Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Hindustanilanguage

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Hindustanilanguage

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: ur-N, hi-N, en-3, fr-1, te-2, eo-1,es-1, de-1, cs-1, ar-1, fa-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear all,

    My dear fellow Wikimedian friends,

    Warm greetings from Urdu, Hindi and English Wikipedia(s) and Wikimedia Commons!

    My name is Muzammil and I come from India. I speak both Urdu and Hindi at the native level. I am comfortable with English - both written and oral. I’ve been a registered active Wikimedian for over six years now (starting 2011). As I look back, some of my initial contributions were on Hindi Wikipedia, mainly on AIDS Control Agencies in India. I later contributed to a wide range of topics, mostly on Urdu and Hindi Wikipedias, followed by English. I did a lot of maintenance work on Commons and soon became a filemover and rollbacker there. In fighting vandalism here, I reported many sockpuppet accounts. I rose to Bureaucrat position on Urdu Wikipedia and Reviewer positions on Hindi and English Wikipedia(s).I have a total of close to 68,000 edits on all Wikimedia projects put together.

    As a result of my efforts since 2012, I am glad that the first Hindi Wiki Sammelan (Meet/Conference) became a reality in 2015. I also hope to hold a similar events for Urdu Wikipedia. More recently, I represented Hindi wikipedia at Fourth International Hindi Conference in january 2017.

    Over the last 4 years, I have also transformed myself into a “Wikimedia Researcher” - in the sense that I survey, study and write blogposts on leading Wikipedians, communities and events. I have so far written blogposts on English, Sanskrit, Esperanto, Urdu, Hindi, Maithili, Doteli, Ido, Punjabi, Western Punjabi and Ido Wikipedia(s)/ Wikipedian(s). I proactively worked with Maithili Wikipedians in getting their project out of incubator and became the admin of the mailing list in the process.

    My main objective in asking for steward rights is to address Steward requests, fight cross-Wiki spams and to counter vandalism. Since I am comfortable with Latin, Perso-Arabic & Devanagri Scripts, I am ready to work with diverse communities across the world (as indicated in my research interests). I am interested in extending a helping hand to emerging as well as established communities. During the past few years I've greatly benefitted from in-person meeting with some of the incumbent stewards, knowing their areas of works and their focus. In line with this experience as well as the background information, I feel that I will be able to justifiably discharge my duties as a Steward.

    Umpteen thanks for your consideration!!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Hindustanilanguage


Yes

[edit]
  1. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Seems to be good at fighting spam on multiple different wikis and counters and prevents vandalism well. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bmcln1 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Bmcln1 (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. आर्यावर्त (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  he know asian languages very well so surely help to user who have coming from asia. आर्यावर्त (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 17:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jayprakash12345 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Jayprakash12345 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Abhilashkrishn (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Abhilashkrishn (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Akhilan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Akhilan (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I am supporting this candidate, aside from the aspects that he wants to contribute to his role as steward, he also brings representation of an underrepresented community to Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Additionally, he seems to have solid multilingual skills which could prove beneficial to Wikimedia oversight. I have no knowledge at all of his past behaviors, which are referenced here, so I can't and won't take a stand against someone for something that I know nothing about. And it may be that there are grudges here, that need to be forgiven. Under the circumstances, I give him a yes vote. Stevenmitchell (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Seems qualified enough to be a steward even though some may have doubts about behavior, I'm willing to give benefit of the doubt. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  За. DENAMAX (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I am sysop on Urdu Wikipedia (urwiki) and we need Steward for regional and south asian languages. He know many asian languages very well and also done valuable contribution in multi languages, so i am supporting this candidate. Arif80s (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. امین اکبر (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ameen Akbar (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. محمد شعیب (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rzuwig► 11:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. مھتاب احمد (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  مھتاب احمد (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Dvellakat (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  pakalon (talk) (talk) 17:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Philoratio (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Philoratio (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Sounds great! Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Wikipedia's one of the feature is multi lingual. This candidate is basically multilingual hence there is a huge possibility of Wikipedia being benefited with his services --Drcenjary (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rostamxani (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Johnanth (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Γιάννης Α. | ✆ 13:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. B25es (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  B25es (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Wiki tamil 100 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 10:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  MannMaus (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Plasm (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Varunr (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  <Need multi linguistics for greater contextual association>. Varunr (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       QazîKurd (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  QazîKurd (talk) 05:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  a×pdeHello! 10:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  let´s give a try Elmie (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Mogoeilor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  lrc lori (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bpierreb (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ruthven (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Min.neel (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Abualsarmad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Abualsarmad (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 18:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jn045 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Eligible! He has done great work. Good going. Jn045 (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Bestoernesto (talk) 07:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jogi don (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 • , we need a steward who can understand South Asian languages particularly Sindhi language to look after matters on Sindhi Wikipedia, I think User Hindustani languages (Mr. Muzamil) can fill this expectations. Jogi don (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Arbnos (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  BuffaloBob (talk) 14:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. I JethroBT (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 • . I JethroBT (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Dan D. Ric (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dan D. Ric (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    QazîKurd (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC) do not vote twice! Ankry (talk) 11:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Tahmina.tithi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tahmina.tithi (talk) 11:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Masssly (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  —M@sssly✉ 14:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Popo le Chien (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Dolotta (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Csisc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Csisc (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. AhmadElq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  AhmadElq (talk) 07:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 14:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ce Ele 415 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. شہاب (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  شہاب (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. يوسف عاشق الجبل (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  يوسف عاشق الجبل (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Mahmoudalrawi (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Mahmood (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Avagyan (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Avagyan (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Deryni (talk) 14:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Sidheeq (talk) 03:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Samuele2002 (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  We need more Hindi and Urdu speakers on the project Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Abbas dhothar (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  We need more Hindi and Urdu speakers on the project & he is for this the best Abbas dhothar (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Jvikings1 (talk) 04:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. JackTracker (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seems as a good fighter with spams on Wiki! Good going! JackTracker (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  M.Karelin (talk) 05:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kubura (talk) 04:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Harvinder Chandigarh (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  As he is one of the most capable multilingual wikimedians so who can contribute a lot. Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 04:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kenzia (talk) 10:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Mouryan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mouryan (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Give him a chance! Mr.User200 (talk) 13:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       CatapultTalks (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  CatapultTalks (talk) 19:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cbyd (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Piet-c (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Azio! --Piet-c (talk) 09:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Шухрат Саъдиев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Язев (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. TMBLover (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  TMBLover (talk) 02:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  ukexpat (talk) 02:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kelvin (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cquoi (talk) 12:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mirinano (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017 •  YaganZ (talk) 08:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Fantafluflu (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017 •  Fantafluflu (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gaeanautes (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  This candidate has enough experience to serve as a steward. Wpollard (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Best of luck! Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Mass opposing stewards who opposed you at the confirmations is not the sort of behavior I want to see from a new steward. Their answer to questions about this is what I would call a political answer. If you can't take criticism at your election, you are in no way ready to handle disagreements over interpretation of policy and unfounded criticism over your steward actions, all of which are a regular part of the job. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Unfortunately he didn't answer any of the interesting questions for all candidates, which would shed much light on his knowledge of the steward role and policies (even though there was at least one week for this), which I can't really discern from the statement. Also, I asked him a question with an example situation to which he gave a rather detailed reply; however my perception is that he may well have researched and read the policies, but the reply seems “rehearsed“ (for lack of a better word) and not really an application to the concrete situation at hand. --MF-W 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ofek j (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Ofek j (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  KPFC 💬 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • The user does not have cross-wiki activity related to vandalism patrolling. It is necessary to reinforce that aspect, besides making merit in obtaining global rights (as GR or GS) before being steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. OJJ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  i haven't got confidence....--OJJ (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Herby talk thyme 15:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Not satisfied with their answers. & per Rschen7754 over mass opposing last year —Ah3kal (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 15:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  Simply can't trust him after massive vote against stewards who opposed him last year. I have met him at Wikimania and know he is a good person in real life, but answers look too political (some vested interests tried to indulge in disruptive edits, distorting the available information) while stewardship needs a lot of not very visible but necessary actions — NickK (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  No. Also, regarding MF-Warburg's question: even that isn't quite satisfactory because the relationship between stewards and bureaucrats is not quite as simple as made out to be. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  I don't like the eye for an eye mentality Rschen7754 describes. You can't expect stewards to work with someone who seeks revenge that way. Makes me wonder what happens if a colleague comes with far more severe criticism. Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mskyrider (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Per Rschen7754 Mskyrider (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 • --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Terry77 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Milad A380 talk 19:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  DCB (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Inactive on Wikiversity for over a year! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Make an all-out effort. Eager Lin (Message) 00:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  I would like to see more real crosswiki contributions from this user, instead of file renaming edits. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 01:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Courcelles 01:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  — TBloemink talk 11:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gryllida 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  That does not demonstrate an great cross-wiki work, Which is essential to be steward. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC) not enough cross wiki experience[reply]
  31. Complainer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Bearers of grudges should not be put in position to do more harm. Complainer (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jim Carter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  He is a great editor, I have absolutely no doubts about that. But Rschen's vote has valid rationale which I agree. Jim Carter (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Past behavior gives me pause. Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Fails my criteria. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Patrug (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Patrug (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Per Rschen7754. Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Theo10011 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Nope, nope. Theo10011 (talk) 22:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  M-J (talk) 08:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  15:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shotgun pete (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lord Roem (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Brainswiffer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --Brainswiffer (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  This user was possibly involved in paid editing, since he created an article on a porn website on his native Wiki (which contained precisely one link, namely to that site), which I proposed for deletion; it was later deleted, but without any deletion log. Apparently someone didn't want it to be seen. Mathmensch (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 • --თოგო (D) 21:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC) better not, per Rschen and others[reply]
  45. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Schnatzel (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Areas of interest are better served by not being a steward. Shine in those, not the process drudgery of stewardry.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  — regards, Revi 14:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Silraks (talk) 15:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Disgusted by past behavior Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Catmando999 (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Az1568 (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Gridditsch (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Marumari (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gts-tg (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Lack of quality cross-wiki experience and not confident in xis tenor. "My main objective in asking for steward rights is to address Steward requests, fight cross-Wiki spams and to counter vandalism" has not been (sufficiently) demonstrated. JustBerry (talk) 06:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  --Fenikals (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 • . KTo288 (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Muhraz (talk) 01:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  02:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beyond My Ken (talk) Savhñ 20:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC) signed: Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 07:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tobovs (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Hatonjan (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Gamaliel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gamaliel (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  conduct cited by Rschen7754 is disconcerting. Lepricavark (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Per Vogone, however I vote "No". Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 10:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Varina (talk) 12:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Xneb20 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Xneb20 (talk) 12:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  UaineSean (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Geraki TL 19:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Smile4ever (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Alan (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  masti <talk> 22:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Yohannvt (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  because of revenge no votes for every steward who opposed him. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. J budissin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  j.budissin 13:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  While experience here is important, confidence is more important, IMO. And I am unsure if this user takes revenge action because I just do something they do not like. Ankry (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Uchiha Itachi1990 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Uchiha Itachimessages 17:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Widr (talk) 07:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  The contributions about wiki are nice. But contributions aren't enough to be a steward. --Uğurkenttalk 20:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Zozoulia (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elkelon (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  per Billinghurst - your skills seem more applicable in other directions. Quiddity (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Wimmiden (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  When looking at the opinion of Rschen7754 and other people, I consider this candidate not suitable for stewardship with such mentality against possible colleagues. Wiki13 talk 11:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Timk70 question? 21:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017 •  Lingering issues from the ill-advised actions amply cited above make me reluctant to support. I note that improvement noted in the answer to Ajr's question but I am still confused as to why something like this would happen to being with. Snowolf How can I help? 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Seems to be well-prepared for the task, however past issues make me remain neutral on this vote. Vogone (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  seems to be a good choice, but, idk, some doubt left Pearli (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    per Vogone Ankry (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC) changing to "no" Ankry (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 Talk to me 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  per Vogone. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. CheChe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  per Vogone. Almost voted yes. CheChe (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Stang 01:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Seems prepared yet doesn't have extensive cross wiki experience. OneMember (talk) 06:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kajuran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kajuran (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  FASTILY 10:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  VictorBrice (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Same vote that last year's. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Naminsk (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rberchie (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Plagiat (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Slashme (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seems to have a good grasp of the task, but I'm also concerned about the retributive behaviour mentioned by others. Slashme (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HHubi (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Candidate has done a poor job of allaying editor concerns. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 08:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Not really convinced. --——d—n—f (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Onverwacht (talk) 09:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Marchy088 (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tvcccp (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lsanabria (talk) 02:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Pngtblrs (talk) 20:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. HowardMorland (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HowardMorland (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gampe (talk) 05:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Litlok (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gag0409 (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  While qualified, the unexplained blanket opposition to every steward who opposed his previous bid for the job leaves me unsure as to whether he handles criticism well. Kurtis (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HMSLavender (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Agremon (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seven twentynine (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Nan (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Ptolusque (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dash77 (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Hindustanilanguage&oldid=16368076"