Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2024/Votes/Lee Vilenski

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2024 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lee Vilenski

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-GB-N
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Edward and I've been on Wikipedia since 2016. I have been an administrator since 2020 on the English language Wikipedia, where I also function as a Bureaucrat. I edit in a bunch of areas, mostly around quality content; finding admin volunteers and keeping articles in line with policy.

    In addition to my role on the English Wikipedia, I have always been willing to help out with additional projects. I am often looking for users that I believe are suitable for Sysop on my home Wikipedia, and contacting the general public to donate images for my personal field of expertise - cue sports. I am also a moderator on the English Wikimedia Discord server.

    In 2020 I was elected as a Sysop on the English Language Wikipedia, and two years later as a Bureaucrat, the first user to be elected to the position with an account created since 2010. If elected as a Steward, I would offer my experience, enthusiam and willingness to pick up new areas with me to the role.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2024/Questions#Lee_Vilenski


Yes

[edit]
  1. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Your statement is pretty mediocre, in that it looks lazy and you didn't really explain what you plan to do with stewardship. That being said, you made a good effort to answer the questions presented to you, such as your answer to the question set to all candidates that was unique and had sufficient depth. As a result, you're getting my vote, since I mark candidates heavily based on potential, not cross-wiki experience. In the future though, if you don't pass this election, please make a better statement, as some of the other candidates have done. Leaderboard (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  Trusted user. I think that Lee would make a good steward. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Frostly (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Frostly (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. UA0Volodymyr (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  UA0Volodymyr (talk) 03:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sebastian Wallroth (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hey man im josh (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  I do think Lee would make a good steward if given the opportunity. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  Good luck! Have a good year! Nurtenge (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 0xDeadbeef (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  0xDeadbeef (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Agree steward is a xwiki role, I trust Lee's judgement however and his answers to questions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Gog the Mild (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Remsense (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  With the main opposition being the lack of crosswiki experience, from personal experience I think the candidate would quickly acquire said experience in the steward role, and it does not concern me enough to require opposition at present. Remsense (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  My wholehearted support Dolotta (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Weltenspringerin (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Weltenspringerin (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Miniapolis 16:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. S60W79 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  --S60W79 (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Elli (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  Elli (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  NoychoH (talk) 17:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Koreanovsky (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  As much as I am familiar with the work of Lee Vilenski, I do believe that he has a lot of potential. Lack of cross-wiki activities is legitimate concern, but I believe that he might make a good steward and that the things to improve will be improved over time. Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Casliber (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Capable - should be net positive Casliber (talk) 02:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hanif Al Husaini (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Shizhao (talk) 11:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Moral support, they'd probably be fine as a steward. Legoktm (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. SunDawn (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Prairie Astronomer (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Prairie Astronomer (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Dantheanimator (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Dantheanimator (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Zippybonzo (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Zippybonzo (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Kreuz Elf (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Kreuz Elf (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. BlackStar1991 (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  I Support this candidate BlackStar1991 (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ideophagous (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Ideophagous (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  I don't see any competency issues or anything. I don't really care about the cross wiki experience argument. Lee will do just fine as a steward. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  BRP ever 11:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Dfertileplain (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Dfertileplain (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Grandmaster Huon (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Grandmaster Huon (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Toadspike (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  I've reconsidered after withdrawing a Yes vote. Lee Vilenski is a trusted editor and we need more Stewards. Having him on board can do no harm (I hope I don't regret saying that...). Toadspike (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Julius 12345)2024 •  Eraevsky (обс.) 15:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Moral support, candidate can be trusted with this access, though obviously more relevant experience would be useful. I hope the candidate considers getting involved in more global/cross-wiki work regardless of the outcome. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Alfa-ketosav (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ericliu1912 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  —— Eric Liu（Talk） 16:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Sdkb (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Sdkb talk 21:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Bio06940 (talk) 00:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. AdaHephais (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  AdaHephais (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rexogamer (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Rexogamer (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Takipoint123 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Takipoint123 (talk) 19:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Shahnamk (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  best regards Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  48. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. JSFarman (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  JSFarman (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  As far as I could see, his activity is almost limited to the English Wikipedia. No cross-wiki experience. I would like to see more cross-wiki experience and involvement in the future, and then I will consider support. --Stïnger （会話） 14:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  I prefer stewards to have greater administrative activity, as the candidate has made 26 logged actions on the English Wikipedia in 2023. I know that numbers aren't everything, but I think that a steward who wants to work at SRG should have made more than 12 blocks in a year. The experience, enthusiam and willingness to pick up new areas are good traits to have, but I have trouble seeing how the candidate's experience translates over to being a steward – I don't think that being a bureaucrat is enough on its own, sorry. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TenWhile6 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Not enove global work TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  I have great respect for the work Lee does on enwiki, but I'm not convinced that steward is the right role for him. He has no significant functionary, crosswiki, or technical experience, and his statement and questions don't really explain what he intends to do as a steward, nor why he is particularly suited to the role. Giraffer (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LR0725 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Limited xwiki experience, mostly active at English Wikimedia projects. LR0725 ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ján Kepler (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Per others above me. Ján Kepler (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Fenikals (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eta Carinae (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Eta Carinae (talk) 14:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  say this every year, won't trust ppl who only edit enwiki and have sysop rights there with the steward tools..its not a stepping stone.. Stemoc 14:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JrandWP (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Sorry, although he had good works on enwiki, the crosswiki experiences are insignificant. JrandWP (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Very little cross-wiki experience. The statement doesn't say why they run as a steward, and the answers to the questions seem rather vague to me, so I'm not sure if the candidate has a good idea of what a steward should do. MF-W 15:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NightWolf1223 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  I am not seeing alot of xwiki experience. NightWolf1223 (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Maximillion Pegasus (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  First, I'd like to thank the candidate for volunteering. It is always appreciated when people are willing to step up and take on more responsibility. However, this candidate lacks two vital criteria for me to vote yes. 1. This user is monolingual and 2. (the most important) There is a distinct lack of any cross-wiki activity/engagement, whether that be in the form of cross-wiki monitoring, taking on other global roles, or being active in some other form globally here at Meta or otherwise. I do appreicate his service at en.wiki, and hope he continues to do good there. Best regards, Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Prodraxis (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Lack of cross-wiki nor functionary experience per others. Prodraxis (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ferien (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Brilliant editor but your experience is limited to the English Wikipedia - with some content writing on the Simple English Wikipedia too which is appreciated. I don't see any need for the tools or experience related to steward work unfortunately. --Ferien (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Limited x-wiki activity; response to questions not convincing. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 16:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  --Minilammas (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  I would be happy to support next time if you increase your cross-wiki activity Ameisenigel (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. 1108-Kiju (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Thank you for your work on the English Wikipedia. However, An important element in SE, there is little activity in meta 1108-Kiju/Talk 17:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Funkruf (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  I'm sorry, but you are mainly only active in the English Wikipedia. Please increase your contribution in the other cross-wikis. Funkruf (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  I'm not a priori opposed to candidates from enwiki, but I do expect some functionary or antiabuse experience from them, which is not the case here. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     17:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Needs (more) cross-wiki and/or global activity and experience. Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Pppery (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  * Pppery * it has begun 19:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. DarkMatterMan4500 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Maybe contribute to Meta more as well? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Enkhsaihan2005 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Enkhsaihan2005 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Queen of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Sorry, but not enough xwiki work. 2nd most edited wiki is scowiki, where the candidate only has 1,962 edits. Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. USSR-Slav (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  USSR-Slav (СССР-Слав) (talk) 02:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ruy (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Not enough crosswiki experience, maybe next time. Ruy (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Minorax (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Don't see enough crosswiki experience to be a steward. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Quangkhanhhuynh (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Need more cross-wiki activities. Khanh ( talk | contribs | CA | vi ) 04:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Insufficient cross-wiki experience. – Ammarpad (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Not enough crosswiki experience. Rzuwig► 10:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Tmv (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Tmv (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Tmv)2024 •  --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 12:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  -- I personally like Lee, and have great respect for his work on en-wiki, but I'm not convinced he has demonstrated enough cross-wiki involvement / skillset here. Eddie891 (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Activity is too concentrated on enwiki unfortunately. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wooze (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 • . Wooze (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Neriah (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  per above. Neriah - 💬 - 21:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Cross-wiki experience is needed. Good luck for next year! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  42. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  dwadieff ✉ 03:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  ミラP@Miraclepine 03:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  44. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Total lack of cross-wiki experience. Hopefully you'll do better next year if you work on that. JavaHurricane 12:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hehua (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  Hehua (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Stewardship is essentially a cross-wiki role, leaning heavilly towards small wikis. ——SerialNumber54129 19:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ankermast (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Per Serial Number Ankermast (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Pinigin (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Pinigin (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Jan Myšák (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Justarandomamerican (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Justarandomamerican (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Victor Schmidt (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  next to no x-wiki activity Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024 •  Bencemac (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by NightWolf1223)2024 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  55. EggRoll97 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Extraordinarily little cross-wiki/global activity. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  56. ChrisWx (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Needs more cross-wiki experience to be a steward. The enthusiasm and willingness to work in new areas is appreciated, but does need more experience as a steward. ChrisWx 🌀 (talk - contribs) 04:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  57. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Julius 12345 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Sorry, but you don't have global permissions. Julius 12345 (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  59. DCB (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  DCB (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Kadı (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Kadı Message 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Besides the low activity levels mentioned above, I have made the experience that after they had approved Russia for a GA status which was then found to have some serious flaws afterwards, Lee Vilenski didn't help much resolving the issue. Thats ok for an average editor but from a Steward I'd expect they get involved in fixing the mistakes they were involved. What if they mess up and just leave? Thanks for volunteering, but not for the moment.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Styyx (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Lack of x-wiki experience. Styyx (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Cremastra (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  per the above. More x-wiki experience needed, and maybe more languages. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  64. ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Sorry! — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Gereon K. (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Ankry (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Ultratomio (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Ultratomio (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  English only? Jusjih (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Adtonko (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  crosswiki is what you may lack Adtonko (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Hadrianus (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Renvoy (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Sorry but I cannot see someone with almost no edits in the meta-wiki main space as a steward reNVoy (user talk) 22:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  No cross-wiki activity in areas related to stewards at all and very little in general. No language skills besides English. Meiræ 22:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  76. 용인 학생 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  ㅡ Joayong (Suggest) 14:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  per above unfortunately, concerns with limited x-wiki activity Fastily 23:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  78. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  —MdsShakil (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Saroj (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  Saroj (talk) 09:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Brewster239 (Eligible, checked by Victor Schmidt)2024 •  Brewster239 (T·C·CA) 09:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  I barely see any cross-wiki experience. Daniuu (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sleyece (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Sleyece (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Aizenr (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Aizenr (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Xania (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Xania (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  86. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 00:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Insufficient cross-wiki experience with just one submitted SRG request. Those who wish to serve as stewards should first train themselves in which requests to lock or globally block (or remove a lock or global block) to accept and which to not. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ZERTINHO (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  ZERTINHO (talk) 06:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Vp08122010 (Eligible, checked by Elton)2024 • Insufficient cross-wiki experience VP PRM VIR💬📝 16:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Mirer (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Draken Bowser (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Draken Bowser (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Spielvogel (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  per above ( cross wiki exper.) Spielvogel (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Antoine.b (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2024 •  Antoine.b (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  94. NgocAnMaster (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Same as K6ka, you need more cross-wiki experiences. Anster (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  No cross-wiki experience Taivo (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
       Buffs (Not eligible, checked by Sdrqaz) •  Buffs per failure to respond to the question posed about arwiki (talk) 19:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Thank you for volunteering, and thank you for the work you do at enwiki, but cross-wiki experience is important for a steward, due to the scope of the role which extends beyond Meta. If you become more active in cross-wiki activities such as anti-vandalism. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 05:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  97. ドラみそ (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  doramiso-meta (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Albertoleoncio (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Eu gostaria de ver em uma possível próxima candidatura, um maior domínio da wiki além da mera experiência com administrador: seja como CU/OS, seja em outras wikis além da Wikipédia em inglês. Este voto não está em inglês justamente para demonstrar isso. ━ Albertoleoncio Who, me? 12:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  99. HarleyQuinn (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Need more crosswiki experience HarleyQuinn❤️ (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Base (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2024 •  Base (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Aspere (Eligible, checked by ZI Jony)2024 •  Aspere (talk) 14:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. V0lkanic (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Not enough crosswiki experience expected from a steward. On the other hand, I do find the answers you have provided convincing. V0lkanic (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DreamRimmer (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  A few more years can help. cyrfaw (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Trusted but near to zero required cross-wiki involvement/experience. CptViraj (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jeffrey Beall (Eligible, checked by Giraffer)2024 •  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Wutsje (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2024 •  Moral support, but needs a lot more cross-wiki experience. Wutsje (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Aca (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Aca (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2024 •  Tvcccp (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by 20041027 tatsu)2024 •  Concerns about lack of cross-wiki activity are legitimate, though I trust Lee Vilenski to do the right thing with the project's best interests at heart (and he's a 'crat on our biggest wiki for good reason). But I also interact with Lee Vilenski in content on a regular basis, and feel a bit interest-conflicted.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lionel Cristiano (Eligible, checked by Yahya)2024 •  Lionel Cristiano (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Em-mustapha (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  No cross wiki contribution Em-mustapha talk 11:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Wolverène (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Drummingman (Eligible, checked by TenWhile6)2024 •  Drummingman (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Zivax (Eligible, checked by JrandWP)2024 •  Zivax (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Needs more cross-wiki activity for me to support, but won't pile-on oppose out of respect for Lee. Lepricavark (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jphwra (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Jphwra (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Masti (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  masti <talk> 16:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2024 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  22. FlyingAce (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  –FlyingAce✈hello 20:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2024 •  Berlin-George (talk) 02:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nicolas Eynaud (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2024 •  Trusted user on enwiki but lacking a bit in cross-wiki experience. DraconicDark (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Mykola7)2024 •  Maleine258 (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  27. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  PoetVeches (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Z1KA (Eligible, checked by EN-Jungwon)2024 •  Z1KA (T) 17:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Nattes à chat (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2024 •  Nattes à chat (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2024 •  DannyS712 (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  Darkhan 10:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  32. M7 (Eligible, checked by Syunsyunminmin)2024 •  M/ (talk) 13:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2024/Votes/Lee_Vilenski&oldid=26300932"