Jump to content

Meta:Requests for oversight/Mardetanha

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Mardetanha

[edit]

Yeah another self-nomination , per this discussion i felt having OS flag would help me doing my job in meta , i have used OS flag several times in Meta ,with recent development on Oversight system it is really helpful now ,so if community truest me with OS Flag i would be happy to act as OS on meta.general information about me I am one the recently elected stewards and am holding sysop and bureaucrat flag on several projects & i am one of active SWMT members --Mardetanha talk 09:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Certainly. We need more Oversighters, and Mohsen fits the bill well. Good luck. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes, very trustworthy. MBisanz talk 09:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support --Thogo (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support —Dferg (talk) 09:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support - per Anonymous Dissident. →Na·gy 09:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support Barras 10:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support --GT5162 (我的对话页) 11:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Support, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 14:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support –Juliancolton | Talk 15:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: do we need more than one oversighter, or do the stewards count? If so, is there any point in this vote? Majorly talk 14:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    We need more oversighters in general; I think that's the general feeling. After the new features were installed, the userright became much more useful for Meta. Hence, more needed and desired. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    To clarify, I meant do we need someone else to run besides Mard, as per policy 2 or more are required. I just thought meta might be an exception with the stewards. Majorly talk 14:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Never mind, forgot Drini and Mike had been reinstated. Support Support Majorly talk 14:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support I don't even have to think about it. Huib talk 15:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support. --Erwin 19:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support Cbrown1023 talk 21:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support Az1568 (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Known, trusted and valued user. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support J.delanoygabsadds 01:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support, certamente. Alex Pereira falaê 12:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support --Meno25 13:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support SPQRobin (inc!) 14:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support He's done it previously, is meta-active, and overwhelmingly trusted. Kylu 02:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support iAlex 10:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support we need more than 3 oversighters.--Kwj2772 (論) 10:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support Finn Rindahl 00:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support, good steward. --~Innvs: 09:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support Leinad 17:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support excellent person imho. oscar 22:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support Nishkid64 (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 22:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support —DerHexer (Talk) 19:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
30-0 votes. Therefore closed as successful. --Thogo (talk) 10:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_oversight/Mardetanha&oldid=2608839"