Meta:Requests for adminship/Innv

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Innv

Scheduled to end: 5:37, January 30 2010

Innv (talk • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • CA • email)

Hi! I request on adminship here.

Requirements:

Be an administrator, bureaucrat, or checkuser on a local Wikipedia or related project: I have crat access in Ru-wikisource, sysop access in "meta" Wikisource, StrategyWiki. Also I have sysop access in some small wikis (like ru-wikibooks). My total sysop-experience >1,5 year. Also I have GR rights.

Have a user page on Meta, with links to the user pages on other participated projects: I have userpage on meta and also SUL, of couse.

Have a valid contact address: Yes, of course.

Are currently an active contributor on Meta: I active on Meta. I made more than 1,4K edits, mainly - in COI reports and special office pages here.

Reasons: Admin rights needs for me because:

Firstly: For editing Spam Blacklist (mainly - for adding reposted links from COI reports), for deleting test/vandal/spam pages on Meta, blocking vandals and spammers, editing MediaWiki namespace (gadgets, interface files, etc) - I have good knowledge of mediawiki (for example my activity in mediawiki pages and all admin activity in Ru WS, my home wiki).

Secondly: For protecting (if this need) some highly visible templates and editing fully protected pages / templates.

Also - for using some admins tools and gadgets like SBhadler ;-)

Some additions: I think that adminship - is not big deal (C) and admin flag - technical flag; it can't be used for pressing on other users.

Thank you for your consideration. Regards, – Innv | d | s: 05:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Trustworthy. Lauryn Ashby (d) 05:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure. Pmlineditor ∞ 05:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support active billinghurst sDrewth 06:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. My interactions with Innv have been helpful and pleasant. Good luck. PeterSymonds 10:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support why not :-) --.snoopy. ✉ 10:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've seen him around here a lot. MBisanz ^talk 10:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support This user has a strong background here on Meta and I have had some dealings with Innv | d | s: and you were very helpful so I trust you. Corruptcopper 11:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support You seem like a fine candidate and a decent person. I can't speak Russian, so I can only verify that so much, but yeah. :) Ottava Rima 15:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course.--Ahonc 01:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support All my interactions with Innv have been positive; if he says he needs the tools and will be active, I trust his word in that. -- Avi 02:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, fine by me. -Barras ^talk 10:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trustworthy --Church of emacs talk 11:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support whynot James (T C) 13:11, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --თოგო ^(D) 11:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Friendly user who could put the tools to good use. Tiptoety ^talk 21:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --M/ 21:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- @lestaty ^discuţie 21:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems fine. --Mercy 08:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support welcome to the admin team --Mardetanha ^talk 09:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure... Sirty 11:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support да oscar 17:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Meno25 23:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support John Vandenberg 00:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
+1 — Dferg (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --Erwin 13:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

27/0/0 — promoted. vvv^t 10:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]