Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Viswaprabha

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Viswaprabha (Viswanathan Prabhakaran)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: ml, en-4, hi-2, sa-2, ur-1, ta-1, ar-1.
  • Personal info: (English)
    I am Viswaprabha, A biomedical engineer, project manager and IT expert, having lived abroad for more than 25 years with many cultures, now stationed in Kerala, India, spending most of my time for activism and evangelism of Wikimedia, open education and other knowledge and language empowerment missions, particularly among the rural masses who are yet to embark upon the digital age.

    With my credentials several of which are indicated below, I would like to be an effective steward for the Wikimedia projects:

    • I have been a registered user of Wikipedia at least since February 2005 (and as an unregistered user since much earlier).
    • Have been the first (and continuing)administrator of ml Wiktionary (2005) as also a current Administrator at ml.wikipedia.org
    • Have more than 37,000 Global edit count, mostly attributed in ml (wikipedia, wiktionary, wikisource), sa (wikipedia), Wikimedia commons and en (wikipedia). Besides, I also have a Bot user ID (ViswaBot).
    • Have been a board member of Wikimedia India Chapter (2012-2014) and also the treasurer in 2014. During my tenure in the Chapter as a Board member, I was also the principal person to take care of the technical and administrative tasks pertaining to the Chapter's internal and open wikis, the Mediawiki installation and other server maintenance.
    • Have been well accepted in my communities as a veteran editor, policy guide, mentor and outreach program advisory.
    • Well versed with the scenarios and critical handling of moderation, consensus formation and user rights management within the ecology of my Wikimedia communities.
    • Have contributed and involved otherwise (such as Outreach Workshops, editathons, GLAM, conferences, media exposure, legal compliance etc.) with ml, en, sa, WMIN chapter and CIS-A2K significantly and other Indic Wikimedia projects moderately.
    • Have been an instrumental resource person for several Hackathons, workshops, conferences and 'Train the trainer' programs conducted within India.
    • Have almost two decades of wide experience on user rights management in other social networks, mail groups, blogs, forums and such collaborative projects.
    • Have met and interacted with a wide array of users, tool makers and administrators and other key persons of Wikimedia ecology during three Wikimania events (held in 2012, 2014 and 2015).
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Viswaprabha


    • Yes

    [edit]
    1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC) We need more native speakers of non-European languages.[reply]
    3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sujalajus (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Viswa's participation of offline Wikimedia activities gives me confidence that he'll be a responsible steward. Deryck C. 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Vikashegde (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Vikashegde (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    8. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LavaBaron (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    9. MADe (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  MADe (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Andrewredk (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Dig deeper (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Seems like a well rounded, intelligent individual. I think he'll do us proud. Dig deeper (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Elkan76 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Elkan76 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He is very active with Malayalam language Wikipedia Prof tpms (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    16. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Rsmn (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Rsmn (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Sayant Mahato (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sayant Mahato (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Adv.tksujith (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Good Viswa is a great Malayalee having international outlook. Definitely he will be an asset of Stewards Group!. Adv.tksujith (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Lalsinbox (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Lalsinbox (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Vinayaraj (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  His Enthusiasm and Sincerity to Wikipedia is sufficient to give him this Responsibility. Vinayaraj (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    27. தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Bff (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Drajay1976 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I have full confidence in him. Drajay1976 (talk) 18:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Irvin calicut (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Irvin calicut (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    31. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Jayantanth (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  although less activity in crosswiki Jayantanth (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I'm not actually opposed. Ghiutun 22:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    34. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  VanEman (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Gaurav Pruthi (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  I have received +ve response for him from Mumbai based wiki community of which I was a part sometime back. So, I am voting him positively. Gaurav Pruthi (talk) 08:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Ranjithsiji (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Plus one for his endless attempt to better wikipedia and attempts to build a community around it. Ranjithsiji (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
         VickRomanoff (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  VickRomanoff (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Tonynirappathu (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  tony 13:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Vengolis (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vengolis (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    40. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  loupgarous (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Vijayakumarblathur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  hard working, intelligent individual. I think he'll do us proud. Vijayakumarblathur (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Sreejithkoiloth (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Sreejithkoiloth (talk) 10:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    44. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Lombanto (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Lombanto (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    46. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Seasoned Wikipedian with understanding of Indic language problems. Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Fotokannan (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Fotokannan (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    48. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Ascánder (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    50. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Clivemacd (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Neddy1234 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Neddy1234 (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Munci (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Munci (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    55. හරිත (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  හරිත (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Experienced and matured wikipedian with huge familiarity with Indic languages Drcenjary (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Msannakoval (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    58. Balajijagadesh (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Balajijagadesh (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    60. बिप्लब आनन्द (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 08:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    62. Akbarali (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016 •  Akbarali (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    64. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    66. לערי ריינהארט (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    67. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    68. Puranastudy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Puranastudy (talk) 04:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  - Because of his good understanding about smaller wikis and also his global outlook. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fraxinus (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    72. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wonderful experience and language knowledge! Fadesga (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    73. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    74. Dvellakat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  very good candidate, wish him all success and good perfomance pakalon (talk) (talk) 07:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    75. Irshadpp (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Irshadpp (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    76. AlfredoGMx (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  AlfredoGMx (talk) 11:59, 16 February 2016
    77. Shubha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Shubha (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
    78. Kew Gardens 613 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    79. Rodrigo Padula (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    80. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Pcnavod (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    81. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    82. Naveenpf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  naveenpf (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    83. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    84. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    85. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate has a wide knowledge base and it seems he wants to steer a reasonable path. Wpollard (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    86. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Utkarshsingh.1992 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Utkarshsingh.1992 (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    87. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    88. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Kiranravikumar (Not eligible, checked by Syum90) •  Kiranravikumar (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    89. Saileshpat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Sailesh Patnaik (Talk2Me|Contribs) 11:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    90. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    91. വരി വര (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  വരി വര (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    92. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Chrishitch (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Chrishitch (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    93. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    94. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 uses lists properly, +1 near my timezone (southwest china), +1 offline work Pratyeka (talk) 06:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  good candidate. Pradeepabk (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    95. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Srikant Kedia 14:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    96. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:03 20 February 2016 (GMT). 18:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    97. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Stalinsunnykvj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Stalinsunnykvj (talk) 09:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    98. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Popo le Chien (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    99. Yogwi21 (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yogwi21 (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    100. Nabin K. Sapkota (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Support Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    101. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  He has a big input in Malayalam langǃ ArmAg 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    102. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         DracoEssentialis (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  An evangelist and a veteran. How wonderful. DracoEssentialis (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    103. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yair rand (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    104. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  good candidate Leništudent (talk) 07:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    105. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    106. Cuaxdon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  accepted--owing to his good understanding of how to deal with the wikimedia and also global outlook.--Cuaxdon (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    107. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    108. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ganesh Paudel (talk) 00:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    109. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Rpclod (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    110. Jorval (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jorval (talk) 01:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    111. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Sidheeq (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    112. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    113. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    114. Jayen466 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Andreas JN466 18:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    115. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Strong support at first, but move to weak support due to Ajraddatz and MF-Warburg's comments ✒ Bennylin 04:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    116. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    117. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bio06940 (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         WriterListener (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  WriterListener (talk) 20:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Tripallokavipasek (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Perhaps it's a little naif, but I love the things you say in your personal page. Undoubtedly, you have my vote. Tripallokavipasek (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    118. Rijinatwiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Rijinatwiki (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    119. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    120. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Interesting background and experiences. --ContributorQ (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    121. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    122. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  [[مهدی فیلو]] (talk) 19:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    123. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    124. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  MirkoS18 (talk) 21:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Romayan (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    125. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    126. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  J7729 (talk) 08:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    127. محمد الفلسطيني (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    128. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    129. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Infernus (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Infernus (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    130. NehalDaveND (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He helped sa.wikipedia very much. I hope he will do so in future too. NehalDaveND (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    131. TillF (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  TillF (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    132. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Mallikarjunasj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Mallik (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    133. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    No

    [edit]
    1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  The answer to the question from Rschen7754 appalls me. It is full of business-speech ("typically local but rather well-performing", "a step-by-step gradual approach of progressing", "peer stewards"), and also not very logical. First he states an order by which he wants to start doing steward actions (where CU actions is the last item of the "maturing curve"), and then in the next sentence he suddenly says "I see no reason to stay away from the main actions stewards do in a routine basis - blocks, rights and CU". — Also, he did not sign the Confidentiality agreement in time and was only allowed to run because ElectCom strangely decided to bend the rules [1]. It was clearly written in the Guidelines that the agreement needs to be signed before February 8. This alone is a reason for me to oppose. A steward should at least be able to read a simple guideline before he candidates for something. --MF-W 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Insufficient global experience for me --Herby talk thyme 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-Warburg and no activists als steward please. Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  shows very little relevant experience, with little use of their administrator flags on the wikis that they have them. I do not think they would use the tools much if elected. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  As per MF-Warburg. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
    10. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Little crosswiki experience and not convinced with answers Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Why do you even want to be a steward? Your statement says nothing about actual steward areas of responsibility. If you want to expand open education and knowledge, this is certainly a role which can help do that, but there are specific things that we do along those lines. So it's a "not now" from me, given the candidate's lack of relevant experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Doesn't seem well suited to be a steward and doesn't have enough crosswiki experience. Reguyla (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    20. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Doesn't sit well with me. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough relevant experience. Miniapolis 20:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    23. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Farin12 (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    26. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    28. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  WikiMichel (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    31. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    34. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Rcsprinter123 (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    37. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    40. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Hmmm. Stewards may need to be bold at times, however, running into hot water is not a smart trait. Neutrality and letting communities make their decisions is important.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Cross-wiki experience is not good Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 16:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    45. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    48. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    50. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Far away from enough understanding of the steward role and also per MF-W and Ajraddatz. — T. 13:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  see above Holmium (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  per MF-Warburg. Being instrumental in the project doesn't mean you "merit" a flag as a reward. Make the case why we benefit with you as steward or go back to your home wiki where you're doing a great job. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    55. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    56. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    58. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  no global rights, has only created self steward requests as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    60. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    62. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Explanations given with "No Vote" serial number-1 Nannadeem (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    64. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Insufficient global activity, and per MF-W. — regards, Revi 07:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lack of cross-wiki experience. Caliburn (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    66. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    67. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    68. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fdssdf (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    72. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    73. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    74. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  ZERO contributions to any Wikiversities. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    75. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    76. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    77. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  No, thanks. VisaBlack (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    78. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    79. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 11:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    80. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    81. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    82. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  A bit preoccupied by the concerns raised. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    83. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    84. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 08:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    85. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    86. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    87. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    88. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    89. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 11:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    90. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  per MF-Warburg Pratyya (Hello!) 12:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    91. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I have talked with the user in off-wiki media relatively and I know that he has rather good perception of Wikimedia projects (though I am not checking the questions now, I see from comments that there is what to look at) which left a very good impression in my mind, but I see that contributions are too Malayalam centred and almost no x-wiki activity is observed :( Base (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    92. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    93. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Neutral

    [edit]
    1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Cannot make my mind. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  hmm.... Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I don't dislike your profile, but maybe you should ask for this flag next year. Alexmar983 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Don't know him. Neutral for now. Trijnsteltalk 13:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I have met Viswaprabha during Wikimania and I found him a nice, responsible and very motivated person. I am not convinced that he is interested in steward duties, however — NickK (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  It doesn't become clear to me why the user applies for steward ship, however, I don't really see a reason to oppose the candidature but I'm also sadly not convinced enough to support. -Barras talk 13:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    11. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  B25es (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    13. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    14. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Indu (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Indu (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Bmhs823 (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    20. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
         Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Viswaprabha&oldid=26753881"