Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2025/Votes/KonstantinaG07

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

KonstantinaG07

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: el-N, en-4, fr-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello,

    I am Konstantina. I am editing as KonstantinaG07, although I have been editing for a brief period of time before my global rename as Konstantina07. I have contributing on Wikimedia since 2016, albeit a big hiatus from 2021 to 2024 due to some major changes in my personal life, and a smaller one this summer due to a health issue I faced. Currently, my main contributions are at Wikidata, where I also serve the community as an admin and oversighter, and cross-wiki countervandalism and anti-abuse work, where I am active with reverting vandalism and submitting request to stewards and global sysops, both on meta and on IRC.

    I initially hesitated to submit this request, but after some discussions I believe that my experience as an admin in a multilingual project, as an oversighter and my overall cross-wiki work would enable me to help the community as a steward if elected, so here I am with this request.

    Should I be elected, I intend to focus mainly on counter vandalism and spam, which I am mostly active and experienced in, handling SRG requests (and similar requests on IRC), handling steward oversight requests from the relevant queue and IRC,in accordance with the policy, and assisting with SRP and SRGP.

    There are of course areas that, while I am familiar with the applicable policies, I am less familiar with their practical aspects. Notably as I have never been a checkuser, I do not have the practical experience there even though I am familiar with the CU policy, and the basics of IPs/networks/user agents. This is an area that I would take it slowly and seek learning with the help of other, more experienced stewards, as LWCU is relevant to some of the areas I intend to focus.

    My timezone is UTC+2 (UTC+3 for summer time), and I am mostly active during midday/afternoon/evening. I am available to handle IRC requests when online, and can be pinged on discord when appropriate.

    Thank you for the consideration, and I am looking forward to answering any questions you may have.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2025/Questions#KonstantinaG07


If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2025|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Yes

[edit]
  1. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  --TenWhile6 14:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Arcticocean (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Support based on past experience and commitment. Volunteers are entitled to take time away and return to take up a user role. arcticocean ■ 14:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  --Minilammas (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Take this as a weak support – mainly as activity levels leave a lot to be desired (but understandable), but the answer to my question satisfies me. shb (t • c) 14:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good candidate. --Stïnger （会話） 14:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. XXBlackburnXx (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  XXBlackburnXx (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Svartava (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good luck! Svārtava (tɕ) 14:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Icodense99 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Icodense (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Good experience and nice to work with on Wikidata :-) I'm not too concerned about activity, the candidate is active enough and sometimes becoming a steward can trigger more activity. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Aqurs1 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  aqurs ❄️ 14:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Wüstenspringmaus (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per Ajraddatz Wüstenspringmaus talk 14:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  still have good commitment as a Steward. JrandWP (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  This is a weaker support than my other support votes due to the reasons EPIC mentioned, the return to activity is still quite recent. But Ajraddatz is right, you are an experienced user and I hope you'll use your permissions well if elected. Johannnes89 (talk) 15:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Pretty able candidate, well done (like the other candidates). I don't see the inactivity part as a problem. Leaderboard (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  V0lkanic (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Talimu0518 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Talimu0518 (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ternera (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  per shb. Ternera (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Bencemac (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Also per SHB2000, and I'm confident the activity is something you will work on being given the feedback. --Ferien (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Alachuckthebuck (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Ajrddatz brings up a good point about activity, but I'm wary of EPICs concerns. All the best -- Chuck Talk 17:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Argam Forbes (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Argam Forbes (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Tvcccp (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  per Johannnes89. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Aopou (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  —Aopou {talk} 19:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  weak per SHB2000 and Ajraddatz Mahir256 (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Zafkiel GD (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Zafkiel GD | Talk 20:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Leserättin (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  Leserättin (talk) 20:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. BilboBeggins (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  BilboBeggins (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sink Cat (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 22:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Codename Noreste (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Other than the activity levels, I otherwise don't see any other issues, so I am happy to support. Codename Noreste (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jet Pilot (Eligible, checked by EPIC)2025 •  Jet Pilot 00:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pólux (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Support, trusting the activity levels can increase if elected. Pólux (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Elli (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Elli (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Takipoint123 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  I understand concerns about activity level, but I don't mind it too much as long as they seem like a net positive. Keep up the good work! :) Takipoint123 (talk) 04:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2025 •  Hehua (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Skilsdhuo (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Skilsdhuo (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 09:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2025 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 09:47, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Пан Хаунд 2 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Пан Хаунд 2 (talk) 10:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2025 •  Mainly due to reasons pointed out by EPIC. Will be glad to support if your activity remains fairly consistent in future. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cactusisme (Eligible, checked by Aqurs1)2025 •  Mainly due to comments by EPIC Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 03:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JustARandomEditor123 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2025 •  Due to issues raised by EPIC. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 07:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. EPIC (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  KonstantinaG07 is a global rollbacker and admin/oversighter at Wikidata, and they have relevant experience. However I have some concerns regarding sustainability, as their activity levels throughout the years have been volatile and haven’t really gotten along with the permissions they currently have and have sought. They registered in September 2016, started being active in March 2017 and continued that activity until mid-2018. After then going inactive they returned in late 2019, was active until mid-2021, returned in early 2024 after 2.5 years (which was the year they received their current advanced rights), to then drop their activity in June shortly after becoming a Wikidata OS and again return just recently. It does give me some concern about how active they will be and how sustained their future activity will be. With that being said, I liked the answer to my question (Konstantina has been the only one to mention the Ukranian Wikipedia exception). If this does not pass I would likely support next year after seeing some signs of sustained activity, and wish them good luck in this election. EPIC (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by Svartava)2025 •  LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 20:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  PoetVeches (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2025 •  Miniapolis 23:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. খাত্তাব হাসান (Verification pending) •  খাত্তাব হাসান (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2025/Votes/KonstantinaG07&oldid=28227953"