Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2021/Votes/VASHGIRD

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: tg-N, fa-1, ru-2, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, I am Dustmorad, from Tajikistan. My home wiki is Tajik Wikipedia, but I am also active in Persian Wikipedia, Russian Wikipedia and sometimes in English Wikipedia and Wikidata and Commons. I have been active since 2012 (except for a few days a month all my working time). I speak Tajik, but I can also read Persian, Russian, English and Uzbek, although my writing is not perfect. I am the administrator of the Tajik Wikipedia. In this project, I have worked in many areas.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#VASHGIRD


Yes

[edit]
  1. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Moral support Mardetanha (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nurtenge (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nebydlogop (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nebydlogop (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Why not give him a try? ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 02:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tickle me (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Why not. --Tickle me (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. .snoopy. (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   .snoopy. 13:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nirmaljoshi (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nirmaljoshi (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jeromi Mikhael (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2021   Competent enough, not a jerk. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. تاورنیه (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   PedramTalk 08:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   VKG1985 (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   It appears they want to violate the homewiki policy. Rschen7754 14:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   The statement is not clear about why he is running; the answers to the questions were unclear and do suggest that the plan is to use the steward rights to act as a "super-bureaucrat" on the home wiki. MF-W 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Clueless user, sadly. The answers to the questions set for him were poor, and did not supply answers to the questions set for all candidates. Leaderboard (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   per MF-W. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Cross-wiki activity is not enough. Also, I think his/her answers to questions isn't clear. --Uncitoyentalk 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Their answers indicate they wish to act as stewards on their homewiki, which violates the steward policy. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Unaware of steward responsibilities. Savhñ 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Per others. Stryn (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   These rights are not given for one wiki (tg.wikipedia) instead of bureaucrat rights; are given for all Wikimedia wikis (see Special:Diff/21018845). Also, the user does not has very much cross-wiki activity (see Special:CentralAuth/VASHGIRD). --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Per Savh. AGK ■ 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Majavah (talk!) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   --IWI (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   per the homewiki management concerns expressed by others above — xaosflux Talk 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fails User:-revi/SEV#3. — regards, Revi 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Af koan Foi 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minorax (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   No. Giraffer (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Per Rschen7754 and MF-Warburg. Natuur12 (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Miniapolis 16:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   per MF-W. Sorry! CptViraj (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   ミラP@Miraclepine 16:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  26. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Aranya (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Aranya (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 17:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  29. 1989 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   1989 (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sorry I cannot support you becoming a "super" crat. Thank you for volunteering but a steward role isn't this. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mz7 (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  34. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I think it's very possible that the homewiki concerns are a language-based misunderstanding, but the fact that it wasn't further clarified is enough by itself for me to say no. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 22:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  35. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   dwf² 01:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Not really impressed with this candidate. JavaHurricane 02:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  37. H78c67c (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Shows intention to violate the Stewards policy. H78c67c (talk) 03:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Per others' concerns. Sorry. Elliot321 (talk) 04:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   They either are not good at communicating their thoughts or they just want to be a steward so they can act like a supersysop on their homewiki. In both cases I can not vote for them. Meiræ 08:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Jack Frost (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Possible misconceptions about stewards' role, not enough crosswiki experience. –Ejs-80 11:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  43. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   KPFC💬 12:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Johannnes89 (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  46. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   The steward role is not for use on your home wiki, sorry. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  47. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   It is not entirely clear to me why this user wants to be a steward. DraconicDark (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  48. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Des Vallee (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Be careful who you give this immense power to, Stewards aren't synops. Des Vallee (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Des Vallee (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hasley (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sgd. —Hasley 23:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   FASTILY 02:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  53. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Sadly not enough understanding of the role. –MJLTalk 05:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   スチュワードの役割を理解していないように思える Kocgs (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  56. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   MarioJump83! 09:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  57. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  59. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Unfortunately the user does not really understand what a steward is supposed to do — NickK (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Not enough cross-wiki experience, statement is not really convincing. Daniuu (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  61. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per all. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  62. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   No main reason given for wanting stewardship. SK2242 (talk) 18:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Packa (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Per MF-Warburg. Sorry, too. Packa (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Did not answer my question to oversight false vanishing, or I might have voted yes. Jusjih (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  65. TrudiJ (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   The statement doesn't provide information about their motivation and expertise for becoming a steward. TrudiJ (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Steward rights are not given out without a need therefore. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   – Ammarpad (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   Kudpung (talk) 13:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  70. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 13:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hiàn (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Iluvatar (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Doesn't really give that many reasons on why they should be a steward. Toad62 (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   not really a good presentation Chz (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Asartea (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   per MF-W and Martin Urbanec. Asartea Talk (Enwiki Talk (preferred)) 18:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Did not answer to questions for all candidates. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  78. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  79. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 23:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  81. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Alaa :)..! 17:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   per MF-W too Zezen (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  83. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Nehaoua (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  85. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per Rschen7754 Wim b 14:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 09:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Not enough understanding of the role. He can be burocrat on his own wiki. Bikarhêner (talk) 11:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  91. فيصل (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Faisal talk 05:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Geagea (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per Rschen7754. Geagea (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Seria muito valioso alguém com o conhecimento desses idiomas para compor o quadro de Steward, mas o usuário ainda não parece entender as funções básicas do cargo. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Geraki TL 19:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  96. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   --AVSmalnad77 talk 12:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   T4B (talk) 11:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Gereon K. (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Per above. — Jules Talk 11:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 14:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  103. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Per Rschen7754 & Martin Urbanec.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  104. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   — csc-1 23:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  109. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Can't tell if this is a joke or not. JLavigne508 (talk) 14:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Appears to only want to be a "super" crat on their homewiki, Also opposing on the lack of answers to Wolf. –Davey2010Talk 18:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  111. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Not enough reasons of why should they become a steward. User3749 (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   not sure if this person knows what they're doing. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ~ Amory (utc) 19:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  116. ZabeMath (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   ZabeMath (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  117. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  119. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  120. P,TO 19104 (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   P,TO 19104 (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Unfortunately, I must concur with those of my colleagues who question the candidate's understanding of the role or whether the candidate knows what they are doing. ——SerialNumber54129 17:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  126. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Ahmad252 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Ahmadtalk 14:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Charitwo (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Lack of understanding what steward role is for at this point. I do hope this changes in the future. Base (talk) 12:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Kizule (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Maynich (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Firestar464 (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V21:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Ahmetlii (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 21:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I would like to be able to vote yes (I think more involvement from wiki editors from smaller wikis is very important) but I didn't feel like the candidate was responsive to some of the questions asked. Jmbranum (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sashatrk (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sashatrk (talk) 14:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   My feelings are similar to those of Jmbranum. I don't see any glaring red flags and he has a lot of experience, but more clarity is needed on the questions and the statement, especially more justification for the desire for stewardship. NK1406 (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   DannyS712 (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]