Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Ellywa

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Ellywa

[edit]

Administrator: User page Wikibooks - Most active: User page NL-Wikipedia

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello to all of you. I am a Wikimedian from The Netherlands, female and born in 1954. From december 2002 I am active on Wikipedia-NL and later on various other projects. I have had several roles, from administrator/bureaucrat at NL-Wikipedia to president of the NL chapter. Currently I am an administrator at NL-Wikibooks, rollbacker on NL-Wikipedia, autopatrolled on Commons and member of the OTRS-team. When logged in, I am present on various IRC channels. In addition I am involved with the NL chapter in various tasks. People who know me might tell you I am a helpful person. I am especially committed to protect our beautiful project from vandalism. Fighting global vandalism and vandalism on small wikis will be my main job if I am selected as steward.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Ellywa


Yes

[edit]
  1. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Viiictorrr (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Viiictorrr (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Natuur12 (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Moral support. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Nuhaa (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bmcln1 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Bmcln1 (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  While there are many broadly valid criticisms of this candidate, I support her candidature as someone that can step into the role. Hopefully, should she be elected she will take a closer look at the full gamut of responsibilities associated with being a steward on Wikimedia, and involve herself in some of those beyond the role of simply fighting vandalism. One of the strongest reasons I have for my support is that she is a female and there is a marked dearth of females either in authority or authorship on Wikipedia/Wikimedia, and Wikipedia, as an entity, needs to greatly expand that involvement and temper some of the testosterone that has historically fueled it. In the unlikely event that does get elected, hopefully Ellywa will take a closer look at the steward responsibilities and find some capacities that she can develop further. Good luck. Stevenmitchell (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Taketa (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Terry77 (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  12345danNL (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Aledownload (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elvesham (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Mbch331 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Blackhat999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I've always been one to believe that rights should be granted based on past *track record of responsibility* - leave the *experience* part for the user to grow into. I personally mostly just do CV stuff, and I don't always have time to edit regularly. Yes, I understand that for security reasons we want to limit the number of people that *never* use administrative permissions, but I think that this attitude has gone so far that users feel uncomfortable asking for permissions and feel like their contributions aren't valued. If she didn't want to use steward permissions, she wouldn't have asked for them. We should have some more trust in our community members, rather than telling them they don't "need" rights when we have not even the shadow of a doubt that they will use them responsibly. Ellywa is a trilingual sysop, CV fighter, OTRS volunteer (which demonstrates experience and responsibility for some of the darker sides of stewardship), and IRC volunteer - a prolific contributor She has demonstrated technical capacity, maturity/responsibility, and the ability to work with difficult situations with "real world" impact. IMHO, that stands to make a good steward. Blackhat999 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. এম আবু সাঈদ (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  এম আবু সাঈদ (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Mirer (talk) 04:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rodejong (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  09:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  Shizhao (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Unusual for me but I have my reasons! Insufficient cross wiki experience but has been around long enough to know which way is up. Herby talk thyme 11:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Openskye (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Martix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Martix (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Vangelis (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Goed bezig op Wikibooks. Vangelis (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  ✒ Bennylin 17:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Brateevsky (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sebek Adamowicz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Sebek Adamowicz (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Quedel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Quedel (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Aboulouei1 (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Aboulouei1 (talk) 23:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9) •  Predatorix (talk) 23:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Woudloper (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Woodwalkertalk 02:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Earthscent (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Esmost (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Grotesque (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Grotesque (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Rostamxani (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rostamxani (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Kate Phaye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Kate Phaye (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  15:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC) the best a Wikimedian can get: friendly. experienced, neutral - need I say more? <<retorical question[reply]
  38. Verbistheword (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Verbistheword (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I'd like to support everyone... although honestly I've never seen this candidate any time before. Wolverène (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Figuerai (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Good willing is an excelent way to start, but I hope that afterwards, good job in Stewards duties will become a fact too. A trusting vote here. Figuerai (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Full Rune (talk) 01:30, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Jcornelius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jcornelius (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  It seems that you would be a good steward. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  MannMaus (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Plasm (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Jbergner (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Coffins (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Arbustum (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Arbustum (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  This user created the article wp:Ear on the Dutch Wikipedia. Mathmensch (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Shriheeran (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Shriheeran (talk) 22:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Schnatzel (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Elmie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  we need more active women Elmie (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Sean Clark (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Sean Clark (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bpierreb (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Min.neel (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. DALIBRI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  DALIBRI (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Rberchie (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Plagiat (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Sb2s3 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Sb2s3 (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Bestoernesto (talk) 07:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Deb (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Deb (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Susant purohit (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ସୁଶାନ୍ତ ପୁରୋହିତ (talk) 12:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. JoRgE-1987 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  JoRgE-1987 (talk) 12:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Joalpe (talk) 13:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  BuffaloBob (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I trust her Tobovs (talk) 08:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HHubi (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ymnes (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Yikkayaya (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Yikkayaya (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Leftie11 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Leftie11 (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  I feel like I'm taking a chance here. I hope the candidate doesn't prove me wrong. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  74. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Someone Not Awful (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Long term Wikipedian, heard nothing bad about her. Someone Not Awful (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  76. IqbalHossain (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  IqbalHossain (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  77. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 10:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Dolotta (talk) 03:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Deryni (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  82. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  UaineSean (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Sidheeq (talk) 03:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Marchy088 (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  84. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Samuele2002 (talk) 12:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Edoderoo (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ulilux (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Ulilux (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Frīheidasliova (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  89. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Veleius (talk) 09:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  91. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  WiseWoman (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Denkhenk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Denkhenk (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Meeyola (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Meeyola (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  M.Karelin (talk) 05:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Medea7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Medea7 (talk) 08:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  I think interwiki experience is not critical here. Ankry (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Spinster (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 •  Spinster (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Artur Franca (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Artur Franca (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Good impression Minoo (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tiputini (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tiputini (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       BasBr1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  BasBr1 (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kenzia (talk) 10:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       T34 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  t34 16:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cbyd (talk) 22:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gag0409 (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Язев (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  ukexpat (talk) 02:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cquoi (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Pelz (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 •  Pelz (talk) 13:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017 •  Krassdaniel (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  109. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  HMSLavender (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Zozoulia (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Agremon (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Ebear422 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Ebear422 (talk) 04:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  112. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017 •  YaganZ (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dick Bos (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  114. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  African Hope (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       PowerBUL (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  --PowerBUL (talk) 08:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Fantafluflu (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017 •  Fantafluflu (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gaeanautes (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  118. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 20:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Hayordi (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Ptolusque (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  this candidate has enough experience. Wpollard (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  122. يوسف عاشق الجبل (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  يوسف عاشق الجبل (talk) 11:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Best of luck! Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  While I appreciate the user's dedication to Wikimedia, I do not feel that the steward tools would be used much outside of a few select incidents, and serving as a global sysop might accomplish much of what the user proposes to do in their candidacy. I am not convinced by their board experience (not that relevant to the role of a steward, which is a technical role that implements community consensus), or their nl.wikipedia sysop/crat experience (which they resigned in 2005, see Steward_requests/Permissions/2005#Removal_of_access - Wikimedia was a different site entirely over 11 years ago.) I would be happy to reconsider with more crosswiki experience. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  The answers given at /Questions show there's unfortunately a lack of experience with regards to steward tasks. Also, the claim that SWMT work without steward tools feels "very ineffective" makes me a little worried, considering that much of the SWMT work is indeed done by volunteers who are no stewards (yet). However, I would be very happy to see Ellywa becoming active in global countervandalism activities even if this election should be unsuccessful. Vogone (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Her answers to the questions show missing experience and knowledge. KPFC 💬 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  With regret I have to oppose. While I was very delighted to see her candidature as she is arguably cross-wiki active and also a multiple sysop, unfortunately she didn't answer any of the interesting questions for all candidates, which would shed much light on his knowledge of the steward role and policies (even though there was at least one week for this). Also with regard to the other questions, she confused global suppressions with global bans, and I don't see how such a confusion is possible at all even if one only read the policies cursorily. Finally, the reply about the SWMT activity is very saddening to me. Apparently it is oh-so-inefficient to do it without being a steward? I wonder how all the active non-stewards manage to do it, and how I did it for four years or so without constantly being frustrated by the described issues. Sorry, but not even Global Rollback requests are accepted with such a reason. --MF-W 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  No apparent use for using the tools. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 • I do not appreciate cross-wiki activity or patrolling tasks in several wikis, nor do I have global permissions (as GR or GS). So I do not see clear the benefit that the community would have with this candidate. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017 •  experience will come with the work you will do as a steward. but i can't see the need of getting steward rights, sorry Pearli (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience related to steward work. Stryn (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  per MF-Warburg —Ah3kal (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Gorlingor (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan) •  Gorlingor (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  QEDK (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Cross-wiki countervandalism is different than reverting in your main language. It's important for steward candidates to have experience in this before they run, especially when they intend to be mainly active in that area. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Milad A380 talk 19:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  The reasons to get the rights are not persuasive, also more (recent) cross wiki activity would be good. Hoo man (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Cross-wiki work is something I always think about FIRST when considering to support/oppose a candidate. Right now, I don't see a lot of experience in the cross-wiki field of Wikimedia (see CentralAuth). Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Zero edits of any kind on Wikiversity! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  rxy (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MechQuester (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MechQuester (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Alex Khimich (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017 •  MoiraMoira (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC) nice person but alas totally unqualified for the job. No activity in cross wiki work and not on her home wiki either.[reply]
  23. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Thank you for volunteering. However, cross-wiki experience for steward candidates is required. Érico (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Not demonstrate cross-wiki experience, Which makes it impossible to judge quality fot your work Leon saudanha (talk) 14:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Contributes are good, beautiful but she's cross-wiki activity is not enough. --Uğurkenttalk 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  The Banner (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Nice lady, but I do not like the idea of a steward who wants to use other wikipedias as source when she can not find proper evidence, even when the desired info is unsourced at the other wiki[reply]
  27. Rampion (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  Rampion (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lack of cross-wiki experience worries me. Joshualouie711 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Lacking cross wiki experience fails my criteria. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Looking for more cross-wiki / non-Wikipedia activity. Dave Braunschweig (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Slowking4 (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017 •  Lacking cross-wiki experience. OneMember (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  M-J (talk) 08:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lord Roem (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  eurodyne (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  FASTILY 10:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Varina (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 • --თოგო (D) 21:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 23:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Jeff alef (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  a×pdeHello! 10:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Per rschen and Vogone. — regards, Revi 14:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hume42 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Unfortunately, lack of cross-wiki experience. Hume42 (talk) 14:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Silraks (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Naminsk (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Catmando999 (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Buggia 09:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  47. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  JurriaanH (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gts-tg (talk) 06:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  49. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Sorry, but insufficient crosswiki experience. JustBerry (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  --Fenikals (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Muhraz (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  insufficient cross-wiki experience. Lepricavark (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  57. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  58. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  --SM7 --talk-- 19:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Lacking cross-wiki experience Smile4ever (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Music1201 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  — Music1201 talk 20:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  masti <talk> 22:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Jvikings1 (talk) 04:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Lotje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Sorry, as per Rschen7754 Lotje (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  63. J budissin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  j.budissin 13:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Pngtblrs (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017 •  Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  65. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  66. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Muijz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Muijz (talk) 09:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Nan (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  The user is active in rather many wikis, but that is not yet the cross-wiki activity I want to see. I consider that trait a prerequisite for the flag, so no. Not this year. Base (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  per concerns from current stewards. Suggest working with SWMT during 2017. Quiddity (talk) 22:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Wimmiden (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  If you do not know, what is global suppression of accounts, simply type "global suppression" into search box in Wikimedia and the first match is Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/revision-deletion-or-suppression Taivo (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Timk70 question? 21:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  GZWDer (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Miniapolis 15:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. AnselmiJuan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017 •  Prefiero mantenerme neutral respecto de este caso. Mucho se ha dicho respecto de la brecha de género existente en Wikipedia, y claro, si no les votamos a las MUJERES, les estamos retaceando OPORTUNIDADES. Igualmente, espero que mi abstención no la desanime. Los proyectos wiki son esencialmente PLURILINGÜES, asi que recomiendo a esta postulante mejorar su dominion en l-- AnselmiJuan (discusión) 15:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)enguas foráneas.[reply]
  5. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  B20180 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017 •  Unknown Rogi 16:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Ankry (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC) changing to "yes"[reply]
  7. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Adog104 Talk to me 19:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Gut says yes, brain is reluctant. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  On one hand, she seems like she would be an active candidate, however, I'm not entirely certain that she'd be fully able to work with other stewards. I'm neutral on this candidate. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017 •  While I have no doubt that the user will do a great job, I am concerned with her cross-wiki activity and thus I remain neutral — TBloemink talk 11:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017 •  BDaniel (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 19:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017 •  Stang 01:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Not really convinced. --——d—n—f (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  VictorBrice (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Rollingcontributor (talk) 05:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  I like the demographic that you represent, much needed among stewardry. I haven't seen the xwiki work, so on that ground I hesitate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  not enough knowledge of languages Maynich (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Ruthven (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Az1568 (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Gridditsch (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Marumari (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017 •  Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Hatonjan (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Geraki TL 19:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Lsanabria (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Tvcccp (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Yohannvt (talk) 07:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Gampe (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Litlok (talk) 08:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Kurtis (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Seven twentynine (talk) 06:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Elkelon (talk) 20:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Wiki13 talk 11:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017 •  Dash77 (talk) 04:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017 •  Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2017/Votes/Ellywa&oldid=24933287"