Jump to content

Stewards/elections 2010/votes/EivindJ

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(简体): 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(繁體): 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

EivindJ (Trond Eivind Johnsen)

[edit]

EivindJ talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Personal info: After a nice Wiki-vacation, I would like to offer my service both as an editor of various Wikis and as a steward. At present I am most active on Norwegian Wikipedia (where I've previously served as an administrator). I am also an administrator at English Wiktionary, though not the most active one. Even though I do not have thorough knowledge of everything the Stewards do, I know the guidelines and basics of Wikipedia very well. Also, working as a web developer, I feel comfortable with gaining knowledge about technical things.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Informationen zur Person: Nach einem schönen Wikiurlaub möchte ich meine Dienste sowohl als Autor in vielen Wikis als auch als Steward anbieten. Im Moment bin ich hauptsächlich in der norwegischen Wikipedia aktiv (in der ich auch schon Administratorrechte hatte). Ich bin außerdem ein Administrator im englischen Wikitionary, wenn auch nicht der aktivste. Obwohl ich keine gründlichen Kenntnisse über alles habe, was Stewards tun, kenne ich die Richtlinien und Grundlagen von Wikipedia sehr gut. Außerdem freue ich mich darauf, aufgrund meiner Arbeit als Web-Entwickler, die technischen Dinge zu lernen.
Ελληνικά:
  • Γλώσσες: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Πληροφορίες: Μετά από ένα ωραίο βικιδιάλειμμα, θα ήθελα να προσφέρω και ως συντάκτης σε διάφορα wiki και ως steward. Προς το παρόν είμαι ενεργός στην Νορβηγική Βικιπαίδεια (όπου προηγουμένως ήμουν διαχειριστής). Είμαι ακόμα διαχειριστής στο Αγγλικό Βικιλεξικό, αν και όχι από τους πιο ενεργούς. Παρόλο που δεν έχω καλή γνώση πάνω σε όλα τα πράγματα που κάνουν οι Steward γνωρίζω τις βασικές πολιτικές της Βικιπαίδειας πολύ καλά. Ακόμα δουλεύοντας ως web developer αισθάνομαι άνετα με την απόκτηση γνώσης για τεχνικά ζητήματα.
español:
  • Idiomas: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Información personal: Después de unas buenas Wiki-vacaciones, quiero ofrecer mi servicio tanto como editor de varias wikis como un steward. Actualmente soy el más activo en la Wikipedia en noruego (donde anteriormente fungí como administrador). También soy administrador del Wikcionario en inglés, aunque no soy el más activo. Aún cuando no tenga el suficiente conocimiento de lo que hacen los stewrads, conozco las guías y bases de la Wikipedia muy bien. También trabajo como desarrollador web, me siento cómodo con obtener experiencia acerca de los detalles técnicos.
suomi:
  • Kielet: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Miellyttävän wikiloman jälkeen haluaisin tarjota palveluksiani sekä useiden wikien muokkaajana että ylivalvojana. Tällä hetkellä olen aktiivisin norjankielisessä Wikipediassa, jossa olen aiemmin palvellut ylläpitäjänä. Olen myös englanninkielisen Wikisanakirjan ylläpitäjä, joskaan en kaikkein aktiivisin. Vaikka minulla ei ole läpikotaista tietämystä kaikesta siitä, mitä ylivalvojat tekevät, tunnen Wikipedian ohjeet ja perusteet varsin hyvin. Lisäksi web-kehittäjänä työskentelevänä minusta on mukavaa hankkia tietoa teknisistä asioista.
français:
  • Langues : no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Renseignements personnels : Après d'agréables Wiki-vacances, j'aimerai offir mes services à la fois comme contributeur de plusieurs Wikis et comme steward. Actuellement, je suis actif sur la Wikipedia en norvégien (où j'ai été, dans le passé, administrateur). Je suis aussi un administrateur sur le Wiktionnaire en anglais même si je suis loin d'être le plus actif. Même si je n'ai pas de connaissances exhaustives de tout ce que font les stewards, je connais très bien les règles et usages de Wikipedia. De plus, travaillant comme développeur web, je suis confiant dans le fait que j'apprendrai rapidement les détails techniques
עברית:
  • שפות: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • מידע אישי: אחרי חופשה נחמדת מויקיפדיה ,אני רוצה להציע את שירותי כעורך של פרויקטים שונים וכמו דייל. כיום, אני פעילה ביותר על ויקיפדיה נורווגית (ששם הייתי מפעיל מערכת). אני גם מפעיל מערכת בויקימילון האנגלית, אף לא אחד מהפעילים ביותר. למרות שאין לי ידע מעמיק על עסקי הדיילים, אני מכיר את הקווים המנחים הבסיסיים של ויקיפדיה טוב טוב. כמו כן, אני עובד כמפתח רשת, ואני מרגיש בנוח ללמוד דברים טכניים.
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • 候補者の情報: 楽しいウィキ休暇から戻って来まして、二つの立場で貢献させて頂ければと思っております。一つは様々なウィキの編集者、もう一つはスチュワードです。私が現在最も盛んに活動している場所はノルウェー語版ウィキペディアです(過去に管理者でした)。英語版ウィクショナリーでも管理者を務めています(最も盛んに活動している場所ではありませんが)。スチュワードの仕事を全て知っているわけではありませんが、ウィキペディアのガイドラインと基礎については熟知しているつもりです。私はウェブ開発者でもあり、技術面で知識が増えるのは嬉しいことです。
русский:
  • Языки: no, sv, da, en-3, nn-3, af-2, nl-1 (+ working on my German ;) )
  • Личная информация: После хорошего вики-отпуска я бы хотел продолжить своё участие в качестве редактора различных вики и стюарда. В настоящее время я наиболее активен в норвежском разделе Википедии (где я раньше являлся администратором). Также я администратор Викисловаря на английском языке, но не очень активен там. Хотя я не обладаю хорошими знаниями о работе стюардов, я очень хорошо знаю принципы и основы Википедии. Кроме того, я работаю в качестве веб-разработчика и поэтому чувствую себя комфортно во время получения технических знаний.

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#EivindJ

Yes

[edit]
  1. Jon Harald Søby 00:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Good candidate, no doubt he will do a good job.[reply]
  2. Good candidate. Laaknor 00:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. True. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Obelix 00:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mr.Z-man 00:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. especially glad to see him back, thanks for wanting to help, trusted user, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. RP459 01:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I'm confident that he'll do a good job. Aldebaran 01:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Jivee Blau 01:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Diupwijk 01:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. § stay (sic)! 01:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Shirik 02:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
     fetchcomms 03:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you're ineligible--Nick1915 - all you want 14:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Tuvalkin 03:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Christian Giersing 06:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Very good language skills, and he has done work on several projects. –Ejs-80 09:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. An excellent candidate with good judgement and good communication skills. Supportive as well. --Harald Haugland 09:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --WizardOfOz talk 10:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Done a lot on no:wp - and a good candidate for steward. - Ooo86 10:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --MannMaus 11:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Harald Krichel 17:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    --Lena Dyrdal Andersen 17:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]
    Sorry, you're ineligible to vote --Egmontaz talk 18:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I know him as an very competent and committed editor and (former) sysop./'crat from no.wiki, solid crosswiki experience, very happy to see him back from wikibreak. Strong support. Finn Rindahl 18:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Good luck WereSpielChequers 20:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Per Harald Haugland. Efloean 21:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --თოგო (D) 00:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Utvik 04:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Mezelf14 07:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --junafani 10:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Per supporters; he speaks languages which are currently needed in steward group; I liked his answers to Mike.lifeguard and Millosh. --Nemo 10:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Vote moved from "neutral" section, where I added it by mistake because of an edit conflict. Nemo 08:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  30. -- smial 13:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Per birdy. It'll be great to have you join the team.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Erwin 15:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -- lucasbfr talk 16:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  34. ✔ • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) wtf?17:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Per Harald Haugland. – Cocu (d) 23:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36. NellieBly 01:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Per above. Razorflame 07:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sigmundur 18:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry you are not eligible to vote. --Egmontaℨ 18:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  38. support - oscar 21:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Kameraad Pjotr 14:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  40. (Moved from neutral) Between this user's crosswiki experience, their language range and previous sysop activity, I have moved to support. 1ForTheMoney 16:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Is capable and doesn't have a cabinet full of sysop powers. He even gave up a sysop status in the past. Good language skills. --Xania 00:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Kaj 08:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Fine behavior on his home wiki, where he acted very truthfully as an administrator in his active period (nice to have him back on any wiki project!) nsaa 15:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Szalakóta 20:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Scandinavian languages are needed. CactusWriter 21:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support Support Good levels of activity on a number of projects. I don't buy the opposing concerns but, even then, a steward with a life is better than nothing. ~ Amory (utc) 23:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Support Support Go Scandinavia! – EtäKärppä99 16:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Support Wefa 20:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Support --Flamelai 00:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  50. --Yair rand 00:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  51. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 17:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Herby talk thyme 16:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    After a little thought I support this candidate. --Xania 21:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Yup, I double-voted.--Xania 20:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you've already done that (vote 41 above). Finn Rindahl 21:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  53. YES Kenrick95 05:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  54. We need more stewards and candidate expressed clear knowledge of what steward tasks are. --Millosh 05:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Enemenemu 17:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Convincing answers to the questions[reply]
  56. KristofferAG 01:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  57. A vote of faith in your intention to contribute. Dhatfield 20:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  58. --PaulVIF 22:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  59. — H92 (t · c · no) 23:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Stepro 04:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Cadfaell 06:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Atluxity 10:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  63. BjørnN 15:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Taichi - (あ!) 20:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  65. -- Bjoertvedt 22:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC), changed from neutral to favourable.[reply]
  66. --Flums 22:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ctande 23:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Answers to questions, language skills, overall impression & able to renounce to a sysop status. --KrebMarkt 20:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Sjakkalle 10:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support Support Bogorm 15:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Ken-Z! Talk 19:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Active in several languages. I don't share the concern some stated about recent low activity: The fact that he had himself desysopped when he was inactive shows me that he is highly responsible and well aware of the commitment to the community. SebastianHelm 04:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Romaine 18:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Trexpro 13:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Yes, seems trustworthy. --Egmontaℨ 15:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Gabriel Kielland 14:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support Support Gjerne. :-) --Geitost diskusjon 16:30, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  78. LeinaD (t) 18:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC) per birdy[reply]
  79. Yes please!--Nick1915 - all you want 18:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Lolsimon 00:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Broad experience and language skills. I have looked at his main projects, and he has indeed returned to a highly-active role. Welcome back, and I hope people review their position before the close of voting! John Vandenberg 01:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Wiki Historian N OH 02:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Бране Јовановић 06:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Let's don't be bureaucrats. He meet all other criterias, in my eyes (in)activity is not a problem. -- Bojan  Talk  08:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Support Support --Јованвб 19:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. No, sorry. No big activity in home-wikis: [1], [2] and on Meta. We need active stewards. —Innv {ru-ws} 03:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Per innv. Sorry. Pmlineditor  07:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Galandil 09:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Treublatt 10:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. say's self, he's not the most active. We don't neet more not active Stewards. Marcus Cyron 11:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I should make it clear that I meant I'm not the most active en.wiktionary admin, mostly because it's not a project I'm most competent to contribute to and also, they are not the ones in most need of active admins (my personal opinion). I do not intend to be an inactive steward ... then I'll rather ask for my rights to be revoked. --EivindJ 08:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. per Innv + Marcus Cyron --MF-W 14:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Quedel 16:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Per Innv. A Stop at Willoughby 19:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Saehrimnir 08:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Uwe Gille 15:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Julius1990 17:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Tony1 10:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. no activity sorry. Corruptcopper 15:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Modernist 14:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --SM 11:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Oppose Oppose I need to see clear cut demonstrations of leadership... Being a sysop on one wiki doesn't show me much. If you were a 'crat I would reconsider. Dusti 01:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Very good knowledge of languages, but little activity. --Sulmues 16:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Jpeeling 19:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oppose Oppose Bolo1910 07:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oppose Oppose SergeyJ 16:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I'm Sorry, I just can't vote for someone with the recent activity you have had especially with the lack of xwiki work. I hope if you are really interested in it that you nominate yourself again later. James (T C) 23:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Prodego talk 01:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. You should already have been an editor and you should have known that.Botteville 20:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. He might have much technicial ability since he is web developer. However, I am not sure that he will be active. Octahedron80 03:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I can't oppose but I don't want to support :P --MisterWiki 05:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -MBK004 05:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Tiptoety talk 08:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Vyk 09:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Per Octahedron cassius1213 10:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I can't decide to either support or oppose. So I be neutral. -Barras talk 11:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. He has a big editcount, but is only a sysop in one wiki and no more. -- Tofra Talk contributions 15:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure which way to go. Plenty of editing experience but few of the "important" rights such as sysop. 1ForTheMoney 16:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    FWIW, candidate has sysop at one wiki, and is former sysop at another. Pmlineditor  16:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    On further reflection, moving to support. 1ForTheMoney 16:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Why a former sysop? Dusti 01:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Took a wiki-break, and I don't think any project needs inactive sysops. Now that I'm back, I can get sysop rights back at any time, but I won't ask for it during this election, as it might come out a bit wrong. I'm not going to ask for sysop rights just to become a steward. --EivindJ 09:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Not enough recent activity, not enough editing sorry Chaosdruid 17:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. I can't decide. I'm not very convinced... VonTasha 18:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Woudloper 23:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC) experience in multiple wikis is a pro, not being active in cross-wiki maintenance is a contra: I'm undecided[reply]
    Also not convinced. This user may just be a power seeker and also aren't 3 of the language he/she claims to be fluent in pretty much the same. I know there are many differences and that they're each classed as languages (not dialects) but Danish, Swedish and Norweigan aren't quite as impressive as, for example, Japanese, Spanish and Urdu.--Xania 02:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) On second thoughts I am disinclined to vote against this user. I understand why he indicates his language skills as he did and he is honest and upfront about not knowing everything about being a steward. I may change this vote to 'support' later but for now consider this as neutral.--Xania 22:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miyagawa 09:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. per some of the above. --FiliP ██ 11:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Could be not a bad steward, but unlikely to be active enough. --Specious 12:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fruggo 14:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Seems competent; languages are certainly a plus; not sure you're active enough.[reply]
  15. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) tried hard to see how the yes vote would go but these stats [3] [4] [5] were not convincing.[reply]
    - Bjoertvedt 18:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC) - probably a good candidate, but extremely sparse information at his userpage does not point to a notion for openness. After having read his answers at dte discussion page, I change from neutral to favourable. Bjoertvedt 22:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. He'd be a very nice steward because of his skills in many languages and in IT, but I don't think he'll be active. --FollowTheMedia 22:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Activity concerns, but otherwise good language skill. I'm on the fence here. Pohta ce-am pohtit 22:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Juanjosemarin1 23:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Decltype 09:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. I'm kind of indecisive at the moment. I'd like to support you but your recent inactivity worries me. --Mercy 09:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. we need more active ppl --Mardetanha talk 14:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]