Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2014/Votes/TBloemink

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

TBloemink (Tomas Bloemink)

[edit]
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

TBloemink talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

  • Languages: nl, en-4, de-1
  • Personal info: Hi there. I am TBloemink and I'd like to be a candidate in the 2014 Steward Elections. I registered in 2009 but never got active. I really started editing in March 2010, and have been active ever since (with a few breaks). I became active on nl.wikipedia, where I became an administrator in November 2011. Later, started patrolling edits outside nlwiki. I already joined the SWMT and became global rollbacker in January 2012 (diff for transparity), and global sysop in February 2013(diff). Both these tools have been really helpful fighting crosswiki vandalism and doing other tasks like fighting spambots. I have asked the stewards' help for these to get these locked and IP's global blocked, checks done and such. I am also an administrator on Wikidata, where I help out with the requests for deletion. I love to help people around on IRC and on-wiki and therefore I am also a member of the e-mail response team for info-nl (otrs). I'd like to help the Wikimedia wiki's in every way I can and like, and I'd like to join the stewards' team so I can help out and protect these wiki's and their users even easier (for example, spambot and/or vandalism attacks and checkusers done), and of course continue to fight vandalism like I already did. I have read the policies, understand and respect these, and will abide by them. I can be found on various IRC channels like #wikipedia-nlconnect, #cvn-swconnect and #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and I can be reached by e-mail very easily and most time of the day. If in any doubt, I will ask another steward for assistance. Some people might note my activity: in my opinion I am active enough to do stuff without problems. If real-life problems which obstruct my work as a steward do come up, I will voluntarily step down, or leave a notice on my user page (in other words, I won't be gone without a notice). Also, because I still have classes, sometimes I am not able to edit, but am able to do requests like SRP and global (b)locks. If you do have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them. Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2014/Questions#TBloemink


Yes

[edit]
  2. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I trust him, he is experienced with SWMT (cross-wiki work), is already a GS and an admin on nlwiki. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 18:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Active with the SWMT. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ronn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Ronn (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I have worked with TBloemink before at places like Wikidata and have made a few requests to them. During those times, I have not had issues regarding their judgement and I do trust them. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  JurgenNL (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Alan (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Wiki13 talk 18:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Érico Wouters msg 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Brateevsky (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  No problem. İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kippenvlees1 (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. LlamaAl (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  LlamaAl (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Okay. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. kasir (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kasir talk 19:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  DangSunM (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jasper Deng (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Stryn (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  --Allan Aguilar • /t/ 20:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. D Eaketts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  D Eaketts (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Stefan Knauf (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I hope you will be active. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Mbch331 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Southparkfan 22:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Hosiryuhosi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. AGK (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  AGK [•] 23:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Tjako (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Trusted user Tjako (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  31. SamanthaPuckettIndo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Ok. SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hym411 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —레비Revi 04:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  35. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Henryk Borawski (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Henryk Borawski (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       HiddenKnowledge (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  HiddenKnowledge (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  37. PWester (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  PWester (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ivan Štambuk (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Conny (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Conny (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  40. JetzzDG (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  JetzzDG (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FiliP ██ 12:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Laaknor (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Inkowik (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  --IW 16:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  45. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Balko Kabo (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Balko (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. FakirNL (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  would I trust this user as a Steward? Yes. FakirNL (talk) 23:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Abd (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Abd (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  49. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Looks responsible and works cross-wiki. GyaroMaguus (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Saschaporsche (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Saschaporsche (talk) 06:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  xwiki work and decision-making looks good, may get a rude shock that you cannot interrogate all spambots  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Павел Петро (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kazkaskazkasako (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Pratyya (Hello!) 15:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by MF-Warburg)2014 •  Zerabat (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Clockery (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Clockery Fairfeld (talk • enWS) 17:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Wikit 19:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  - ʈucoxn\talk 20:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Midnight Gambler (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Midnight Gambler (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jusjih (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Marcel coenders (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  <optional comments>. Marcel coenders (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Courcelles 03:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. John Reaves (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  John Reaves (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Alberto568 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Alberto568 (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Sammyday (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Fagairolles 34 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Fagairolles 34 (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Burgerhallojan (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Burgerhallojan (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Guerillero 02:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  —Locke Cole • t • c 00:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  I approve. I'm pleased so many candidates are not threatened by their limited abilities to use languages other than their native one. Wpollard (talk) 03:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. יונה בנדלאק (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  [[user:יונה בנדלאק|Yona B.] 11:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Elfix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  He's okay. Elfix 12:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wikiklaas (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Wikiklaas (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Member of SWMT with experience Rome2 (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. EKMK (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  EKMK (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Mr. Stradivarius (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  The availability concerns raised in the oppose section don't bother me so much. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  I trust him. Abaddon1337 (talk) 11:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  CT Cooper · talk 17:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •   Hazard SJ  03:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Technical 13 (talk) 03:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. KundaliniZero (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  KundaliniZero (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Active and helpful, knows how to use the tools wisely and will take on those matters he feels most comfortable with MoiraMoira (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Erik009 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Erik009 (talk) 13:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Jim Fitzgerald (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 • Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Tremonist (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Tremonist (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. The Anonymouse (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  No concerns, crosswiki experience. Recent activity (or perceived lack thereof) isn’t an issue for me. The Anonymouse [talk] 19:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Tonelada (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Tonelada (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Tiyang (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Respectfully, Tiyang (talk) 06:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  Thehelpfulone 02:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Rcsprinter123 (talk) 13:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Gabriel Kielland (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Gabriel Kielland (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. This, that and the other (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  This, that and the other (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Maleine258 (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. JordiCuber (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  I am de:Benutzer:Jordi (Diff). To check my eligibility see my user page, thx.--JordiCuber (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Aurora (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ...Aurora... (talk) 02:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  FASTILY 09:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. nickispeaki (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  --Nickispeaki (talk) 02:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Soap (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Soap (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Unimog404 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Unimog404 (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Lymantria (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Lymantria (talk) 13:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Coffins (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Coffins (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Annabel (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Annabel (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Teles (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  If all the risk is having an inactive steward, I will take it and expect that he will help a little. Worst scenario is removing his tools next year. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. I am One of Many (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  I am One of Many (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by matanya)2014 •  Not sure yet, per Snowolf. Trijnsteltalk 22:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC) vote moved Convinced by Teles. Trijnsteltalk 11:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Eonzoikos (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Eonzoikos (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Dqfn13 (Eligible, checked by Dqfn13)2014 •  Trustwurthy and honest. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by JurriaanH)2014 •  JurriaanH (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. TheGeneralUser (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  TheGeneralUser (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Meno25 (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Tegel (Talk) 16:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  2. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I am afraid that such "volatile activity" would result in having an inactive steward rubin16 (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I share Rubin16's and Snowolf's concerns. If you succeed to be active less volatilely I would happily support you in 2015. Vogone talk 22:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  I have to agree with Snowolf so I vote no. You are not verry active and sometimes I got the feeling that you overlook the consequenses when dealing with more difficult cases. I respect you and your work but there are some concerns. I got the idea that you think quite black and white sometimes and that you miss the nuances. Natuur12 (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Георгий Суворов (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Георгий Суворов (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Cedalyon (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Base (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Not now. I don't want to have one more inactive stew. But sure constant work would turn my vote in future to the positive section. Base (talk) 20:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Woodcutterty (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Woodcutterty (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bijltjespad (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Bijltjespad (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC). Why should you be a steward if you are not very active?[reply]
  10. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I really enjoy working with TBloemink from time to time, but I share some of Natuur12's concerns: I'm not yet sure enough about his capability to judge issues critically and independently. As of now, I think the role of global sysop would suit him better than stewardship. Mathonius (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Jafeluv (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Obelix (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       فلورانس (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Florence (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Drzewianin (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Dick Bos (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Rzuwig► 19:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. ZeaForUs (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •   Klaas|Z4␟V:  11:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reverts valid edits; doesn't respect the rule Assume Good Faith[reply]
    Could you give an example? From what I've seen, TBloemink seems to do a good job with reverting, PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Promising candidate, but too early for such a cumulation of functions. IJzeren Jan (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by TeleComNasSprVen)2014 •  Ronhjones (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2014 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20. MichaelSchoenitzer (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 17:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Timk70 question? 23:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  per IJzeren Jan. MZaplotnik (contribs) 10:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Gamma127 (Eligible, checked by Avraham)2014 •  Gamma127 (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I fear that there is too much "volatibility" in your profile. Sometimes you're very involved in the project, and sometimes very absent from it. Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per Mathonius. MF-W 20:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26. OhanaUnited (Eligible, checked by Einsbor)2014 •  OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fontes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  The "volatile" activity is a reasonable concern. I do appreciate the willingness to perform such tasks among users but I do wonder if it's not about the 'rank' accumulation. Please just be more (steadily) active in the current roles. Fontes (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Reade (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Reade (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Mátyás (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  FeralOink (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  2. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Emin • message 19:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  TBloemink's been working with the SWMT for a quite a long time now, but his activity levels have been volatile and I wonder whether they match the high number of permissions he has sought and obtained in the past and currently holds. Snowolf How can I help? 19:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Per above. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  David1010 (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Bene* (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Bene* (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bill william compton (Eligible, checked by LlamaAl)2014 •  Bill william compton (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  per Snowolf Chris Troutman (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  I share the concerns raised above. I'm not convinced enough to support but won't put a spoke in his wheel if he gets the approval of the rest of the community. Quentinv57 (talk) 19:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 •  Niesy74 (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kapsuglan (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2014 •  Kapsuglan (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2014 •  per Vogone. Glaisher [talk] 17:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Alan)2014 • --Hubertl (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Glaisher)2014 •  ST ○ 22:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oursdesmontagnes (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2014 •  Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 11:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Waka Waka (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Barras)2014 •  Bpierreb (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       LessayCatus (Not eligible, checked by Alan) •  LessayCatus (talk) 10:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
       Benjamlikesjam (Not eligible, checked by Avraham) •  Benjamlikesjam (talk) 03:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2014 •  Harlock81 (talk) 08:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2014/Votes/TBloemink&oldid=19971436"