's more, he's been a sysop for a year. Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/Avraham_(2nd_attempt). I think he will have to work hard at the job to overcome the barriers of experience and language, but if he does (and I know he will) he'll be a fine steward. Avi, if you don't pass this year, help out more, help the small wiki team, get global rollback, get more active still at Commons, and try again. ++Lar: t/c 22:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support Support --Davecrosby uk 00:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support Support --Egmontaz 01:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support Support Per Lar.--chaser - t 05:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support Support Stef48 08:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Support - Punx 09:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support Support --Lighterside 16:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support after a private talk. Thanks, Avi. Alex Pereira falaê 17:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support Support --.snoopy. ✉ 19:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support Support good and reasonable Wikipedian. Carlossuarez46 20:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support Support --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support Support You undersold your second language indeed! - Mailer Diablo 23:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support Support I recognize him from his excellent track record on en. A fine choice for steward -- Samir 01:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Support Support — Rlevse • Talk • 02:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Support Support Telaviv1 15:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support OK. --Goodmorningworld 15:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support Support Kingturtle 17:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Support Support Language evidence has changed my vote. RyanGerbil10 18:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support Support Jon513 22:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support Support Avi is "solid as a rock" and absolutely trustworthy. -- (cypsy) 09:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support Support ok for me --Gdgourou 10:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support Support Yes we need people to deal with cross-wiki vandalism. Leujohn (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support Support Filipe RibeiroMsg 13:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support Support - good work on en, active on Commons. Warofdreams 15:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support Support Yes ...Modernist 03:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support Support Xenus 15:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support Support I'm okay with the candidate. Iss246 15:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support Support Rosiestep 17:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support Support --Roberta F. 18:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support Support - Eug 11:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support Support Glad to bring up the century for Avi. I've said elsewhere why I trust Avraham. Lar's statement deals well with the main reasons for oppose, and confirms my judgement. NSH001 14:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Support --Snake311 20:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support Support fr33kman t - c 00:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support Support -- --Zeljko 10:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support Support--Ziko 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support Support — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 15:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support Support --Hardenacke 17:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support Support IMatthew 21:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support Support--Jusjih 22:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Support Malinaccier (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Support as experienced sysop and cu on en:wp he'll get "experience to speak of in steward areas" (s.b.) quickly --Rax 22:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Support Support no problem, serious motivations. O. Morand 00:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Support Support --Martina Nolte 12:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Support Support per Lar. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Support Support Nbarth 02:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support Support -- lucasbfr talk 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Support -- Drboisclair 23:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support Support --4wajzkd02 09:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support Support rootology (T) 04:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121. --Mayer Bruno 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Support Support Betacrucis 09:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    As much as I truly appreciate your support, I believe you are not eligible to vote in this year's elections, so I am afraid I have to indent your vote. Trust me, I'm as sorry as you are, but rules are rules. -- Avi 15:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support Support As long as stewards has full access to enwiki it's good to have stewards knowing this area well and can follow up in case of misuses. Plus for he language skills. nsaa 16:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support Support. Good experience, good attitude. Jayjg 22:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Support Nothing but positive experiences and observations of this user. IronDuke 04:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Support --Sampi 04:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Support. Does a great job in all his admin, CU, and Oversight positions. Have full confidence that he'll make a fantastic Steward.--Brewcrewer 05:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support Support Inspires confidence. -- Tundrabuggy 05:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Support --Cerejota 12:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Support Great checkuser on en.wiki, I'm confident they'd make a great steward on meta. This flag once was red 15:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Support—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Christian Hartmann (talk) 11:37, February 17, 2009
  132. Support Support -- Scrupulous, fair, nice to vote for him while signing off from the project. If not in much else, at least in voting for Avi, one can be useful to wiki. Nishidani 20:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Support Support --Jpgordon 23:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Support Support DVD R W 01:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support Support ~Franchement, il n'y en a pas beaucoup des comme lui... Ceedjee 20:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support Support Yossiea 15:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support Support Die4Dixie 22:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support Support Marlith T/C 00:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Support . He is an exceptional and caring admin on Wiki! IZAK 03:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Support For sure! Tiptoety talk 05:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Support. Helpful user, and I trust him. He helped me once. W Tanoto 07:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Support Support --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support Support Fritzpoll 09:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support Support without hesitation. Jakew 10:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Support Support --MPerel 10:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Support Support Good luck! Dorgan 11:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Support Support Speaking as someone who is heavily involved in cross-wiki work, I still don't think there is a problem per se with an excellent contributor who concentrates on en.wikipedia. Dovi 14:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Support Support I know Avi as a very able and responsible contributor to en.wiki Any Wikimedia project will gain by his contributions! Gidonb 15:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support Support --Yoavd 16:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Oppose Oppose No experience to speak of in steward areas - seems primarily based on English Wikipedia. Majorly talk 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Oppose Puntori 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Oppose --FollowTheMedia 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly. An excellent en:wiki sysop, but stewards need broader experience. Durova 02:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Oppose Andre (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose OpposeAgree with Majorly. Giggy 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose Oppose --Sir James 05:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose Oppose --Latitude 08:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Oppose Limited language skills. feydey 11:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose Oppose No per FeydeyCarn 12:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose candidate is spamming by mail.Carn 08:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly, Durova et Feydey. -- Nahum 14:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Oppose Oppose --MF-W 14:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose Oppose Sorry, but 16 useful edits to non-English projects does not show an aptitude for steward work, nor exposure to the dynamics of small wiki projects. John Vandenberg 15:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oppose Oppose Definitely a trusted user (on the English Wikipedia) but as pointed out above, no cross-wiki work. - Rjd0060 15:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oppose Contra — Albert Krantz¿? 15:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oppose Oppose Per Rjd0060 --Herby talk thyme 16:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose Don't seem to be interwiki active --Nux (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Oppose OpposeInsufficient interwiki activity. Jehochman 17:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Oppose Oppose I'm sorry, you simply don't have any cross-wiki experience.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 18:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Tim Q. Wells 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose--RoswithaC 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose Oppose --Jan eissfeldt 23:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oppose Oppose Uwe Gille 09:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose Oppose No cross-wiki experience. Tombomp 10:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oppose Oppose — MrDolomite • Talk 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Oppose Oppose - Agree, Bjoertvedt
    Looking for proficiency in two languages or more. - Mailer Diablo 03:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Oppose Oppose Hargau 05:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    as Mike says. Alex Pereira falaê 12:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC) change my vote. Alex Pereira falaê 17:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose While excellent in EnWiki, more experience in international areas and other languages is necessary for the job. Marlith T/C 19:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Upon further inspection, I take back my opposition. Marlith T/C 00:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Oppose Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oppose Oppose Per Majorly. ...Aurora... 11:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No. 148.225.101.3 18:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to vote, thanks. Majorly talk 02:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Oppose Oppose Tesi1700 18:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Oppose Oppose After 6 days of thinking, I've decided that I have to oppose this. Experience is just an issue for me. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Meekohi 22:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)(|1000 4 20 24 46 106 119 121 1000)[reply]
  32. Oppose Oppose --Anthony Ivanoff 17:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Oppose Oppose A meta-steward should have more crosswiki experience and language skills. EdBever 18:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oppose Oppose No, per Majorly and John Vandenberg. His meta involvement seems to be limited into voting concerning about English Wikipedia rather than steward-related cross-wiki issues. --Aphaia 18:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose Oppose per Majorly Bogorm 15:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Note User is indefinitely blocked in project where user has the edits for sufferage, for what it is worth. -- Avi 00:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose Oppose Experience only in English projects. Sp5uhe 10:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oppose Oppose. Not a lot of cross-wiki experience. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose Oppose. More cross-wiki experience is required--132.205.110.197 20:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC) IP don't vote. --Lucas Nunes 20:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry but I think there are other candidates that are more focused on multiple wikis and languages. -- lucasbfr talk 09:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)switching vote per my misunderstanding of the election process. -- lucasbfr talk 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oppose Oppose per Majorly--Wikikids 03:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oppose Oppose-- Harrywad 23:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oppose Oppose because candidate is using edit summaries for campaigning. /Pieter Kuiper 23:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    comment but only on his own user page, nothing much wrong with that (except maybe a bit OTT) NSH001 08:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oppose Oppose en:wiki only expierence :( Masti 21:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Neutral Neutral Vyk 11:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Neutral --Smihael 11:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Neutral Don't know him Patio 14:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Neutral I trust Avi but I don't think this is the role for him. WJBscribe (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Neutral If it's only going to be CU requests, then no. Otherwise, not a bad candidate. --FiliP × 12:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I trust this user greatly, but Stewards need to be multilingual. RyanGerbil10 18:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Changing vote per new evidence. RyanGerbil10 18:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Neutral - Agree with WJBscribe. Juliancolton 00:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral NeutralNatanaeel83 20:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Avraham&oldid=22557184"