Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/DidiWeidmann

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

DidiWeidmann

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: de-N, gsw-N, eo-N, fr-3, en-3, it-3, es-2, nl-1, rm-1, la-1, pt-1, hu-1, vo-1, ca-1, ro-1, sv-1, da-1, nn-1, no-1, nov-1, io-1, af-1, vec-1, oc-1, pdc-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    • My real name is Dietrich Michael Weidmann
    • My user account on Meta
    • My user account on my home Wiki
    • About my person: I was born in 1960 in Zurich, Switzerland, and I am linguist, translator and journalist. I was graduated in 1988 at the University of Zurich in general linguistics as lic. phil. My activities on Wikimedia projects: EO-Wikipedia: Administrator (since 2007) and burocrate (since 2014), about 125000 edits since 2006 on EO-Wikipedia (creation of more than 3000 articles), about 30000 edits on Commons (upload of more than 15000 pictures), about 15000 edits on German Wikipedia, active contributions to 156 different projects. Globally I did in all Wikimedia projects about 300'000 edits, i.e. I am among the 500 most active collaborators of Wikimedia. - I have special knowledge about international copy right law and did several research about questions of panoramic law for pictures in Switzerland to clear up and resolve a copyright conflict on Commons for about 2000 pictures taken inside of Swiss churches. I am actively fighting vandalism. With steward access I could due to my language knowledge help fighting vandalism in small Wiki projects (like for example Volapuk, Ido or Novial, where active administrators are missing).
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#DidiWeidmann
    • The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

    Yes

    [edit]
    1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Filterkaffee (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 • --Filterkaffee (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Bildoj (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 • --Bildoj (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Detailed responses to questions. As for sending an email to the wrong queue, I have seen many such emails in OTRS. As long as he sent it to Wikimedia, it will most likely have been read by a trustworthy person and shunted along to the correct queue. Better to see this as a learning experience. Green Giant (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Fine. Vogone (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Jü (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --Jü (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Clemensfranz (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  -- Clemensfranz (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Pelz (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Pelz (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Joachim Mos (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Joachim Mos (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. ChamithN (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ChamithN (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. C3r4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --C3r4 (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Bigbossfarin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bigbossfarin (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  → «« Man77 »» [de] 21:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  By candidate's answers to these questions. Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No real problem, but would prefer it if he were more active around Meta. PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Scooter (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Scooter (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Rax (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 23:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Nannadeem (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  His enthusiasm in his respectable life turn (DOB-1960) with his contributions is self explanatory for me to favor him Nannadeem (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Nahum (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Looks like a good candidate. We all make mistakes, I'm sure he will take extra care next time. Nahum (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Per above, mmm Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Very strong Yes. I'm not interested in the comments below regarding sending his/her details to the wrong address. To me, that indicates a lack of clarity and simplification with regards to Wikimedia and how it communicates with its users. Xania (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Kavdiamanju (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Cncmaster (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  No one is entirely perfect, and I think that one mistake (that had no extremely severe ramifications from what I've read) should not automatically disqualify an otherwise great candidate from Stewardship. Cncmaster (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Xoristzatziki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xoristzatziki (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Micha L. Rieser (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Micha (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         喜小羊羊 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  喜小羊羊 (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. Schumir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Schumir (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Renschi81 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Renschi81 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Star Flyer (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Star Flyer (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. Schudi 45 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Very good! Schudi 45 (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Stefan Weil (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stefan Weil (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stigfinnare (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Caronna (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Caronna (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Nastoshka (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Wischmat (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Austral blizzard (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    48. Wahrerwattwurm (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Shii (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Shii (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    50. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    55. Macuser10 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Macuser10 (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kilith (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    58. ThomasPusch (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  ThomasPusch (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    59. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    60. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    61. Gus.dan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Gus.dan (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    62. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    63. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    64. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    65. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    66. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I agree with Green Giant. Gilc (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    67. PP2014 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  PP2014 (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    68. Indlekoferw (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Indlekoferw (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    69. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bookvaedina (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    70. Elfix (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Candidate's expertise in languages, maturity and experience on the Wikimedia projects are things that I believe are valuable for a Steward. He will be careful next time about how to identify. Elfix 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    71. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    72. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    73. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not perfect, but is still suitable for the role. CT Cooper · talk 14:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    74. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    75. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    76. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    77. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    78. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    79. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Könnte ein echte Stütze werden. ST ○ 22:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    80. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    81. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    82. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Good Luck :) geo ») 06:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    83. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Howan Hansi (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    84. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Posivite (such as variety of spoken languages) overcomes the negative for me. Widr (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    85. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    86. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    87. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    88. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Trust him. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    89. Joe Watzmo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Joe Watzmo (talk) 13:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    90. Emericpro (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emericpro (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    91. Cadfaell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Cadfaell (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    92. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Approved. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    93. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    94. Nioger (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Nioger (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    95. Tempodivalse (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Kvankam mi mem neofte interagas kun Didi, mi ankoraŭ trovas lin valorega EO-Vikipediisto meritanta mian plenan subtenon kaj fidon. Li antaŭ longe montras sin kiel afablan, helpeman, kaj kompetentan uzulon. Pro tiu eraro pri alsendado retleterojn mi apenaŭ povas zorgi. Ĉu lian kandidatecon vere povas nuligi nur unu eraro? Eĉ jamaj stevardoj faras de temp' al temp' misaĵojn. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    96. Nicolas1981 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Nicolas1981 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    97. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    98. محمد عصام (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  محمد عصام (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    99. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  DanielTom (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    100. Miklaws (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miklaws (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    101. Dr.jagdish (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Dr.jagdish (talk) 02:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    102. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Good answers to questions and satisfactory experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    103. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Niesy74 (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    104. Hvd69 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hvd69 (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Reneman (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    105. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Sujalajus (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    106. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Eric schreiner (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Eric schreiner (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    107. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    108. Linksfuss (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Linksfuss (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    109. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Arbnos (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    110. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bulldoc (talk) 01:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    111. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Endo999 (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    112. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  S.Didam (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    113. LoupDragon42 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  LoupDragon42 (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    114. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Chrisaliv (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    115. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    116. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Mathmensch (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    117. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MannMaus (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    118. Hawkeye7 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    119. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    120. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Hadrianus (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    121. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Artregor (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    122. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Mature "international-minded" candidate. And please learn from your past mistakes. ContributorQ (talk) 23:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    123. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Royalmate1 (talk) 00:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    124. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nnemo (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    125. Flixtey (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Expresses enthusiasm for the role Flixtey (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    126. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    127. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    128. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    129. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:52, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    130. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  I think that the mistake is not so important and if he focuses on what he can do and start slowly, he can perform his duties well. If the election turns out unsuccessfully, I suggest to apply for Global renamers, almost no renamer or steward has eo>3 kowledge.Alexmar983 (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    131. Tuvalkin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Tuvalkin (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    132. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    133. Ariaveeg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ariaveeg (talk) 10:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    134. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Don-kun (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Cabana (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Cabana (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    135. Khalid Mahmood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Khalid Mahmood (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    136. Mikered (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  --Mikered (talk) 19:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    137. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    138. Altkatholik62 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Altkatholik62 (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    139. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Cbyd (talk) 21:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    140. Amikeco (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Amikeco (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    141. Bondaruk85 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bondaruk85 (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Der-wuppertaler (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Der-wuppertaler (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    142. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    143. Markbassett (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Markbassett (talk) 03:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    144. Mugglschoas (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Mugglschoas (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    145. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lt2818 (talk) 14:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    146. Johnbod (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Johnbod (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    147. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    148. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Kossa b (talk) 20:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    149. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    150. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  per Elfix Zyephyrus (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    151. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vik-Thor (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    152. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I can't oppose over one screw up. TCN7JM 23:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    153. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I can't see how a mistake with submitting own data is an argument against. It's others' data he'll need to keep safe. And often people have different attitute to own and to some one's things. Besides that tiny mistake so far I see no reasons to oppose. I'm inclined giving people chances to try doing something and then removing their rights in case they crew up instead of being too cautious in the very start. Base (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    154. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    155. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Caligatus (talk) 12:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    156. Edmenb (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2015 •  Edmenb ( Mensajes ) Wikipedia en Español 17:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    157. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  In favor of a multilingual candidate, who seems to have plenty of experience on-wiki and seems to be handling things in a well-considered way. nl:Gebruiker:Woudloper/Verdorie waarom niet? RonnieV (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    158. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Prompt and detailed responses to the questions. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    159. Neptuul (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Viel Glück! Neptuul (talk) 08:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    160. Martin E. Walder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Martin E. Walder (talk) 08:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    161. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    162. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    163. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xinstalker (talk) 16:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    164. Rossi101 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Rossi101 (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    165. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    166. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 23:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    167. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tracouti (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    168. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    169. Tomitomtom62 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomitomtom62 (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    170. Lucifer8k (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lucifer8k (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    171. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Alarob (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    172. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    173. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 23:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    174. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  --Gryllida 00:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    175. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Odannur (Not eligible, checked by Vituzzu) •  Odannur (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    176. Bub's (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bub's (talk) 14:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    177. Nobs01 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    178. BlueBreezeWiki (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    179. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    180. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    181. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Krassdaniel (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    182. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    183. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FocalPoint (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    184. Salatonbv (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Salatonbv (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    185. Liz (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Liz (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    186. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Everyone makes mistakes. I do not think that Didi's error indicates anything more than nerves, and I his wikimedia contributions lead me to believe that he would be a positive addition to the steward corps. Avi (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    187. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    188. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  IJzeren Jan (talk) 12:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    189. Piet-c (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Piet-c (talk) 13:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    190. NKOzi (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  N KOziTalk 13:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    191. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Has gained experience since to be able to take up this responsibility. Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    192. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    193. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Jan Kovář BK (talk) 23:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    194. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 02:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    195. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    196. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I count on swiss neutrality DrTrumpet (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    197. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Adirlanz (talk) 03:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    198. The Herald (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  The Herald 08:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    199. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  AMPERIO (talk) 12:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    200. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    201. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    202. Arivera92 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  I think that is the most suitable candidate to be elected Steward . It is a multilingual user xD
      Therefore, this would be my justification for my vote to this user candidate Arivera92 (talk) 05:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    203. Arivera92 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Arivera92 (talk) 05:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    204. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    205. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Best wishes. Good afternoon (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Aidas (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Aidas (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    206. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    207. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Seems to be very much qualified for the role. —Gyaro–Maguus— 02:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    208. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    209. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    210. Kalki (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I finally have had time to do some reviewing of the candidates here, and am voting for some whom I am familiar enough with to support. Kalki (talk) 14:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    211. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    212. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  In confidence. WM is indeed in great need of candidacies with similar profile. --Kikuyu3 (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    No

    [edit]
    2. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I see in terms of the contribution globally to prevent vandalism. --Uğurkenttalk 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. M7 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  People running for this role should be able to successfully read instructions and to take additional care in using emails, especially when containing personal data. "Appealing" to correct such errors is not always possible in the real life, and sometimes even when dealing with this Project. M/ (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  You doing a good job in some projects, but your countervandalism experience seems not very high. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  No I don't need clueless steward who sent their identification to WMF to info- , what will happen stewwy who wrongly lock account just because confusing name? I (really) don't need a clueless steward.--AldNonBicara? 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Aldnon. Rschen7754 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Davey2010Talk 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Rschen7754. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Eurodyne (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I am concerned about the user's handling of private information, given they mistakenly sent their own identification info to all the volunteers on OTRS rather than the secure address meant for it. Snowolf How can I help? 22:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Exactly per Snowolf. I don't see a problem with the identification arriving little too late, but the fact that the user sent the information to the wrong mail makes worrying about his ability to really understand rules, policies and guidelines. (Reading and understanding the how-to guide for the identification process surely isn't really hard.) That already those very basic things were done wrongly worry me too much to trust him now with steward rights. -Barras talk 22:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Aldnon. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. KTC (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Per M7, Snowolf & Barras. Mistake happens, but I would rather be safe than sorry. Maybe in the future. KTC (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Savh (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Whilst making mistakes is understandable and human, these kind of mistakes should be avoided. What put me off the most, however, was the candidate's handling of the situation. First of all, I believe the user should have been aware earlier that his identification had not been processed, with the approaching deadline. Secondly, once disqualified, I would like a steward to check his work first instead of inmediately starting to complain about others, to later notice that it had been sent to the incorrect email address. Savhñ 15:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Teles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  What Savh said. Concerns with how sensitive data was sent to wrong place and how bad situation was handled afterwards. Seems to have good skills and would be a great addition with a few more experience with stewards' tasks, but not now. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wpollard (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per above. SPQRobin (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I don't really think he has the cross-wiki experience which I would like to see in a steward (e.g. in SWMT areas) - the thousands of edits globally outside of the home wikis are from adding interwiki links. Also, the incident with the identification not having arrived at the Foundation before the deadline is really embarassing. Actually that should have lead to disqualification anyway; but the complaining then was even worse. The candidates have the requirement to ensure that they send the identifying information to the right address, and to check that it is received and processed, not anyone else. Whatismore, I am appalled by the answer to Rschen's question for all candidates ("I[f] a[=I] am not involved directly or indirectly in the case, there is no problem by acting also in the home Wikipedia"). MF-W 23:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per Snowolf, see there. Holmium (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 18:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. This, that and the other (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Not now, but maybe next year. This, that and the other (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. -revi (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Per MF-W. — regards, Revi 16:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Epìdosis (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Lankiveil (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Craig Franklin (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    36. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  თოგო (D) 14:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    37. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Snowolf.    FDMS  4    16:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    38. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    39. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I suggest to take experience running as global sysop for instance. Vituzzu (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    40. Philosopher (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  "... there is no problem by acting also in the home Wikipedia" is the wrong answer to Rschen7754's question about whether a Steward can act in a home wiki. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    41. Andreas Werle (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    42. Trigonomie (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  The answer to the question of MF-Warburg doesn't convince me. Trigonomie (talk) 08:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    43. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Per M7 and MF-Warburg Glaisher (talk) 17:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    44. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  After reading the discussion and answers to the questions, I was going to put myself in the "neutral" section; however, after reading Snowolf's "no" vote, if a detail such as that can be overlooked, I'm worried about what else could be overlooked in the event this editor becomes a steward. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    45. Openskye (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Openskye (talk) 03:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    46. Bonaditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Aldnon and Snowolf. Bonaditya (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    47. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    48. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Coekon (talk) 01:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    49. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    50. KuboF (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  (change from "neutral" until respond to my questions) Didi is well involved but I have doubts about his technical skills (he himself declared technically less experienced, what has manifested e.g. in discussion about Universal LanguageSelector on eowiki), his way of communication (he didn't checked template's history before writing long discussion and similar situations) and his admin activity (600 admin actions during 6 years, 80 during last year - both on eowiki, his home wiki). Also his reason for stevardship looks to be reason for global sysop. KuboF (talk) 14:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    51. Yger (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Yger (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    52. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    53. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Tegel (Talk) 15:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    54. Tlustulimu (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  I have doubts about his technical skills. Tlustulimu (talk) 16:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    55. Trofobi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Trofobi (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    56. Raboe001 (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Raboe001 (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    57. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  it seems you need a little more technical experience Shivanarayana (talk) 17:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Neutral

    [edit]
    2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Really unsure per M7's comments. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Patriot8790 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Patriot8790 (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    5. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I would have supported the nomination, but I have doubts per M7 — NickK (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    10. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Obviously experienced, trying to be polite, but with some answers which I do not understand. I favor short, clear answers from stewards because this minimizes chance of confusion. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    11. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    12. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Unsure. He gave good answers, but I get the feeling he doesn't have the right image from the stewards with all the legal talk. Also, everyone makes mistakes obviously, but sending your private information to the wrong email address ... Trijnsteltalk 12:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    13. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not sure. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    14. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    15. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    16. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 18:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    17. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    18. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not sure. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    19. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    20. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    21. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    22. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Trijnstel Matanya (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    23. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I'm not know this user Poti Berik (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    24. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Idk. You seem to be well-involved, but the mistake risen by M7 makes me raise an eyebrow. Gonzolito (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    25. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    26. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    27. Monopoly31121993 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Part of me says that making a single email mistake is no reason to disqualify someone from the position but I'm also new to this and don't know how serious the mistake was. In general I think this is a highly qualified candidate who has done A LOT for the community. I also really value their emphasis and dedication to lesser used languages. If this user is confirmed then I doubt they will do more harm than good and if they are not I hope they have more time to continue doing what they are already been doing. Their work deserves our respect and appreciation. Monopoly31121993 (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
         Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mjesfahani (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    28. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bpierreb (talk) 12:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    29. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wikit 19:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    30. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    31. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    32. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Miniwark (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    33. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  I don't understand their reasoning for wanting stewardship. Looks like a great participant, though I am not sure that I see participation in areas where stewards participate. Having had global rollbacker or global sysop would have been an advantage.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    34. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  FeralOink (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    35. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Not sure--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/DidiWeidmann&oldid=24961069"