Meta:Requests for adminship/Xaosflux

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

xaosflux

I have been an administrator on en: for almost a year, and been registered here for over a year. I am also reachable on IRC as nick xaosflux from time to time. I'd be willing to help by: Maintaining the Interwiki map, with New Pages Patrol, RFD, needed speedy-deletions, and updates to the MediaWiki: interface namespace. I have a history of vandal fighting, and applying approriate blocks and unblocks (am a list moderator for unblock-en-l). Thank you! xaosflux ^Talk 04:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have seen this user's fine work as an administrator and a contributor on En, and am pleased to support him here as well. Newyorkbrad 04:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alnokta 10:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Majorly 12:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Slade ♠ 14:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih 16:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eagle 101 20:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seen around en-wiki and is, in my opinion, a good admin and an admin candidate. Cbrown1023 22:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nishkid64 22:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Steel ^en:Steel 23:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just curious, but these two edits stood out in your contributions; I seem to recall something about your account being used by a vandal. (Or I could be completely wrong, thinking of someone else.) In any case, would you mind clarifying? Many thanks. Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Those were done my myself, as an early calibration test of an IRC RC vandal bot that was running on #meta-vandalism at the time (now #vandalism-meta). xaosflux ^Talk 01:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. Support. Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grand master ka 04:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Afinogenoff 06:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --dario vet (talk) 06:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Jon Harald Søby 14:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sarah Ewart 14:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral since I don't know you nor most of the people who support you. guillom 09:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Guillom + less edit on main namespace in my criteria. Aphaia 13:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Picaroon 03:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support NoSeptember 00:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support 200.95.226.15 05:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You need to be logged in to vote :) --Majorly 22:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Pill δ 12:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC) (But make you signature look smaller ;-))[reply]
Support --Marbot 20:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shyam ^(T/C) 21:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shanel 21:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(19/0/4) Sysop flag granted by Anthere: [1] - 01:12, 13 February 2007 Anthere (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Xaosflux from (none) to sysop