Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2019/Votes/Jon Kolbert

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2019 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Jon Kolbert

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, fr, de-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Jon and I am an administrator on Wikimedia Commons, an account creator on the English Wikipedia and an OTRS agent. My work focuses on anti-spam and anti-vandalism and I am mostly active on IRC networks under the nick “kolbert”.

    As a member of the English Wikipedia Account Creation Team, I help users who are caught up in rangeblocks create accounts and participate in Wikimedia projects. As a considerable portion of requests are global blocks, we rely on the work of stewards to filter requests and prevent LTAs from getting through this process. There is a large backlog of requests and only a few stewards active on the team (list of users).

    I have also worked in collaboration with other Wikimedians to combat cross-wiki LTAs through edit filters and other monitoring to help identify and address specific types of vandalism and spam.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2019/Questions#Jon Kolbert


Yes

[edit]
  1. Érico (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Érico (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Cohaf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 • I am seeing no red flags and I am impressed with their answers to my questions. They do it promptly (in fact very). They will be a fine steward.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  I can say with confidence that Jon Kolbert would be one of the strongest additions to the steward team this year. He has admin experience on commons, the 2nd largest project, and works seemlessly on en.wiki to help in files and other areas where this experience is needed. This ability to cross between the cultures of those two projects is not something we often see from individuals highly active on one of the other, and makes me comfortable trusting him to work on any project because I know he will always respect policy and local users. I have no qualms here. Strongest possible support. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  one of the best admins Commons has. Fair, honest and patient. Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  –Ammarpad (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  I have had the pleasure of interacting with Jon Kolbert for a few years now, and I trust their judgement immensely. Their experience on Commons will be very helpful in stewardship as they are already comfortable dealing with editors from many different backgrounds speaking many languages. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Thanks for your willingness to serve as a steward! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ruyaba (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 14:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JOAN (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  JOAN ~ (Questions?) 14:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Present lack of cross-wiki experience not a concern. Miniapolis 15:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Ankry (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Hesitate a bit, but looking at their experience and activity on other projects I'd like to give them a chance. Trijnsteltalk 15:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I strongly believe Jon Kolbert would be a highly beneficial asset to Wikimedia in a steward role. He is experienced in steward-related areas, and is more than sufficiently trustworthy to hold steward permissions. Vermont (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Clinamental (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Clinamental (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Overall good answers to questions. Not controversial. Support. Leaderboard (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  I would like to see more crosswiki experience or experience with advanced permissions, but the answers to questions are good. Take it slow once you are elected, and be sure to ask lots of questions :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ~ Rob13Talk 16:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by علاء)2019 •  Crosswiki experience is on the lower side, but seems trustworthy in general. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kaviraf (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Kaviraf (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yuriy kosygin (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  ✈IGOR／ 〒 Tell Me What?! ． Wikivoyager 16:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  23. FR30799386 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  FR30799386 (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Dlohcierekim (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  25. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  His anti-abuse work is good and would make him be able to perform stewards actions wisely. Considering his participation on many other areas, I think the low cross-wiki activity wouldn't make him less capable of holding the flag. Esteban16 (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  26. BRPever (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  BRP ever 17:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Fenikals (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Seen them around. Dreamy Jazz (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  cyrfaw (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 19:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -revi (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  — regards, Revi 19:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Mz7 (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  35. stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  stwalkerster (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ra'ike (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Ra'ike (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Majora (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Excellent addition to the steward team. 100% support. Majora (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  nothing alarming to recognize; clear and quick answers on question page; and experience will surely grow. --Rax (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  See other comments. Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  40. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  --TheSandDoctor Talk 21:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Gereon K. (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  42. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  AGK ■ 22:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Some very impressive contributions and I see no reason to doubt they wouldn't be a fine steward. Hiàn (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  44. GreenMeansGo (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  GMGtalk 22:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  45. NickK (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Relevant set of experience, and enwiki colleagues above are of a good opinion of him. This gives me enough reason to support — NickK (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Lcdo. jose francisco vargas muñoz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Will do a good job Lcdo. jose francisco vargas muñoz (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Muhraz (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  48. NMW03 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  NMW03 (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  49. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  multilingual — Bukhari (Talk!) 07:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  50. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  GZWDer (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Brainswiffer (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  52. EVinente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  EVinente (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  53. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  BugWarp (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Barkeep49 (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ayagaures 0 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Ayagaures 0 (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Gog the Mild (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Gog the Mild (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  57. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Experienced and trustable user to be steward. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 17:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  –Davey2010Talk 17:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  59. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Good luck ! - DePlusJean (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Dolotta (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  61. CreativeC (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  CreativeC (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  62. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 19:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Ganímedes (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Mbrickn (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Has a clue, and is the type of user we need as a stewards. The lack of Xwiki experience isn't a cause for hesitation IMHO. --Cameron11598 (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Antanana (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  アンタナナ 00:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Rafael (stanglavine) msg 00:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Mirer (talk) 04:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  69. K.e.coffman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  thank you for volunteering. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  FASTILY 07:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Kpgjhpjm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Kpgjhpjm (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  72. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  WikiBayer (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2019 •  Linedwell [talk] 08:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Arystanbek (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arystanbek (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Taivo (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Artregor (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Snookerado (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Snookerado (talk) 15:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  78. B20180 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  B20180 (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Iluvatar (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Steindy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Steindy (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Techso01 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Techso01 (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  84. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  *Youngjin (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Shizhao (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Nick (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  I'm familiar with Jon from working with him on Commons - I was delighted when he was successful in requesting adminship there. I said at his RfA that he's "sufficiently experienced and [has] the required manner to be a successful administrator" and from further interactions with Jon, I'm going to state he's sufficiently experienced and has the required manner to be a successful steward. I'd also add, I'm particularly impressed by his willingness to ask for second opinions and to offer sound advice when asked himself, just a perfect temperament for stewarding. Nick (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 11:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Flooded with them hundreds (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 • . Flooded with them hundreds 11:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Kb03 (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  90. BotBln (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 • --BotBln (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  91. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  ~ℳɑrio (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  92. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Easily the most worthy per above. IWI (chat) 17:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Euro know (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Euro know (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Praxidicae (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  95. علاء (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  --Alaa :)..! 23:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Galahad (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 03:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Galobtter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Galobtter (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Cedalyon (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  100. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Very helpful editor. I have been working with them at ACC from a long time and seems trustworthy to hold advance permissions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Krd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Krd 09:07, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Fish and karate (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Airbornemihir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Airbornemihir (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  104. 1.02 editor (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  1.02 editor (talk) 11:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  105. JDuggan101 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  JDuggan101 (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  106. J ansari (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  -J. Ansari Talk 12:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Omondi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  A second steward with a long experience of Wikimedia and a good knowledge of French will be welcome to help French speaker who have no knowledge of English. Omondi (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  108. QEDK (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  QEDK (talk 桜 enwiki) 15:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  109. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 16:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  111. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  DannyS712 (talk) 21:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  112. L293D (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  113. IM3847 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  IM3847 (talk) 01:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Lasks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Lasks (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  115. P. W. Siebert (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  P. W. Siebert (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Saig Keryann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Saig Keryann (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Asobiyafuul (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  I expect it for his moves. Asobiyafuul (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Sj (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  ++ Commons is its own language. –SJ talk  17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  119. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  S.Didam (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Enki Barthel (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Enki Barthel (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Simplexity22 (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  122. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  123. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  水瀬悠志 (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  124. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  TheDragonFire (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Ntmamgtw (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Ntmamgtw (talk) 13:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  127. CoolSkittle (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  CoolSkittle (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  128. DGG (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  DGG (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Uğurlar arzu edirəm! ►Cekli829 10:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Rprpr (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Rprpr (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Ymnes (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  131. StraussInTheHouse (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2019 •  SITH (talk) 17:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  132. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  133. გიო ოქრო (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  გიო ოქრო (talk) 23:05, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Eihel (talk) 11:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  135. SkyGazer 512 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  SkyGazer 512 (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Darylgolden (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Darylgolden (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Udo T. (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Maleine258 (talk) 15:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  139. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       SwagGangster (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  SwagGangster (talk) 23:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Mustafa desamangalam (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Dear Jon Kolbert Im happy to support for your kind willingness to serve the Stewards Mustafa desamangalam (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Oshawott 12 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 06:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  144. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 12:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Tiven2240 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Deserving and trustworthy candidate Tiven2240 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  146. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  17:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  147. 和平至上 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  【wopingzisoeng】💬📝 09:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  148. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Trustworthy editor with cross-wiki experience. Kurtis (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Good luck. Wolverène (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Rhododendrites (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019 •  Waddie96 (talk) 11:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  153. PlyrStar93 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 14:37, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Ruthven (msg) 18:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  155. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  FN Markus (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Rzuwig► 08:34, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Meno25 (talk) 09:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  158. مھتاب احمد (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  مھتاب احمد (talk) 12:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Pelz (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Pelz (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Andyzweb (Not eligible, checked by PlyrStar93) •  Andyzweb (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  160. PrussianOwl (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  PrussianOwl (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  161. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 05:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Sigma'am (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  Good luck! Sigma'am (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 22:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Tymon.r (talk) 01:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Dr. Sroy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  I see no points against their proposed policy. Dr. Sroy (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Billofocham (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Billofocham (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Officine Informatiche (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Officine Informatiche (talk) 10:59, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  168. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Pythoncoder (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Spintendo (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •   Spintendo  18:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Bluemel1 (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Enfcer (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Enfcer (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2019 •  It appears that he would contribute substantially to an understaffed circumstance. Thumbs up... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Pasdideedenom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Pasdideedenom (talk) 11:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Stïnger) •  Predatorix (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Jason M. C., Han (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Jason M. C., Han (talk) 02:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Rosguill (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Rosguill (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Xunonotyk (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Very active person. Xunonotyk (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Genium (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  genium ⟨✉⟩ 12:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Darkhan 16:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Sarbast.T.Hameed (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  He is indeed one of the best Commons admins ... Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2019 •  Matanya (talk) 23:47, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  184. ANode (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2019 •  ANode (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  masti <talk> 09:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Sun-crops (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Sun-crops (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  187. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  RadiX∞ 11:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Largely per Rschen7754. The candidate lacks experience in relevant areas, but might be a good candidate for the future. Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  Inexperience. Nihlus 14:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Per Vogone.—Jasper Deng (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Additionally, I do not like his answer to the blanket question about harassment. Harassment is more than trolling or vandalism and RBI is not applicable to it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MrX (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  MrX (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Not much cross-wiki experience and "filtering requests" in the enwiki account creation queue does not seems like steward work. MF-W 19:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  Not now, maybe in the future. Eurodyne (talk) 22:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Too soon. ——SerialNumber54129 07:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  per Rschen7754; see you maybe in a year or two again KPFC 💬 10:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Santasa99 (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Inexperience —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Herby talk thyme 11:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Alan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Alan (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Küñall (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2019 •  Küñall (talk) 02:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Buggia 08:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Count Count (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  No CU/OS experience. Count Count (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  — xaosflux Talk 14:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Incnis Mrsi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Page-move warring is a poor recommendation for such high position. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Kudpung (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Pamputt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Pamputt (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Slowking4 (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wikit 19:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  - Might do okay if elected but I would prefer a bit more experience (only adminship is Commons, which has been held for just over a year [1], and in my opinion ACC and OTRS have a lower bar of entry, and neither really deal with the sort of CU/OS private data that one would have access to as a steward - ACC provides IP addresses of new editors, not necessarily those that are already established). --Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think trying to value some user's private data over others is a good idea. I could argue that getting the IP of established users could be seen as less important since it's probably been leaked in some way already (email, accidentally logging out for an edit, using some external tool, etc.), while new users have no Wikimedia paper trail yet. Private data, regardless of whose it is, is important to safeguard and should be only entrusted to users who we would entrust with our own private data IMO. Legoktm (talk) 07:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Generally (but not always) when people get in trouble for leaking private data, it is usually that of established users. There is the added temptation with users that you might know. --Rschen7754 07:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  --Stïnger （会話） 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2019 •  per Rschen7754 Mahir256 (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SQL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Per Rschen7754 SQLQuery me! 19:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Pórokhov (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Pórokhov (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Piotr Bart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Piotr Bart (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2019 •  Soul Train (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Defender)2019 •  No specific concerns, just not enough active steward-like aspects to get me over the line  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ping08 (Eligible, checked by PlyrStar93)2019 •  Ping08 (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2019 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Methodios (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  --Methodios (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2019 •  Good candidate Gryllida 08:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  15. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  oSeveno (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Arif80s (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  [[kgh]] (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2019 •  Liang(WMTW) (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  19. MattLongCT (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2019 •  Would prefer to see more edits on German and French Wikipedia since you speak both languages... ―MattLongCT -Talk-☖ 21:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2019/Votes/Jon_Kolbert&oldid=24929682"