Stewards/Confirm/2015/Wikitanvir

Wikitanvir

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages:
Personal info: This steward did not create their confirmation page before the start of the comment phase. Page created on behalf of the Election Committee by Snowolf

Hi, although late, but I believe I have very good reason for that. I had real emergency in my personal life which came just a about a week ago before the confirmation. Previously I talked to my fellow steward colleagues and thought briefly about seeking reconfirmation or stepping down. I thought a lot and made up my mind.
I have been a steward for quite a while now. Truth be told, I was mostly inactive during last year. I was stuck with my real life (not this present emergency I am dealing with) issues and could not find enough time to be active as a steward. But I have always missed it and I hope to be active this year as I look for more stability in my personal life. Nevertheless I cannot guarantee future but I have decided to seek confirmation for at least once more so I can have this one chance to continue my work as a steward. I believe I have still the trust of the community (and my account was never compromised during the inactivity level) so it will allow me to give me a chance to continue for another year. I hope you will understand.
So it is up to you fine people. I will be friendly and active whether or not I pass this confirmation. It's just a matter of finding scope which I hope I will find in this coming year. Thank you.

— T. 18:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

Comments about Wikitanvir

Remove Unfortunately no reconfirm statement. Thanks for your past service! Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no reconfirm statement --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Alan ^(talk) 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately, it seems that Wikitanvir has moved on. Remove, with thanks for their work. --Rs chen 7754 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that there is a statement, I would prefer that Wikitanvir returns to a greater level of activity first and runs again in the future. --Rs chen 7754 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral none against but it seems he cannot longer be active. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Long time is not active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Eurodyne (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen remove, with thanks for your work.--Enst38 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above--DangSunM (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~per Rschen. Thank you for your contributions and hopefully we will see more from you soon.~~ On second thought. Green Giant (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, statement about his activity is not really convincing although I have nothing against his work — NickK (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Atcovi (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Nah, it's fine, don't sacrifice your IRL for wikis too much. In the end it's your own life, not us, it's your own decision and I am sure you will take the best course of action for your own well being, be well and farewell Wikitanvir.--AldNon^Bicara? 00:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
remove sadly due to the policy. :-( —DerHexer (Talk) 01:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral His statement makes me problematic. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove was quite active before but only one action since March last year..alas ..--Ste moc 01:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Although stewards policy says any steward inactive (as a steward) will have their steward permissions removed and inactive means with steward actions amounting to zero for the past 6 months and less than 10 in the last year, I don't think inactive steward will harm Wikimedia. I will not vote remove until we can elect stewards any time or stewards removed due to inactivity may be restored without further discussion as long as there are no issues.--GZWDer (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep. Please write the statement on time.--Jusjih (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Pundit (talk) 07:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose White Master (e s) 09:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :(. Maybe run again next year if you have more time? Ajraddatz (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm willing to give you two, three, four chances. But please take them this time, if others are willing to give it too. Trijnstel_talk 13:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - I'd like to hear from you soon if you already know if you will become active again or that the IRL issues just don't make it possible. Southparkfan 19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Considering there has been a valid reason why no statement page was created, I am ready to give Wikitanvir one more chance to get more active. His past absence has been a noticable loss already. Vogone (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Aldnonymous, Ajraddatz, Trijnstel and Vogone — Arkanosis ^✉ 21:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A confirmation statement is a statement whether it's by the due date or not.--Xania (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactivity. Widr (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baffled that something as menial as not creating a reconfirmation statement can cause such consternation ... Bureaucracy at its finest. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- with my respect and admiration. I respect his judgment, and I've come to consider him a friend. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 05:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Wants to keep the steward rights just to have them, while explicitly refusing the slightest commitment to the community and the duties that come with that position. Sorry. Troubled @sset ^{Work • Talk • Mail} 12:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per the inactivity policy. Mike V • Talk 21:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Trijnstel's and Vogone's comments above. --თოგო ^(D) 16:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Berlin-George (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Rcsprinter123 (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Tanvir is always friendly, capable and willing to help in so many ways. It is sad to see that real life is taking your time, but I am sure you are following a good path. Please, return with more activity this year if you can. It is also fine if you don't and I am sure you will keep helping WMF projects somehow. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 17:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've mostly no problems with stewards with little activity (using the Steward tools is not a duty or a responsibility and the number of users with these tools is not limited, AFAIK). The problem is when they start pulling away and getting out of touch with the projects (missing about new policies, tools, etc.) and then cannot at least give well-thought inputs on the current issues. I'm mostly okay with Tanvir staying for another year, but I would like to see him more often in the Stewards' internal discussions. Keep Elfix 10:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No statement StudiesWorld (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral With other responsibilities in WMF world and ill family, you would think that is enough on one's plate, periods of inactivity are okay, though are not the purpose of the tools — billinghurst sDrewth 11:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ///EuroCarGT 01:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Thanks for all your contributions to Wikimedia! Glaisher (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Elfix --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Sidelight12 03:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - IAR if we need to! Thehelpfulone 00:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Tanvir is honest, skilled and trustworthy. I hope he takes into consideration this new chance people are willing to give him and makes a come back in the coming term. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 17:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]