Jump to content

달에 위키백과 보내기/투표

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This page is a translated version of the page Wikipedia to the Moon/Voting and the translation is 100% complete.
Other languages:
홈 1 단계 : 계획 2 단계 : 투표 3 단계 : 작업 4 단계 : 통합 소개 FAQ
  완료 완료 완료 완료    

이곳은 "위키백과 달에 보내기"를 위한 자료를 모으고 정리하기 위한 최고의 방법을 뽑는 곳 입니다. 1 단계 : 계획에서 계획들과 개발들을 확인하세요. 계획의 초안은 완성되었습니다. 아래에서 투표를 위한 요약 버전을 확인하실 수 있습니다. 투표는 2016년 6월 24일 까지 계속됩니다.

투표방법

누구나 사용자 권한이나 권리에 상관없이 투표에 참여하실 수 있습니다. 투표를 하시기 전 로그인 하시거나 [계정 만들기]에서 계정을 만들어 주세요. IP 투표는 무효화 됩니다.

  • 여러분은 아래 계획들의 목록 만큼의 투표권을 가지고 있습니다. 모두 사용할 수 있지만, 그러지 않으셔도 됩니다.
  • 시나리오 하나당 한표만 투표할 수 있습니다.
  • 투표 모드는 "찬성"이고, 이는 투표가 각 시나리오를 지지하는 것으로 간주됨을 의미합니다. "반대" 표는 없습니다.

어떻게 결과를 도출하나요?

  • 가장 많은 표를 얻는 시나리오가 선택됩니다.
  • 다수 투표("상대 다수"라고도 함)입니다. 이는 가장 많은 표를 얻은 시나리오가 승리하기 위해 백분율 임계값(예를 들어, 50%)을 넘을 필요가 없음을 의미합니다.
  • 투표 할 수 있는 10가지 시나리오가 있으며, 그중 9가지는 데이터 디스크를 글로벌 커뮤니티로 사용하는 방법에 대한 다른 제안입니다. 그러나 마지막 시나리오는 기본적으로 "아니오" 투표입니다. "달에 위키백과를"에서 글로벌 커뮤니티로 일하지 말 것을 제안합니다. 다른 시나리오에 투표 한 사람의 수를 능가하는 경우에만 승리 시나리오로 인정됩니다.

여기서 투표하세요

작업해 봅시다: 위키백과 표준

여러 시나리오(예를 들어, "언어 불가지론"과 "모든 위키백과의 모든 TOP (및 HIGH) 중요 문서" 참조)는 캐논 시나리오의 더 많거나 적은 버전인 것으로 보이며, 이는 초기 세 가지 제안 중 하나였습니다. 핵심 아이디어는 특정 언어 대신 주제에 따라 대표 문서 묶음을 선택하는 것입니다. 일단 그러한 문서 묶음에 대한 총의에 도달하면 문서를 가능한 한 많은 언어로 번역해야합니다. 캐논 시나리오에서 중요한 문제는 문서를 선택하기 위해 어떤 기준을 설정해야 하는가입니다.

기본 아이디어: "문학에서 캐논은 일종의 표준 또는 공식적인 표현으로 간주되는 일련의 작업을 설명합니다. 가장 중요한 위키백과 문서 또는 이와 유사한 것에 대한 글로벌 표준은 없습니다. 그러나 많은 언어 버전에는 사람들이 모든 위키백과가 다루어야한다고 제안하는 위키백과 문서 목록이 있습니다. 이 시나리오에서 모든 언어 커뮤니티는 위키백과 문서의 하나의 운동 전반에 걸친 표준에 대해 토론하고 동의하도록 초대됩니다." 캐논 의견의 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!, language agnostic 계획, Top importance 계획­, Space4all 계획

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 위키백과 규범범

  1. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Mysteriumen (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Gerrit (talk) 12:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --NaBUru38 (talk)
  11. --Eritain (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Tonystewart14 (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Arussom (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: TOP30 목록

이것은 모든 위키백과 커뮤니티를 대표하는 한 세트의 문서가 없다는 다소 "역전된" 표준 아이디어입니다. 대신, 모든 언어 커뮤니티는 자신의 톱 30 문서 목록을 제출할 수 있습니다.

기본 아이디어: "위키백과 표준이 하나의 글로벌 커뮤니티의 결정을 나타내는 반면, 위키백과의 거의 300개 언어 버전은 다양한 문화와 지식을 나타냅니다. 이 시나리오에서 모든 위키백과 언어 버전은 토론하고 상위 30개 문서를 선택하도록 초대됩니다. 모든 참여 언어 버전에서 상위 30개 선택 항목이 모두 수집되어 위키백과 페이로드에 포함됩니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: TOP30 목록

  1. -- Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Maria.martelli (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)--[reply]
  3. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. José Luiz talk 21:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Waters.Justin (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AveroXY (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Zabia (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Franco3450 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Carnildo (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Joalpe (talk) 01:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Sthelen.aqua (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Dimi z (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. -- Chickadee46 (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. — Yerpo Eh? 17:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Filipinayzd (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: 지명된 항목 목록

초기 제안의 세 번째는 언어 또는 기타 장벽에 관계없이 등록된 계정당 하나의 제안으로 채울 수 있는 공개 목록을 설명합니다.

기본 아이디어: "하나의 계정, 하나의 투표. 이 시나리오에서 모든 위키백과는 하나의 목록 항목을 추가한 다음 자신의 제안에 서명할 수 있습니다. 이것은 위키백과 문서(언어에 관계없이), 이미지 또는 기타 미디어 항목일 수 있습니다. 목록 항목의 이름을 하나만 지정할 수 있다는 점을 제외하고는 제한이 없습니다. 전체 목록의 항목은 공간으로 이동합니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

Discussion_Scenario_.23List:

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 지명된 항목 목록

  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Irn (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Carlsrator (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --DS-fax 17:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: “Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon”을 달에 싣고 가세요!

이 새로운 시나리오는 단 하나의 문서를 선택하는 것을 제안합니다. 즉, 사용 가능한 모든 언어로 된 달 자체에 대한 문서.

기본 아이디어:" القمر, آی, ചന്ദ്രൻ, चंद्र, Mặt Trăng, 그리고 다른 많은 언어로 된 달에 관한 문서가 실려 있습니다. 모두 그곳으로 보내도록 합시다. 이것은 다른 시나리오의 일부일 수 있습니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: “Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon/ਚੰਦਰਮਾ”를 달에 가져가세요!

  1. Almafeta (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Liridon (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Seb az86556 (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Michaelpires (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --valepert (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Barbaking (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --Golan's mom (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. --Winstonza (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  TOW  talk  08:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Postcrosser (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- HvW (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Though I dont like the part about "picking just one article". The Moon articles won't fill the disc, so this should be combined with other scenarios.[reply]
  31. --CristianCantoro (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Zabia (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -- ONUnicorn (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --YjM (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. -- Jonathunder (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Khutuck (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. -- Bora (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- YenilenebilirAdamMESAJ 16:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Popo le Chien (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)It would be our Rosetta Stone[reply]
  45. Olsi (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --e.c. 23:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: 천문학에 대한 글로벌 에디터톤

이것은 한 달 간의 천문학 에디터톤을 개최할 것을 제안합니다. 그것은 가상이 될 것입니다. 즉, 온라인과 전 세계 어디에서나 일어날 것입니다. 참가자들은 천문학 관련 문서를 기고해야 합니다.

기본 아이디어: "사람들이 천문학에 대해 글을 쓰는 온라인 편집 주 또는 달을 개최합니다. 모든 문서는 작성자에게 티켓을 받습니다. 결국 우리는 우주로 갈 문서를 선택할 수 있는 12명의 사람들을 그립니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 천문학에 대한 글로벌 에디터톤

  1. --GunChleoc (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Mickey83 (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -- Tanweer (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ~ Moheen (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: 모든 위키백과의 모든 알찬 글 및 목록

특집 문서는 또 다른 초안 아이디어의 핵심입니다. 여러 언어에 걸쳐 이와 유사한 종류의 저명한 문서 중에서 선택하도록 제안합니다.

기본 아이디어: "최고 중의 최고를 보냅시다. 모든 위키백과의 모든 특집 문서 및 목록. 이것은 사람들이 자신이 좋아하는 주제를 특집으로 올리도록 하는 강력한 인센티브를 생성할 것입니다. 이 이니셔티브가 얻을 수 있는 홍보의 종류를 상상해 보세요: "위키백과 커뮤니티는 제공할 수 있는 최선을 달에 보냅니다"." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 모든 위키백과의 모든 알찬 글 및 목록

  1. --AzorAhai (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --JTCEPB (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Liridon (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Arian Talk 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --MrBn (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Lsanabria (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. NMaia (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -- Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. GrandCelinien (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Tetraktys (talk) 23:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Gts-tg (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Michaelpires (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  05:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Like tears in rain (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Murbaut (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Bspf (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Cavaliere grande (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. --Lotus 50 (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --g (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Coolland (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Titou (talk 11:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. --Wintereu 11:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --Marica Massaro (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Assuming that the number is ~40,000, the rest goes to the next place, third place, etc. I would like to see combinations of proposals.[reply]
  31. --Winstonza (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. -- Irn (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mathanaharan (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. José Luiz talk 20:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Yiyi (talk) 23:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jopparn (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. --Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Palnatoke (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --Zamaster4536 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Ghilt (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Gerrit (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Fanfwah (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Syced (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Braveheart (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. --Cruifer (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Nahum (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. -Nyiffi (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. -- CreativeC38 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. -- Zabia (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. — Antimuonium U wanna talk? 18:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Soul Train (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. --Moony22 (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Frettie (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --Carnildo (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. -- Bora (talk) 23:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --Eritain (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. --Golan's mom (talk) 05:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Tanweer (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --Fano (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. --MRG90 (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. --White DemΩn (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Lucas (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Rodrigo Padula (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. --Pablo Darko (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Stepro (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Paolotacchi (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Samuele2002 (talk) 07:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. --wL<speak·check> 05:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Olsi (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --3Jo7 (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Florian838 (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. --Uğurkenttalk 22:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Galobtter (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. --Pakeha (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: 최첨단 기술에 대한 정보

이 제안의 각도는 각 시대의 기술에 대한 정보를 산출하는 다른 타임캡슐의 내용을 되돌아보는 것입니다.

기본 아이디어: "(이것은 디스크 전체를 채우고 일부로 사용하기에 충분하지 않을 수 있습니다.) 오늘날 타임캡슐과 오래된 문서에서 흥미로운 점은 축음기, 복엽 비행기, 레이더와 같은 '최첨단' 기술과 과학에 대한 정보입니다. 그래서 확실히, 우리는 그것을 보내야 합니다. 다른 과학과 기술 분야의 가장 최근 발전이 있는 페이지와 아마도 오늘날의 지구에 대한 정보가 있는 페이지를 보내야 합니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 최첨단 기술에 대한 정보

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 21:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  3. …Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Miguu (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: DNA로 해독

이것은 문자 그대로 인간을 넘어서 보는 것 입니다. 디스크에 포함될 것은 유용할 것이고, 다른 의미로 멸종에서 인간을 다시 되돌리기 가능할 것입니다(누가?).

기본 아이디어: "인간이 멸종에서 다시 돌아올 수 있도록 하고 인간의 언어나 소프트웨어에 익숙하지 않더라도 그것을 발견한 사람이 이해할 수 있도록 하는 데 중점을 둡니다. 둘 다 지구 생물권의 모국어인 DNA의 일부를 포함함으로써 가장 잘 달성됩니다. 기사 "인간", "멸종 제거", "인간 게놈", 실제 인간 게놈, DNA 바코드가 있는 유기체의 우수 및 특집 문서, 주기율표, 태양계 본체, 우주선 문서 및 모든 문자에 대한 문서 포함 , 숫자 및 인간의 언어. 두 번째로 투표된 다른 제안으로 나머지 공간을 채웁니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: DNA로 해독

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. #--Mickey83 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Zzyzx (talk) 17:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Anntinomy (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: 멸종 위기

여러분은 멸종위기 종들에 대해 들어본 적 있으신가요? 이 계획은 앞으로 일어날법한 것들의 정보를 모으는 것에 관한 것입니다.

기본 아이디어: "앞으로 수십 년, 수백 년, 수천 년 안에 사라질 가능성이 높은 것들에 대한 정보를 보존하는 데 집중하세요. 다음 분류의 모든 언어로 된 모든 기사를 포함하십시오(또는 이에 상응하는 - 저는 en.wikipedia에서 작업 중입니다): 분류: IUCN 적색 목록 멸종된 야생 종, 분류:IUCN 적색 목록 멸종 위급 종, 분류: IUCN 멸종 위기 종, 분류:IUCN 적색 목록 취약종, 분류:위험에 처한 세계 유산 및 분류:멸종 위기에 처한_언어; 다음 목록에 있는 문서:유네스코 무형 문화 유산 목록. 분류:멸종_위기에 있는 모든 언어의 전체 위키백과를 포함합니다." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: 소멸 위험

  1. --MrBn (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Aranae (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. …Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --AzorAhai (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --Bastenbas (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Miguu (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --MRG90 (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Chiborg (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. --PupyFaki (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

작업해 봅시다: … 잠깐, 아니, 하지 맙시다

이 옵션은 달에 위키백과 보내기의 기본 아이디어에 대한 질문을 나타냅니다. 전 세계 커뮤니티가 이 프로젝트 내에서 콘텐츠를 참여하고 편집해야 합니까? 이러한 음성을 포함하기 위해 이 옵션을 추가했습니다.

기본 아이디어: "이것을 세계적인 것으로 만들지 말고 행동을 요구하지 마세요." 전문을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

여기서 투표하세요!

투표: … 잠깐, 아니, 하지 맙시다

  1. Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. AndyVolykhov (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —MarcoAurelio 10:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I'd hope that we had so much enthusiasm on rather more important things such as fixing bugs and admin tools development. Apparently not this year either...[reply]
  4. BethNaught (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. pne (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I don't like any of the options (including this one). Nemo 16:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

결과

투표는 2016년 6월 24일까지 진행됩니다. 결과는 위키마니아 다음날 아침 발표됩니다. 물론 이곳에도 공개됩니다.

지금 무슨 일이 일어나는 있는 건가요? 이 결과는 모든 언어 커뮤니티의 위키맥과 사용자가 데이터 디스크에 포함될 최고의 문서와 목록을 작성하기 위해 앞으로 몇 주 그리고 몇 달 동안 따뜻하게 초대된다는 것을 의미합니다. 실제로 작업을 수행하는 방법에 대한 자세한 내용은 며칠 내로 알려드릴 것입니다.

지금은 투표해주신 모든 분들께 감사드립니다! 우리는 4월 24일 메타위키에 제안을 올렸습니다. 자원 봉사자들은 페이지를 즉시 60개 이상의 언어로 번역했습니다. 많은 사람들이 6주간의 토론에 참여하여 함께 작업하는 방법(및 경우)에 대해 이야기했습니다. 17개 시나리오 중 10개는 지난 2주 동안 투표할 수 있었습니다. 이제 작업 단계/편집이 10월 31일까지 열려 콘텐츠를 선택 및 개선하거나 그 과정에서 문제를 해결하는 데 많은 시간을 할애할 수 있습니다.

목표는 세계 자원봉사자의 날인 2016년 12월 5일까지 "위키백과 타임캡슐"을 완성하는 것입니다.

참고사항

참고: 논의된 두 가지 시나리오는 아이디어를 위키백과 자체 이상으로 확장합니다. 하나는 모든 위키미디어 프로젝트에서 콘텐츠를 선택하도록 제안하고 다른 하나는 위키데이터에 중점을 둡니다. 두 시나리오 모두 유효한 제안이지만 이 선물에 대한 다른 프로젝트가 아니라 위키백과에 대해 명시적으로 접근했습니다. 다음은 모든 자격을 갖춘 제안입니다:

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_to_the_Moon/Voting/ko&oldid=27661528"