Talk:Wikibooks/Logo/Proposal/H

This talk page contains the archived discussions concerning Proposal H that may no longer apply to the current proposal. New discussion should be added directly to the proposal page itself. Thank you.

Previous discussion

1. These are pretty cool. I'd like to see some versions using different colours. As well, these should be square; probably just stretching the background to square and scaling the text as needed would be fine. 3 is probably the best here - the grey in 2 is really boring, and having the books all line up isn't visually interesting in 1. I wonder though, if having different heights, but equal thicknesses might be better. All three of these scale nicely to small sizes, and will do so even better without the text. This is a good proposal, and I hope to explore some variations at a later date. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2. If this were to pass, I think it should be in a square-ish form rather than a rectangle, although this may not be a problem. --penubag (talk; w) 04:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Done what about it? --Ramac 21:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
4. I like 3 (or 3B), with the different sized books it looks a little more like a natural bookshelf. Nice colours too, none too vibrant. --99.228.161.19 18:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5. Too bland in my opinion. There are many ways to make the concept behind the logo (a book shelf) more interesting than this. Husky 21:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
6. 3b is one of my two favorites - not bland at all, but subtle -- lusth
7. 3b: better than 3 (reason: e.g. has more space above). Question: could the thinner book (in 3 the 3rd from right) be implemented again ? Also in some book shelves there are some books lying above or at the side like this: \ - could you make such a version for a test ? ----Erkan Yilmaz (Wikiversity:Chat, wiki blog) 12:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
8. These are great. I think that "1" is really exceptional. Philippe 01:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
9. (3b) is very nice, representative of the project, and scales well. It's not (a+u), but I reckon it beats the other options hands down. Webaware ^talk 02:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
10. Yes, (3b) is cool.
11. the first one and the last two ones are okay. abf /talk to me/ 18:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
12. Say what? Bar graphs. Just gives the wrong impression completely. Drop SunCreator 14:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
13. I am afraid that 3 and 3b look like the lights of audio players, instead of books. Maybe with the changes proposed by Erkan Yilmaz they would look more like bookshelves. - Jorge Morais 17:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
14. Yes this is quite confusing! As previously noted, one may think of these as bar graphs or even music visualisation stuff. -- Felipe Aira 12:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
15. DropZginder 00:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)