Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Mys 721tx

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Mys_721tx (Yishen Miao)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: zh-N, en-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Good day, this is mys_721tx. I joined Wikipedia in 2009 and am an administrator and a checkuser on Chinese Wikipedia. I was in the 2011 election but did not success due to the lack of cross-wiki activity. I subsequently became an Commons admin in the same year, and later an Meta admin the following year. My works on Wikipedia primarily involve center-vandalism on Chinese Wikipedia; I also help with house-keeping on those projects and respond to info-zh and permissions queue in OTRS.

    I fully understand the privacy policy and other policy regarding the steward bit. I would like to aid our current stewards and contribute to global anti-spam and counter-vandalism. This includes revert, blocking/locking spambots, and identifying patterns of spambots via checkuser tools when necessary. I am familiar with many of those measures from pass experience. I would also perform the more "trivial" aspect of steward duty, e.g. respond to various steward request pages on Meta.

    In real life I am a college student, as an result I am constantly away from the keyboard. This makes me inactive on IRC; however, I am reachable by email. If elected, I will make frequent appearance on IRC. I speak Chinese as my native language and am fluent with English.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Mys_721tx
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Yes

[edit]
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  right experience with CU and with issues crosswiki. Rschen7754 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Érico Wouters (msg) 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Decent candidate. I felt the answers were slightly unsatisfactory, but still acceptable. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Eurodyne (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:55 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  benefit of the doubt PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  "not on IRC" and "Too few contributions to any Wikiversity" are no valid counter ads - IMHO Rax (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Would rather vote on the work than too heavily on the answers (which I agree could have been better), So, support on balance Courcelles 22:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I also haven't any Wikiversity's edits, why it's also a problem?! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  We must have Chinese-speaking steward if Shizhao can not keep his flag. GZWDer (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  INeverCry 03:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. 老陳 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  老陳 (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Rschen7754. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Chiefwei (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Chiefwei (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Byfserag (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. E8xE8 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  E8xE8 (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Jacklamf1d14 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  放電の少女 アクセス 09:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  The applicant is fully qualified Rberchie (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 333-blue (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 • 333-blue 11:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  A bit uncertain, but I think with a little bit of guidance this will end well. Experience with CU and being Asian is a plus for me. Trijnsteltalk 12:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SzMithrandir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  -- SzMithrandir (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 16:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Walter Grassroot (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  he is a trustworthy leader. Walter Grassroot (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 18:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  He dealt with the questions he faced well, his language skills are much-needed and I feel he is a trustworthy user Xania (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kilith (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Aa1388zz (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  符合標準。且根據其以往的經驗能對其有正面幫助。 Aa1388zz (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yp8080123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Yp8080123 (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Competent. CT Cooper · talk 14:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Expérimenté et compétent Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I have no problem to keep the candidate from exercising the duties of a steward. Good luck and greetings! Leon saudanha (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Man sollte ihm eine Chance geben, sich zu bewähren. ST ○ 22:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. JoeenNc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Yes JoeenNc (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Cwek (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Cwek (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Already trusted with other hats. No issues with this one. Widr (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Aoke1989 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Active and trustworthy. Aoke1989 (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Yxyang93 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Do better Azunyan(留言) 19:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. The powder toy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  值得信任的用户。 The powder toy (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Wong128hk (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  trustworthy J.Wong 10:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 11:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ellery (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. NativeForeigner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  NativeForeigner (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Whaterss (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  guy, come on, I trust you. Whaterss (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Vantharith) (talk) 09:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Tn4196 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  I don't know him, but his situation and answers convinced me. Tn4196 (talk) 11:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  FeralOink (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ch.Andrew (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Ch.Andrew (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Gakmo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Gakmo (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Royalmate1 (talk) 00:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mjesfahani (talk) 15:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •     FDMS  4    16:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lt2818 (talk) 14:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Kossa b (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Philosopher (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  – Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Good luck! YaganZ (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 • Lately keep seeing this user patrolling Cross Wikis, good work.--AldNonymousBicara? 10:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xinstalker (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Rossi101 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Rossi101 (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  The Banner (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Harlock81 (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Nobs01 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Nobs01 (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FocalPoint (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I believe that Mys 721tx has sufficient cross-wiki activity in multiple languages (Personally, I believe the xwiki index to be misleading for editors with very-high edit counts on their own home wiki and I look for actual number of edits). I also think that the user's answers were satisfactory, and the fact that user is willing to ask more experienced stewards first is important. I do not expect a steward candidate to have given much thought to minimum project size for bureaucrats prior to volunteering for the position, and in a real world case, I expect Mys 721tx to learn quickly and be a positive addition to the current group of stewards. Avi (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Acalycine (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sufficient experience with the correct amount of capability, and has handled the questions well. Acalycine (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  comfortable with approach and brings LTA and CU experience  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Theodoreianmo2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Theodoreianmo2 (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Yes, you have my vote. Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  110. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Is experienced with many tools and has good plans. —Gyaro–Maguus— 14:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Unsatisfactory answers. Maybe next time. Vogone (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not now Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not happy with the answers at all (IMHO they could've and should've been expanded ALOT more!). –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not on IRC, stewards should be on duty imo. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Too few contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per Vogone. DangSunM (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Not yet: no real crosswiki experience, see the other non-supporters and inequality index of 0.88 among contributed wikis. I appreciate the Meta-Wiki activity, which could give a more global perspective, if expanded compared to the rather limited use he made so far of the administrator flag.[1] Nemo 08:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Your answers to the questions did not satisfy me. AmaryllisGardener talk 14:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ruthven (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per above. SPQRobin (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Orzel Bialy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Don't think I've forgotten what you did to me on 21st March 2014. You wrongly declared that I was User 1abacada and blocked my account. A steward committing such a serious mistake should not be forgiven. Orzel Bialy (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Wetrace (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Unsatisfactory answers and performance on controversy. Wetrace (talk) 10:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Reneman (talk) 12:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 13:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Unsatisfactory answers and performance on controversy. Bulldoc (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Maybe next time LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Per Nemo's statement above MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  answers are not satisfying, and working on Commons and Meta is not cross-wiki activity. თოგო (D) 15:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Lack of cross-wiki experience. Glaisher (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  QueenCake (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  User needs to gain some experience. Per above. Base (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Stolengood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Stolengood (talk) 07:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Not satisfed with answers Coekon (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Didn't answered well to the hypothetical question, which is very important in this elections. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 23:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Baycrest (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Unsatisfactory performance on controversy. One of the most serious vandal in zhwp. Baycrest (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       MikeLynch (Not eligible, checked by Openbk) •  Thank you for running, but I felt your answers were unsatisfactory, particularly the one involving Checkuser-ing on a relatively new project. Lynch7 00:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Smail886 (Not eligible, checked by Openbk) • Smail886 (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Marvin 2009 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Unsatisfactory performance on controversy in zhwp. Marvin 2009 (talk) 02:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --Uğurkenttalk 18:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I am torn. On the one hand, my impression of this candidate has always been good when I encountered him. On the other hand, the crosswiki activity could be higher and I found the answer to my question unsatisfactory (e.g. that his primary concern was about CUing the voters, instead of denying a bureaucrat request on a wiki which obviously is too small for it). MF-W 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per MF-W's question. Any candidate for a trusted group should declare all relevant information even if they think it isn't relevant. Green Giant (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mixed opinions, on one hand, it's good to have a steward candidate with a CU flag and some crosswiki experience, on the other hand, answers are not really satisfactory — NickK (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sadly not convinced. -Barras talk 22:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The answer to the hypothetical question leaves me underwhelmed, for the reasons mentioned by MF-W, however I think their experience across multiple projects and language knowledge would be very helpful to the steward team, so I'm not really convinced either way. Snowolf How can I help? 23:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Uncertain I'm afraid Herby talk thyme 11:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 18:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC) not enough information[reply]
  20. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not sure. Gilc (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Never seen. Never at all... Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Imo, not enough spoken languages. Three should be a minimum. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Once this candidate has more time (he said he was at present a student and has limited time for the computer), I would be happy to vote yes. If you do not get elected, please run again when you have more time. I will vote yes then. Wpollard (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Artregor (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  This user is not very active, but quite trustworthy. Good afternoon (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bpierreb (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Harsh 2580 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Harsh (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wikit 18:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Read all I could, and I'm on the fence, and probably not moving from it. Steel1943 (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Alarob (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Need a bit more experience. Miniwark (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Poti Berik (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/Mys_721tx&oldid=24961074"