User talk:Nicolas Eynaud
Add topicWelcome to Meta!
[edit]Hello, Nicolas Eynaud. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
--Meno25 (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]
Hi Nicolas Eynaud, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrol right to your account, as you are a trustworthy user. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Meta:Autopatrollers. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
My honest apologies
[edit]Hello Nicolas Eynaud. At start convesration I would like to honestly sorry you for my comment toward you here. It was not my intention to keep many emotional comments toward you and it is so embarassing for me, I feel really bad with and regret. I do not want to you remember me as volunteer who might be difficult to deal with.
I also want to honestly apologise what happened on Occtian Wikipedia, I made there four editions for which I got indefinite ban in all dimenstions without permission to keep comment there on talk page. I desire to be focussed on myself, take responsiblity for my things, and try show that I understand you, so I will show my full repentance, and just will explain from where that [quite strange] intention come from. I promise improving myself. I really want to ask you for forgivness and hope you will give me chance to expire that my embarassing track record (indef block onOCC Wikipedia, the only where I am). I politely ask you to change my block on Occ wiki into e g settle warning after revieving situation
1one/two edit were related to google maps articles, I hoped that users will use my proposed source to cretting articles about most visited places in Wikipedias according to googl maps (to Wikipedia have not only trivia articles like most followed Tik Tokers but for ballance also something about high culture). Yes. I it was mistake. I should not edit languages I geerally do not know, it was fastly examined o my talk page. (Regarding user Count Count, and see fast diffs to see time: 12:08-12:11 12:17, 12:32, 12:18 (the block log).
2 Just two small other edits are from subjects I am interested in personally. I just found inspiation here to make "see also" in some wikis this way and I was inspired by someone who made similar edition on their home-wiki here. Was it right? Perhaps not as you said in block summary, especially that I noted now also that I made language mistake here. I honestly sorry for that my common mistake which should not happened.
3Even if I do not know Occtian language, perhaps it is not needed to keep me embarassing track record for being indefinite block on Occtian Wiki Nicolas? Especially if I PROMISE to not make edits which could engage unnecesary time to checking fo others. Sometimes people make small technical editions in many wikipedias, for example you can find user who smade +4 edits in at leasst+190 editions on Wikimedia, for small changes or technical purposes, I tried did the same, I am sorry if that detail appeared wrong. Also look, I made four edits in Occtian Wikipedia. Meanwhile I had probably far more interactions with you and other users from OCCwiki on Metawiki (You, Toku for example). Indefinite blocks are usually for dangerous vandals. Meanwhile I am user who want to collaborate with you on Metawiki (why not to trust users who made many edits in Wikimedia projects since 2009, and last block had for one day in 2011 on PLwiki for en:wp:common mistakes? Especially when Count Count forgive me), I would like for example share opionion with you about this article (I am quoted there at one discussion on the image in that article BTW) and improve our relations. What do you think about quote "We therefore support Menking and Rosenberg’s revised version of the third pillar—“The integrity of Wikipedia is a function of the size and breadth of its community.”" for example about Wikipedia?
If you have any questions, you can ask me to elaborate. This essay is sincere for congent matter, of course I am not apologising just to apologise or show my emotions, I really try show you how I am trying politely trying to cnvince you why I ask for unblock after showing my regretting. Like I said I am really disapointed I got indef ban on OCCwiki but basically I regret for what happened there so I. Please, give me a chance and forgive me. Futhermorely I also want to apologise you for my comment on metadiscussion earlier and improve our relations, I will be more careful and will collaborate like volunteer. It is your decison what can be constructive for me and that situation. Yours sincerely. Dawid2009 (talk) 12:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- @ User:Dawid2009. Hello, on small wikipedias, there is not enough administrators to explain to vandals the problems with their contributions: the ban is usually the quickest solution to save time. Regarding the rest of your message, you're now ununblocked but remember the insertion of more or less advertising links is not a recommended activity. Best regards, --Nicolas Eynaud (talk) 14:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Thx for updating. I have added some links to WikiData. Look at Wikipedia featured articles (links to all records: # of FAs) ;) Hedger z Castleton (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)