Template talk:Babel

...

Better use {{User3}} with this template, instead of {{User}} --Mac 11:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

user:I18n/template:babel/testcase
user:לערי ריינהארט/template:babel

somthing is wrong

{{babel|de-0|ro-0|ru-0|eo-0|yi-0|en-0|fr-0|is-0}}

generates:‎

image:Screen dump · « meta » · template Babel · parameters are getting screwed · 01.jpg

examples

Please see the categories at the bottom:‎

Categories: User de-0 | User yi-0 | User en-0 | User fr-0 | Users de-0 ro-0‎

fixed 19:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Majorly! Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 19:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

compatibility, transparency, portability

Please remove the following

<!-- mulitlingual users -->
{{#if:{{{2|}}}|[[Category:Users {{{1}}} {{{2}}}|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}

from the template which is used in many projects of the Wikimedia Foundation with a well known meaning in all of the wikis.
If you feel that people want to emphasize that they are multilingual one should use another template. If you look at special:Prefixindex/category:Users you may see how inflationary this code can be. Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 18:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. I'd been wondering how to remove the red category from my userpage. Now I know. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

da Support requested please

Hi, I am new user here, who just created my first revision of my user page incorporating the {{Babel}} template. I am a native Dane, and I miss support for da in the template as can be seen on my user page. -- Slaunger 20:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Instructions for Use

The instructions on this page are very unhelpful and need work. - Stillwaterising 23:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

This template is deprecated since February 2008. Use Template:User language instead. It was not made clear on the template, so I just added it. HenkvD 10:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

RFD

A RFD was closed as no consensus to delete. Special:PermaLink/26580075#Template:Babel. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I really don't like this outcome... The opposers never explained their arguments and just followed Billinghurst's unexplained rationale. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)