Jump to content

Stewards' noticeboard

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 22 hours ago by Vikiyılmaz in topic Bot requests
Shortcut:
SN
Welcome to the stewards ' noticeboard. This message board is for discussing issues on Wikimedia projects that are related to steward work. Please post your messages at the bottom of the page and do not forget to sign it. Thank you.
Stewards
For stewards
Noticeboards
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 2 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 30 days.

U4C-rights change

[edit]

FYI, the U4C requested temporary giving checkuser-log to our usergroup (change is already made). You can read the details here. Best regards, Luke081515 15:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

RfC closure

[edit]

Requests for comment/Welcoming policy is overdue for a closure - I think the points that are going to be made have been made. * Pppery * it has begun 03:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Similar to the request below I would expect the wikis affected to be notified by the RfC initiator in order to allow RfC participation and make them aware of potential changes if the policy gets adopted. Johannnes89 (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Consensus should be clear here. * Pppery * it has begun 19:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Have the wikis (potentially) affected [1] been notified about the RfC? Requests for comment/Policy#Initiating an RFC usually expects notifications, this RfC has apparently gone largely unnoticed, I don't see why just 10 users (including one sockpuppet and one opposing comment) should be able to implement such a change. Johannnes89 (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


request for mass message

[edit]

Hello. Would someone kindly send the mass message regarding Steward requests/Bot status#Global bot status for KiranBOT? It has been almost three weeks since the request was put forward. courtesy ping to User:EPIC. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Xaosflux can you do this? Leaderboard (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Usernamekiran: Have you prepared the invitation list yet? – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 07:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Hide on Rosé: Hi. The list is at Bot policy/New global bot discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Usernamekiran: Can you please make a message? Thanks! – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 07:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Hide on Rosé: one message can be found at de:Benutzer Diskussion:Zabe/Newsletter#Request for global bot flag for CommonsDelinker. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@EPIC, Leaderboard, Xaosflux, and Hide on Rosé: never mind. I am doing it myself right now. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Close Requests for comment/Global ban requirements

[edit]

Requests for comment/Global ban requirements is overdue for a closure. * Pppery * it has begun 16:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

GIPBE

[edit]

Good day stewards. Was taking a look at the users with GIPBE and found that some of them were blocked for socking (e.g. AndreaGotts, Svpnikhil, ThePhantom65, etc.), some never made any edits (e.g. Sushree Andia), and some not editing for an extended period of time (e.g. Digimarks).

My question is that how often does the users in the GIPBE group gets reviewed and should there be an activity requirement and/or criteria for the users in said group? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

As far as I see, there is no community policy for activity related to this flag (Global IP block exemptions). Gaining a single local block isn't necessarily a revocation bright line. I'd be fine with clean ups of very lenghty inactivity (perhaps 3+ years globally inactive) - and think that would be fairly uncontroversial. — xaosflux Talk 15:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I think removing some of the very inactive ones makes sense (I seem to remember us doing that waaay back in the day, there was a list on stewwiki and everything). Blocks aren't necessarily a cause for removal as xaos mentioned, but I wouldn't object to reviewing some of those as well. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Xaosflux and Ajraddatz: Is 3 years of inactivity a good time for a review? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
2 or even one year of inactivity should be enough. Leaderboard (talk) 06:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would Support Support 1,5-2 years. – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 07:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Test of the Blocklog IP-Range Evaluation & Review Report

[edit]

I have a new project with which we can better fight spam and vandalism and am looking for a few testers. This is still experimental and there may still be problems. I think this is particularly useful for stewards. I would be happy about feedback.Blocklog IP-Range Evaluation & Review Report 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 17:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@WikiBayer "© WikiBayer 2025 All rights reserved" - why is the tool not open-source? Also, the charts don't make much sense as they don't have any kind of labelling - some context on what each of these charts do would be helpful to see. Leaderboard (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Is there somewhere to set the interface language? The URI above loads in =en, but any use reverts to de. — xaosflux Talk 18:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Leaderboard " not open-source?" Open Source does not mean that there are no rights. I will also public the code, AGPL or other licenses also have certain restrictions. This is currently still an unfinished test operation. The charts are based on tooltips. At least I thought it would be good, but I had added unobtrusive labels to some of the charts. Is this obtrusive better? + I have now add "<input type="hidden" name="lang" value="<?php echo htmlspecialchars($_GET["lang"] ?? ); ?>"> to fix the lang" 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 19:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
That's better now. Leaderboard (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
@WikiBayer: I fixed your link, shouldn't be 1111-03-16. – Phương Linh (T · C · CA · L · B) 07:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Iranian Wikimedians UG Election

[edit]

Dear Stewards,

I reaching out a message on behalf of the Committee Election in Iranian Wikimedians UG for this year(2025) .We need two stewards to help us as a scrutineer. The voting will start from 5May until 18 may. We expect a voter turnout of about 69 users. Please let us know if you are interested.

With the best regards. Hootandolati (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comment Comment Hootandolati, I can volunteer for this task and help you with the election --Alaa :)..! 14:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I really appreciate your help. Hootandolati (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm interested in helping with the election. ~ Yahya (talkcontribs) 19:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I really appreciate your help Hootandolati (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Feedback welcomed on SRCU discussion

[edit]

Please see Talk:Steward requests/Checkuser#SRCU, CU blocks, logged out editing, and local policies, thanks :) 0xDeadbeef (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bot requests

[edit]

Steward requests/Bot status --Yılmaztalk 11:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply