Jump to content

Meta:Requests for checkuser/Johannnes89

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Johannnes89

[edit]

Not ending before 9 March 2025 06:59 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Johannes, steward and admin on metawiki & dewiki. I mainly work in fighting crosswiki spam and LTA. Usually LWCU is sufficient for that purpose (see my stats for the past months [1]), but when spammers / LTA use sleeper accounts, LWCU is not possible, as it only shows registration data and (just like regular CU) only for the last 90 days. Hence the ability to do local checks via metawiki would be helpful. This would also allow detecting sockpuppets more effectively for LTAs known to switch proxy IPs after registering. I'm also happy to assist at Meta:Requests for CheckUser information, although there are just a few requests per year. Thanks for your consideration and your feedback! --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Support Support--Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 07:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support, no brainer. aqurs ❄️ 07:08, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Support sure! --Wüstenspringmaus talk 07:38, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong support Strong support One of the easiest strong supports I can make. //shb (t • c) 07:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Support. Svārtava (tɕ) 08:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Support --Arcticocean ■ 08:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 08:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support with frustration, because this is something that Meta:MSR should be explicitly allowing instead of having stewards apply for local CU here. But that isn't Johannes' problem. Leaderboard (talk) 08:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Communicating with local CUs for data is not that difficult in meta. It done that way in all other wikis with local CUs. BRP ever 10:44, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, but stewards are unique in that they often need to work with CU data in multiple forms. Half of the stewards have admin/CU/OS just because of how restrictive MSR is. Leaderboard (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    How it is interpreted. The intention between MSR was a completely different one when it was created. Some individual changes[2][3][4] (reflecting common practice) have turned MSR into something counterproductive. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The original proposal is much more sensible. Leaderboard (talk) 06:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Support AramilFeraxa (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support --M/ (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support and disagree with Leaderboard about MSR --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support sure! --TenWhile6 13:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support sounds good. Ternera (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. --Stïnger （会話） 13:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  15. Support Support until we have a proper global checkuser, Meta checkuser is the next best thing for stewards. No concerns with the candidate or rationale for the access. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but Ajraddatz, did you really meant „Meta adminship“? TenWhile6 07:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I would assume a freudian slip for checkuser? //shb (t • c) 07:45, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, indeed. Corrected. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 23:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Sure. ⟲ Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 20:48, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support Thanks for volunteering! --Superpes15 (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support See my comment on MSR above. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support —Meruleh {talk} 04:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support – Leotalk 12:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support –FlyingAce✈hello 14:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support Tulsi 24x7 05:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Support ShifaYT ✉Talk 14:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support Already a stew, no concerns.-FusionSub (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support Support, thanks for volunteering. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     03:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Neutral

With unanimous support and minimum number of votes surpassing the requirements in WM:CU, this request is successfully closed. --M/ (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_checkuser/Johannnes89&oldid=28361665"