Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2021/Votes/Charitwo

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Charitwo

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-N
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone, I am Charitwo and I've been a contributor for a little over 14 years. I started out in the very beginning with random edits and anti-vandalism work on Wikipedia, where lately I've found myself getting involved with improving bird related articles as needed as I have been a bird owner for a couple years now and it's nice to be involved with content again!

    I've also spent time contributing to various parts of the project including as a local administrator at MediaWiki.org for the last 7 years and spent a year as freenode staff (directly assisting projects including ours) and then a year as a WMF group contact on IRC under the nickname c where I am still very active helping with channel moderation and access mod duties across several channels including #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and #wikimedia-gsconnect and as a global op maintaining the project wide ban list along with making the current group contacts workload a little easier!

    With the advent of a global pandemic I began working from home in March and found myself with more free time to focus on another aspect of volunteering on-wiki due to the added availability and flexibility of working from home. So I'd like to put my experience back into the community as a steward.

    While my cross-wiki activity on WMF has been sporadic, I do already have extensive experience dealing with cross-wiki spam, vandalism, and long term abuse as a Volunteer Spam Task Force (VSTF) (which is now called SOAP[!?]) member for Wikia/Fandom accumulating over 100K+ global edits on 300K+ wikis over two years with performing an innumerous number of blocks, checkusers, deletions, and oversights. Their policies regarding usage and privacy are not unlike the policies here.

    If elected, my focus will be on teaming up with the existing Stewards in keeping the queues much more manageable. The various queues under Steward requests get backlogged and we can make a bigger impact this year by having a strong, dedicated team. Like others I am available on IRC at the aforementioned channels for any issues that may require immediate attention.

    I hope my longevity with the project, the number of areas of contributed to during that time and my experience with cross-wiki cleanup in general should be sufficient for election in addition to my meeting the all the requirements for candidacy. I look forward to providing the same dedication I've put in other areas of our community into stewardship.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Charitwo


Yes

[edit]
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  I think they should be given a chance. CptViraj (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vit Koz (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Трэба даць чалавеку шанец. Vit; talk 17:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  My experiences with Charitwo on IRC and in the MediaWiki project have generally been positive. I'm disappointed that others don't see MediaWiki.org as a co-equal Wikimedia project. Legoktm (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  I think he will be a good steward Nurtenge (talk) 07:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Wiwik P (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  I'm unsure of the procedure to change my vote, but I would like to. After a discussion with this candidate they managed to alleviate my concerns, both about them being globally locked on Wikia, and about their homewiki being mediawiki.org. While this probably won't affect the fate of this candidacy, I would like my vote to be updated if possible. Elliot321 (talk) 02:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Competent and will probably be a fine steward Whiteguru (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Eatcha (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021 •  Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 06:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mahedi181 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Mahedi Hasan (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Jmbranum (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       SVG (Not eligible, checked by Xaosflux) •  Tim (SVG) 19:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Gereon K. (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Wil540 art (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  🍀 Wil540 art (talk) 01:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 03:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Vikrantkorde (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Vikrantkorde (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  WikiAviator (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 13:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Coming in with 2,000 edits over 14 years makes a mockery of a steward's need to be engaged with the Wikimedia community in order to judge consensus. Also (as you can probably guess) am not a fan of the borderline arrogance displayed on the questions page. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Herby talk thyme 14:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Does not inspire confidence. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Unappealing candidate. Even if I were to ignore the bizarrely low number of edits and the weird case of never having an RfA, your answers were similarly bad. Your answer to the "uniqueness" question was generic, and your answer to the "bizarre situations" problem is not what a good steward should do in my opinion. Leaderboard (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Blablubbs (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  I cannot vote for someone who has little to none of Wikimedia experience. Also, status of this Fandom user is very interesting. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Not convinced the user has sufficient experience to contribute to the steward duties. Savhñ 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  No previous activity that suggests they would be a fitting steward. MF-W 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  ミラP@Miraclepine 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Can not trust. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  AGK ■ 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Very limited cross-wiki experience, and no demonstrated need for the permission. --IWI (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Very low contributions across all projects and lack of advanced permissions on any content projects. — xaosflux Talk 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  I cannot in good conscience support a candidate who was unable to answer specific, simple questions about edits and who has no cross wiki work whatsoever and almost no edits in the last decade to even their home wiki. The reliance on their fandom work - which they did not even provide a link to - is irrelevant to Wikimedia, however presenting themselves as a checkuser and advance right holder on a project where they are globally locked is beyond concerning to the point that this users candidacy almost seems like trolling. Praxidicae (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Very little cross-wiki contribution in a very long period of time (Special:CentralAuth/Charitwo). --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Saroj Uprety (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Stryn (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  No cross-wiki activity. He/she isn't active even on his/her main wiki. I'm not satisfied with some of his/her answers (especilally Fandom). --Uncitoyentalk 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Not a sysop on any content wikis and per above pretty much. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Fails User:-revi/SEV#3 (possibly 1). — regards, Revi 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Spicy (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Dylsss (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Af koan Foi 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  26. ZabeMath (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  ZabeMath (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Minorax (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User456541 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Having 100k edits on Wikia is not a reason to be a steward here –User456541 15:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  This user doesn't seem to understand the core value's of Wikimedia. When someone tries to convince you that their bizarre arguments are really true, the first reaction shouldn't be "troll, let's ignore". We should assume good faith. Also, answers to the other questions aren't convincing. Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  30. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Miniapolis 16:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Negligible relevant experience, no community trust, no cross-project work (or...any work), and sub-par answers to questions. Vermont (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per several others above (particularly Prax and Vermont) - negligible Wikimedia participation for a role of this magnitude, Fandom/Wikia is irrelevant to me, I do not believe they have demonstrated that they have the community participation or trust necessary for Stewarship. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  34. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Sysop only on mediawiki. MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  35. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  SQLQuery me! 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  per Praxidicae. Majavah (talk!) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  * Pppery * it has begun 16:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Aranya (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Aranya (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per Praxidicae Kb03 (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  I cannot accept a candidate whose only adminship that qualifies is one without any vote, and was just handled out by trust by a crat. I will like to see SE as not the 1st vote anyone had undertaken. There is also insufficient crosswiki activity, and wikia/fandom have no place here in determing experience - they are disparate projects. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Not enough experience on Wikimedia projects, unfortunately. Mz7 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  42. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Perryprog (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  I really wish this wasn't the case, but I doubt the skills and knowledge Wikia requires overlap enough with what Stewardship requires. Perryprog (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Not enough experience. Kusurija (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Seems like trolling. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 20:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  No experience. Samuele2002 (Talk!) 20:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  47. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  48. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Thanks for your work. Collect more Admin Experience DrTrumpet (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  49. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  dwf² ✉ 01:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  50. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  No crosswiki experience over 14 years. JavaHurricane 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  mediawiki.org isn't really a content-wiki, this user doesn't meet the spirit of the rules listed at Stewards/Elections 2021/Guidelines#Candidates Elliot321 (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Changed to support after discussion with the candidate, see above. Elliot321 (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  I'm sorry, but this is a hard no. 1) You were never elected to hold any trusted position on any Wikimedia project (MediaWiki is not a content wiki and you received your sysop role there without any vote by a direct request while also having made barely any edits there). 2) Your overall edit count is low and you don't have any cross-wiki experience. Meiræ 06:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  mirinano (talk) 08:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Jack Frost (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Not enough experience. –Ejs-80 10:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Michel Bakni (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Imetsia (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  59. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Needs to be more active on projects here rather than on Wikia. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  60. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  DraconicDark (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  61. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Per everyone else OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Patrik L. (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  concerns with experience FASTILY 01:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Enjoyer of World (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Not even funny. Enjoyer of World (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Maynich (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Mirer (talk) 05:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Kocgs (talk) 08:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  69. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Not enough experience, low number of edits is quite far below the threshold for a steward. MarioJump83! 08:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Man77 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021 •  As always my "No" to monolingual stewards. → «« Man77 »» [de] 10:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  71. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Gripweed (talk) 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  73. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  I think the cross-wiki experience is very weak. I would expect a steward have a bigger editing experience to have a better understanding of how our editing communities work, especially the smaller ones — NickK (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Giraffer (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Daniuu (talk) 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  76. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Sorry, but the Simply because it's the position I applied to take responsibility for, like any job I've ever worked (even volunteer work) answer to "Why would you be active here?" sinks this for me. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  77. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021 •  Not enough activity, barely any presence at AfD. SK2242 (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Too inexperienced with English only. Jusjih (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  I think you might need to contribute more on wikimedia sites. Especially on small wiki site. In your contribution history you mainly edit in English Wikipedia. But, your contributions there cannot that me vote for yes, it's too less. Wish you can contribute more on small wikis like English Wikinews. ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Not enough xwiki experience. Sun8908 (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Nosebagbear (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Far too little experience Nosebagbear (talk) 10:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  – Ammarpad (talk) 11:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021 •  Kudpung (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  84. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Hiàn (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Cbyd (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Although I'm appreciating the user's regular contributions for over 10 years; there's not enough editing experience even in non-Wikipedia wikis, which is vital for a steward.Ahmetlii (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen) •  Toad62 (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  89. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Zppix (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021 •  Zppix (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Juan90264 (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  92. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  --Alaa :)..! 17:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  93. YoungstownToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  YoungstownToast (talk) 21:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  gobonobo + c 07:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  This a cross wiki function and large part of the job is multilanguage and someone that only speaks one language is not the right person of this job. Carsrac (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  96. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Not enough experience in Wikimedia projects. AVSmalnad77 talk 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  97. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Extremely limited experience, no language skills other than English. AFBorchert (talk) 10:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 20:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Mfb (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Essentially zero activity outside of English-speaking communities mfb (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Pouca atividade cross-wiki. Resposta às perguntas não surpreenderam. Tenho certeza de que tem potencial para demonstrar mais afinidade com as tarefas dos Stewards desde que interaja mais nos processos relacionados. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Geraki TL 19:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  102. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Sorry, but personally with an average of 22 contributions per year (Wikiscan and Xtools), the applicant has not acquired the necessary bases to apply for the position. DePlusJean (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       Storkk (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Storkk (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  not enough experience T4B (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  You have no crosswiki activity. If we look projects in other languages than English, then you have made less than 5 edits in everyone of them. You are not ready to work in multilingual community. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Too little on-wiki (I mean Wikimedia wikis) experience, imho. — Jules Talk 10:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Rzuwig► 11:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  108. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Insufficient actual community involvement. Having a barely-used account for 14 years is basically meaningless.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  20:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  109. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  *Youngjin (talk) 04:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mercy (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021 •  Nowhere near the requisite level of experience. — csc-1 22:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  113. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  NK1406 (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  114. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  <Could use a bit more time on wikimedia as per this role in my opinion.>. JLavigne508 (talk) 13:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Lack of experience and piss-poor editing activity. If it was 1 April I would've assumed this was an April fools joke!. –Davey2010Talk 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Dash77 (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Insufficient experience Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Negative, per Rschen7754. There's no real harm in arroganc when it's deserved; unfortunately, in this candidature, it is not. ——SerialNumber54129 16:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mrschimpf (talk) 04:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  – bradv🍁 20:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  125. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  masti <talk> 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Kallichore (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  --Kallichore (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Nadzik (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  I am absolutely pro MWW work and such as the main focus, I am also happy that they have relevant experience elsewhere, but the scale of contributions to Wikimedia wikis is just too small to give the most advanced technical flag off it at this point. Base (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Zblace (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Zblace (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Kizule (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  痛心疾首 (talk) 04:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. นคเรศ (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Nakaret (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  I just don't want to pile on. I haven't looked at the questions, but I did find their wiki-resume to be rather adequate (just not for a potential steward- though it is more than I think people are giving credit for). If Charitwo put their mind to it, I could probably support this next year with sufficient cross-wiki experience. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. TSK201911 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  TSK201911 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Firestar464 (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. WhitePhosphorus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  I feel like Charitwo is capable enough and all they need is more interactions with Wikimedia community and more cross-wiki experience on Wikimedia wikis. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Per WhitePhosphorus. Hope they can bring their so-called expertise in fandom to Wikimedia 94rain Talk 13:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  PoetVeches (talk) 13:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Veracious (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Chz (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  KPX8 (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Csisc (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Small cross-wiki experience Mykola7 (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Zabia (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Gampe (talk) 10:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  26. chansey (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Honestly, I am not sure. Cross-wiki experience is important for stewards. chansey message? 13:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  The X-tool editcounter and the Wikiscan stats give me an idea this is a beginner. I'm not gonna vote NO, this is not to slaughter the candidate, but I do 2000 edits in 6 weeks (the last years). I'm sure Charitwo has other qualities to become a steward, but not this year. The cross-wiki experience is limited and I don't have a clue what Charitwo can do as steward, she/he has to learn everything from others (things that non-stewards sometimes already know). So thanks for your candidacy, maybe in a few years? Richardkiwi (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Darkhan 17:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  User3749 (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  — Robert Važan (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2021/Votes/Charitwo&oldid=23803437"