Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 5

Inspired by mathematical function notation, with the "Wikipedia W" in place of x.
Not red, blue and green.

Voting

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support gabrielchl (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support H78c67c (talk) 01:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fabro (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This logo make newcomers convenient because it shows what role Wikifunctions plays easily. ₆₇₂₆₀₀About672599 (talk) 02:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ghybu (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support YFdyh000 (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Enaldodiscussão 04:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chaduvari (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and much clearer than 3 — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 09:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strobilomyces (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sintakso (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support (as creator) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best proposal so far, I especially like the colors, the simplicity and the readability (very clear, even as an icon). VIGNERON * ^discut. 10:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lt2818 (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lepticed7 (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support MocnyDuham (talk) 11:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jag gillar den här designen, speciellt med tanke på att den lätt att skriva återge och känna igen. --Sabelöga (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Keep It Simple Gorkaazk (talk) 13:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tgr (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clump (talk) 13:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krissie (talk) 14:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RobertBlinov (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ויקי4800 (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grtek (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Imetsia (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks very "technical" to me, I also like it how it includes the Wikipedia "W" - that's why I support it. Koreanovsky (Ča–Kaj–Što?!) 18:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 19:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nclm (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's fairly simple, and captures the old-school geekery of Wikimedia projects. Anon423 (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomDotGov (talk) (hold the election) 05:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Syrcro (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mike like0708 (talk) 13:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clean, memorable, could use other colours, not keen on the orange, contrast is a bit low · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 14:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Saguameau (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be better without the gradient. Also doesn't look good without parentheses Cortex128 (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sagivrash (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Eihel (talk) 07:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jcornelius (talk) 14:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support VanyaTihonov (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jack Pomi (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Monirec (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hogne (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support seav (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Asartea ^Talk ^{(Enwiki Talk (preferred))} 16:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 01:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks simple and smart Aschmidt (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one might be the one 15Rutendo (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Boehm (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wiki13 (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support WikiLuke (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yupik (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Emaus (talk) 14:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hadi (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Toniher (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the few that still stand legible in small sizes Lonitaron (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poslovitch (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely my favourite Seddon (WMF) (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, simple, clean Guettarda (talk) 00:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support AdamSobieski (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support simplest is best Fgnievinski (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 'f' looks good. Proposal 3 also looks good. But I prefer the simplest. Ryuch (talk) 01:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support But make parentheses in Wikimedia colours. Base (talk) 02:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kirill Lokshin (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support perfect! Kerry Raymond (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 02:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Peacearth (talk) at 03:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support RBrounley (WMF) (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tiger- (talk) 06:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is my favorite, but surely if chosen, an RBG (Wikimedia colors) variant can be made. Ijon (talk) 06:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xplt (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — putnik 08:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xiplus (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and works. QEDK (talk 桜 enwiki) 12:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support abi án 12:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nosebagbear (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Steven Sun (talk) 13:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cikabo (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olaf (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Joalpe (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Patsagorn Y. (Talk) 16:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — WikiLucas (🖋️) 17:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krinkle (talk) 17:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 00:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simon.letort (talk) 04:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support QZanden (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vera (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Enjoyer of World (talk) 09:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support BugWarp (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kotwys (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pymouss Tchatcher - 20:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kropotkine 113 (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thibaut (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Un Fou (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GrandBout (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Jules ^Talk 21:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ата ^(talk) 05:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jeromi Mikhael Asido Sagala (talk) 07:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Itamar Bet (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noé (talk) 08:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LukiZ (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support NAyoub (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Emptyfear (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TitaniumCup (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LMata (WMF) (talk) 18:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support EuCJD (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — fox 18:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support AHollender (WMF) (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.