Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/BlackBeast

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

BlackBeast (Samuel Cirilo)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: es-N, en-2, zh-2, jp-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Samuel Cirilo, also known as BlackBeast. I would like to serve you as Steward. First time I dare to posit here, because I regard it as a serious liability. Here my proof of eligibility.

    My career as wikipedian begins in March 2007, when I record the account but have little activity. However, shortly, whe I star to meet community and its policies, I become fond of with the project. Since 2011 I am Sysop and bureaucrat in the Spanish Wikipedia.

    Although my activity in the global manteinance is not very high, I'm fast learning and strive to meet the requirements and responsibilities of this tool. I'm running because I want to involve more in the project, given my support wiht tools available to it. You can contact by IRC, e-mail, even in my talk page, since I am constantly active in projects.

    In Wikipedia in Spanish, constantly attend requirements and requests as soon as possible. So participate in SRG, SRP and SRCU, would be a priority to me. I usually attend complicated cases, always looking for ways to remain calm and allowing the fellowship is maintained. I completely agree with Stewards policy. I like to find how we can improve, so I am willing to work together in several activities. Any questions you have, let me know. Thanks for the opportunity.- 我叫 BlackBeast Do you need something? 你问问什么？ 04:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#BlackBeast


Yes

[edit]
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RomanLier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --RomanLier (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oscar_. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Oscar_. (talk) · @ 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Long term and trusted sysop at w:es.[reply]
  5. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Cárdenas (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Long-time Wikimedian, participates in Wikimedia conferences with enthusiasm. His grammar and vocabulary may not be up to expectations for en-4 but he communicates well, at least in person. I support his bid for a bigger challenge. Deryck C. 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dimadick (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veteran Wikipedian with some experience with multiple languages and websites. Dimadick (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Why not? He is a trusted user. White Master (es) 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 19:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Taichi - (あ！) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. SouthWillRiseAgain (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SouthWillRiseAgain (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. JackTracker (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  JackTracker (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Eclipsis Proteo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eclipsis Proteo (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Farin12 (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mashford (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Mashford (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Thanks Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jim Carter (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Jim Carter (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Syced (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Syced (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sigmundur (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Sigmundur (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zbrnajsem (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Zakard (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Zakard (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. ChocolateCherryNight (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Support Mr.User200 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. L736E (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  L736E (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gasdine (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Gasdine (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Cd tenerife (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Cd tenerife (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Caligatus (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I think you'll do a great work, despite of the big difference between votes, I think you still can made it. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート • 投稿記録) 23:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Katz191 (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Katz191 (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Kwangmo (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Kwangmo (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  VanEman (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  We need more people to speak asian languages. Liang(WMTW) (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Jonnie d smith (Not eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio) •  Jonnie d smith (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  39. Willicab (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Willicab (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Irwin アーウィン 18:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Hashima20 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hashima20 (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Wae35244 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Morza (sono qui) 08:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. 아름불휘 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Support! Bamtori Friends (talk/profile) 15:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. PetrohsW (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  petrohs (gracias) 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. ElGatoSaez (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Good user. Also very old so great experience. ElGatoSaez (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Ascánder (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hongqilim (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  keep it up. Hongqilim (talk) 09:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 12:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  DENAMAX (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mcshadypl (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Mcshadypl (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Janakacombank (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Janakacombank (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  B25es (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Geoide (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Fixertool (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Fixertool (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. VR0 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  VR0 (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Xiiaowu97 (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Xiiaowu97 (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I have looked at contributions and global and this user seems good to be a Steward Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Invertiert (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ciell (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ciell (talk) 10:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Helmy oved 18:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Wpollard (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Interesting candidate, with some command of Asian languages. Fadesga (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  VisaBlack (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Kew Gardens 613 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Srolanh (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Srolanh (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Jordydanielss (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Jordydanielss (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Михаил Тум (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Михаил Тум (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Yeni Üye (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Yeni Üye (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ciberprofe (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Rami75013 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Rami75013 (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Qingchuer1980 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Qingchuer1980 (talk) 09:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Catmando999 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Catmando999 (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Euphoria42 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Euphoria42 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Rocksanddirt (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Rocksanddirt (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Nino Marakot (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  I'm a supportative in this election! Nino Marakot (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Baiji (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  support to the beast Baiji --> (Opinión) 00:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Robertiki (talk) 04:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Ocaso33 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ocaso33 (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Leon saudanha (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nizzi G (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Nizzi G (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Георгий Суворов (Not eligible, checked by Defender) •  Георгий Суворов (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Nubifer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nubifer (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Soaper1234 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Soaper1234 (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Nioger (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Sergio Andres Segovia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Sergio Andres Segovia (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Full support for non-English stewards. Has some knowledge of en. zh is more like zh-1 I would say. Seems accountable. Have a go. New blood is good. Pratyeka (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Amaling (talk) 19:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Wissenschaftler-Uni (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 02:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. LucSaffre (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  LucSaffre (talk) 04:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Archi38 (Not eligible, checked by Defender) •  Archi38 (talk) 07:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Mjesfahani (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Mjesfahani (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Loco085 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Trusted syspo at es.wiki. Loco085 (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Roxyuru 22:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Abrikoss (Not eligible, checked by Syum90) •  Abrikoss (talk) 08:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tyseria (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  <optional comments>. Tyseria (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Davidstewartharvey (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Nachosan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nachosan (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  BRP ever 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mar123ius (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Mar123ius (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Ph03nix1986 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Pho3niX Discusión 01:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Rpclod (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. GMoyano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  GMoyano (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Виолетова (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Виолетова (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Bruno Rene Vargas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Terry77 (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Edjoerv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Edjoerv (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  MirkoS18 (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Tashi (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Tashi (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Dimitra megest (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ming-Yang Chen (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Ming-Yang Chen (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  J7729 (talk) 08:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. BeeCeePhoto (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  BeeCeePhoto (talk) 14:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Answers to questions do not convince me, I have the feeling the steward role is not fully understood. --Vogone (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience (95% of edits on eswiki), also only a sysop on one wiki (+bureaucrat, but every sysop on eswiki is automatically given bureaucrat). Additionally, the self-characterization as being en-4 certainly is too high; and while perfect English is not required, reading his statement and the answers to the questions, I am having a lot of difficulty understanding anything (e.g. "Work in maintenance in each project also is important, but is no esential."). And where I understand something, I am very concerned about the answer, e.g. in the question from Steinsplitter, his reply suggests that stewards can desysop people more or less at their own discretion. --MF-W 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-W. Southparkfan 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not convinced by his answers, also agree that level of English is quite deficient, certainly not en-4. --Maragm (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  As per users MF-W and Maragm. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Andreas Werle (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  -- Andreas Werle (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  His intentions are good but he lacks the requires skills. Perhaps in the future. And please update your babel since you are not en-4. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Sir Joseph (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sir Joseph (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Herby talk thyme 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Lacks experience in steward areas, and I am unconvinced by the answers to questions. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  21. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per MF-Warburg Armbrust (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Andrewredk (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Uninvolved in steward areas from what I've seen. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience --Uğurkenttalk 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Not experienced cross-wiki Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  WikiMichel (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  lacks cross-wiki experience.. Stemoc 00:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I can't vote for the person who does not understand what "emergency desysop" means. I assume good faith that BlackBeast really wants to resolve these local conflicts but this is not what a steward should do — NickK (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Томич (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Томич (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ruthven (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Chamarasca (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Chamarasca (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  No. Conceptually not understanding the purpose of stewards.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Trijnsteltalk 13:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per MF-W DCB (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       AirCombat (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Sorry, as others have said, not enough experience, and fluency not nearly good enough. AirCombat (talk) 23:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. The Photographer (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  I know Blackbest from several years, and my mother language is Spanish, the same as his, however, his answer to first question made by Steinsplitter show, IMHO a lack of basic understanding of what a Stewards is and what it can and can't do. The Photographer (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Scriptartis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Language is indeed a barrier. -- Scriptartis | Parley 05:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Pau Colominas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He lies about his English level. Pau Colominas (talk) 08:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 10:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Lacking cross-wiki experience. Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Among his first edits is a defence of the practices of Jehova's witnesses. We do not need religious fundamentalists as stewards, since they are neither qualified nor morally sufficient. Mathmensch (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Lack of corss-wiki experience and limited understanding of steward role. — T. 13:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Technopat (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Answers provided were insufficient. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Numbermaniac (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Not too happy with some of the answers to the questions. Also definitely not en-4. -- numbermaniac 22:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Obelix (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I'm not happy with the answer to the first question, which is an important one for a steward who might have to actually make that call. I'm pretty sure that next go-round, he'll be a better candidate, and encourage him to study the guidelines until then. loupgarous (talk) 03:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Sorry, but I never noticed you in any relevant area. Furthermore, I doubt that you've a near-native knowledge of the English language. -Barras talk 12:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Per Vogone Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 13:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Maferlona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Maferlona (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Cookie (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Anna (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC) No, far from neutral as a sysop[reply]
  71. AlaskanNativeRU (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  AlaskanNativeRU (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC) No doesn't seem qualified.[reply]
  72. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 08:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  -- Mediatus (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 16:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  No global rights, has not created an steward request as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  No crosswiki experience. Sorry. まSan [T•C•ES] 21:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Aphillipsmusique (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Aphillipsmusique (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Jeff alef (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Mar del Sur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Mar del Sur (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Biased and partial sysop. Decaying contribution rate. Flag collector, a year ago he tried to do the same in Wikidata, requesting for adminship without much knowledge of the project. No crosswiki experience.[reply]
  79. Sparkyb10123 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Sparkyb10123 (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hampcky (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Beria (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  I was not going to vote, but given that he does believe that a Steward can remove and give flags at their discretion only proves that he never bothered reading the policies. Also being en-4 is not required, but since he lied about this, It gets me thinking about what else did he lied. Béria L. de Rodríguez msg 04:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Doesn't seem to have a deep understanding of Stewards' role, per Vogone, MF-W. — regards, Revi 17:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Not enough cross wiki experience and not convinced with the answers to the questions Shanmugamp7 (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Antur (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016 •  --Antur (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  – Meiræ 12:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  — Coffee // have a cup // 16:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC) IMHO - considering your answers to questions - it will be better to review again the role and the conditions under which one may act as a steward - or may not.[reply]
  95. Woodcutterty (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  The candidate's level of English is deficient. Woodcutterty (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. UY Scuti (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Having gone through his talk page archives, there are a lot of unresponded messages. I believe this user will continue doing the same. And cross-wiki activity is too low. —UY Scuti Talk 05:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sebleouf (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SPQRobin (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Krett12 (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Has too little cross-wiki work Krett12 (talk) 16:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Some wikis, like enwp, have clear requirements for an "emergency desysop" (Level I desysop on enwp); but most do not. The answer to the question shows little understanding of when an emergency desysop is required as a steward action (rather than, say, implementing a local arbcom or community decision). Courcelles 22:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per some of the concerns cited Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Krujoski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Krujoski (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Jschnur (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Jschnur (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  The candidate considers age to be a sign of maturity... No further reading is required. Fessor (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  The candidate has made no effort to contribute to any Wikiversities. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  I vote no for BlackBeast Qewr4231 (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Masonpatriot (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Masonpatriot (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 08:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Answers to questions fail to sufficiently address issue in many cases other than to elaborately say variations of "that's a hard question". Ford MF (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Tonton Bernardo (talk) 09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Not convinced with the answers. :( Pratyya (Hello!) 09:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 • --DerekvG (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --Wetterwolke (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Not convinced with this person's speech. His level of English is not very good, certainly not near native like it says on their userpage. Tom29739 (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Alexandru M. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Alexandru M. (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  --DrTrumpet (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Vvven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Vvven (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Not convinced by the answers to questions --ContributorQ (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. TaqPol (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lacks of proficiency in English and not convinced by answers. TaqPol (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Iceandsnow (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Iceandsnow (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Study the guidelines and improve your English level. Alexmar983 (talk) 02:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Same opinion as MF-Warburg. Brejnev (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Varina (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Imbericle (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No x-wiki activity. Base (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  not enough experience Ireas (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. .js (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  .js[democracy needed] 13:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not convinced by the constant diminution of activity on every wiki. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Jahaza (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Probably wouldn't do anything bad if elected, but not a lot of crosswiki experience and some of the answers to the questions are wrong. Rschen7754 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bobbyshabangu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I think you rather have written your response in Spanish, I feel you've got potential, just that you are not well articulate in the English language to convince us why we really need to vote for you. Bobbyshabangu (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Although your statement indicates that you're a native English speaker, that doesn't seem to be the case. Miniapolis 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough to support or oppose so I'm going to vote Neutral for now. Reguyla (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       ZhengZhou (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  ZhengZhou (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Kippelboy (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kippelboy (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  I like this user, but concerns mentioned leaves me unsure Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Never seen him before. Ghiutun 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I am also concerned with what MF-Warburg stated above. Would like to see how the candidate address these issues in the question section. Caballero1967 (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. WisiW (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  WisiW (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Aledownload (talk) Italian 16:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Nannadeem (talk) 07:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. POLNET55 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  POLNET55 (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Boboseiptu (talk) 12:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. I diaze1993 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  I diaze1993 (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Sanmosa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I have nothing to ask, and I am confused of everyone and everything, so neutral. Sanmosa (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yair rand (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Cysioland (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Cysioland - Talk with me 08:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Bmhs823 (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bio06940 (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       AlvaroMolina (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  From what I read in the section questions, there are too many opinions, so it is difficult to decide specifically. AlvaroMolina (talk) 12:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Tracouti (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Banfield - Reclamos aquí 23:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Good afternoon (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/BlackBeast&oldid=24929668"